PDA

View Full Version : mtdna confusion



Jana
11-01-2019, 08:46 AM
I tought 23andme assigned Stears to U5 and nothing deeper just because they are lazy, but seems what her gets is extremely rare among 23andme customers. Could he belong to basal type of U5?!
https://i.imgur.com/UKwgdYy.png

Wegene assign him to U5b1, which could be Finno-Ugric origin? (it peaks among Saami)
https://i.imgur.com/QP9czEy.png

James Lick predictor show something else, U5a1b? It was found in in Mesolithic Latvia and Neolithic Ukraine

Best mtDNA Haplogroup Matches:

1) U5a'b

Defining Markers for haplogroup U5a'b:
HVR2: 73G 263G
CR: 750G 1438G 2706G 3197C 4769G 7028T 8860G 9477A 11467G 11719A 12308G 12372A 13617C 14766T 15326G
HVR1: 16192T 16270T

Marker path from rCRS to haplogroup U5a'b (plus extra markers):
H2a2a1(rCRS) ⇨ 263G ⇨ H2a2a ⇨ 8860G 15326G ⇨ H2a2 ⇨ 750G ⇨ H2a ⇨ 4769G ⇨ H2 ⇨ 1438G ⇨ H ⇨ 2706G 7028T ⇨ HV ⇨ 14766T ⇨ R0 ⇨ 73G 11719A ⇨ R ⇨ 11467G 12308G 12372A ⇨ U ⇨ 16192T 16270T ⇨ U5 ⇨ 3197C 9477A 13617C ⇨ U5a'b ⇨ 65D 191D 299I 459D 2074I 2156D 2405D 3307D 4317I 5537D 5656G 5752D 7471D 8281D 8286D 14482T

Imperfect Match. Your results contained differences with this haplogroup:
Matches(11): 263G 1438G 3197C 7028T 8860G 9477A 11467G 11719A 12308G 12372A 13617C
Extras(16): 65D 191D 299I 459D 2074I 2156D 2405D 3307D 4317I 5537D 5656G 5752D 7471D 8281D 8286D 14482T
No-Calls(3): 73G 2706G 16270T
Untested(5): 750 4769 14766 15326 16192


2) U5b1

Defining Markers for haplogroup U5b1:
HVR2: 73G 150T 263G
CR: 750G 1438G 2706G 3197C 4769G 5656G 7028T 7768G 8860G 9477A 11467G 11719A 12308G 12372A 13617C 14182C 14766T 15326G
HVR1: 16192T 16270T

Marker path from rCRS to haplogroup U5b1 (plus extra markers):
H2a2a1(rCRS) ⇨ 263G ⇨ H2a2a ⇨ 8860G 15326G ⇨ H2a2 ⇨ 750G ⇨ H2a ⇨ 4769G ⇨ H2 ⇨ 1438G ⇨ H ⇨ 2706G 7028T ⇨ HV ⇨ 14766T ⇨ R0 ⇨ 73G 11719A ⇨ R ⇨ 11467G 12308G 12372A ⇨ U ⇨ 16192T 16270T ⇨ U5 ⇨ 3197C 9477A 13617C ⇨ U5a'b ⇨ 150T 7768G 14182C ⇨ U5b ⇨ 5656G ⇨ U5b1 ⇨ 65D 191D 299I 459D 2074I 2156D 2405D 3307D 4317I 5537D 5752D 7471D 8281D 8286D 14482T

Imperfect Match. Your results contained differences with this haplogroup:
Matches(12): 263G 1438G 3197C 5656G 7028T 8860G 9477A 11467G 11719A 12308G 12372A 13617C
Mismatches(1): 14182T
Extras(15): 65D 191D 299I 459D 2074I 2156D 2405D 3307D 4317I 5537D 5752D 7471D 8281D 8286D 14482T
No-Calls(3): 73G 2706G 16270T
Untested(7): 150 750 4769 7768 14766 15326 16192


3) U5b1(T16189C)

Defining Markers for haplogroup U5b1(T16189C):
HVR2: 73G 150T 263G
CR: 750G 1438G 2706G 3197C 4769G 5656G 7028T 7768G 8860G 9477A 11467G 11719A 12308G 12372A 13617C 14182C 14766T 15326G
HVR1: 16189C 16192T 16270T

Marker path from rCRS to haplogroup U5b1(T16189C) (plus extra markers):
H2a2a1(rCRS) ⇨ 263G ⇨ H2a2a ⇨ 8860G 15326G ⇨ H2a2 ⇨ 750G ⇨ H2a ⇨ 4769G ⇨ H2 ⇨ 1438G ⇨ H ⇨ 2706G 7028T ⇨ HV ⇨ 14766T ⇨ R0 ⇨ 73G 11719A ⇨ R ⇨ 11467G 12308G 12372A ⇨ U ⇨ 16192T 16270T ⇨ U5 ⇨ 3197C 9477A 13617C ⇨ U5a'b ⇨ 150T 7768G 14182C ⇨ U5b ⇨ 5656G ⇨ U5b1 ⇨ 16189C ⇨ U5b1(T16189C) ⇨ 65D 191D 299I 459D 2074I 2156D 2405D 3307D 4317I 5537D 5752D 7471D 8281D 8286D 14482T

Imperfect Match. Your results contained differences with this haplogroup:
Matches(12): 263G 1438G 3197C 5656G 7028T 8860G 9477A 11467G 11719A 12308G 12372A 13617C
Mismatches(1): 14182T
Extras(15): 65D 191D 299I 459D 2074I 2156D 2405D 3307D 4317I 5537D 5752D 7471D 8281D 8286D 14482T
No-Calls(3): 73G 2706G 16270T
Untested(8): 150 750 4769 7768 14766 15326 16189 16192

Any idea how to interpret this? :)

Jana
11-01-2019, 12:59 PM
bump

vbnetkhio
11-01-2019, 01:45 PM
Any idea how to interpret this? :)

1) there is a haplogroup tree on 23andme, with all the subclades which they test for. so you can see which subclades they test under U5. if they gave him just U5, it means he is negative for all those.

2) James Lick seems kind of outdated, and it says all those are "Imperfect Matches" so i trust wegene more.

and they seem to be giving him U5a'b, which is the ancestor of all U5a and U5b, as the first match . it's not U5a1b, it's much broader.

https://www.yfull.com/mtree/U5a'b/

and the next match is the same as wegene's

CordedWhelp
11-01-2019, 01:50 PM
Jameslicks site is solid good and the Most part accurate, but yeah, seems outdated a bit now. It was spot on with my fathers mtdna (H3) but my own (N1b1b, per 23andme), the specific N1b1b clade wasn’t even mentioned as an imperfect match. Think I got at closest match N1b1a2 as closest.

Confusingly, I spoke with a Jewish guy who is mtdna N1b2, who got my subclade as an imperfect match.

Jana
11-01-2019, 02:04 PM
1) there is a haplogroup tree on 23andme, with all the subclades which they test for. so you can see which subclades they test under U5. if they gave him just U5, it means he is negative for all those.

2) James Lick seems kind of outdated, and it says all those are "Imperfect Matches" so i trust wegene more.

and they seem to be giving him U5a'b, which is the ancestor of all U5a and U5b, as the first match . it's not U5a1b, it's much broader.

https://www.yfull.com/mtree/U5a'b/

and the next match is the same as wegene's

Thank you! :)

https://i.imgur.com/ArQawTj.png
https://i.imgur.com/TS77L8a.png

Looks like he tested negative for U5a and U5b. Could he really be basal U5/U5a'b?

vbnetkhio
11-01-2019, 02:28 PM
Thank you! :)

https://i.imgur.com/ArQawTj.png
https://i.imgur.com/TS77L8a.png

Looks like he tested negative for U5a and U5b. Could he really be basal U5/U5a'b?

his sample was possibly damaged or "rushed" by 23andme, so i would wait some time and contact 23andme if nothing changes, as somebody already recommended

and you could contact some haplogroup U project or somebody who knows more about HVR markers for their opinion