classify without the aid of background

[JerryS.]

to remove the suggestive reasoning that I see, how would you classify this person? a few photos throughout life.

I'm a little curious to see if phenotypes and all that jazz are accurate or reasonable in a general sense.

[TheMaestro]

Aged well, suggest never to grow his hair.

[Viridian1]

Seems like italian and central european ancestry.

[JerryS.]

Aged well, suggest never to grow his hair.

Lol, I don't understand the hair comment. Lol

[JerryS.]

Seems like italian and central european ancestry.

Partially right.

[Blondie]

Looks british

[leisitox]

Atlanto-Med+Borreby
Could be Swiss?

[JerryS.]

I'm finding a interesting to see how people from different parts of the world view the same person.

[TheMaestro]

Lol, I don't understand the hair comment. Lol

Looks good with short hair not long.

[vorobuthek]

When young he looks partially Asian (from behind the eyes), but when adult he looks completely white.

[Columella]

In Europe he could come from anywhere!
Seems Dinaric-Med.

[Benyzero]

Italian-British mix is my vote

[Mr.G]

Gotta have significant Italian ancestry.

[Celestia]

Italian/Polish mix?

[Mr.G]

I think Atlanto Med + Norid for classification.

[JerryS.]

ok, folks, thank you for the participation. except for eastern European and Asian most are right in part.

On paper: 31.25% English (Kent and Shropshire mix), 18.75% Italian (Calabria and some north mix) , 25% German (supposedly Bremen), and 25% "Scottish-Irish" (but mostly Scottish). Various DNA test show this as accurate.