View Full Version : How Fond Are You of the Saharan Pump Theory?
You, personally.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahara_pump_theory
Harkonnen
12-29-2019, 09:54 AM
Related to the topic.
Go there and vote
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?254640-Sahara-Sea
if you think Saharians should be drowned. Or go there and vote, if you think Saharians should not be drowned. If you do not have a opinion, do not go there.
Related to the topic.
Go there and vote
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?254640-Sahara-Sea
if you think Saharians should be drowned. Or go there and vote, if you think Saharians should not be drowned. If you do not have a opinion, do not go there.
I duly voted in your poll.
Now do me!
How fond are you of the Saharan Pump Theory on a scale from blue to wheat?
Harkonnen
12-29-2019, 10:05 AM
It is not a bad theory. I'm thinking of a more thought out response to this, but we will see if nothing comes of it.
Thank you for the vote.
It is not a bad theory. I'm thinking of a more thought out response to this, but we will see if nothing comes of it.
Thank you for the vote.
Take your time, my friend.
And you're welcome.
Harkonnen
12-29-2019, 11:28 AM
Like said, this could work.
But migration during Ice Age could also work. Cooler conditions helps migration because it helps to preserve food longer time.
Also, what comes to human migration, spread of African flora and fauna is not a benefit. Since in Africa hominids and other mammals had evolved side by side (co-evolution), there had developed a mutual respect. When humans spread to other continents, animals there, had no fear of man in them, as man was a creature like no other they had previously met. This obviously is less obvious conclusion in areas with Neanderthal occupation, but if we presume that the hunting methods were as different as we are made to believe, it still holds at least half of its water.
This also made domestication of animals that much easier, and is the reason why Indian elephant is tamed, but African elephant is not.
Harkonnen
12-29-2019, 11:32 AM
Like said, this could work.
But migration during Ice Age could also work. Cooler conditions helps migration because it helps to preserve food longer time.
Also, what comes to human migration, spread of African flora and fauna is not a benefit. Since in Africa hominids and other mammals had evolved side by side (co-evolution), there had developed a mutual respect. When humans spread to other continents, animals there, had no fear of man in them, as man was a creature like no other they had previously met. This obviously is less obvious conclusion in areas with Neanderthal occupation, but if we presume that the hunting methods were as different as we are made to believe, it still holds at least half of its water.
This also made domestication of animals that much easier, and is the reason why Indian elephant is tamed, but African elephant is not.
Like said, this could work.
But migration during Ice Age could also work. Cooler conditions helps migration because it helps to preserve food longer time.
Also, what comes to human migration, spread of African flora and fauna is not a benefit. Since in Africa hominids and other mammals had evolved side by side (co-evolution), there had developed a mutual respect. When humans spread to other continents, animals there, had no fear of man in them, as man was a creature like no other they had previously met. This obviously is less obvious conclusion in areas with Neanderthal occupation, but if we presume that the hunting methods were as different as we are made to believe, it still holds at least half of its water.
This also made domestication of animals that much easier, and is the reason why Indian elephant is tamed, but African elephant is not.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTPMt-9_XBsX_RhZf9DPj-BaN8YbptRHX90Ms8gJZAi-wLb_jxv
Like said, this could work.
But migration during Ice Age could also work. Cooler conditions helps migration because it helps to preserve food longer time.
Also, what comes to human migration, spread of African flora and fauna is not a benefit. Since in Africa hominids and other mammals had evolved side by side (co-evolution), there had developed a mutual respect. When humans spread to other continents, animals there, had no fear of man in them, as man was a creature like no other they had previously met. This obviously is less obvious conclusion in areas with Neanderthal occupation, but if we presume that the hunting methods were as different as we are made to believe, it still holds at least half of its water.
This also made domestication of animals that much easier, and is the reason why Indian elephant is tamed, but African elephant is not.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTPMt-9_XBsX_RhZf9DPj-BaN8YbptRHX90Ms8gJZAi-wLb_jxv
Harkonnen
12-29-2019, 08:14 PM
Confusion reaches Confucianism level 10
https://i.ibb.co/7YMscB3/confucianism-and-the-asian-martial-traditions-367.jpg (https://imgbb.com/)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.