PDA

View Full Version : US Federal Reserve Bank to buy $1 Trillion of Debt



Æmeric
03-19-2009, 04:39 PM
The agency's announcement that it will buy $1 trillion in debt could lower home-loan rates by a full point and stimulate the housing market, economists say.
:confused:{It well likely cause inflation & raise rates.}

Reporting from Washington -- Escalating the government's already aggressive effort to revive the struggling economy, the Federal Reserve said Wednesday that it would spend an additional $1 trillion to bring down interest rates on home mortgages and other business and consumer loans.

The surprise news that the central bank would more than double its planned purchases of mortgage bonds and also start buying large quantities of Treasury bonds had an immediate effect on the financial markets. The Dow industrials posted their sixth gain in seven trading days, while long-term interest rates plummeted -- exactly the reaction the Fed wanted.

The Fed's latest move -- coupled with an unprecedented panoply of previous steps by the government to fix the financial crisis and stimulate spending -- makes it more likely that the country's 15-month-old recession will be over by the end of this year, with economic growth resuming early in 2010, economists said.

"They are trying to fire absolutely every weapon they can," said Nigel Gault, chief U.S. economist at forecasters IHS-Global Insight in Lexington, Mass. "It improves the odds that we'll bottom out in the second half of the year."

The central bank's main tool to combat a recession, lowering a key short-term interest rate, was no longer an option because that rate had already been slashed to practically zero.

So instead the Fed intends to buy an additional $750 billion in mortgage-backed bonds issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, more than doubling its planned purchases this year of those securities. And, in a rare move, it also plans to buy $300 billion of long-term U.S. Treasuries.{If this in with newly printed money, the US $ supply will increase by 40%. If the purchase of mortgage debt is also with newly printed money the money supply will more then double!}

"The Fed has been looking for a new way to make a big headline announcement effect on the markets, and they have found it," said Chris Rupkey, an economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi.

But the action also increases the risk that inflation, dormant for the last year, could spring back to unwelcome heights. That danger sent the value of the dollar down against other currencies and boosted the market price of gold by about $50 an ounce, putting it back above $900.

The prospect of recovery, however, cheered the stock market, which had been down for the day before the Fed's announcement. The Dow Jones industrial average closed up 90.88 points, or 1.2%, at 7,486.58. The broader Standard & Poor's 500 stock index surged 2.1%.

Since hitting 12-year lows last week, the Dow has jumped 14% and the S&P is up 17%.

In the bond market, the yield on 10-year Treasury note -- considered a benchmark for home loan rates -- tumbled about half of a percentage point, suggesting that mortgage rates also could fall that much.

The Mortgage Bankers' Assn. said Wednesday that the average 30-year loan rate fell to 4.89% last week, down from 4.96% the week before.

David M. Jones, a former Fed economist now with DMJ Advisors in Denver, said mortgage rates could drop a full point.

"If you bring the interest rate down that much, we'll have a huge amount of refinancings," he said.

"I've never known when the Fed has taken a move this powerful in easing monetary policy," he added.

Lower home-loan costs could set off a series of beneficial effects. Smaller monthly payments for homeowners who refinance could stimulate consumer spending. More-affordable mortgages also would encourage people to buy homes, and allow more people to qualify for a loan. That would help stabilize the housing market, which is considered the main source of the problems confronting the financial system and the economy.

If housing does stabilize, the wave of huge mortgage-related losses recorded by banks could begin to dry up. In the meantime, troubled banks could benefit from a surge in revenue by issuing new mortgages.

"Bottom line, these actions by the Fed today certainly increase the chances of a housing bottom sometime this year," said Scott A. Anderson, chief economist at Wells Fargo Economics in Minneapolis.

Similarly, the Fed hopes, interest rates paid by companies and consumers on a variety of loans would fall, rescuing some firms and households from financial distress and making it easier for many to boost their spending.

Of course, there's no guarantee all this will occur.

Mortgage rates may not fall that quickly because lenders, whose numbers have shrunk significantly since the housing crisis began, are already swamped with applications for loan refinancings and modifications, said Guy Cecala, editor of Inside Mortgage Finance, a trade publication.

"If they have all the business they can handle, what's their incentive to lower their rates?" he said.

Indeed, although the Fed has kept the rates it charges banks near zero since December, interest rates for consumers and businesses have remained stubbornly high because banks are cautious about issuing new loans during a recession.

"We're not in a credit crunch because of an inability to provide credit. It's because of an unwillingness to create credit," said Joel Naroff, president of Naroff Economic Advisors in Holland, Pa.

The economy's continued deterioration forced policymakers to reach further into their economic medicine chest.

"Job losses, declining equity and housing wealth, and tight credit conditions have weighed on consumer sentiment and spending," the Fed's rate-setting committee said in a statement. "Weaker sales prospects and difficulties in obtaining credit have led businesses to cut back on inventories and fixed investment. U.S. exports have slumped as a number of major trading partners have also fallen into recession."

In its statement, the Fed's rate-setting panel expressed cautious optimism.

"Although the near-term economic outlook is weak," the panel said, "the committee anticipates that policy actions to stabilize financial markets and institutions, together with fiscal and monetary stimulus, will contribute to a gradual resumption of sustainable economic growth."

Source (http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-fed19-2009mar19,0,6940821.story)

RoyBatty
03-19-2009, 08:10 PM
Unfortunately what this means in laymans terms is that the printing presses will be running even more overtime than they already are. We all know what happened in Post WW1 Germany after they started printing money like there was no tomorrow - hyperinflation. Same thing in today's Zimbabwe.

Another worrying development is that for some time now "The Fed" (in other words, the PRIVATE bank masquerading as a "Federal" operation) aren't publishing M3 data anymore which enables analysts to work out how many dollars are in circulation.

Baron Samedi
03-19-2009, 08:33 PM
Being American is awesome! :thumbs:

Rudy
03-22-2009, 03:12 PM
This article says we will no longer be able to export our inflation to China, and with have to eat it right here in the US instead.

With such a policy in place, America has now become a banana republic. It won’t be too long before our living standards reflect our new status. Got Gold?
by Peter Schiff
http://www.lewrockwell.com/schiff/schiff9.html

I remember reading the article a few years ago when they stopped putting out the M3 data. I think this was right before they started printing massive amounts of dollars.

Hors
03-22-2009, 04:07 PM
The US economy is in death spiral and nothing can help it.

stormlord
03-22-2009, 05:28 PM
The US economy is in death spiral and nothing can help it.

You really are a special flower; your well meaning, generous and constructive contributions really add to the forum :thumb001:

Anyway, why is it that no one seems to be pointing out that every single stimulus measure taken seems to be designed around getting us back into the exact same sort of behaviour that caused the recession? Reflate the house price bubble, get the banks back to handing out credit to people who shouldn't be getting it and put people in debt up to their eyeballs again; ingenious! :lightbul:

Æmeric
03-22-2009, 05:38 PM
The US economy is in death spiral and nothing can help it.
The American economy will never sink as low as the Russian. Besides natural resources (oil, gas, minerals), vodka & mail order brides, what else does Russian export?:icon1: I've heard that Russians are hurting more then Americans.

Hors
03-22-2009, 05:50 PM
The American economy will never sink as low as the Russian.


You mean the US will print more greenish paper aka US Dollar? Sorry, dude, nobody is buying it anymore. This year or next,but hyper-inflation is inevitable.


Besides natural resources (oil, gas, minerals), vodka & mail order brides, what else does Russian export?:icon1:

You mean the other 86% of export? :D

By the way, what the US export? I mean, besides democracy and the so called American values (always shipped together with the greenish paper)?! LOL


I've heard that Russians are hurting more then Americans.

Your Chinese made hearing device is obviously malfunctioning...

Rudy
03-23-2009, 12:26 AM
This article lays the blame on the politicians and the bankers equally. It then goes on to think about society as a whole.

"Our Constitution is made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams

In this deepening crisis, what is being tested is not simply the resilience of capitalism, but the character of a people. Pat Buchanan
http://www.vdare.com/buchanan/090319_failure.htm

Birka
03-23-2009, 01:15 AM
This article lays the blame on the politicians and the bankers equally. It then goes on to think about society as a whole.

http://www.vdare.com/buchanan/090319_failure.htm

Always a good post with a Pat Buchanan article.

RoyBatty
03-23-2009, 07:57 PM
One thing to consider is that the rules for the US economy (in my opinion, I could be wrong) are somewhat different than for most other countries.

I base that assertion on

- the fact that energy transactions are still largely done in dollars meaning that despite the fact that they are worthless (and they are worthless) there is still a demand for them

- the fact that dumb cameldrivers from the Middle East were roped into reinvesting their petrodollars back into the US economy by Kissinger and co back in the 60's or early 70's (forgot the exact date).

- to a lesser extent, raw materials and a lot of trade is often conducted in dollars, again helping to maintain a demand for it

- the US military which effectively controls the Middle East. Military power certainly helps maintain relatively stable conditions to do global business in.

In the 1970's the US did of course also have a strong industrial base and it still produced a fair amount of oil which benefitted its economy.

Nowadays things are different as many factories, services and jobs have been outsourced by greedy crooks, oil production went into decline and the US Govt and public simply overspent. The economy is still being propped up by petrodollars, foreign investments and Asian T bond purchases but it's hard to see how this situation where money is borrowed which will supposedly be repaid by children and grandchildren can last forever.

Spending is running away and the revenue to support that spending just isn't being generated. Interesting times ahead.

Birka
03-23-2009, 08:05 PM
Spending is running away and the revenue to support that spending just isn't being generated. Interesting times ahead.

Brings to mind the Chinese curse: "May you live in interesting times"

Vulpix
03-23-2009, 09:01 PM
Anyway, why is it that no one seems to be pointing out that every single stimulus measure taken seems to be designed around getting us back into the exact same sort of behaviour that caused the recession? Reflate the house price bubble, get the banks back to handing out credit to people who shouldn't be getting it and put people in debt up to their eyeballs again; ingenious! :lightbul:

Indeed, throwing out taxpayers' money at the same companies that caused the mess and they're still rewarding those who were responsible with large bonuses and fat pensions :eek:! (For examples just look up Joe Cassano of AIG and Fred Goodwin of RBS...)

In addition the bail-out schemes are skewed in favor of the bigger companies (deemed "too big too fail") over the smaller ones, those less likely to have meddled in toxic securities in the first place...


... yet another opportunity for big banks to devour market share at the expense of smaller regional lenders. While all the bigwigs at Citi and Goldman and Bank of America who had Paulson on speed-dial got bailed out right away — remember that TARP was originally passed because money had to be lent right now, that day, that minute, to stave off emergency — many small banks are still waiting for help. Five months into the TARP program, some not only haven't received any funds, they haven't even gotten a call back about their applications.
...
Which, of course, is exactly the opposite of what should be happening, since small, regional banks are far less guilty of the kinds of predatory lending that sank the economy. "They're not giving out subprime loans or easy credit,"

...
Nonetheless, the lion's share of the bailout money has gone to the larger, so-called "systemically important" banks.

...
This itself is a hugely important political development. In essence, the bailout accelerated the decline of regional community lenders by boosting the political power of their giant national competitors.
Which, when you think about it, is insane: What had brought us to the brink of collapse in the first place was this relentless instinct for building ever-larger megacompanies, passing deregulatory measures to gradually feed all the little fish in the sea to an ever-shrinking pool of Bigger Fish. To fix this problem, the government should have slowly liquidated these monster, too-big-to-fail firms and broken them down to smaller, more manageable companies. Instead, federal regulators closed ranks and used an almost completely secret bailout process to double down on the same faulty, merger-happy thinking that got us here in the first place, creating a constellation of megafirms under government control that are even bigger, more unwieldy and more crammed to the gills with systemic risk.



Source (http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/26793903/the_big_takeover/7)

Sol Invictus
03-23-2009, 09:18 PM
I wonder how many people here realize that the Federal Reserve is privately owned by Bankers and has nothing to do with the Federal Government..

Birka
03-23-2009, 09:26 PM
I wonder how many people here realize that the Federal Reserve is privately owned by Bankers and has nothing to do with the Federal Government..
A+ and a gold star for today.

And not even American privately owned. Ron Paul is pushing for a bill to audit the Federal Reserve Bank. It has never been done. Can you imagine that, the international bank(s) that control the monetary supply for the US has never been audited? The powers that be will never let that bill get approved by Congress, and if it did, Ombongo will be told to veto it.

1913, the worst year in the history of the US. That year gave birth to the Federal Reserve and Federal Income Tax. We have become productive livestock ever since.

Sol Invictus
03-23-2009, 09:29 PM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5232639329002339531&ei=C__HSYvbOpzc-gHIytHGAQ&q=federal+reserve+violates+the+constitution&emb=1