Article 10: Relative Trunk Lenght

[Joso]

It is synonymous with relative leg length and sitting height. On the population level, sitting height varies from 45 to 56 percent of standing height. The length of the legs often contributes more to height than trunk length itself. People with lower Relative trunk lenght have longer legs, so they could be hypotheticaly faster (remember Usain Bolt).
1-Brachyskelic: Sitting height 53 % of overall height and more. PHENOTYPES: Majority of mongoloid phenotypes.
2-Mesoskelic: Sitting height between 51 and 53 % of overall height. PHENOTYPES: Majority of caucasoids, majority of amerindians, some central-African phenotypes.
3-Macroskelic: Sitting height 49 % and less. PHENOTYPES: Majority of Sub-Saharan African phenotypes, all Australian phenotypes, Indian phenotypes, some nordids and mediterranids.
https://scontent.fpoa24-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/s960x960/71500013_2487784647935009_1881355010344747008_o.jp g?_nc_cat=109&_nc_ohc=nSoRqmuLNDUAX9ngtxC&_nc_ht=scontent.fpoa24-1.fna&_nc_tp=1002&oh=0901b30049bcea9868730c070999c716&oe=5E9E495D

[kalach]

Great subject, I'm a Caucasoid with mongoloid proportions on this matter. With 5'10" guy wearing 32' pants.
I find long legged women attractive very much to eliminate mongoloid thick short legs genes.

[Joso]

Great subject, I'm a Caucasoid with mongoloid proportions on this matter. With 5'10" guy wearing 32' pants.
I find long legged women attractive very much to eliminate mongoloid thick short legs genes.

I am brachyskelic too, i don't know if my legs are short or medium but i torso definitely looks to be long.
I think i am still maturing though and have grow some few cms since the beginning of the year.

[kalach]

I am brachyskelic too, i don't know if my legs are short or medium but i torso definitely looks to be long.
I think i am still maturing though and have grow some few cms since the beginning of the year.

Just find a long legged SSA admixed girl from there. I observed mulattas and quadroons of Brazil have Caucasian alike cute faces and great legs and curves.

[Joso]

Just find a long legged SSA admixed girl from there. I observed mulattas and quadroons of Brazil have Caucasian alike cute faces and great legs and curves.

No, man, long thin legged tall women are low IQ small feminine headed produscers.
I need even more mongoloidness.

[kalach]

No, man, long thin legged tall women are low IQ small feminine headed produscers.
I need even more mongoloidness.

So, how can you explain Nordics and meds having high IQ?
Many triracials have robust and harmonious features. They look very good averagely:
https://bambuassessoria.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/luka-web.jpg
I think Brazil has the hottest women on planet.

[Joso]

So, how can you explain Nordics and meds having high IQ?
Many triracials have robust and harmonious features. They look very good averagely:
https://bambuassessoria.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/luka-web.jpg
I think Brazil has the hottest women on planet.

1=IQ is a matter of multiple factors and tend to bullshit and so does most methods of inteligence measuring like encefalisation.
2=Nordids do tend to have high IQ but no more than brachycephalic large headed types.
Meds don't tend to that much to high IQ but again the point 1 stands as well.

[Ymyyakhtakh]

Finns and Karelians are both in the brachyskelic mong class (>=53) according to Coon:

"The bodily proportions of the Finns show no unusual features; a relative span of 104.5[97] is higher than that of most Scandinavians, while a relative sitting height of 53[98] is moderate."
https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-IX11.htm

"The mean stature of the total Carelian group is 165.7 cm., with the Volga males slightly taller than those farther north and west. This is a moderate or medium height, neither notably tall nor short; it is short by Nordic standards, and about average when compared with that of most Russians. The bodily proportions as indicated by Zolotarev's data as well as by those of other investigators do not show the lateral, heavily built type predicted by the study of Finnish influence in Scandinavia; on the contrary, the relative sitting height index of 53 is little higher than that expected among Nordics."
https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-IX9.htm

I think a lower relative sitting height is one reason why Finnics are phenotypically more northern than Germanics.

[Joso]

Finns and Karelians are both in the brachyskelic mong class (>=53) according to Coon:

"The bodily proportions of the Finns show no unusual features; a relative span of 104.5[97] is higher than that of most Scandinavians, while a relative sitting height of 53[98] is moderate."
https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-IX11.htm

"The mean stature of the total Carelian group is 165.7 cm., with the Volga males slightly taller than those farther north and west. This is a moderate or medium height, neither notably tall nor short; it is short by Nordic standards, and about average when compared with that of most Russians. The bodily proportions as indicated by Zolotarev's data as well as by those of other investigators do not show the lateral, heavily built type predicted by the study of Finnish influence in Scandinavia; on the contrary, the relative sitting height index of 53 is little higher than that expected among Nordics."
https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-IX9.htm

I think i have Lapp blood, my father looks very lappid-like with nordid admix, he is 1.67 with brachyskelic proportions. He is fully German but looks more like a Russian/Finnish, i think.
Maybe he has Eastern German ancestry.