Anyone know what “Iberia Southeast 10-16CE is?

[FilhoV]

It’s my closest population on the ancient spreadsheet

https://imgur.com/a/KuUicsb

[Grace O'Malley]

This is the distance of the averaged ones to populations. The might have a bit more North African blood.

Distance to: Iberia_Southeast_c.10-16CE
0.02165825 Spanish_Canarias
0.04263051 Portuguese
0.04279173 Spanish_Extremadura
0.04593082 Sicilian_West
0.04638572 Spanish_Andalucia
0.04724963 Spanish_Murcia
0.04795179 Maltese
0.04839924 Spanish_Galicia
0.05011696 Spanish_Castilla_Y_Leon
0.05104337 French_Corsica
0.05264482 Spanish_Eivissa
0.05305656 Spanish_Alacant
0.05357429 Spanish_Menorca
0.05359108 Italian_Tuscany
0.05413457 Italian_Umbria
0.05449633 Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha
0.05450418 Italian_Lazio
0.05512174 Italian_Liguria
0.05535228 Italian_Marche
0.05572690 Ashkenazi_Ukraine
0.05581071 Spanish_Baleares
0.05597461 Italian_Piedmont
0.05668352 Swiss_Italian
0.05724130 Spanish_Valencia
0.05741384 Sicilian_East

In the southeast, we recovered genomic data from 45 individuals dated between the 3rd-16th
222 centuries CE. All the analyzed individuals fell outside the genetic variation of preceding Iberian
223 Iron Age populations (Figs. 1C-D and S3) and harbored ancestry from both southern European
224 and North African populations (Fig. 2D), as well as additional Levantine-related ancestry that
225 could reflect Jewish contributions (21). These results demonstrate that by the Roman period,
226 southern Iberia had experienced a major influx of North African ancestry, probably related to
227 the well-known mobility patterns during the Roman Empire (22) or the earlier Phoenician-Punic
228 presence (23); the latter is also supported by the observation of the Phoenician-associated Y229 chromosome J2 (24). Gene flow from North Africa continued into the Muslim period, as is clear
230 from Muslim burials with elevated North African and sub-Saharan African ancestry (Figs. 2D,
231 S4 and table S22), and uniparental markers typical of North Africa not present among pre232 Islamic individuals (Figs. 2D and S11). Present-day populations from southern Iberia harbor
233 less North African ancestry (25) than the ancient Muslim burials, plausibly reflecting expulsion
234 of moriscos (former Muslims converted to Christianity) and repopulation from the north, as
235 supported by historical sources and genetic analysis of present-day groups (25). The impact of
236 Muslim rule is also evident in northeast Iberia in seven individuals from Sant Julià de Ramis
237 from the 8-12th centuries CE who, unlike previous ancient individuals from the same region,
238 show North African-related ancestry (Fig. 2C and table S19) and a complete overlap in PCA
239 with present-day Iberians (Fig. 1D).

We grouped the individuals under three population names: SE_Iberia_c.3-4CE,
2099 SE_Iberia_c.5-8CE and SE_Iberia_c.10-16CE. All the individuals that we analyzed are
2100 clearly shifted towards present-day and ancient North Africans in PCA (Fig. S3-4), which
2101 suggests that North African genetic input was already present in this region several
2102 centuries before the Islamic conquest of the Iberian Peninsula beginning in the 8th century
2103 CE. Two individuals from SE_Iberia_c.10-16CE plot on a very different position (Fig.
2104 S3-4) and thus were not included in the three groups. For qpAdm analysis, we began by
2105 using the following outgroup set:

https://pure.hud.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/16104897/Olalde_et_al.pdf

[FilhoV]

Thanks

[FilhoV]

This is the distance of the averaged ones to populations. The might have a bit more North African blood.

Distance to: Iberia_Southeast_c.10-16CE
0.02165825 Spanish_Canarias
0.04263051 Portuguese
0.04279173 Spanish_Extremadura
0.04593082 Sicilian_West
0.04638572 Spanish_Andalucia
0.04724963 Spanish_Murcia
0.04795179 Maltese
0.04839924 Spanish_Galicia
0.05011696 Spanish_Castilla_Y_Leon
0.05104337 French_Corsica
0.05264482 Spanish_Eivissa
0.05305656 Spanish_Alacant
0.05357429 Spanish_Menorca
0.05359108 Italian_Tuscany
0.05413457 Italian_Umbria
0.05449633 Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha
0.05450418 Italian_Lazio
0.05512174 Italian_Liguria
0.05535228 Italian_Marche
0.05572690 Ashkenazi_Ukraine
0.05581071 Spanish_Baleares
0.05597461 Italian_Piedmont
0.05668352 Swiss_Italian
0.05724130 Spanish_Valencia
0.05741384 Sicilian_East

In the southeast, we recovered genomic data from 45 individuals dated between the 3rd-16th
222 centuries CE. All the analyzed individuals fell outside the genetic variation of preceding Iberian
223 Iron Age populations (Figs. 1C-D and S3) and harbored ancestry from both southern European
224 and North African populations (Fig. 2D), as well as additional Levantine-related ancestry that
225 could reflect Jewish contributions (21). These results demonstrate that by the Roman period,
226 southern Iberia had experienced a major influx of North African ancestry, probably related to
227 the well-known mobility patterns during the Roman Empire (22) or the earlier Phoenician-Punic
228 presence (23); the latter is also supported by the observation of the Phoenician-associated Y229 chromosome J2 (24). Gene flow from North Africa continued into the Muslim period, as is clear
230 from Muslim burials with elevated North African and sub-Saharan African ancestry (Figs. 2D,
231 S4 and table S22), and uniparental markers typical of North Africa not present among pre232 Islamic individuals (Figs. 2D and S11). Present-day populations from southern Iberia harbor
233 less North African ancestry (25) than the ancient Muslim burials, plausibly reflecting expulsion
234 of moriscos (former Muslims converted to Christianity) and repopulation from the north, as
235 supported by historical sources and genetic analysis of present-day groups (25). The impact of
236 Muslim rule is also evident in northeast Iberia in seven individuals from Sant Julià de Ramis
237 from the 8-12th centuries CE who, unlike previous ancient individuals from the same region,
238 show North African-related ancestry (Fig. 2C and table S19) and a complete overlap in PCA
239 with present-day Iberians (Fig. 1D).

We grouped the individuals under three population names: SE_Iberia_c.3-4CE,
2099 SE_Iberia_c.5-8CE and SE_Iberia_c.10-16CE. All the individuals that we analyzed are
2100 clearly shifted towards present-day and ancient North Africans in PCA (Fig. S3-4), which
2101 suggests that North African genetic input was already present in this region several
2102 centuries before the Islamic conquest of the Iberian Peninsula beginning in the 8th century
2103 CE. Two individuals from SE_Iberia_c.10-16CE plot on a very different position (Fig.
2104 S3-4) and thus were not included in the three groups. For qpAdm analysis, we began by
2105 using the following outgroup set:

https://pure.hud.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/16104897/Olalde_et_al.pdf

Can you tell me more about this particular one

It’s identical genetically to me

Iberia_Southeast_c.10-16CE:I12516