Classify these Turks from Wagenseil's study work

[Laag]

https://i.imgur.com/v6jrcBj.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/aIitE7h.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/OKw1t4j.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/dKm5dbF.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/UE0wTKD.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/Sa5adFA.jpg

[Ülev]

https://youtu.be/I6eQ78HCGEA

[Ymyyakhtakh]

Nr. 216: Kebabid
Nr. 217: Kebabid
Nr. 218: Kebabid
Nr. 12: Kebabid
Nr. 22: Kebabid
Nr. 34: Kebabid
Nr. 315: Kebabid
Nr. 318: Kebabid
Nr. 343: Kebabid
Nr. 226: Kebabid
Nr. 261: Kebabid
Nr. 281: Kebabid
Nr. 219: Kebabid
Nr. 221: Kebabid
Nr. 226: Kebabid
Nr. 363: Kebabid
Nr. 373: Kebabid

[Columella]

..
Do you know if they refer to a specific area?
Is the material available online?

The common feature to all is the head height (from ear to vertex) and short headedness (from ear to occiput), faces are usually high.
318, 314 and 336 are the extreme examples.
They mostly belong to a Dinaric/Armenoid (Taurid) category, probably the “Anatolian” of German anthropology.
12 and 221 and 216 seem to have a Mongolian element and look s almost “Andid”

[Laag]

Do you know if they refer to a specific area?

Bursa, Izmir, Ankara, Kastamonu etc.



Is the material available online?

https://www.jstor.org/stable/25749062?seq=1

[Arsen_]

Oh my God, they all look like patients in a psychiatric hospital. Nightmare!

[Laag]

Oh my God, they all look like patients in a psychiatric hospital. Nightmare!

They are real Turks. Not those European looking "Turks" (actually they are European ethnic minorities living in Turkey, mostly Balkan Slavic or Circassians) which Kivan posting here.

[lameduck]

Nord Indid and Indo brachid

[VigVagKesalt]

They have a lot of East Asian mix. Some of them look native American, wow.

[Nomansman]

WHy do all these people from the work of these "anthropologists" always look fugly asf? Like even if all turks are black haired iraqi looking people, they still dont look that ugly. Its the same case with some of the iranian examples as well. They pick some very ugly looking people....

[Hurrem sultana]

WHy do all these people from the work of these "anthropologists" always look fugly asf? Like even if all turks are black haired iraqi looking people, they still dont look that ugly. Its the same case with some of the iranian examples as well. They pick some very ugly looking people....

probably to make others look like unter mensch would not suprise me,when was this made?

[Laag]

probably to make others look like unter mensch would not suprise me,when was this made?

The study was done in 1918-1919.

[Laag]

WHy do all these people from the work of these "anthropologists" always look fugly asf? Like even if all turks are black haired iraqi looking people, they still dont look that ugly. Its the same case with some of the iranian examples as well. They pick some very ugly looking people....

Because anthropologists take ordinary people for their examples. Examples from anthropological studies are as close as possible to how real people look.
These Turkish crowds look exactly like the Turks from the study.
https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/rlepf_WsfDBb.JOwZLaw1w--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9ODAwO2lsPXBsYW5l/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/afp.com/23e4bb93c0e038e0141ccfdec34accfe851c4d27.jpg
https://www.abc.net.au/cm/rimage/9902668-3x2-xlarge.jpg?v=4
https://www.dw.com/image/42928103_303.jpg
https://www.middleeasteye.net/sites/default/files/styles/article_page/public/main-images/000_Par8115485.jpg?itok=UAJePgzD
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTgtP19QU3X_uOC7_s0CSiOYwhqZR2 HdG2KJuG6EZbGfbnyPya-
https://editorial01.shutterstock.com/wm-preview-1500/10570951f/a8d9413c/protest-against-russia-over-death-of-turkish-soldiers-istanbul-turkey-shutterstock-editorial-10570951f.jpg
https://static.timesofisrael.com/www/uploads/2016/07/Turkey-Military-Coup_Horo-2.jpg