A closer look to Huns

[Kaspias]

These two results represent Asian admixtures of part Hunnic Gepid and DEU-MA samples.

Crosscheck

https://i.ibb.co/7Yyky0Q/Gepid-Sa-lama.png
https://i.ibb.co/zP7npJs/Deu-Sa-lama.png

DEU_MA_ACD:AED_1108


https://i.ibb.co/9sM7mbT/Deu-Dist.png
https://i.ibb.co/74dttdH/Deu-Ancient.png
https://i.ibb.co/vjtTMq1/Deu-Dist-Modern.png

Gepidian_SRB_ACD:VIM_2


https://i.ibb.co/gTRfsQ6/Gepid-Dist.png
https://i.ibb.co/qpnVgcw/Gepid-Ancient.png
https://i.ibb.co/TRjDCwX/Gepid-Dist-Mod.png

Clustering


https://i.ibb.co/BzH4BLt/Euclidean.png

East Eurasian

https://i.ibb.co/9grxkRF/EE.png

[Kaspias]

Lesson learned: I shouldn't open a thread while everyone sleeping

[Leto]

So you basically singled out the Asian part of the Gepid sample? Not sure if the result is representative of the Huns.

[Kaspias]

So you basically singled out the Asian part of the Gepid sample? Not sure if the result is representative of the Huns.

I modeled them with full gradient run then excluded Germanic and Roman components. I did the same process for Bulgars and Oghuz too, will post results later.

[War Chef]

So they were just slightly more Mong than a Bashkir. Nice