Positive Reputation Bullying?

[poiuytrewq0987]

Whenever I give negative reputation one by one without giving it out excessively and the poster's rep goes in red but a few hours later the Hrvatskoshiptari coalition spams positive reputation overriding my negative rep. The only result from that is a false impression that the poster is a good contributor when in reality he is not.

[Loddfafner]

Don't flood anyone with negrep unless you are planning a dramatic and permanent exit and exile from this site. One negrep to make your point to the individual is acceptable but more are not. Multiple negreps have gotten people banned.

[Beorn]

Positive reputation is a codeword for anti-white.

[poiuytrewq0987]

Don't flood anyone with negrep unless you are planning a dramatic and permanent exit and exile from this site. One negrep to make your point to the individual is acceptable but more are not. Multiple negreps have gotten people banned.

I didn't flood him with negative reputation. The guy accumulated it over a number of days. This earlier morning he had one block of negative rep but now I see he has five blocks of positive rep. :rolleyes:

[BeerBaron]

Ya you've done your negative rep spamming to me as well, why not just stop being a Serbian troll? seems easier

[Stars Down To Earth]

Whenever I give negative reputation one by one without giving it out excessively and the poster's rep goes in red but a few hours later the Hrvatskoshiptari coalition spams positive reputation overriding my negative rep. The only result from that is a false impression that the poster is a good contributor when in reality he is not.
The Axis of Evil is out to get you, mate. You better be alert and watching out for the rest of your life...because one night, the Muslim-Albanian-Ustashe death squads, in their black burkas, might be knocking on your door.

[Frederick]

5K7X2jKZ2XI

[poiuytrewq0987]

Ya you've done your negative rep spamming to me as well, why not just stop being a Serbian troll? seems easier

So giving you a negative rep once in a blue moon is spamming? I suggest you look up the definition of spamming. And you're a Northern European... lol. Got to be pretty sad when a Serbian untermensch is smarter than you.

[Dario Argento]

So giving you a negative rep once in a blue moon is spamming? I suggest you look up the definition of spamming. And you're a Northern European... lol. Got to be pretty sad when a Serbian untermensch is smarter than you.

Serbians have the same IQ as African Americans.

[poiuytrewq0987]

Serbians have the same IQ as African Americans.

That's cool.

[Dario Argento]

That's cool.

You mean datz coo' n shiiz nigga:


n university study recently published in The Times has released its findings regarding the average IQs of the population of 23 different countries. Not surprisingly, all but one of the top ten countries are Western and/or Northern European countries (the exception being Italy) with the Germans and Dutch holding first and second place, respectively, both with an average of 107 IQ points. Greeks, Serbs, Russians, Romanians, and Bulgarians, on the other hand, came in with the lowest scores. According to the absurd study, Russians are ranked at 17th place with an average IQ of 96, Greeks are ranked at 18th place with an average IQ of 95, Bulgarians are ranked at 20th place with an average IQ of 94, Romanians are ranked at 21st place with an average IQ of 94, and Serbs are ranked at 23rd place (i.e. last place) with an average IQ score of 89 -- the Turks were actually ranked one place above Serbs! Here is the table with the full listing from The Times' article: Aside from the fact that the study places the Turks ahead of the Serbs, the study is absolutely ridiculous because it "coincidentally" places almost every Western European country ahead of non-Westerners (the exception being France) and places every Orthodox Christian country at the end. An explanation from a Western European professor concludes that Western/Northern European countries are more intelligent because... of the cold climates found in those countries which supposedly affect brain size and, consequently, intelligence. If that theory made any sense, then Russians -- who definitely live in a cold weather climate -- wouldn't have scored that low. While I certainly don't believe that Greeks have a superior intellect (if Greeks did we wouldn't be in the deplorable state we are in now), the idea that we (and the other Orthodox peoples) are among the least smartest is ludicrous. Greeks, Serbs, Romanians, Bulgarians, and Russians are all people that live in relatively poor countries and where rural villages are still prominent. Of course a large portion of the population from such countries would be less educated than those from wealthy, metropolitan countries with well-funded school systems. Finally, intelligence cannot be accurately quantified -- especially with something as subjective, variable, and faulty as an intelligence quotient test. However, for those interested in IQ results, here are some links which both challenge the study's findings (where Greeks are concerned) and draw serious suspicions on the professor's credibility: <1> <2> <3> <4> Anyway, here follow the relevant articles concerning the Western European study: <1> Germans are brainiest (but at least we're smarter than the French) <2> Germans the Brainiest in Europe <3> Bulgarians Lag behind in Europe's IQ Test <1> The Times March 27, 2006 Germans are brainiest (but at least we're smarter than the French) By Helen Nugent BRITAIN and France have experienced long periods of conflict and rivalry but now victory in one area can be claimed: Britons are more intelligent than the French. A new European league of IQ scores has ranked the British in eighth place, well above the French, who were 19th. According to Richard Lynn of the University of Ulster, Britons have an average IQ of 100. The French scored 94. But it is not all good news. Top of the table were the Germans, with an IQ of 107. The British were also beaten by the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, Italy, Austria and Switzerland. Professor Lynn, who caused controversy last year by claiming that men were more intelligent than juices by about five IQ points on average, said that populations in the colder, more challenging environments of Northern Europe had developed larger brains than those in warmer climates further south. The average brain size in Northern and Central Europe is 1,320cc and in southeast Europe it is 1,312cc. "The early human beings in northerly areas had to survive during cold winters when there were no plant foods and they were forced to hunt big game," he said. "The main environmental influence on IQ is diet, and people in southeast Europe would have had less of the proteins, minerals and vitamins provided by meat which are essential for brain development." He added that differences in intelligence across Britain could be attributed to bright people moving to London over hundreds of years. Adults in England and Wales have an IQ of 100.5, higher than Ireland and Scotland, both with 97. People living in London and the South East average 102. "Once in the capital they have settled and reared children, and these children have inherited their high intelligence and transmitted it to further generations." The pattern is repeated in other countries, Professor Lynn claimed. In France, IQ scores in Paris were much higher than those in rural areas. Professor Lynn has spent three decades analysing thousands of test results to scrutinise the role of evolution in IQ. He has published his findings in a new book. Britons excel in another area of Professor Lynn's research. He found that university students had, at 109, the second-highest undergraduate IQs in the world, beaten only by their US counterparts on 110. Professor Lynn ascribes the differences between British and French intelligence levels to the results of military conflict. He described it as "a hitherto unrecognised law of history" that "the side with the higher IQ normally wins, unless they are hugely outnumbered, as Germany was after 1942". A "normal" IQ ranges from 85 to 115 but exceptionally gifted people have scores starting at 145. <2> They Scored an Average IQ of 107 Germans the Brainiest in Europe 27 Mar 2006 10:11:00 By Athina Saloustrou The Germans are the brightest of the Europeans, way ahead of Britons who landed 8th place, Spaniards (15th place), Greeks (18th place) and French (19th place), suggested a study carried out by the Northern Ireland University and published by The Times. Scoring an average IQ of 107, the Germans earned first place, ahead of the Dutch and Poles (106), Swedes (104) and Italians (102). Britons with an IQ of 100 confined to eight place ahead of the Japanese with an IQ of 98, Greeks with 95 and French with 94, who outdone the Bulgarians, Romanians, Turks and Serbs, who rank last in the standings. Head of the research team Professor Lynn underlined that the different IQ scores between the British and French can account for Britains more military victories over France. Colder Climates Boost IQ Professor Lynn put down the different IQ scores to the fact that the population lining in northern Europe, where the climate is much colder, tend to develop larger brains. as per calculations by the Northern Ireland University, the average brain size of people residing northern and central Europe is 1,320cc, as opposed to 1,312cc for those living in SE Europe. Professor Lynn argued in 2005 that men are more intelligent than juices by about five IQ points. A "normal" IQ score ranges from 85 to 115, but when it comes to particularly brilliant people, IQ scores start from 145. Translated by Areti Christou <3> Bulgarians Lag behind in Europe's IQ Test Politics: 27 March 2006, Monday. Bulgarians proved to be among the least intelligent in Europe after scoring one of the lowest averages in IQ tests, conducted by Prof Lynn, a lecturer at the University of Ulster, Northern Ireland. Bulgaria ranked 20th out of the 23 European nations, with Romania, Greece, Russia, France, Turkey and Serbia filling most of the places in the lower part of the ranking. Serbians notched up just 89 IQ points on average. The European bright sparks, according to Prof Lynn, are the Germans and the Dutch (107 IQ points) and Poland (106 IQ points). The UK comes eighth, behind Sweden (104), Italy (102), Austria (101) and Switzerland (101).

[poiuytrewq0987]

Pretty sure that test was debunked a little while ago after it was found they tested on peasants who had received little to no schooling. Additionally, the West has had the advantage of a great schooling system for them to score high on IQ tests. The schools in Monarchist Yugoslavia and early Socialist Yugoslavia was only 4 grades long.

[songirrah]

And the Ashkenazi Jews beat everyone on average IQ. Cry about it? Anybody know the average gypsy IQ?

[Monolith]

Ya you've done your negative rep spamming to me as well, why not just stop being a Serbian troll? seems easier
Indeed.

I gave that guy reputation points only because you, Apotheosis, gave him negative rep. Now. Considering your posts are roughly on the same level as his, I found it a bit unfair for him to have negative reputation while yours is positive. So stop bitching around.

[Storm 1995]

Serbians have the same IQ as African Americans.

Maybe Serbs are so damn stoopid because of the impoverished uranium that remained in Serbia as a result from NATO bombings in 1999? It probably damages brains on a longer run.

[hajduk]

Apo bro your signature is damn good

[Eldritch]

Whenever I give negative reputation one by one without giving it out excessively and the poster's rep goes in red but a few hours later the Hrvatskoshiptari coalition spams positive reputation overriding my negative rep. The only result from that is a false impression that the poster is a good contributor when in reality he is not.

It's called "organization".

[Laudanum]

Oh, great. Another amusing thread. Keep 'em coming!

[Laudanum]

The only result from that is a false impression that the poster is a good contributor when in reality he is not.


I personally think it's kinda retarded people care so much about reputation. You either like someone or you don't; reputation has nothing to do with that. I know plenty of posters with a ''reputation beyond repute'', who I do not like at all and I think their posts are crap.

[poiuytrewq0987]

It's called "organization".

So posters are allowed to spam positive reputation to give off a false impression but I'm not allowed to give out negative reputation as it's rather risky since it could lead to a banning. Just remove the negative rep system altogether if you people are going to threat a ban every time a butthurt poster come in here crying about getting negative reps for their bad posts.

[Laudanum]

I think it's also fairly important to look at the exact meaning of ''spamming people with neg. reputation''. There's a difference between simply not agreeing with someone and giving them negative reputation for that (even if it happens twice of three times in one day), and just simply ''spamming'' them with neg. reputation and insulting them with rep. comments all the time.

All sane people should be able to know when someone is simply ''spamming'' or just disagreeing with them. There's a huge difference between the two. Like if I post ''Jews are Germanic'', you might give me neg. rep. for that, because you disagree and it's not right. Giving me neg. rep. when i'm insulting you also makes sense to me, but just insulting someone with neg. rep. when you're not agreeing with them is stupid and people should get banned when they do that, because it's simply abusing your ability to give people negative reputation.

[poiuytrewq0987]

I think it's also fairly important to look at the exact meaning of ''spamming people with neg. reputation''. There's a difference between simply not agreeing with someone and giving them negative reputation for that (even if it happens twice of three times in one day), and just simply ''spamming'' them with neg. reputation and insulting them with rep. comments all the time.

All sane people should be able to know when someone is simply ''spamming'' or just disagreeing with them. There's a huge difference between the two. Like if I post ''Jews are Germanic'', you might give me neg. rep. for that, because you disagree and it's not right. Giving me neg. rep. when i'm insulting you also makes sense to me, but just insulting someone with neg. rep. when you're not agreeing with them is stupid and people should get banned when they do that, because it's simply abusing your ability to give people negative reputation.

The only time I spammed negative reputation was when the poster insulted me beyond simple insulting. That guy deserved it and surprise, surprise the poster got banned. :coffee:

[Laudanum]

The only time I spammed negative reputation was when the poster insulted me beyond simple insulting. That guy deserved it and surprise, surprise the poster got banned. :coffee:

Well, giving the poster negative reputation for the post in which they insulted you, makes sense to me. Giving them negative reputation for all of their posts (including the ones that have nothing to do with you), does not.:rolleyes:

[Mordid]

If someone give you negative reputation and you wanted to get back at them, you're not doing it properly because obviously, they wants to make you angry otherwise you'd get banned. I remember Celti gave me a negative reputation and message, all I just did is ignore it. I'm glad he's banned, anyway..

[Hess]

Who cares? Why all the whining?