Maguzanci
04-15-2020, 02:38 PM
They seem to have even less than Maris, Udmurts which is very surprising to me. This is because the latter ought to have less Neolithic Farmer than Saamis as they are geographically farther from Europe and much closer to Siberia than the former.
I use HUN_Koros_N to represent Neolithic Farmer admixture in these runs. It seems that Neolithic Farmer ancestry varied upon the proxy used to represent the Steppe ancestry. Like when RUS_Progress_EN was used, the Saami and Mari score around 10.83-11.67% and 14.17% Neolithic admixture
"sample": "Saami:Average",
"fit": 6.0937,
"RUS_Progress_En": 45,
"Nganassan": 24.17,
"WHG": 20,
"HUN_Koros_N": 10.83,
"sample": "Mari:Average",
"fit": 11.7716,
"RUS_Progress_En": 46.67,
"Nganassan": 29.17,
"HUN_Koros_N": 14.17,
"WHG": 10,
"sample": "Udmurt:Average",
"fit": 5.5068,
"RUS_Progress_En": 53.33,
"Nganassan": 23.33,
"HUN_Koros_N": 15,
"WHG": 8.33,
but when RUS_Afanasievo is utilized, the Saami and Mari exhibited approximately 7.5% and 10% Neolithic admixture:
"sample": "Saami:Average",
"fit": 5.3827,
"RUS_Afanasievo": 54.17,
"Nganassan": 23.33,
"WHG": 15,
"HUN_Koros_N": 7.5,
"sample": "Mari:Average",
"fit": 11.3632,
"RUS_Afanasievo": 55,
"Nganassan": 28.33,
"HUN_Koros_N": 10,
"WHG": 6.67,
"sample": "Udmurt:Average",
"fit": 4.8121,
"RUS_Afanasievo": 64.17,
"Nganassan": 22.5,
"HUN_Koros_N": 10,
"WHG": 3.33,
I wonder what is the difference behind this? I thought that there is an inverse relationship that the higher Mongoloid (Nganassan) affinity a European group has, the lower Neolithic they would have. But it seems to not be the case for the Saami and Mari as the latter apparently possessed more farmer admixture than the former.
Why is this?
I use HUN_Koros_N to represent Neolithic Farmer admixture in these runs. It seems that Neolithic Farmer ancestry varied upon the proxy used to represent the Steppe ancestry. Like when RUS_Progress_EN was used, the Saami and Mari score around 10.83-11.67% and 14.17% Neolithic admixture
"sample": "Saami:Average",
"fit": 6.0937,
"RUS_Progress_En": 45,
"Nganassan": 24.17,
"WHG": 20,
"HUN_Koros_N": 10.83,
"sample": "Mari:Average",
"fit": 11.7716,
"RUS_Progress_En": 46.67,
"Nganassan": 29.17,
"HUN_Koros_N": 14.17,
"WHG": 10,
"sample": "Udmurt:Average",
"fit": 5.5068,
"RUS_Progress_En": 53.33,
"Nganassan": 23.33,
"HUN_Koros_N": 15,
"WHG": 8.33,
but when RUS_Afanasievo is utilized, the Saami and Mari exhibited approximately 7.5% and 10% Neolithic admixture:
"sample": "Saami:Average",
"fit": 5.3827,
"RUS_Afanasievo": 54.17,
"Nganassan": 23.33,
"WHG": 15,
"HUN_Koros_N": 7.5,
"sample": "Mari:Average",
"fit": 11.3632,
"RUS_Afanasievo": 55,
"Nganassan": 28.33,
"HUN_Koros_N": 10,
"WHG": 6.67,
"sample": "Udmurt:Average",
"fit": 4.8121,
"RUS_Afanasievo": 64.17,
"Nganassan": 22.5,
"HUN_Koros_N": 10,
"WHG": 3.33,
I wonder what is the difference behind this? I thought that there is an inverse relationship that the higher Mongoloid (Nganassan) affinity a European group has, the lower Neolithic they would have. But it seems to not be the case for the Saami and Mari as the latter apparently possessed more farmer admixture than the former.
Why is this?