PDA

View Full Version : The Oldest Alliance In The World - The Anglo/British-Portuguese Alliance



Storm
09-02-2011, 03:04 AM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/98/Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg/85px-Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/Coat_of_arms_of_Portugal.svg/85px-Coat_of_arms_of_Portugal.svg.png


The Anglo-Portuguese Alliance (ratified at the Treaty of Windsor) between England (succeeded by the United Kingdom) and Portugal is the oldest alliance in the world which is still in force. It was signed in June 13, 1373.

This alliance, which goes back to the Middle Ages, has served both countries. It was very important throughout history, influencing the participation of the United Kingdom in the Iberian Peninsular War, the UK's major land contribution to the Napoleonic Wars and the establishment of an Anglo-American base in Portugal. Portugal, however, remained neutral throughout World War II.

Middle Ages

English aid to the House of Aviz set the stage for the cooperation with England that would be the cornerstone of Portuguese foreign policy for more than 500 years. However, English aid to Portugal went back much further to the 1147 Siege of Lisbon, when English and Northern European Crusaders en route to the Holy Land to participate in the Second Crusade stopped and helped Portuguese King Afonso Henriques to conquer the city. In May 1386, the Treaty of Windsor sealed the alliance that first started in 1294, and was confirmed at Aljubarrota with a pact of perpetual friendship between the two countries. The most important part of the treaty stated that:

It is cordially agreed that if, in time to come, one of the kings or his heir shall need the support of the other, or his help, and in order to get such assistance applies to his ally in lawful manner, the ally shall be bound to give aid and succour to the other, so far as he is able (without any deceit, fraud, or pretence) to the extent required by the danger to his ally’s realms, lands, domains, and subjects; and he shall be firmly bound by these present alliances to do this.

The next year, John of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster, son of king Edward III of England, and father of king Henry IV of England, landed in Galicia with an expeditionary force to press his claim to the Crown of Castile with Portuguese aid. He failed to win the support of the Castilian nobility and returned to England with a cash compensation from the rival claimant.

John of Gaunt left behind his daughter, Philippa of Lancaster, to marry king John I of Portugal in order to seal the Anglo-Portuguese alliance. By this marriage, celebrated in 1387, John I became the father of a generation of princes called by the poet Luís de Camões, the "marvellous generation", who led Portugal into its golden age, during the period of the Discoveries.

Philippa brought to the court the Anglo-Norman tradition of an aristocratic education and gave her children good educations. Her personal qualities were the highest, and she reformed the court and imposed rigid standards of moral behaviour. On the other hand, her method was also seen as too traditional or outdated by the more tolerant Portuguese aristocracy. Philippa provided royal patronage for English commercial interests that sought to meet the Portuguese desire for cod and cloth in return for wine, cork, salt, and oil shipped through the English warehouses at Porto. Her eldest son, Duarte, authored moral works and became king in 1433; Pedro, who travelled widely and had an interest in history, became regent when Duarte died of the plague in 1438; Fernando, who became a crusader, participated in the attack on Tangiers in 1437; and Henrique – Prince Henry the Navigator – became the master of the Order of Christ and the instigator and organiser of the early voyages of discovery.

Disruption

The Iberian Union (1580-1640), a dynastic union between Portugal and Spain, interrupted the alliance. Portuguese foreign policy became tied to Spanish hostility to England. As a result, Portugal and England were on opposite sides of the Anglo-Spanish War and the Dutch-Portuguese War. The alliance was reconfirmed after the Portuguese Restoration War and the English Restoration.

17th to 19th Centuries

Other important episodes in the alliance were:

* The War of Spanish Succession, when Portugal together with the Duchy of Savoy initially sided with France, but after the Battle of Blenheim reunited with its ally.
* The Napoleonic Wars, when Portugal, isolated in a Europe wholly dominated by Napoleon, continued to trade with the United Kingdom despite French restrictions and was finally invaded, but with British help finally regained total sovereignty and independence.
o When the Portuguese royal family at the time of king John VI of Portugal took refuge in its then vice-royalty of Brazil, under escort of the British fleet.

* The 1890 British Ultimatum was considered by Portuguese historians and politicians at that time to be the most outrageous and infamous action of the British against her oldest ally.

20th century

During the 20th century, the treaty has been invoked several times:

* After German incursions in Portuguese East Africa (Mozambique), Portuguese troops fought on the Western Front during World War I.
* In the Second World War, Portugal was neutral but the treaty was invoked by the Allies to establish bases on the Azores.
* In 1961, during the invasion of the Portuguese possessions of Goa, Daman and Diu by the Indian Union, Portugal sought the help of Britain to little effect.
* During the 1982 Falklands War the facilities of the Azores were again offered to the Royal Navy.

Importance in modern times

Today, as both countries are members of the European Union and NATO, their relations are largely coordinated through those institutions rather than by the provisions of the many treaties forming the Anglo-Portuguese Alliance.

http://armchairanglophile.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/250px-anglo-portuguese_alliance.jpg


@ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Portuguese_Alliance

http://www.jstor.org/pss/20029211

http://www.angloportuguesesociety.org.uk/index.cfm?sector=historyalliance&page=historyalliance

Trog
09-02-2011, 03:44 AM
This can be contrasted with the Auld Alliance (http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/scottishhistory/europe/features_europe_auldalliance.shtml). The Italians, french and Spanish have fought to help the Irish as well in battles, and the Irish have returned the favour, supporting the Spanish at Villettri in 1744 and the French at Cremona in 1702. Indeed, the ill-fated Spanish Armada was greatly anticipated to liberate the Irish and Scottish Catholics (sigh, if only....)

British relationships with our southern neighbours is more historical and glorious than any supposed pact with those of the north.

Storm
09-02-2011, 03:48 AM
Personally, the Anglo-Portuguese alliance is something I learned about as a boy. My father had a bunch of old 1950's encyclopedias and this is where I first learned about it.

Johnston
09-02-2011, 06:18 AM
This can be contrasted with the Auld Alliance (http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/scottishhistory/europe/features_europe_auldalliance.shtml). The Italians, french and Spanish have fought to help the Irish as well in battles, and the Irish have returned the favour, supporting the Spanish at Villettri in 1744 and the French at Cremona in 1702. Indeed, the ill-fated Spanish Armada was greatly anticipated to liberate the Irish and Scottish Catholics (sigh, if only....)

British relationships with our southern neighbours is more historical and glorious than any supposed pact with those of the north.Keep your Jacobitism to yourself. The House of Stuart never should have set foot on English and Irish soil, belonging to the Tudors and Parliament.:wink

Damião de Góis
09-02-2011, 10:24 PM
This worked well for us against Castille and Napoleon, here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Aljubarrota
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peninsular_War

But the English seem to have "forgotten" about it during the Iberian Union and here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_Map

However, the times the alliance worked was vital for us, so i would say that all in all, the alliance was a good thing.

Johnston
09-03-2011, 03:39 AM
This worked well for us against Castille and Napoleon, here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Aljubarrota
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peninsular_War

But the English seem to have "forgotten" about it during the Iberian Union and here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_Map

However, the times the alliance worked was vital for us, so i would say that all in all, the alliance was a good thing.How many Duartes do you know?;)

Damião de Góis
09-03-2011, 02:51 PM
How many Duartes do you know?;)

I know one actually. It's a given name here... why are you asking me that?

Johnston
09-03-2011, 04:52 PM
I know one actually. It's a given name here... why are you asking me that?It is a cultural legacy of the alliance.:thumb001:

Damião de Góis
09-03-2011, 04:54 PM
It is a cultural legacy of the alliance.:thumb001:

How? :confused:
Have any link? I know Lencastre is a changed surname from Lancaster but i didn't know about Duarte.

Wulfhere
09-03-2011, 05:04 PM
Duarte comes from Edward, as Anglo-Saxon a name as you could wish for. However, versons of it also exist in Spanish, and a large number of other languages too, even Russian. Eleven kings of England and Great Britain have been called Edward: Edward the Elder, Edward the Martyr, Edward the Confessor, and the post-Norman Edwards I to VIII (the English before 1066 didn't number their monarchs). Edward the Martyr and Edward the Confessor were both canonised, which may account for the name's popularity in other European languages.

Johnston
09-03-2011, 05:08 PM
How? :confused:
Have any link? I know Lencastre is a changed surname from Lancaster but i didn't know about Duarte.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_of_Portugal

Damião de Góis
09-03-2011, 06:51 PM
Apparently you are right about Duarte. But as for Edward, we also have the name Eduardo which is a simple adaptation from a germanic name like in other names such as Carlos, Ricardo, etc.

Osweo
09-12-2011, 10:04 PM
Apparently you are right about Duarte. But as for Edward, we also have the name Eduardo which is a simple adaptation from a germanic name like in other names such as Carlos, Ricardo, etc.

Edward is rather special to the English, though. The first element Ead- is not seen elsewhere much, if at all. I'd be interested to hear of a non-English usage of this element in other Germanic languages, but until then, I'll call it a specifically English trait in name formation.

As Wulfhere said, you probably its introduction to the popularity of Edward the Confessor's saintly cult, as well as Philippa's familial connections and filial piety. (Never mind that he was probably one of the most disastrous sovereigns we've ever had).

Having two distinct names with the same origin is nothing too amazing. There are plenty of parallels. They usually involve a popular assimilated form, and a later reintroduction of a more faithful learned form. We have Jennifer and Gaynor, from the top of my head.

Albion
09-13-2011, 01:45 PM
This worked well for us against Castille and Napoleon, here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Aljubarrota
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peninsular_War

But the English seem to have "forgotten" about it during the Iberian Union and here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_Map

However, the times the alliance worked was vital for us, so i would say that all in all, the alliance was a good thing.

1) The Iberian Union ~ Spain - Spain held the power in it.
2) Rhodesia was ours.

Damião de Góis
09-13-2011, 08:15 PM
1) The Iberian Union ~ Spain - Spain held the power in it.
2) Rhodesia was ours.

Yes, "Iberian Union" is a decieving term... it was no union.
As for the african thing i really don't know or care much about it but England basically threatened us with war. Couldn't they be more diplomatic with their supposed allies? :p

Albion
09-13-2011, 09:06 PM
Yes, "Iberian Union" is a decieving term... it was no union.
As for the african thing i really don't know or care much about it but England basically threatened us with war. Couldn't they be more diplomatic with their supposed allies? :p

It was important for the empire at the time to stretch from the Cape to Cairo.
Cecil Rhodes was very influential regarding British policy in Africa, it was more him than anybody else who pursued it. Rhodes was very well connected in business and government.

Yes, allies should be treated better than that.