Do scientists cenzor the studies on certain populations due to political correctness?

[yamagi]

They've portrayed the Cheddar man with strong African features and called them a black man, which was obviously false, the question is raised - What else do they do which contradict the law of science which requires one to be objective and free from emotional bias?

[Tauromachos]

The Cheddar man doesn't look like a Black Man but more Romani,Gypsy imo

[Lucas]

At least Jews are very well studied genwtically. I think no one censor modetn population studies.

[The Lawspeaker]

Of course. Science is no longer science but as encapsulated into the system as it was under the Hitler or Soviet Regimes. Genuine science no longer exists.

[KirillMazur]

Censorship begins already at the level of search engines.
Exactly so, with the criminal peoples, whose R1b-ine ancestors basically slayed the population of Western Europe 5,000 years ago and now have their own "concepts".
Yandex makes it difficult to find due to endless captcha or simply a denial of work, as well as Google search on certain topics. For example, information about haplogroup migration and paleogenetics, which is unprofitable for haplogroups J, E1b1b and R1b.
For example, the real Indo-Europeans for them are R1b, who never ruled India until the 19th century, and not R1a, who still make up the top of their society so far (in the north).
Frank lies and the formation of excuses for the conquests and genocides of peoples. The same is true for other haplogroups - the homeland of J is the Arabian Peninsula, the homeland of E1b1b is today's Somalia.

[Ford]

Population studies is barely real science. But often scientific results are presented in a misleading way (either intentionally or unintentionally) by the media, which leads to people accusing the scientific community instead of the journalists.