PDA

View Full Version : Most aggressive countries in the world



Arsen_
06-12-2020, 01:57 PM
The Institute of Economics and World named the most aggressive countries in the world.

The top ten looks like this:

Afghanistan
Syria
Iraq
South Sudan
Yemen
Somalia
Libya
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Central African Republic
Russia


On the other hand the most peace-loving country is Iceland. It is followed by New Zealand, Portugal, Austria and Denmark.

https://kudago.com/all/news/nazvanyi-samyie-agressivnyie-stranyi/

KirillMazur
06-12-2020, 02:52 PM
Obviously, these are the colonial and genocidal robber powers - the USA, UK, Israel and other civilized strongholds of democracy.
To some extent, Russia and the USSR and China, but our empire models is built on other principles.

Хватить тащить всякую поебень из западных источников. Самому то не смешно, что в качестве самых агрессивных стран они поставили в основном жертв своей же демократии?

Arsen_
06-12-2020, 03:40 PM
Obviously, these are the colonial and genocidal robber powers - the USA, UK, Israel and other civilized strongholds of democracy.
To some extent, Russia and the USSR and China, but our empire models is built on other principles.

Хватить тащить всякую поебень из западных источников. Самому то не смешно, что в качестве самых агрессивных стран они поставили в основном жертв своей же демократии?

Источник русскоязычный, а не западный, я же ссылку указал. :lol:

А по составу списка есть вопросы, и по методике составления тоже. Вот поэтому и хотелось послушать мнения умных людей и понять, что к чему. :)

Blondie
06-12-2020, 03:46 PM
Somalia by far

Alla Zima
06-12-2020, 04:12 PM
well, the US should also be in the top 10 at least

Alenka
06-12-2020, 04:30 PM
https://i.imgur.com/MfsICqZ.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/TJWpkFd.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/3JbFDTh.jpg

Rumata
06-12-2020, 05:46 PM
Источник русскоязычный, а не западный, я же ссылку указал. :lol:

И твоя ссылка указывает источником этот сайт (несомненно, независимый):

Источник: dsnews.ua

sean
06-12-2020, 05:47 PM
https://i.imgur.com/pTEyq7r.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/bht28F4.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/GQVJDrc.png
https://i.imgur.com/pzBUw8n.jpg

Rumata
06-12-2020, 05:49 PM
NATO aggression doesn't count as such as it's there to bring slavery peace and democracy to the world.

Rumata
06-12-2020, 05:51 PM
sean, when do you leave the occupied land?

Ercüment Çizer
06-12-2020, 05:53 PM
Kazakhstan

Bender1999
06-12-2020, 08:15 PM
Although i dont support the annexation of crimmea, russia is the last country of europe, which kept his severity. Usa should be on 1st place...

Arsen_
06-12-2020, 08:59 PM
И твоя ссылка указывает источником этот сайт (несомненно, независимый):

Да я собственно говоря и хотел понять, почему именно такой список, как и по какой методике он был составлен, потому что я не понял логики. Надеялся, что кто-то из умных участников форума, объяснит в чём дело. :)

gixajo
06-12-2020, 09:14 PM
Источник русскоязычный, а не западный, я же ссылку указал. :lol:

А по составу списка есть вопросы, и по методике составления тоже. Вот поэтому и хотелось послушать мнения умных людей и понять, что к чему. :)

:)

Rumata
06-13-2020, 04:24 AM
Да я собственно говоря и хотел понять, почему именно такой список, как и по какой методике он был составлен, потому что я не понял логики. Надеялся, что кто-то из умных участников форума, объяснит в чём дело. :)

Серьёзно? :) Непонятно, почему в списке составленном в Украине есть РФ? :) Их банда в контрах с нашей, это - более чем достаточное основание.
Методика, предположительно, "от фонаря".

Rumata
06-13-2020, 04:26 AM
:)

Check the bottom of that page (https://kudago.com/all/news/nazvanyi-samyie-agressivnyie-stranyi/):

Источник: dsnews.ua = Source: dsnews.ua
ua = domen of Ukraine

Tauromachos
06-13-2020, 04:26 AM
USA and Turkey

Arsen_
06-13-2020, 06:18 AM
Серьёзно? :) Непонятно, почему в списке составленном в Украине есть РФ? :) Их банда в контрах с нашей, это - более чем достаточное основание.
Методика, предположительно, "от фонаря".

Ну вот, теперь стало понятнее, потому что я как-то совершенно не обратил внимания на "украинский след"! :)

Trouble
06-13-2020, 06:46 AM
What you mean is which country has the most aggressive citizenry. By saying most aggressive country they make it sound like they're talking about imperialism.

Nykyus
06-13-2020, 07:31 AM
USA is the most aggressive country. It is worth waiting for an attack on any state from it. Naturally, this will be presented as a struggle for the establishment of democracy, for the preservation of human rights.

Lemgrant
06-13-2020, 07:32 AM
Источник русскоязычный, а не западный, я же ссылку указал. :lol:

А по составу списка есть вопросы, и по методике составления тоже. Вот поэтому и хотелось послушать мнения умных людей и понять, что к чему. :)


И твоя ссылка указывает источником этот сайт (несомненно, независимый):

Source is Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Economics_%26_Peace

http://visionofhumanity.org/app/uploads/2020/06/GPI_2020_web.pdf

Nykyus
06-13-2020, 07:43 AM
China and Russia are not ready for aggression, because they experience deep internal difficulties that threaten them with death and disappearance from the surface of the planet.

At the very end of the millennium, only Americans will remain who are half black. The rest will die from American weapons

aja675
06-13-2020, 08:11 AM
Is this for politics or for everyday attitudes? Because I know that the Middle East seems to be angry when it comes to everyday attitudes. And I know that because of how I was talking to an Israeli about how I've had problems in my life with controlling anger. It's as if the guy thought it was an alien idea to ever have to control your anger.

Arsen_
06-13-2020, 09:14 AM
China and Russia are not ready for aggression, because they experience deep internal difficulties that threaten them with death and disappearance from the surface of the planet.


Can you elaborate on this? What do you mean?

akva
06-13-2020, 11:11 AM
Kazakhstan

Unless aggression of the Kazakhstan Government towards their people

Bender1999
06-13-2020, 11:29 AM
Unless aggression of the Kazakhstan Government towards their people

This guy is a troll posting nonsense




USA is the most aggressive country in this world, Nato shouldn’t exist anymore. Imagine how the western countries would react if russia found a similar military union with other states.
Honestly also China is very aggressive, it is the new „Sowjetunion“ .

Nykyus
06-13-2020, 11:54 AM
Can you elaborate on this? What do you mean?

China and Russia are weak economically.
In Russia, industry was completely destroyed as a result of Gorbachev-Yeltsin reforms. Until now, Russia exists on the basis of the Soviet infrastructure of the USSR, which has long been outdated and is not being updated. Power plants are breaking down, mines are crumbling, water pipelines have rusted and are not being updated, science is in decline, the population is falling, the population is degrading and stratified into different layers and regions, the Arctic and Far Eastern cities are abandoned. Russia is practically unprepared for the upcoming battle for resources.

The economy of China in 2020 is reduced by 40%, the Chinese economy is not self-sufficient, it needs hydrocarbons. China receives hydrocarbons from Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, whose population does not like the Chinese. China receives part of the hydrocarbons from Russia, part from Saudi Arabia, where maritime communications may be subject to US maritime attacks.
China is surrounded by hostile countries: India, Vietnam, Taiwan, the Philippines, Japan, which are ready to cooperate with the United States. China's naval forces are weak.
The nature of China is a sad sight, very polluted. The population of China does not want to work as before for a small portion of rice.
In this confrontation, the parties will not use atomic weapons. It’s like in the Second World War, then Hitler did not use chemical weapons.

The conflict will be in this century and will grow. Because it is a struggle for natural resources. The United States does not want to allow China to get Russia's natural resources.

America will first try to provoke revolutions through the CIA. The so-called Arab spring, the overthrow of Saddam Hussein on a false pretext, and the creation of ISIS was only the first step. There were Chinese monetary investments in Libya, so the United States and NATO hit China through the bombing.

Blondie
06-13-2020, 12:07 PM
Funny to see these brainwashed russian droids who think USA is the most agressive. Americans have never massacred their own citizens like Stalin did, there were no gulags in USA, neither any totalitarian system, americans never commited any organized genocide against others like russians did with tatars,
ukrainians (holodomor). Russians also took their land from others: finno-ugrics, iranics, turkics, native siberians. The american foreign policy was very isolated before the WW2, unlike the agressive Russia's foreign policy who invaded their every neighbour during the history, that's why ukrainians,finns, baltics, turkics, caucasians are all hate Russia. So thats laughable when a russian person blaming USA for being most agressive lol

Nykyus
06-13-2020, 12:19 PM
Funny to see these brainwashed russian droids who think USA is the most agressive. Americans have never massacred their own citizens like Stalin did, there were no gulags in USA, neither any totalitarian system, americans never commited any organized genocide against others like russians did with tatars,
ukrainians (holodomor). Russians also took their land from others: finno-ugrics, iranics, turkics, native siberians. The american foreign policy was very isolated before the WW2, unlike the agressive Russia's foreign policy who invaded their every neighbour during the history, that's why ukrainians,finns, baltics, turkics, caucasians are all hate Russia. So thats laughable when a russian person blaming USA for being most agressive lol

Who is writing this? Hehe. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed millions of civilians, the destruction of Dresden by bombing in World War II, the trial of lynching Negroes, the genocide of American Indians, millions of burned Vietnamese during the Vietnam War. Continue?

Mortimer
06-13-2020, 12:19 PM
Those are the war torn countries and USA politicians are partly responsible for that half of the countries were invaded by USA army

Blondie
06-13-2020, 12:40 PM
Who is writing this? Hehe. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed millions of civilians, the destruction of Dresden by bombing in World War II, the trial of lynching Negroes, the genocide of American Indians, millions of burned Vietnamese during the Vietnam War. Continue?

Germany and Japan declared war on USA firstly, and they also commited many crimes just like every side. There were no amerindian genocide, they have perished because of wars and european diseases what they immune system didnt know, the SovietUnion also attacked free countries like Afghanistan, and every crime what you said happened in 20. century, the bloody russian history started in the medieval age.
Go and suck russian's cock who massacred your turkic ancestors you cuck.

Smeagol
06-13-2020, 12:41 PM
Who is writing this? Hehe. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

I don't see how anyone can argue this was wrong. It prevented the deaths of hundreds of thousands of troops we would have lost if we were forced to invade the Japanese home islands. Also it ended a war of aggression started by Japan.


the trial of lynching Negroes,

Negroes lynched were criminals. Although I don't support civilians taking the law into their own hands, the fact is that black on black crime kills more negroes in a year than all those who were lynched in U.S. history.

Benyzero
06-13-2020, 12:41 PM
Germany and Japan declared war on USA firstly, and they also commited many crimes just like every side. There were no amerindian genocide, they have perished because of wars and european diseases what they immune system didnt know, the SovietUnion also attacked free countries like Afghanistan, and every crime what you said happened in 20. century, the bloody russian history started in the medieval age.
Go and suck russian's cock who massacred your turkic ancestors you cuck.

I declare you to write me baccc xd

Bender1999
06-13-2020, 12:42 PM
Germany and Japan declared war on USA firstly, and they also commited many crimes just like every side. There were no amerindian genocide, they have perished because of wars and european diseases what they immune system didnt know, the SovietUnion also attacked free countries like Afghanistan, and every crime what you said happened in 20. century, the bloody russian history started in the medieval age.
Go and suck russian's cock who massacred your turkic ancestors you cuck.

We dont talk about the 2.world war, now america is more aggresive than any other country.

Nykyus
06-13-2020, 12:50 PM
I do not think Martin Luther King was a criminal. Lynch Court is a crime.
The first concentration camps were created by the British during the Boer War.
You are ready to give an excuse to any crime, except for Stalin. So Stalin also killed criminals, traitors. Without these harsh measures, the Soviet Union would have lost to Germany. Stalin deported Crimean Tatars, Chechens, because they supported German troops. They were ready to support NATO troops in case of war.

Blondie
06-13-2020, 12:53 PM
We dont talk about the 2.world war, now america is more aggresive than any other country.

That true, but i see the complete history.

Bender1999
06-13-2020, 12:58 PM
That true, but i see the complete history.

I dont. You cant describe Germany as aggressive today, 80 years ago they was the most. Sowjetunion also was the same way aggressive like USA then, but nowadays USA is definitely more and the most(maybe North korea should also be mentioned).

Nykyus
06-13-2020, 01:02 PM
The population of the USSR under Stalin only grew. Under Stalin, thieves were killed quickly, regardless of their political rank. Stalin even accused Zhukov of stealing because he kept German trophy books and jewelry in his barn. His comrades-in-arms began to accuse Stalin in order to hide his theft of the treasury.
Under Putin, theft of government officials has become the norm. Under Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Putin, the population was falling, factories were crumbling, wars broke out, which claimed many millions of lives. So who is the most criminal Yeltsin, who ruined the Russians, soldered the population, or Stalin, who pursued the criminals?

After Stalin's death, only his old suit and trumpet were discovered in his room. He did not leave any wealth to his children, he lived very modestly, all his time he sacrificed to ordinary people. He sent his 2 sons to war.
Are the current Russian authorities ready to do this? They are ready to dump abroad, steal the treasury

akva
06-13-2020, 01:04 PM
That true, but i see the complete history.

If you see the complete, in that case, the Germans must shut up. No country has yet surpassed Nazi Germany in aggression.

Bender1999
06-13-2020, 01:05 PM
The population of the USSR under Stalin only grew. Under Stalin, thieves were killed quickly, regardless of their political rank. Stalin even accused Zhukov of stealing because he kept German trophy books and jewelry in his barn. His comrades-in-arms began to accuse Stalin in order to hide his theft of the treasury.
Under Putin, theft of government officials has become the norm. Under Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Putin, the population was falling, factories were crumbling, wars broke out, which claimed many millions of lives. So who is the most criminal Yeltsin, who ruined the Russians, soldered the population, or Stalin, who pursued the criminals?

After Stalin's death, only his old suit and trumpet were discovered in his room. He did not leave any wealth to his children, he lived very modestly, all his time he sacrificed to ordinary people. He sent his 2 sons to war.
Are the current Russian authorities ready to do this? They are ready to dump abroad, steal the treasury

Stalin was a asshole, the communist equivalent to hitler.

Blondie
06-13-2020, 01:08 PM
If you see the complete, in that case, the Germans must shut up. No country has yet surpassed Nazi Germany in aggression.

What about your tatar-mongol ancestors who commited global genocide for fun? What these nomads contributed to science, human history? Nothing... pls be quiet...

Bender1999
06-13-2020, 01:10 PM
What about your tatar-mongol ancestors who commited global genocide for fun? What these nomads contributed to science, human history? Nothing... pls be quiet...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

whats about homo sapiens sapiens, who killed the neanderthals? Evil evil homo sapiens sapiens....

Serbian Eagle
06-13-2020, 03:26 PM
https://i.imgur.com/pTEyq7r.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/bht28F4.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/GQVJDrc.png
https://i.imgur.com/pzBUw8n.jpg

NATO AGGRESION ON YUGOSLAVIA 1999, During the 78 days that the NATO aggression on our country lasted, 1,031 members of the army and Serbian police were killed, 5,173 were wounded, and about ten are still listed as missing. As for the civilians, about 6,000 were seriously and lightly wounded, including 2,700 children, and 79 of them were killed.Although they claimed to be targeting only legitimate targets, the NATO bombs also hit the hospital "Dragisa Misovic, the Embassy of the People's Republic of China, a passenger train in Grdelica, the building of the Serbian Radio and Television, where civilians lost their lives, and three-year-old Milica Rakic became a symbol of suffering, a girl who died on a stretcher in her home, from shrapnel bombs that hit Batajnica.

Serbian Eagle
06-13-2020, 03:27 PM
https://i.imgur.com/pTEyq7r.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/bht28F4.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/GQVJDrc.png
https://i.imgur.com/pzBUw8n.jpg


NATO AGGRESION ON YUGOSLAVIA 1999, During the 78 days that the NATO aggression on our country lasted, 1,031 members of the army and Serbian police were killed, 5,173 were wounded, and about ten are still listed as missing. As for the civilians, about 6,000 were seriously and lightly wounded, including 2,700 children, and 79 of them were killed.Although they claimed to be targeting only legitimate targets, the NATO bombs also hit the hospital "Dragisa Misovic, the Embassy of the People's Republic of China, a passenger train in Grdelica, the building of the Serbian Radio and Television, where civilians lost their lives, and three-year-old Milica Rakic became a symbol of suffering, a girl who died on a stretcher in her home, from shrapnel bombs that hit Batajnica.

Rumata
06-13-2020, 04:36 PM
Source is Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Economics_%26_Peace

http://visionofhumanity.org/app/uploads/2020/06/GPI_2020_web.pdf

Really?? The funny thing is you link says this "Institute" collaborates with NATO :thumb001:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Economics_%26_Peace#Partners

And what if that institute was of Bill Gates himself? Why should anyone believe it??

In Russia, the enemies say Ukrainians are the worst of people while in Ukraine they say the same about Russians. The reason for it is obvious. The authorities of both countries don't represent the interests of their peoples at all.

Rumata
06-13-2020, 05:51 PM
Also it ended a war of aggression started by Japan.

Sure you got attacked by Japan. Wasn't it exactly what you wanted imposing sunctions on Japan?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan%E2%80%93United_States_relations#Headed_for_w ar

Rumata
06-13-2020, 06:17 PM
There were no amerindian genocide, they have perished because of wars and european diseases what they immune system didnt know,
When Bill brings you coronavirus don't call it genocide too.


the SovietUnion also attacked free countries like Afghanistan,
Soviet Union supported local communist who could make Afghanistan something like today Tajikistan. Alas you (NATO) won there so now it's an Islamist narco shithole sending refuges around the world so that you could cry about them here.

Roy
06-13-2020, 06:27 PM
Russia. But USA is a close 2nd.

Rumata
06-13-2020, 06:38 PM
What about your tatar-mongol ancestors who commited global genocide for fun? What these nomads contributed to science, human history? Nothing... pls be quiet...

Mongols mass killed civilians to impose horror on the rest. But you Germans always did it for civilised purposes.


Josef Mengele
Josef Mengele ([ˈjoːzɛf ˈmɛŋələ] (About this soundlisten); 16 March 1911 – 7 February 1979), also known as the Angel of Death (German: Todesengel)[1] and the White Angel (German: der Weisse Engel or Weißer Engel),[2] was a German Schutzstaffel (SS) officer and physician during World War II. He is mainly remembered for his actions at the Auschwitz concentration camp, where he performed deadly experiments on prisoners and was a member of the team of doctors who selected victims to be killed in the gas chambers.[a] With Red Army troops sweeping through Poland, Mengele was transferred 280 kilometers (170 mi) from Auschwitz to the Gross-Rosen concentration camp on 17 January 1945, just 10 days before the arrival of the Soviet forces at Auschwitz.

Smeagol
06-13-2020, 06:43 PM
Sure you got attacked by Japan. Wasn't it exactly what you wanted imposing sunctions on Japan?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan%E2%80%93United_States_relations#Headed_for_w ar

That's because they were starting aggressive wars with everyone else in Asia during that time.

Smeagol
06-13-2020, 06:44 PM
Sure you got attacked by Japan. Wasn't it exactly what you wanted imposing sunctions on Japan?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan%E2%80%93United_States_relations#Headed_for_w ar

That's because they were starting aggressive wars with everyone else in Asia during that time.

Rumata
06-13-2020, 06:49 PM
That's because they were starting aggressive wars with everyone else in Asia during that time.

So the fault of Japan was it tried to replace you in that role.

Smeagol
06-13-2020, 06:53 PM
So the fault of Japan was it tried to replace you in that role.

Japan was creating an empire in Asia founded on brutal conquests. We only took the Philippines from Spain and prepared them for independence. Ask the Filipinos whether they were better off under American or Japanese rule.

Blondie
06-13-2020, 06:56 PM
When Bill brings you coronavirus don't call it genocide too.


Soviet Union supported local communist who could make Afghanistan something like today Tajikistan. Alas you (NATO) won there so now it's an Islamist narco shithole sending refuges around the world so that you could cry about them here.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/df/0a/fc/df0afc4b1fc2faa8c4150f572fb5c46c.gif

Ouistreham
06-13-2020, 07:04 PM
Most aggressive countries are presently USA, Israel and Turkey, there can't be any debate about it.

Rumata
06-13-2020, 07:05 PM
Blondie, got too much beer tonight?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFPPuqCWwAIWllC.jpg:large

Rumata
06-13-2020, 07:52 PM
Japan was creating an empire in Asia founded on brutal conquests. We only took the Philippines from Spain and prepared them for independence. Ask the Filipinos whether they were better off under American or Japanese rule.

All the "independences" when controlled undercover are totally fake anyway. The modern vaccination hysteria is an exelent proof. Almost all the world government went insane at once all of a sudden (as it may seem).

Concerning USA, it waged its wars in Asia right after Japan was defeated: in Korea and Vietnam. USA was too late for China this time, so no Opium War (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars) with millions of crippled victims happened there that time.

While your future NATO allies ravaged in Indonesia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indonesian_National_Revolution

Smeagol
06-13-2020, 07:57 PM
Concerning USA, it waged its wars in Asia right after Japan was defeated: in Korea

South Korea should be glad we did so. That was a war started started by communist aggressors. Stalin gave North Korea his blessing to attack the south.

Blondie
06-13-2020, 10:13 PM
Blondie, got too much beer tonight?

It seems to me the crocodile drug damaged your commie brain.

Faklon
06-14-2020, 02:13 AM
Global Peace Index should take into account that you have nasty neighbours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Peace_Index

Otherwise, you are free to believe that half of Africa is more peaceful than South Korea, Greece or the US.

sean
06-14-2020, 02:14 AM
NATO AGGRESION ON YUGOSLAVIA 1999, During the 78 days that the NATO aggression on our country lasted, 1,031 members of the army and Serbian police were killed, 5,173 were wounded, and about ten are still listed as missing. As for the civilians, about 6,000 were seriously and lightly wounded, including 2,700 children, and 79 of them were killed.Although they claimed to be targeting only legitimate targets, the NATO bombs also hit the hospital "Dragisa Misovic, the Embassy of the People's Republic of China, a passenger train in Grdelica, the building of the Serbian Radio and Television, where civilians lost their lives, and three-year-old Milica Rakic became a symbol of suffering, a girl who died on a stretcher in her home, from shrapnel bombs that hit Batajnica.

https://i.imgur.com/GJQ0huI.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/oLkptwq.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/XyzcLcc.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/NWNRCU0.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/c1BAR7Z.jpg

Rumata
06-14-2020, 02:51 AM
It seems to me the crocodile drug damaged your commie brain.

I'm not a party person and I've never tried that kind of stuff. You must be confusing me with somebody else. Stop drinking, you still can get better than this some day.

Tauromachos
06-14-2020, 02:58 AM
Sean being from America one more reason for me to consider America one of the most agressive or even the most
agressive country

Serbian Eagle
06-14-2020, 08:04 AM
https://i.imgur.com/GJQ0huI.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/oLkptwq.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/XyzcLcc.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/NWNRCU0.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/c1BAR7Z.jpg

Did you hear for the Albanian KLA terrorists that you first declared them as terrorist organization and then as the liberators, did you hear how they took organs from Serb civilians in the Zuta Kuca and sold them all over Europe? How many Serbs today in 21. century still suffer violence in Kosovo by Albanians. And now find me an excuse to bomb Schools, Hospitals, Maternity Hospitals, Kindergartens. what does that have to do with any war, any president, any millitary? You used depleted uranium, because of which Serbia still has consequences. Your country only wanted profit from Kosovo and Metohija.

Serbian Eagle
06-14-2020, 08:07 AM
That is "Zuta Kuca" place were Albanians removed organs from Serbs. Your country has a lot of documents about it but it keeps and hides them.
https://www.ekspres.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/26/733029_zuta-kuca-majkl-montgomeri_ls.jpg

Serbian Eagle
06-14-2020, 08:11 AM
https://www.srbijadanas.com/sites/default/files/styles/full_article_image/public/a/t/2015/03/24/profimedia-0087096466.jpg
https://www.novosti.rs/upload/images/2018//05/16n/02-uranijum%20(4).jpg
https://www.novosti.rs/upload/thumbs/images/2017//05/27/novine/15-macak_620x0.jpg
Look what you done to RTS building, there were people inside, and they were all killed during the bombing! LINKhttps://www.rtrs.tv/_FOTO/nwz/0571/057135.jpg

Decius
06-14-2020, 08:16 AM
Wheres the US?

Serbian Eagle
06-14-2020, 08:33 AM
Wheres the US?

NATO / USA is the same thing, most of the Americans were on the planes that bombed Yugoslavia.

akva
06-14-2020, 08:43 AM
Very logical article. They added Libya but didn’t add the USA who destroyed this country.

https://cs5.pikabu.ru/post_img/2015/12/20/9/1450620129287141946.jpg

Serbian Eagle
06-14-2020, 08:46 AM
Very logical article. They added Libya but didn’t add the USA who destroyed this country.

https://cs5.pikabu.ru/post_img/2015/12/20/9/1450620129287141946.jpg

Whichever state gets a "defense" from the USA's goverment it ends that way.

sean
06-14-2020, 01:10 PM
Did you hear for the Albanian KLA terrorists that you first declared them as terrorist organization and then as the liberators, did you hear how they took organs from Serb civilians in the Zuta Kuca and sold them all over Europe? How many Serbs today in 21. century still suffer violence in Kosovo by Albanians. And now find me an excuse to bomb Schools, Hospitals, Maternity Hospitals, Kindergartens. what does that have to do with any war, any president, any millitary? You used depleted uranium, because of which Serbia still has consequences. Your country only wanted profit from Kosovo and Metohija.

I am not American and I don't give a fuck about your kind so I will make it simple.

The United States secretly gave Yugoslavia generous loans in an effort to get Marshal Tito to at the very least secretly be on the side of the West throughout the Cold War. Later on, it was not enough for Yugoslavia to be nominally neutral.

By the 1980's, the US Congress was writing financial aid packages for Yugoslavia requiring that, if Yugoslavia was to receive aid, the individual republics would have to ask separately, independent from the government based in Belgrade.

Serbian forces attacked Slovenia and Croatia well before Bosnia. They committed abhorrent atrocities and crimes all around the former Yugoslavia irrespective of their foes religion or creed.

The KLA only formed after 1995 Dayton Agreement, and Albanians of Kosovo weren't mentioned even once in the Dayton Agreement, it wasn't until 1999 that US truly got involved, even then it was too late and destructive. European countries of NATO helped bomb Serbia to stop the aggression on Bosnia.

NATO didn't do the fighting for Albanians, otherwise Albanians wouldn't have suffered 1500 casualties, it was a war between the KLA with air support from NATO vs the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

Both sides were performing nasty things on each other, first police force, then general population, leading up to NATO entry. For NATO to smash Serbia on the pretext of human rights after Milosovic basically walked out of Rambouillet Agreement was justified to them, but equally so, they should have also smashed the KLA. But they didn't know what the KLA was doing/did at the time.

Also neither of the KLA crimes have actually been proven, so your point is moot. Even if KLA did its fair share in rebelling and invasion, the US just so happened to intervene and pick the side of the Albanians. Perhaps it can be argued that the war was unfair in the sense that NATO had more power than Serbia's army, but all that matters is that Albanians won and you did not. That's how war is and that's how it will always be, no military group will send equal numbers in the name of fairness.

Serbian Eagle
06-14-2020, 01:43 PM
Yugoslavia defended its own people and own territorial integrity, there were crimes from all sides, don't just attribute it to the Serbs, that lie doesn't work here. The war in Bosnia had nothing to do with the Aggressive bombing on Yugoslavia in 1999. The Albanians declared war on Yugoslavia as "KLA" with their terrorist attacks, not the Serbs on them. The KLA did massacres on Serbs, none of them were held criminally responsible for the war crimes, they even killed Albanians. And don't forget that in the beginning NATO and USA recognize KLA as terrorist organisation, and when they learned that there is a Trepca mine in SAP Kosovo and Metohija, they began to support them, because they wanted profit from Trepca, NATO bombed Yugoslavia without UN approval and with depleted uranium. And you forgot about United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 and then Kosovo has declared independence illegally and violated the resolution 1244. We all see that NATO does not care about peace and stability, that organisation care about profit and influence in the world. You people from Canada have never gone through the hell of the Bombing in 20. Century so you will never ever understand that feel. The feeling when you are thinking at any moment whether your children are there in the basement, as soon as you fall asleep, you are awakened by an alarm siren or a bomb. North Atlantic Terrorist Organisation.

Götterfunke
06-15-2020, 09:29 AM
Definitely related to the higher amounts of the low-activity form of MAO-A aka. "the warrior gene" in the Middle East and Africa.

Lioncourt
06-15-2020, 09:30 AM
USA is the most aggressive country. It is worth waiting for an attack on any state from it. Naturally, this will be presented as a struggle for the establishment of democracy, for the preservation of human rights.

All imperialists have an excuse. American is democracy, Russian is "saving the opressed brothers" who ironically used to be the richest in Ukraine.

I personally prefer to be touched by American imperialism. Puerto Rico is doing a bit better than Belarus.

Rumata
06-15-2020, 11:26 AM
If you have to accept any unknown shit injected in your vene, it doesn't really matter if you had used to be a bit better or a bit worse off before.

At this time it's not countries that are the most aggressive. It's the international group of people that is up to having most of people altered and totally controlled. In USA, Russia and elsewhere.

KirillMazur
06-15-2020, 02:38 PM
NATO aggression doesn't count as such as it's there to bring slavery peace and democracy to the world.
Yes, I have already described this mechanism in brief (https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?224411-Communist-architectural-wonders&p=6555899&viewfull=1#post6555899).

If you have to accept any unknown shit injected in your vene, it doesn't really matter if you had used to be a bit better or a bit worse off before.

At this time it's not countries that are the most aggressive. It's the international group of people that is up to having most of people altered and totally controlled. In USA, Russia and elsewhere.
That's right, if you imagine our planet as a whole enterprise, then individual countries are blocks of shares of various sizes in the hands of the ruling clans, and a separate clan can even own parts of the state. For example, America - conditionally 50% Dems, 50 Resp. In Russia, too, for example, the media and foreign policy are indisputably controlled by different clans.
Two countries could be fierce enemies, but if at the moment they are controlled by one clan, then these will be best friends.

pulstar
06-15-2020, 02:43 PM
Agressive in what way? Foreign politics or the way they treat immigrants?

Rocinante
06-15-2020, 02:44 PM
Russia, U.S.A., Turkey, Iran and North Korea.

Westbrook
06-15-2020, 02:54 PM
How are your beaches? What's your oil situation?


Asking for a friend.




I personally prefer to be touched by American imperialism. Puerto Rico is doing a bit better than Belarus.

Rumata
06-15-2020, 07:03 PM
Two countries could be fierce enemies, but if at the moment they are controlled by one clan, then these will be best friends.

Don't you think that a clan controlling two countries could benefit more from making the population of both countries be hostile to each other? So that instead of taking care of the internal enemy the population would direct all the energy outwards while deeming their rulers as a part of them (of that population)?

The rampantly anti-Russian former leader of Ukraine Poroshenko always had business (Roshen) in Russia bringing him money. And I'm sure that it's only the top of the iceberg of similar cases.

Bender1999
06-15-2020, 09:26 PM
Did someone write Shitty Arabia? Maybe One of the most aggressive..

Nykyus
06-16-2020, 08:44 AM
Russia, U.S.A., Turkey, Iran and North Korea.

Strange, but I don’t know any country attacked by Iran or North Korea. Maybe, you know?

renaissance12
06-16-2020, 09:04 AM
USA = CIA

Arap Cumali
06-16-2020, 10:16 PM
1.Adana
2.Russia
3.Turkey
4.Usa
5.Latin Americans

Bender1999
06-16-2020, 10:17 PM
Adana,

lol

KirillMazur
06-17-2020, 01:37 PM
Don't you think that a clan controlling two countries could benefit more from making the population of both countries be hostile to each other? So that instead of taking care of the internal enemy the population would direct all the energy outwards while deeming their rulers as a part of them (of that population)?

The rampantly anti-Russian former leader of Ukraine Poroshenko always had business (Roshen) in Russia bringing him money. And I'm sure that it's only the top of the iceberg of similar cases.
No sane clan will wage war between its own assets (countries), undermining its own position.
Poroshenko is a Rothschild man.
https://finance.liga.net/ekonomika/novosti/poroshenko-poluchil-esche-polmilliarda-griven-ot-rothschild-trust
With the advent of Putin, the influence of the Rothschilds in Russia gradually decreases (Soros, Gusinsky, Berezovsky, Khodorkovsky, etc.) and is now insignificant. Naturally, no one will allow Poroshenko to conduct business in Russia anymore, as his clan lost in Russia. And in Ukraine, they are still strong. In Ukraine there is now a full-fledged clan war.
I should write about the clan management of the world later, but now I don't have enough time.

Rumata
06-17-2020, 07:06 PM
No sane clan will wage war between its own assets (countries), undermining its own position.
Poroshenko is a Rothschild man.
https://finance.liga.net/ekonomika/novosti/poroshenko-poluchil-esche-polmilliarda-griven-ot-rothschild-trust
With the advent of Putin, the influence of the Rothschilds in Russia gradually decreases (Soros, Gusinsky, Berezovsky, Khodorkovsky, etc.) and is now insignificant. Naturally, no one will allow Poroshenko to conduct business in Russia anymore, as his clan lost in Russia. And in Ukraine, they are still strong. In Ukraine there is now a full-fledged clan war.
I should write about the clan management of the world later, but now I don't have enough time.

OK, the factory of Roshen in Lipetsk Russia was closed in 2017.

Idk what exactly is the clan ruling kremplin but the uniformity of the reaction of world's governments to the corona is utterly disturbing.