Rethel
01-14-2021, 09:04 PM
Sorry, but I am proved right again, not the first time, but this is probably the hugest one.
As I was suggested many times, WHGs had to have at least EHG admixture (for the eyes'
colour, which happend to occure at the end of WHG "independent" existance) or be a mix
between EHG and some unnamed population (the original the the-C-&-I-pre-whg) as the
admixture analysis suggested such similarity and possibility.
And finally I find the scientific proof for that!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5003663/
"and WHG are a mix of EHG and the Upper Paleolithic Bichon from Switzerland"
And in the supplement:
"Eastern Eurasians have admixture from a population related to the EHG. In Supplementary Information, section 7 we showed that the WHG could be modeled as a mixture of EHG and Switzerland_HG. Discovering this admixture was possible by the availability of the Bichon (Switzerland_HG) individual."
(...)
We model WHG as a mix of Switzerland_HG and a population A (Table S7.24). Remarkably while all triples (WHG, Switzerland_HG, A) are consistent with only two streams of ancestry, only for a subset of them is WHG modeled as a mix of Switzerland_HG and A with a feasible (≤1) proportion of ancestry from Switzerland_HG. This subset includes only populations with EHG ancestry. We verify visually that WHG can be modeled as EHG+Switzerland_HG by plotting statistics of the form f4(WHG, EHG; O2, O3) vs. f4(WHG, Switzerland_HG; O2, O3) for all pairs (O2, O3) of the outgroups. Such statistics (see ref. 1) are anti-correlated and form a line through the origin when WHG is a mix of EHG and Switzerland_HG (Fig. S7.20). Direct evidence for admixture in WHG is provided by the negative f3(WHG; Switzerland_HG, EHG) =-0.01635 (Z=-7.5).
The modeling of ref. 1 made it unclear whether WHG was an admixed population or not (it was determined that at least one of WHG, EHG, MA1 must be). By making use of Switzerland_HG we can now determine that at least WHG is admixed.
(...)
We withhold WHG and re-estimate mixture proportions. We also estimate the mixture proportion of Europe_MNChL by making use of the fact that WHG can be modeled as a mixture of Switzerland_HG and EHG.
(...)
Thus, mixture proportions from “Ghost EHG” are within ~8% of those from actual EHG. Note the successful modeling of Steppe_EMBA when using the Switzerland_HG→WHG cline to infer the “Ghost EHG”: since WHG has mostly Switzerland_HG ancestry, this involves projection well beyond the (Switzerland_HG, WHG) segment
So, I was proved right claiming:
- that R1b (as whole R1) is IE;
- that Rh- was originaly IE;
- that fair complexion was originally IE;
- that N wasn't white and european originaly;
- that EHG = IE = R1;
- that pre-IE western, southern and northern populations of Europe couldn't be fair and pale;
- that Yamnayans are not the only IEs or R1 source at it's time => Yamnaya ≠ onlyIEs;
- and now that WHG had EHG admixture or was a hybrid of EHG and something else;
- and that proves also inevitably, that ANE = EHG+AmInd, ergo = castizo, as I always am saying.
So, you can still be laughing if you want, but the truth will remain as she is,
and will come out sooner or later, regardless of any wishfull thinking agenda.
As I was suggested many times, WHGs had to have at least EHG admixture (for the eyes'
colour, which happend to occure at the end of WHG "independent" existance) or be a mix
between EHG and some unnamed population (the original the the-C-&-I-pre-whg) as the
admixture analysis suggested such similarity and possibility.
And finally I find the scientific proof for that!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5003663/
"and WHG are a mix of EHG and the Upper Paleolithic Bichon from Switzerland"
And in the supplement:
"Eastern Eurasians have admixture from a population related to the EHG. In Supplementary Information, section 7 we showed that the WHG could be modeled as a mixture of EHG and Switzerland_HG. Discovering this admixture was possible by the availability of the Bichon (Switzerland_HG) individual."
(...)
We model WHG as a mix of Switzerland_HG and a population A (Table S7.24). Remarkably while all triples (WHG, Switzerland_HG, A) are consistent with only two streams of ancestry, only for a subset of them is WHG modeled as a mix of Switzerland_HG and A with a feasible (≤1) proportion of ancestry from Switzerland_HG. This subset includes only populations with EHG ancestry. We verify visually that WHG can be modeled as EHG+Switzerland_HG by plotting statistics of the form f4(WHG, EHG; O2, O3) vs. f4(WHG, Switzerland_HG; O2, O3) for all pairs (O2, O3) of the outgroups. Such statistics (see ref. 1) are anti-correlated and form a line through the origin when WHG is a mix of EHG and Switzerland_HG (Fig. S7.20). Direct evidence for admixture in WHG is provided by the negative f3(WHG; Switzerland_HG, EHG) =-0.01635 (Z=-7.5).
The modeling of ref. 1 made it unclear whether WHG was an admixed population or not (it was determined that at least one of WHG, EHG, MA1 must be). By making use of Switzerland_HG we can now determine that at least WHG is admixed.
(...)
We withhold WHG and re-estimate mixture proportions. We also estimate the mixture proportion of Europe_MNChL by making use of the fact that WHG can be modeled as a mixture of Switzerland_HG and EHG.
(...)
Thus, mixture proportions from “Ghost EHG” are within ~8% of those from actual EHG. Note the successful modeling of Steppe_EMBA when using the Switzerland_HG→WHG cline to infer the “Ghost EHG”: since WHG has mostly Switzerland_HG ancestry, this involves projection well beyond the (Switzerland_HG, WHG) segment
So, I was proved right claiming:
- that R1b (as whole R1) is IE;
- that Rh- was originaly IE;
- that fair complexion was originally IE;
- that N wasn't white and european originaly;
- that EHG = IE = R1;
- that pre-IE western, southern and northern populations of Europe couldn't be fair and pale;
- that Yamnayans are not the only IEs or R1 source at it's time => Yamnaya ≠ onlyIEs;
- and now that WHG had EHG admixture or was a hybrid of EHG and something else;
- and that proves also inevitably, that ANE = EHG+AmInd, ergo = castizo, as I always am saying.
So, you can still be laughing if you want, but the truth will remain as she is,
and will come out sooner or later, regardless of any wishfull thinking agenda.