Rethel
01-23-2021, 08:09 AM
Something what was never ever said about Gengis' provenance is the fact that Temujin's provenance was from... Tibet (sic!)
In this case proposed O hg has much more sense, and is yet another nail to the coffin of the dumbest commercial C proposal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tengri_Tribe
Temujin was a Borjin, BUT Borjins weren't fatherless (as is claimed), but descent from Tengris and these from tibetan Yarlungs.
So the problem now is what haplogroup had Yarlungs and what was their provenance. If it was local, then the lastly proposed
hg O has sense (theoretically can be D) if Gengis' brother's descendants have correct hg, and if Tołuy was Gengis' son indeed.
If family was not local, but came f.e. from India or from the steppe or Tarim, then there we have totaly different opportunities.
But at now, what is known to me, is, that they were locals. It doesnt resovle the mistery yet, but gives a totaly different look
on, who the Gengis was, and what was his provenance. And surely makes from these stupid scientists who promoted idea that
he was C-guy, the dumbest from the dumb, as they did not even try to check his genealogy, neither close one, the Borjin-one,
neither the deeper, as I did now. And there is still a lot of people who belive this lie, or were even told, that they are the GKh's
descendants, becasue they have C2 hg - they were lied by genetics and scentists even before the camera directly in the face.
In this case proposed O hg has much more sense, and is yet another nail to the coffin of the dumbest commercial C proposal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tengri_Tribe
Temujin was a Borjin, BUT Borjins weren't fatherless (as is claimed), but descent from Tengris and these from tibetan Yarlungs.
So the problem now is what haplogroup had Yarlungs and what was their provenance. If it was local, then the lastly proposed
hg O has sense (theoretically can be D) if Gengis' brother's descendants have correct hg, and if Tołuy was Gengis' son indeed.
If family was not local, but came f.e. from India or from the steppe or Tarim, then there we have totaly different opportunities.
But at now, what is known to me, is, that they were locals. It doesnt resovle the mistery yet, but gives a totaly different look
on, who the Gengis was, and what was his provenance. And surely makes from these stupid scientists who promoted idea that
he was C-guy, the dumbest from the dumb, as they did not even try to check his genealogy, neither close one, the Borjin-one,
neither the deeper, as I did now. And there is still a lot of people who belive this lie, or were even told, that they are the GKh's
descendants, becasue they have C2 hg - they were lied by genetics and scentists even before the camera directly in the face.