YourDNAPortal vs G25

[JamesBond007]

YourDNAPortal is better than G25 IMHO :

G25 :

Target: KevinG_scaled
Distance: 1.9624% / 0.01962356
42.8 England_IA (Welsh or Celtic Britons)
32.0 ISL_Viking_Age_Pre_Christian (Icelandic Viking)
25.2 SVK_Poprad_MA( Deutschendorf German from Slovakia?)

Third Oracle Run YourDNAportal :

Celtic_Briton : 40%

Germanic_Suebi : 30%

Anglo-Saxon : 10%

Gaul_Santones : 10%

Viking_Sweden_Malmo : 10%

^G25 is similar but YourDNAPortal is just better

G25 :

Target: Kevin_scaled
Distance: 2.5054% / 0.02505408 | R4P
65.2 Scandanavian:Norwegian
16.6 Iberia:Spanish_Soria
16.0 West_and_Central_Europe: Dutch
2.2 Central_Asia:Punjabi_Jatt

YourDNAportal :

Wales : 50%
Wales (Welsh: Cymru [ˈkəm.rɨ] KUM-ree) is a country that is part of the United Kingdom. It is bordered by England to the east, the Irish Sea to the north and west, and the Bristol Channel to the south.

Scotland
Scotland : 25%
Scotland (Scots: Scotland, Scottish Gaelic: Alba [ˈal̪ˠapə] ) is a country that is part of the United Kingdom. Covering the northern third of the island of Great Britain, mainland Scotland has a 96-mile (154 km) border with England to the southeast and is otherwise surrounded by the Atlantic Ocean to the north and west, the North Sea to the northeast and the Irish Sea to the south. The country also contains more than 790 islands, principally in the archipelagos of the Hebrides and the Northern Isles. Most of the population, including the capital Edinburgh, is concentrated in the Central Belt – the plain between the Scottish Highlands and the Southern Uplands – in the Scottish Lowlands.

Norway
Norway : 12.5%
Norway (Bokmål:Norge; Nynorsk:Noreg; Northern Sami: Norga; Lule Sami: Vuodna; Southern Sami: Nöörje), officially the Kingdom of Norway, is a Nordic country in Northern Europe whose mainland territory comprises the western and northernmost portion of the Scandinavian Peninsula. The remote Arctic island of Jan Mayen and the archipelago of Svalbard also form part of Norway. Bouvet Island, located in the Subantarctic, is a dependency of Norway; it also lays claims to the Antarctic territories of Peter I Island and Queen Maud Land.

Thuringia
Thuringia : 12.5%
Thuringia (English: /θəˈrɪndʒiə/; German: Thüringen [ˈtyːʁɪŋən] ), officially the Free State of Thuringia (Freistaat Thüringen [ˈfʁaɪʃtaːt ˈtyːʁɪŋən]), is a state of Germany. In central Germany, it covers 16,171 square kilometres (6,244 sq mi), being the sixth smallest of the sixteen German States (including City States).

G25 (not a perfect 50/50 split no time for that)

Target: Kevin_scaled
Distance: 2.5841% / 0.02584149 | R2P
82.0 Scandanavian:Norwegian
18.0 Iberia:Spanish_Soria

YourDNAPortal :

Friesland : 50%
Friesland (/ˈfriːzlənd/ FREEZ-lənd, also US: /-lænd/ -⁠land, Dutch: [ˈfrislɑnt] ; official West Frisian: Fryslân, [frislɔ̃ːn] ), historically known as Frisia, is a province of the Netherlands located in the northern part of the country. It is situated west of Groningen, northwest of Drenthe and Overijssel, north of Flevoland, northeast of North Holland, and south of the Wadden Sea.

Wales
Wales : 50%
Wales (Welsh: Cymru [ˈkəm.rɨ] KUM-ree) is a country that is part of the United Kingdom. It is bordered by England to the east, the Irish Sea to the north and west, and the Bristol Channel to the south.

[JamesBond007]

I have been saying that G25 is mentally retarded Polack science for a while but nobody wanted to believe me :

Polack slavic(slave) negro science :


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vQaVIoEjOM

[Grace O'Malley]

All these ancient calculators give me similar results whether it is G25, MyTrueAncestry or yourDNAportal. They all give me significant Germanic and while I think I do have some input from Germanic groups I believe I'm overwhelmingly of Gaelic stock. The problem though is that these populations are similar and you most probably need something more refined than a calculator to tease these things apart. There is also the problem of not having enough Gaelic samples. There are only some from the Viking paper and the Icelandic study but not enough.

Using your samples for G25


England_IA,0.1317503,0.1307495,0.0601505,0.0480462 ,0.0350832,0.0201498,0.0048175,0.0036922,0.0042438 ,0.0041915,-0.0044248,0.0057322,-0.0105175,-0.018476,0.0180167,0.0100438,0.001206,-6.33e-05,0.0033312,0.003908,0.0038995,0.000247,-0.0012018,0.0114172,0.0004493
ISL_Viking_Age_Pre_Christian,0.1281142,0.1294236,0 .0681749,0.0618366,0.0366562,0.0195534,0.0069459,0 .0088458,0.0002728,-0.0021463,-0.0048718,0.009608,-0.0101914,-0.0155362,0.0242939,0.0120656,0.0019703,0.0065033, 0.002947,0.0051831,0.0056566,0.004053,0.0024102,0. 0136563,0.0015302
SVK_Poprad_MA,0.124067,0.135065,0.059585,0.043282, 0.041238,0.017291,-0.001175,0.002769,0.002659,-0.00328,-0.003248,0.007044,-0.012487,-0.006606,0.0057,0.020154,0.002217,0.000127,-0.000377,-0.00075,-0.00287,0.004081,0.000986,0.021328,0.000599

This is what I get

Target: Grace_scaled
Distance: 2.4165% / 0.02416451
63.6 England_IA
36.4 ISL_Viking_Age_Pre_Christian

Distance to: Grace_scaled
0.02552519 England_IA
0.02809987 ISL_Viking_Age_Pre_Christian
0.04084480 SVK_Poprad_MA

G25 using all Modern Averaged populations

Target: Gracie_scaled
Distance: 1.6904% / 0.01690364
53.6 Irish
38.0 Icelandic
6.6 Swedish
0.8 Welsh
0.6 Darginian
0.4 French_Pas-de-Calais


With DNA Portal on the main oracle run this is my result with Eurasia Ancient

Viking_Sigtuna : 36%
Gaul_Redones : 26.5%
Germanic_Suebi : 18.5%
Anglo-Saxon : 8.5%
Celtic_Briton : 8.5%
Tatar_Russia : 1.5%

With Modern Origins Main Oracle

Norway : 50.5%
Scotland : 24.5%
Ireland : 22.5%
Russia_Alania : 2%

Pangea Ancient

Viking_Dane : 33%
Celtic_Orkney : 28%
Anglo-Saxon : 22.5%
Hallstatt_Celt : 13.5%
North_Caucasus : 2.5%

Pangea Modern Origins Main Oracle

Ireland : 38%
England : 37%
North_Sea : 21%
Alania : 2%
Sweden : 2%

They all seem pretty consistent really. A bit Isles, some Scandinavian, some Continental Celt and some Caucasus. I would love if there was some test in the future that could do what 23&Me or Ancestry does but with deep ancestry. I think a lot of Europeans and other populations would be interested in that.

[J.S.]

There is also the problem of not having enough Gaelic samples.

As far as i am concerned, i would rather say "Gallic samples". Also, French modern panel is quite poor.

[Grace O'Malley]

As far as i am concerned, i would rather say "Gallic samples". Also, French modern panel is quite poor.

Yes Gallic would be for French but I'm meaning Gaelic i.e. Irish, Scots samples. Yes I hope we get more samples from France i.e. Gauls would be great. :thumb001:

[JamesBond007]

All these ancient calculators give me similar results whether it is G25, MyTrueAncestry or yourDNAportal. They all give me significant Germanic and while I think I do have some input from Germanic groups I believe I'm overwhelmingly of Gaelic stock. The problem though is that these populations are similar and you most probably need something more refined than a calculator to tease these things apart. There is also the problem of not having enough Gaelic samples. There are only some from the Viking paper and the Icelandic study but not enough.

Using your samples for G25


England_IA,0.1317503,0.1307495,0.0601505,0.0480462 ,0.0350832,0.0201498,0.0048175,0.0036922,0.0042438 ,0.0041915,-0.0044248,0.0057322,-0.0105175,-0.018476,0.0180167,0.0100438,0.001206,-6.33e-05,0.0033312,0.003908,0.0038995,0.000247,-0.0012018,0.0114172,0.0004493
ISL_Viking_Age_Pre_Christian,0.1281142,0.1294236,0 .0681749,0.0618366,0.0366562,0.0195534,0.0069459,0 .0088458,0.0002728,-0.0021463,-0.0048718,0.009608,-0.0101914,-0.0155362,0.0242939,0.0120656,0.0019703,0.0065033, 0.002947,0.0051831,0.0056566,0.004053,0.0024102,0. 0136563,0.0015302
SVK_Poprad_MA,0.124067,0.135065,0.059585,0.043282, 0.041238,0.017291,-0.001175,0.002769,0.002659,-0.00328,-0.003248,0.007044,-0.012487,-0.006606,0.0057,0.020154,0.002217,0.000127,-0.000377,-0.00075,-0.00287,0.004081,0.000986,0.021328,0.000599

This is what I get

Target: Grace_scaled
Distance: 2.4165% / 0.02416451
63.6 England_IA
36.4 ISL_Viking_Age_Pre_Christian

Distance to: Grace_scaled
0.02552519 England_IA
0.02809987 ISL_Viking_Age_Pre_Christian
0.04084480 SVK_Poprad_MA

G25 using all Modern Averaged populations

Target: Gracie_scaled
Distance: 1.6904% / 0.01690364
53.6 Irish
38.0 Icelandic
6.6 Swedish
0.8 Welsh
0.6 Darginian
0.4 French_Pas-de-Calais


With DNA Portal on the main oracle run this is my result with Eurasia Ancient

Viking_Sigtuna : 36%
Gaul_Redones : 26.5%
Germanic_Suebi : 18.5%
Anglo-Saxon : 8.5%
Celtic_Briton : 8.5%
Tatar_Russia : 1.5%

With Modern Origins Main Oracle

Norway : 50.5%
Scotland : 24.5%
Ireland : 22.5%
Russia_Alania : 2%

Pangea Ancient

Viking_Dane : 33%
Celtic_Orkney : 28%
Anglo-Saxon : 22.5%
Hallstatt_Celt : 13.5%
North_Caucasus : 2.5%

Pangea Modern Origins Main Oracle

Ireland : 38%
England : 37%
North_Sea : 21%
Alania : 2%
Sweden : 2%

They all seem pretty consistent really. A bit Isles, some Scandinavian, some Continental Celt and some Caucasus. I would love if there was some test in the future that could do what 23&Me or Ancestry does but with deep ancestry. I think a lot of Europeans and other populations would be interested in that.

Thanks for the reply. You might be mostly Gaelic but you can't go by paper trail. My grandfather said he was Irish from Donegal but looked WASPy in the Scottish sense . My grandmother identified as English but looked significantly Brittonic influenced ( can still be English) and my other grandfather swore he was Irish looked Welsh more than anything else.

I think people are too stuck on paper trails and preconceived notions. My other grandmother was from Alsace-Lorraine and Suebian thuringia make more sense than Slovakian German I.E POPRAD.

G25 does not do too bad on the ancients but is still too fine grained and for modern populations it is extremely too fine grained in my opinion.

G25 ancient gives me about 42% Brittonic but the modern splits me up into Norwegian, Spanish and Dutch with no Welsh , Cornish, or Breton in the breakdown which is just ridiculously inconsistent and stupid IMO.

[J.S.]

Yes Gallic would be for French but I'm meaning Gaelic i.e. Irish, Scots samples. Yes I hope we get more samples from France i.e. Gauls would be great. :thumb001:

To be fair, i can't complain to much about G25 and Eurogenes calculators in general; they are pretty accurate for me, but the lack of French reference samples, especially the Modern ones from Normandy and Western France, give some biased results with much further Northern components.
DNA Portal also, probably for the same reason, with Orkney, England and Ireland.

[Grace O'Malley]

Thanks for the reply. You might be mostly Gaelic but you can't go by paper trail. My grandfather said he was Irish from Donegal but looked WASPy in the Scottish sense . My grandmother identified as English but looked significantly Brittonic influenced ( can still be English) and other grandfather swore he was Irish looked Welsh more than anything else.

I think people too stuck paper trails and preconceived notions. My other grandmother was from Alsace-Lorraine and Suebian thuringia make more sense Slovakian German I.E POPRAD.

G25 does not do too bad on the ancients but is still too fine grained and for modern populations it is extremely too fine grained in my opinion.

G25 ancient gives me about 42% Brittonic but the modern splits me up into Norwegian, Spanish and Dutch with no Welsh , Cornish, or Breton in the breakdown which is just ridiculously inconsistent and stupid IMO.

Yes I agree you can't go by paper trail. I have some non-Irish names in my family tree i.e. Scots, English and Norman surnames. I do think all the Isles populations have input from each other and outside sources such as Normans, Vikings etc. English having the most but people have some odd idea that the Irish are pure unadulterated Celts. This does not tie in with history or genetics.

I think you have to look at population similarity i.e. if you get Scottish instead of Irish or Welsh and if you get Danish instead of Norwegian etc. Bretons also have similarity to Welsh/Cornish groups so on calculators you can get similar populations as a sort of proxy. It is interesting that you get the Propad sample and have German ancestry so that shows that it does work. I have no German at all so that makes sense only getting an Isles and Scandinavian result. We are learning all the time. :)

[JamesBond007]

Yes I agree you can't go by paper trail. I have some non-Irish names in my family tree i.e. Scots, English and Norman surnames. I do think all the Isles populations have input from each other and outside sources such as Normans, Vikings etc. English having the most but people have some odd idea that the Irish are pure unadulterated Celts. This does not tie in with history or genetics.

I think you have to look at population similarity i.e. if you get Scottish instead of Irish or Welsh and if you get Danish instead of Norwegian etc. Bretons also have similarity to Welsh/Cornish groups so on calculators you can get similar populations as a sort of proxy. It is interesting that you get the Propad sample and have German ancestry so that shows that it does work. I have no German at all so that makes sense only getting an Isles and Scandinavian result. We are learning all the time. :)

I dunno, I am kind of Amazed at YourDNAportals results compared to AncestryDNA in particular. I swear companies such as AncestryDNA and LivingDNA can skew the results based on clues such as your name. To be fair G25 did a decent job on my Iron age + medieval age modelling of my ancestry but YourDNAPortal was just better for me

Meanwhile ancestryDNA is saying I am 53% Irish instead of say Welsh and I think they are doing that based on my Irish name (precocncieved notion) and weasel stuff (cambro-normans in Ireland).

G25 and YourDNAPortal agree I am about 40% British P Celtic rather than Q Celtic Gaelic. I think I might delete my AncestryDNA account because of that.

[JamesBond007]

To be fair, i can't complain to much about G25 and Eurogenes calculators in general; they are pretty accurate for me, but the lack of French reference samples, especially the Modern ones from Normandy and Western France, give some biased results with much further Northern components.
DNA Portal also, probably for the same reason, with Orkney, England and Ireland.

K13 says I am Irish, K15 English and G25 Dutch --that is too much Polack mental retardedness for me to take.
Scottish, English and Dutch single results would not have been mentally retarded but still disappointing.

[Grace O'Malley]

I dunno, I am kind of Amazed at YourDNAportals results compared to AncestryDNA in particular. I swear companies such as AncestryDNA and LivingDNA can skew the results based on clues such as your name. To be fair G25 did a decent job on my Iron age + medieval age modelling of my ancestry but YourDNAPortal was just better for me

Meanwhile ancestryDNA is saying I am 53% Irish instead of say Welsh and I think they are doing that based on my Irish name (precocncieved notion) and weasel stuff (cambro-normans in Ireland).

G25 and YourDNAPortal agree I am about 40% British P Celtic rather than Q Celtic Gaelic. I think I might delete my AncestryDNA account because of that.

Companies like Ancestry and 23&Me look at long strands of dna and have a population panel of people with long term ancestry in a country so their aim is to look at recent ancestry. They also use IBD and trees (i.e. Ancestry) for their Genetic Communities and these are very accurate. Short strands of dna have to be used to look at more ancient ancestry. I presume it would be possible with ancient genomes to find living ancestors? (Can that be done?) That would be great if that could be done. I think only 6 generations back can be used for relatives. I presume with someone from about 1,000 years ago it wouldn't be possible to get direct ancestry unless from mtdna and ydna. Can anyone clarify?

Do you have actual Welsh ancestry or Irish? I was under the impression that you have Irish ancestry but would prefer to be Welsh, Cornish or anything but Irish. :) That's bizarre to me if you are serious but I sometimes think you are trolling. Otherwise it's like a kind of denial which I can't understand how someone could function with that sort of psychology. But I think you are using a persona on here. :) Anyway I'm not that bothered and have lost interest in the subject as far as your identify issues so you don't have to respond to that. ;) I'm just genuinely interested in genetics and looking forward to when some more studies come out looking at Irish genetics especially pre-Viking and then the Medieval period in Ireland. I'm also interested in studies about Britain and France especially but any European population would be interesting to me.

[JamesBond007]

Yes I agree you can't go by paper trail. I have some non-Irish names in my family tree i.e. Scots, English and Norman surnames. I do think all the Isles populations have input from each other and outside sources such as Normans, Vikings etc. English having the most but people have some odd idea that the Irish are pure unadulterated Celts. This does not tie in with history or genetics.

I think you have to look at population similarity i.e. if you get Scottish instead of Irish or Welsh and if you get Danish instead of Norwegian etc. Bretons also have similarity to Welsh/Cornish groups so on calculators you can get similar populations as a sort of proxy. It is interesting that you get the Propad sample and have German ancestry so that shows that it does work. I have no German at all so that makes sense only getting an Isles and Scandinavian result. We are learning all the time. :)

I dunno Grace , POPRAD I think might be based on one German warrior sample in Slovakia and Swabian, Gaul Santones, Viking etc... make more sense than Icelandic Viking and POPRAD these are not even source populations I could theoretically replace the Icelandic sample with a Norwegian one but that still sucks in comparison.

You say I have a lot to learn and need to use proxy populations but that is just making excuses for inferior services rendered IMHO .

Modern G25 is a Polack joke for me it says I am Spanish and Norwegian or Norwegian, Spanish and Dutch ? Proxy populations ? Yeah, in a sloppy retarded Polish science way.

[Grace O'Malley]

I dunno Grace , POPRAD I think might be based on one German warrior sample in Slovakia and Swabian, Gaul Santones, Viking etc... make more sense than Icelandic Viking and POPRAD these are not even source populations I could theoretically replace the Icelandic sample with a Norwegian one but that still sucks in comparison.

You say I have a lot to learn and need to use proxy populations but that is just making excuses for inferior services rendered IMHO .

Modern G25 is a Polack joke for me it says I am Spanish and Norwegian or Norwegian, Spanish and Dutch ? Proxy populations ? Yeah, in a sloppy retarded Polish science way.

No I didn't say you have a lot to learn where did you get that? I think you're pretty good at this stuff. I think Davidski is great. I'm a fan of his and think he has done marvellous things for people like the hobby genealogist and amateurs like myself with an interest in genetics. All credit to him especially but also people like Lukas, ph2ter, Peterski and all the people that post their calculators and models. What would we do without them? I also like to read Eurogenes Blog when I get the time.

[JamesBond007]

Companies like Ancestry and 23&Me look at long strands of dna and have a population panel of people with long term ancestry in a country so their aim is to look at recent ancestry. They also use IBD and trees (i.e. Ancestry) for their Genetic Communities and these are very accurate. Short strands of dna have to be used to look at more ancient ancestry. I presume it would be possible with ancient genomes to find living ancestors? (Can that be done?) That would be great if that could be done. I think only 6 generations back can be used for relatives. I presume with someone from about 1,000 years ago it wouldn't be possible to get direct ancestry unless from mtdna and ydna. Can anyone clarify?

Do you have actual Welsh ancestry or Irish? I was under the impression that you have Irish ancestry but would prefer to be Welsh, Cornish or anything but Irish. :) That's bizarre to me if you are serious but I sometimes think you are trolling. Otherwise it's like a kind of denial which I can't understand how someone could function with that sort of psychology. But I think you are using a persona on here. :) Anyway I'm not that bothered and have lost interest in the subject as far as your identify issues so you don't have to respond to that. ;) I'm just genuinely interested in genetics and looking forward to when some more studies come out looking at Irish genetics especially pre-Viking and then the Medieval period in Ireland. I'm also interested in studies about Britain and France especially but any European population would be interesting to me.

It is not my personal issues Grace I try to combine common sense with Genetics :

1.) Ireland was invaded numerous times

2.) You said I don't look Irish

3.) Rainman XenophobicPrussian says I look Welsh/Cornish/Devonshire


4.) Coon's work places me anthropometrically In Cornwall England

5.) Coon's work says the composite Irishman approximates West Norwegians and he is a mix of Brunn and Iron Age nordic.

6.) I look in the mirror and agree with XenophobicPrussian

7.) YourDNAportal Admixture results would theoretically be consistent with Cornwall/Devonshire for me .

[Grace O'Malley]

It is not my personal issues Grace I try to combine common sense with Genetics :

1.) Ireland was invaded numerous times

2.) You said I don't look Irish

3.) Rainman XenophobicPrussian says I look Welsh/Cornish/Devonshire


4.) Coon's work places me anthropometrically In Cornwall England

5.) Coon's work says the composite Irishman approximates West Norwegians and he is a mix of Brunn and Iron Age nordic.

6.) I look in the mirror and agree with XenophobicPrussian

7.) YourDNAportal Admixture results would theoretically be consistent with Cornwall/Devonshire for me .

I wouldn't go on looks in regards to genetics. What I say about someone's phenotype is just a personal opinion. You have other ancestry other than Irish so it's not surprising you don't look particularly Irish. Some Irish don't look like what would be the most common look in Ireland. I think you also have a continental European look. You aren't Cornish or from Devon. It would be like me ignoring my actual ancestry and saying I was something like North Dutch because a calculator has that as my no 1 population. That's almost like you don't know what your identity is but that might be a new world phenomenon as some people with multiple ancestries do appear to have some confusion about what they are. That can be understandable as well. I know some people will pick one ancestry over others.

My hope is for some good genetic studies to come out this year.

Anyway if that's the spiel you want to use I'm not going to change your mind. :p

[JamesBond007]

I wouldn't go on looks in regards to genetics. What I say about someone's phenotype is just a personal opinion. You have other ancestry other than Irish so it's not surprising you don't look particularly Irish. Some Irish don't look like what would be the most common look in Ireland. I think you also have a continental European look. You aren't Cornish or from Devon. It would be like me ignoring my actual ancestry and saying I was something like North Dutch because a calculator has that as my no 1 population. That's almost like you don't know what your identity is but that might be a new world phenomenon as some people with multiple ancestries do appear to have some confusion about what they are. That can be understandable as well. I know some people will pick one ancestry over others.

My hope is for some good genetic studies to come out this year.

Anyway if that's the spiel you want to use I'm not going to change your mind. :p


fundamental axioms :

1.) The bourgeoisie has given an international and cosmopolitan quality to all of their productions therefore one should use the opposite a non-commercial academic OpenSource single population only technology unless one is a hopeless mutt but even then it can still do pretty good

2.) A completely truthful woman is perhaps an impossibility and women dissimulate often

3.) Everyone who is not English is not to be trusted. Everyone who is not English is a likely to a be shady liar foreigner with a funny hat. Outside of England there is dodgy food, dodgy plumbing and worst of all dodgy foreigners such as you

4.) G25 and Eurogenes etc... were made by nationalistic foreigners (that is biased not scientific )


5.) K13 and k15 where made in 2013 and people still use them. The idea that we need more new studies and new technology is absurd .

6.) Polish people are a problem for the British and Davidski is Polish or worse German

7.) Southern Britain has a more continental flavour than the rest of Britain with French/German blood admixture. The Queen of England is continental according to your logic. YournaPortal correctly recognizes most of my continental ancestry as 30% Seubi, Swabian or the Swaefas who settled in Swaffham England with 10% being Gallic French celtic etc... :picard2:

8.) The only reason why academia ever told anyone their real ancestry (not bourgeousie international cosmopolitan bullshit) was for disease reasons i.e. gauging potential for proneness to certain diseases based on ancestry :


Spatial Ancestry analysis (SPA) is a method for predicting ancestry or where an individual is from using the individual's DNA. Accurately modeling ancestry is an important step in identifying genetic variation involved in disease.

http://genetics.cs.ucla.edu/spa/



https://i.postimg.cc/Xvm90m0G/ancestry.png


http://genetics.cs.ucla.edu/spa/


MyTrueAncestry is based in Switzerland i.e. neutrality rather than Poland or Greece or America etc.. :

Your closest genetic modern populations...

Info

1. Southwest_English (4.205)
2. Southeast_English (4.275)
3. North_Dutch (4.390)
4. Danish (4.722)
5. West_Scottish (4.930)
6. Irish (5.014)
7. Orcadian (5.114)
8. North_German (6.151)

Genetic distance measures how close you are to a given modern population. Many modern populations are surprisingly close to another, which is often due to true common ancestry.

5 means you are close to this population
10 means you could fit into this population
15 means a related population


[img]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIdsjNGCGz4


P.S. both updated Vahaduo K13 and vahaduo updated K15 have me as English but that is modified by help from Creoda so is not pure Polack science and Creoda is half English.

YourDnaPortal has me at a 50/50 Split hyper generalized as half Frisian Saxon and half Welsh looking like Cornwall/Devonshire to me

[Leto]

P.S. both updated Vahaduo K13 and vahaduo updated K15 have me as English but that is modified by help from Creoda so is not pure Polack science and Creoda is half English.

YourDnaPortal has me at a 50/50 Split hyper generalized as half Frisian Saxon and half Welsh looking like Cornwall/Devonshire to me
We still need your FULL K13 results (adding up to 100 percent) for the Members' results thread. Be a serious man, Kevin, who the fuck cares if you get black African or South Asian noise or some shit like that. We all know you don't actually have that type of ancestry. So please post your UNSORTED components!

[Pine]

What's your mental illness oracle?

66% Autistic +34% Schizophrenic @ Out of your mind

[Peterski]

Post your mental illness oracle.

I found his mental illness oracle results:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZI9MS3EoX4