Romanian/Vlach from Eastern Serbia Myheritage and k13

[vbnetkhio]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IijTgzQ84Cs

Population
North_Atlantic 23.1 Pct
Baltic 25.91 Pct
West_Med 16.83 Pct
West_Asian 10.03 Pct
East_Med 18.57 Pct
Red_Sea 3.38 Pct
South_Asian 0.94 Pct
East_Asian 0.74 Pct
Siberian 0.33 Pct
Amerindian -
Oceanian 0.17 Pct
Northeast_African -
Sub-Saharan -

# Population (source) Distance
1 Romanian 2.57
2 Bulgarian 3.51
3 Serbian 4.73
4 Moldavian 10.19
5 Greek_Thessaly 11.56
6 Croatian 12.92
7 Hungarian 12.93
8 Austrian 15.92
9 Tuscan 16.72
10 North_Italian 16.8
11 East_German 17.67
12 Italian_Abruzzo 17.97
13 Central_Greek 18.56
14 Ukrainian_Lviv 19.29
15 West_Sicilian 19.34
16 East_Sicilian 19.68
17 South_Polish 20.06
18 West_German 20.07
19 French 20.41
20 Ukrainian 20.57

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 63.5% Greek_Thessaly + 36.5% South_Polish @ 1.22
2 67.2% Greek_Thessaly + 32.8% Polish @ 1.35
3 50.5% East_Sicilian + 49.5% South_Polish @ 1.39
4 56% Central_Greek + 44% Polish @ 1.45
5 52% Central_Greek + 48% South_Polish @ 1.46
6 50.8% South_Italian + 49.2% Polish @ 1.48
7 55.1% West_Sicilian + 44.9% Ukrainian_Belgorod @ 1.5
8 68.9% Greek_Thessaly + 31.1% Russian_Smolensk @ 1.52
9 69.7% Greek_Thessaly + 30.3% Belorussian @ 1.53
10 52.7% Ukrainian + 47.3% South_Italian @ 1.53
11 52.7% South_Italian + 47.3% Russian_Smolensk @ 1.54
12 51.1% East_Sicilian + 48.9% Ukrainian @ 1.56
13 68.6% Croatian + 31.4% Sephardic_Jewish @ 1.56
14 60.5% Croatian + 39.5% East_Sicilian @ 1.63
15 62.7% Greek_Thessaly + 37.3% Ukrainian_Lviv @ 1.64
16 53.6% South_Italian + 46.4% Belorussian @ 1.65
17 52.8% Greek_Thessaly + 47.2% Croatian @ 1.66
18 64.2% Greek_Thessaly + 35.8% Ukrainian @ 1.68
19 53.3% South_Polish + 46.7% South_Italian @ 1.69
20 53.1% South_Italian + 46.9% Estonian_Polish @ 1.7

[vbnetkhio]

Distance to: v
2.19168885 Bulgaria_Northwestern
2.49082316 Romania_average
2.50485529 Romania_Banat
2.69697979 Romania_Wallachia
2.73611038 Romania_Oltenia
2.75602975 Romania_Moldavia_South
2.78666467 Romania_Dobruja
2.80918138 Moldova_South
2.93146721 Serb_Southern_Montenegro
2.95464042 Romania_Muntenia
2.96641197 Romania_Transylvania
2.99135421 Montenegrin
3.11436992 Bulgaria_Southwestern
3.41972221 Bulgaria_average
3.46878941 Serb_Serbia_South
3.47978448 Bosniak_Sandzak
3.67021798 Bulgaria_Northcentral
4.12780814 Serb_Herzegovina
4.23768805 Bulgaria_Southcentral
4.32123825 Romania_Crisana
4.55661058 Pomak_Bulgaria
4.56596102 Romania_Maramures
4.76724239 Serb_Serbia_Vojvodina
5.25162832 Serb_Serbia_Central
5.27820045 Bulgaria_Northeastern

[Voskos]

What's the average East Med for Romanians and Serbs?

[vbnetkhio]

What's the average East Med for Romanians and Serbs?

Romanians 17, Serbs 15.
http://vahaduo.genetics.ovh/k13-vahaduo.htm

[Ion Basescul]

"Vlach"
Definitely not Aromanian, and unsurprisingly similar to the results in Oltenia.

[MandM]

"Vlach"
Definitely not Aromanian, and unsurprisingly similar to the results in Oltenia.

I have talked to here befor, they of ourse mean "Serbian Vlach" and yes i know you dont belive in that terme for the people living there :)

[Varda]

Pretty Montenegrin like result.

[vbnetkhio]

"Vlach"
Definitely not Aromanian, and unsurprisingly similar to the results in Oltenia.

Yeah. nobody thinks they are close to Aromanians/Vlachs, it's just one big confusion with their name.

Vlach was the traditional Serbian name for Romanians until recently (Aromanians were known as "Tsintsars") so the Timok Romanians presented themselves as Vlachs when communicating with Serbs, so it started from there. The first census which acknowledged them as Vlachs was in Socialist Yugoslavia after WW2. Before that they were in the "Romanian and Aromanian" category.

[Ion Basescul]

I have talked to here befor, they of ourse mean "Serbian Vlach" and yes i know you dont belive in that terme for the people living there :)

I'm just mentioning this because of the stark difference between the two groups (Serbian Vlachs fom Eastern Serbia vs. Vlachs from Macedonia and Greece). I don't want the Aromanian average to get diluted, unless it is clear that the person from Serbia has Aromanian roots.
Maybe we could have another average for Serbian Vlachs?

[vbnetkhio]

Pretty Montenegrin like result.

like most Transylvanians and Oltenians.

[MandM]

I'm just mentioning this because of the stark difference between the two groups (Serbian Vlachs fom Eastern Serbia vs. Vlachs from Macedonia and Greece). I don't want the Aromanian average to get diluted, unless it is clear that the person from Serbia has Aromanian roots.
Maybe we could have another average for Serbian Vlachs?

I agree de should not delad echother, is there even samepls for a east vlach serbian average

[Ion Basescul]

I agree de should not delad echother, is there even samepls for a east vlach serbian average

I think vbn had one or two from Serbia, but I don't know if they were from the Eastern part of the country.

[vbnetkhio]

I agree de should not delad echother, is there even samepls for a east vlach serbian average

Here I collected some people with Vlach surnames and their matches:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?342186-Serbian-autosomal-DNA-2&p=7105406&viewfull=1#post7105406

many of these are probably half or 1/4 Serb, so don't take it too seriously

[MandM]

Here I collected some people with Vlach surnames and their matches:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?342186-Serbian-autosomal-DNA-2&p=7105406&viewfull=1#post7105406

many of these are probably half or 1/4 Serb, so don't take it too seriously

Thanks! But think it would be very hard to finde a "pure" vlach from east serbia, most of them have probably mixed at some point with either serbs or Romanians there, but we will have to work with what we have, I have tried to go to vlach fb and insta pages to Hunt for some one who have made dna test, but I has gone with out fruit

[Varda]

Northern Macedonians are more Vlach and less Slavic genetically than Serbian Vlachs and Romanians.

[MandM]

Northern Macedonians are more Vlach and less Slavic genetically than Serbian Vlachs and Romanians.

i belive you are right there! NM probably mixed alot with the Aromanians there, whiles The Serbian Vlach mixed first with The Slaves and and then after they left for Romania they mingeld with them, came back to East Serbia. And untill they do a proper testing on them we can only speculate about there DNA, but i think they are probably some combo of serbs with olteni Romanian.
I looked in Serbian DNA project and there are only like 28 people tested in that area, but i took all the peoples haplo gruops there, even if most are serbian surnames, i know many have changed there names, but its hard to say who is what, but it looks somthing like this ( I2/ 9 people) (J2 /6 people) (E/6 people) (I1/ 2 people) (R1a/1 person) (R1b 1 per) (J1/1 per) (Q/1per) (G/1 per)

maby some one can translate this to somthing, i am not that skilled tho

[vbnetkhio]

I think vbn had one or two from Serbia, but I don't know if they were from the Eastern part of the country.

They live only in Eastern Serbia. A couple of villages could technically be Central, but I don't think those should be separated.

https://miraprika.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/2.jpg

Romanian + Vlach percentage: (Vlachs south of the Danube, Romanians north.)

https://i.imgur.com/hnbescq.png

[MandM]

They live only in Eastern Serbia. A couple of villages could technically be Central, but I don't think those should be separated.

https://miraprika.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/2.jpg

Romanian + Vlach percentage: (Vlachs south of the Danube, Romanians north.)

https://i.imgur.com/hnbescq.png
The vlach from that area are saying that does stats are not correct just becouse most vlach choosed Serb on the cencus, but we have to go with what we got

[Varda]

The vlach from that area are saying that does stats are not correct just becouse most vlach choosed Serb on the cencus, but we have to go with what we got

Some cities and towns in eastern Serbia got certain number of Serbian settlers from other parts of Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Croatia after WW2. This is one of reasons for higher % of Serbs than in the past, not only assimilation of Vlachs.

[MandM]

Some cities and towns in eastern Serbia got certain number of Serbian settlers from other parts of Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Croatia after WW2. This is one of reasons for higher % of Serbs than in the past, not only assimilation of Vlachs.
Of course there is that, it just its dramaticly fallen the population, I belive assimilation, many have left the area, and as you mention, "new" settlers

[Varda]

..

[vbnetkhio]

4 confirmed results and their average


Vlach_Eastern_Serbia,25.17,26.70,18.87,6.81,17.69, 1.75,0.20,0.54,0.21,0.56,1.71,0.00,0.33
Vlach_Eastern_Serbia,23.83,26.24,19.79,12.57,14.55 ,0.00,0.23,1.59,0.50,0.71,0.00,0.00,0.00
Vlach_Eastern_Serbia,23.10,25.91,16.83,10.03,18.57 ,3.38,0.94,0.74,0.33,0.00,0.17,0.00,0.00
Vlach_Eastern_Serbia,18.97,29.45,20.86,10.70,16.46 ,0.00,0.00,2.13,0.41,0.69,0.00,0.00,0.33
Vlach_Eastern_Serbia_avg,22.77,27.08,19.09,10.03,1 6.82,1.28,0.34,1.25,0.36,0.49,0.47,0.00,0.17

Distance to: Vlach_Eastern_Serbia_avg
2.05209649 Montenegro_South
2.67168486 Romanian_Transylvania
2.67729341 Romanian
2.79234668 Romanian_Banat
2.88352215 Serb_Herzegovina
2.97069016 Romanian_Oltenia
2.97914417 Romanian_South-Moldavia
3.06998371 Serb_South
3.21328492 Bulgarian_Northwestern
3.29517830 Bosniak_Sandžak
3.38777213 Romanian_Dobruja
3.46199365 Romanian_Crişana
3.51378713 Serb_Vojvodina
3.61177242 Romanian_Wallachia
3.92935109 Romanian_Muntenia
4.10305983 Montenegro_Herzegovina
4.15492479 Serb
4.25934267 Bulgarian_Southwestern
4.47167754 Serb_Central
4.48413871 Moldovan_South
4.68187996 Serb_West
4.81649250 Bulgarian
5.06452367 Bosniak_Southeast
5.12885952 Serb_Croatia
5.21123786 Bulgarian_Northcentral

quite close to Banat, where most of them originated from. with more samples they might be even closer.

[Ion Basescul]

4 confirmed results and their average



Vlach_Eastern_Serbia,25.17,26.70,18.87,6.81,17.69, 1.75,0.20,0.54,0.21,0.56,1.71,0.00,0.33

Vlach_Eastern_Serbia,23.83,26.24,19.79,12.57,14.55 ,0.00,0.23,1.59,0.50,0.71,0.00,0.00,0.00
Vlach_Eastern_Serbia,23.10,25.91,16.83,10.03,18.57 ,3.38,0.94,0.74,0.33,0.00,0.17,0.00,0.00
Vlach_Eastern_Serbia,18.97,29.45,20.86,10.70,16.46 ,0.00,0.00,2.13,0.41,0.69,0.00,0.00,0.33
Vlach_Eastern_Serbia_avg,22.77,27.08,19.09,10.03,1 6.82,1.28,0.34,1.25,0.36,0.49,0.47,0.00,0.17

Distance to: Vlach_Eastern_Serbia_avg
2.05209649 Montenegro_South
2.67168486 Romanian_Transylvania
2.67729341 Romanian
2.79234668 Romanian_Banat
2.88352215 Serb_Herzegovina
2.97069016 Romanian_Oltenia
2.97914417 Romanian_South-Moldavia
3.06998371 Serb_South
3.21328492 Bulgarian_Northwestern
3.29517830 Bosniak_Sandžak
3.38777213 Romanian_Dobruja
3.46199365 Romanian_Crişana
3.51378713 Serb_Vojvodina
3.61177242 Romanian_Wallachia
3.92935109 Romanian_Muntenia
4.10305983 Montenegro_Herzegovina
4.15492479 Serb
4.25934267 Bulgarian_Southwestern
4.47167754 Serb_Central
4.48413871 Moldovan_South
4.68187996 Serb_West
4.81649250 Bulgarian
5.06452367 Bosniak_Southeast
5.12885952 Serb_Croatia
5.21123786 Bulgarian_Northcentral

quite close to Banat, where most of them originated from. with more samples they might be even closer.

Vlach or Romanian? Those in Banat usually declare themselves Romanians, while those in Timok valley say Vlachs. Those from Banat are the same as those in Romanian Banat, but those from Timok mostly derive ancestry from Oltenia. This is very obvious from surnames and especially the shared accent and specific regional words.
The total number of self-declared Romanians according to the 2011 census[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanians_of_Serbia#cite_note-1) was 29,332, while 35,330 people declared themselves Vlachs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlachs_of_Serbia);
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanians_of_Serbia

In any case, the name Vlach is very confusing, because this is not a separate ethnicity like the Aromanians, who are the true Vlachs that are probably genetically the closest to early Romanians.

[vbnetkhio]

Vlach or Romanian? Those in Banat usually declare themselves Romanians, and Vlachs in Timok valley. Those from Banat are the same as those in Romanian Banat, but those from Timok mostly derive ancestry from Oltenia.
The total number of self-declared Romanians according to the 2011 census[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanians_of_Serbia#cite_note-1) was 29,332, while 35,330 people declared themselves Vlachs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlachs_of_Serbia);
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanians_of_Serbia

In any case, the name Vlach is very confusing, because this is not a separate ethnicity like the Aromanians, who are the true Vlachs that are probably genetically the closest to early Romanians.

All these are declared Vlachs from Eastern Serbia, south of the Danube (Banat isn't considered to be a part of this region)
Even here, most of them originate from Banat and only a minority from Oltenia (the "Tsarani" group who live at the Serbia/Bulgaria Border)

Yes, I agree, they are just Romanians, but they declare as "Eastern Serbian Vlachs" so that should be respected.
(some of them also translate it as "Wallachian" when speaking English so maybe that should be used?)

[Ion Basescul]

All these are declared Vlachs from Eastern Serbia, south of the Danube (Banat isn't considered to be a part of this region)
Even here, most of them originate from Banat and only a minority from Oltenia (the "Tsarani" group who live at the Serbia/Bulgaria Border)

Yes, I agree, they are just Romanians, but they declare as "Eastern Serbian Vlachs" so that should be respected.

Whatever the local legends say, they don't talk like people in Banat. Banat is part of the Northern subdialects of Romanian. Those in Timoc speak in Southern subdialects, and as you approach Banat, Banat subdialects begin to appear.

Orange - Northern subdialects, Blue - Southern
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/74/GraiuriDaco-Rom%C3%A2ne.jpg

Orange - Banat subdialect; Green - Oltenian
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/Graiurile_din_Timoc.JPG?1643723364428

[vbnetkhio]

Whatever the local legends say, they don't talk like people in Banat. Banat is part of the Northern subdialects of Romanian. Those in Timoc speak in Southern subdialects, and as you approach Banat, Banat subdialects begin to appear.

Orange - Northern subdialects, Blue - Southern
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/74/GraiuriDaco-Rom%C3%A2ne.jpg

Orange - Banat subdialect; Green - Oltenian
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/Graiurile_din_Timoc.JPG?1643723364428

The second map shows what I said, the green group (Oltenians) is the smallest. Yellow are supposed to originate from Banat but picked up some Oltenian dialectal influence, and orange both come from Banat and speak the Banatean dialect

[Ion Basescul]

The second map shows what I said, the green group (Oltenians) is the smallest. Yellow are supposed to originate from Banat but picked up some Oltenian dialectal influence, and orange both come from Banat and speak the Banatean dialect

Yes, but that picking of different elements comes from mixing. It's only very recently that language became possible to spread without having any physical contact.
So along the valley, I doubt there are people with pure Banat origins. But in any case, that's mostly a linguistic and cultural debate, because genetically Banat and Oltenian Romanians are very close.

[vbnetkhio]

Yes, but that picking of different elements comes from mixing. It's only very recently that language became possible to spread without having any physical contact.
So along the valley, I doubt there are people with pure Banat origins. But in any case, that's mostly a linguistic and cultural debate, because genetically Banat and Oltenian Romanians are very close.

Yes, that might be true.
Still the Ungureani are the most numerous subgroup and considered the typical representatives of the East Serbian Vlachs. I don't know the exact numbers, but among declared Vlachs there's surely more Banatean admixture than Oltenian.

[vbnetkhio]

Yes, but that picking of different elements comes from mixing. It's only very recently that language became possible to spread without having any physical contact.
So along the valley, I doubt there are people with pure Banat origins. But in any case, that's mostly a linguistic and cultural debate, because genetically Banat and Oltenian Romanians are very close.

Yes, that might be true.
Still the Ungureani are the most numerous subgroup and considered the typical representatives of the East Serbian Vlachs. I don't know the exact numbers, but among declared Vlachs there's surely more Banatean admixture than Oltenian.

[Ion Basescul]

Yes, that might be true.
Still the Ungureani are the most numerous subgroup and considered the typical representatives of the East Serbian Vlachs. I don't know the exact numbers, but among declared Vlachs there's surely more Banatean admixture than Oltenian.

Could be, what's certain is that they are not a preserved old ethnicity. Banat and Oltenia Romanians can be very similar, so all fit as both.

Oltenia
<google-sheets-html-origin style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: medium; --darkreader-inline-color:#e8e6e3;" data-darkreader-inline-color="">
<tbody>
N_Atlantic
Baltic
West_Med
West_Asian
East_Med
Red_Sea
South_Asian
East_Asian
Siberian
Amerindian
Oceanian
NE_African
Sub-Saharan


22.27
23.40
17.73
12.50
17.07
3.39
0.75
0.07
2.02
0.45
0
0.20
0.16


22.25
24.85
18.66
9.74
18.79
2.60
1.11
0
0.42
0.57
1.01
0
0


24.11
22.08
17.90
10.21
21.15
2.32
0.29
0
0.47
0.58
0.87
0
0


25.77
22.41
16.20
13.83
16.77
2.71
0
1.58
0
0.36
0.36
0
0


26.30
25.20
17.18
11.00
14.27
1.85
0.63
2.86
0
0
0.65
0
0


25.44
24.14
18.89
11.68
17.82
0.26
0
0.79
0.81
0.15
0
0
0


24.08
24.38
19.25
11.62
17.43
0
0
1.83
0
1.23
0.18
0
0


25.97
24.20
16.99
9.33
17.93
4.04
0
0.96
0
0
0.34
0.23
0


19.88
26.17
18.21
12.80
15.59
4.78
0.20
0.81
0
0.71
0.84
0
0


22.19
28.74
18.44
11.16
15.46
1.26
0.20
1.51
0.47
0.28
0.28
0
0


18.86
26.52
21.22
9.18
18.31
0.90
2.17
2.00
0
0.59
0.25
0
0


29.00
22.93
16.82
7.39
18.66
2.80
0
1.30
0.07
0.10
0.93
0
0


23.37
25.16
14.47
11.40
18.83
3.31
0.70
1.05
0.06
0
1.67
0
0


24.86
23.97
17.62
7.88
22.74
0
0
1.56
1.27
0
0.10
0
0


23.65
24.90
19.10
12.36
17.01
0.64
0
1.47
0
0
0.87
0
0


23.54
22.65
18.50
14.61
13.57
4.97
0.89
0
0.08
0.08
0
1.13
0


21.39
23.41
17.82
12.30
18.47
4.12
0.96
0.16
0
0.25
0
0.40
0.71


21.19
26.77
18.68
9.15
19.15
1.02
1.97
0.50
0.18
1.25
0.14
0
0


24.92
24.35
16.91
9.83
21.16
0
0.81
0.91
0.99
0
0.11
0
0


18.77
27.81
17.31
11.20
20.33
1.48
1.20
1.37
0
0.53
0
0
0


22.71
27.80
19.86
9.86
14.53
0.62
1.41
0.54
1.04
1.13
0.23
0.10
0.18


18.93
27.60
17.99
11.39
19.12
2.14
0
0.21
0
1.06
1.31
0
0.26


25.67
23.15
19.43
9.43
19.17
1.62
0
0.78
0.42
0.34
0
0
0


20.43
26.30
19.27
12.74
17.15
0
1.68
1.12
0.11
1.19
0
0
0


24.79
25.36
17.52
7.86
21.42
0.52
0
0
0.81
0
1.72
0
0


24.21
25.75
17.51
9.34
19.25
0.83
0.14
0.60
0
1.15
1.19
0
0


22.52
22.40
20.77
7.99
21.58
1.98
0
0
1.66
0
0
0
1.06


23.73
25.36
18.19
8.53
20.18
0.81
0
0
2.78
0.15
0.26
0
0


20.69
25.55
17.85
10.75
18.16
2.25
0.63
0.50
2.21
0
1.41
0
0


19.23
26.69
20.73
11.99
15.56
0.94
0.66
0.84
3.01
0.28
0.08
0
0


26.33
21.61
14.72
12.14
18.01
3.09
1.08
0.11
2.41
0
0.51
0
0


24.61
24.06
17.24
9.40
19.34
2.66
0.54
0
1.56
0.58
0
0
0


26.34
21.26
22.47
8.89
17.58
1.46
0.23
0.35
0
0.62
0
0.17
0.65


21.77
24.08
18.67
10.19
20.22
1.83
0.21
1.54
0
0.37
0.80
0
0.33


22.82
24.72
19.48
10.73
17.59
0.59
0
1.80
0.40
0.77
1.10
0
0


25.39
26.10
17.03
10.88
19.17
0
0
0
0.87
0
0
0.56
0


20.48
26.23
16.39
8.84
22.98
2.66
0.58
0.10
1.73
0
0
0
0


24.53
24.65
15.35
13.63
15.68
2.21
0
0.06
2.51
0.60
0.67
0
0.12


22.13
26.63
20.09
7.41
18.41
1.76
0.75
0
1.98
0.85
0
0
0


24.28
24.27
17.31
9.14
18.97
2.35
1.60
1.57
0.17
0
0.18
0
0.15


22.03
25.51
17.01
11.25
18.14
2.63
0.97
1.43
1.02
0
0
0
0


19.57
24.39
18.70
10.07
20.75
1.77
0
1.56
0.93
1.08
0.46
0
0.71


20.89
20.92
19.71
11.96
20.17
1.95
2.52
0.36
0.75
0.30
0.04
0
0.44


18.59
27.90
19.33
11.26
15.78
3.31
0
0
2.37
1.36
0.09
0
0


23.75
23.08
18.32
10.99
19.38
2.26
0
1.23
0
0.55
0.45
0
0


27.45
25.72
19.32
7.23
14.82
1.58
1.62
0.54
0.89
0.84
0
0
0


25.76
22.45
18.28
11.73
15.26
3.42
0
0
1.57
0.24
1.29
0
0


23.34
26.95
17.68
8.86
17.09
1.97
0
3.24
0
0
0
0
0.86


27.16
20.52
20.98
9.52
17.36
1.60
0
0.03
1.33
0.06
0.92
0.52
0


26.46
23.90
17.86
9.21
19.32
1.44
0.11
1.34
0
0
0.36
0
0


21.93
25.87
19.17
11.21
15.71
0.50
4.10
0
1.43
0.02
0
0
0.05


29.73
20.75
17.72
7.05
16.40
1.93
2.81
1.67
0.23
0
0.25
1.48
0


26.94
21.52
15.96
11.03
18.18
2.91
1.32
0
1.31
0.66
0
0
0.13


27.28
21.73
15.78
10.79
18.44
2.83
0
1.72
0
1.44
0
0
0


25.71
22.17
19.99
9.66
17.10
2.50
0.13
0
1.42
1.01
0
0
0.31


23.04
26.74
20.18
9.69
18.43
0
0
0.91
0
0.51
0
0
0.47


23.69
25.96
18.07
10.13
18.99
1.18
0
0
1.98
0
0
0
0


21.68
26.21
19.78
10.56
18.48
1.17
0
0.30
0.83
0
1.00
0
0


24.72
24.38
15.99
11.94
16.70
3.78
0
1.63
0.87
0
0
0
0


23.70
24.12
17.76
10.36
18.73
2.49
0.59
2.02
0
0.09
0.13
0
0


25.89
28.85
16.01
10.07
13.71
1.43
0.66
0.69
0.75
0.93
0.75
0
0.27


20.27
24.03
19.20
9.76
21.51
1.46
0
0.16
2.14
0.22
1.26
0
0


26.61
28.30
18.06
6.23
16.92
1.57
0
0.96
0
0.58
0.42
0.35
0


28.20
24.60
16.17
11.38
17.24
0
0
0
0
1.14
0.11
0
1.16


18.99
23.87
17.02
14.69
19.53
1.25
0.59
0.89
2.92
0.24
0
0
0


24.73
25.07
19.24
11.85
15.93
1.42
0.13
0.44
0.38
0
0.41
0.40
0


24.39
24.21
16.69
11.43
19.82
1.94
0
0
1.23
0
0.29
0
0


20.37
22.89
20.37
12.53
19.34
0.82
0.51
0.80
1.59
0.32
0
0
0.44


24.78
23.82
18.76
10.23
18.57
1.95
0
0
1.72
0
0.16
0
0


23.66
26.53
18.17
11.79
17.96
0.91
0
0
0.41
0.23
0
0
0.31


22.63
28.07
18.05
6.64
22.16
0
0
0.61
1.28
0
0.55
0
0


22.07
24.32
19.23
12.60
15.85
2.68
0
0.42
1.86
0.22
0.59
0
0.16


21.99
25.48
16.66
12.59
16.53
4.03
0
0
1.82
0.60
0.30
0
0


21.79
23.34
17.23
14.11
20.00
0.32
0.63
1.30
1.05
0
0.23
0
0


20.82
25.32
17.45
10.01
21.08
3.18
0.44
0.64
0
0.44
0.63
0
0


23.36
25.08
20.34
8.01
19.13
0.54
0.64
1.17
0.82
0.57
0.36
0
0


26.01
22.82
17.10
12.11
15.91
2.49
1.75
0
0.65
1.15
0
0
0


23.98
28.09
16.82
8.42
18.15
1.64
0
0.09
1.07
0.76
0.07
0
0.92


23.40
29.14
19.39
6.58
17.77
1.00
0
0
1.18
0
0.63
0.71
0.20


24.05
25.87
16.69
10.32
15.20
3.00
2.80
1.65
0.27
0
0.15
0
0


20.36
23.97
19.65
14.76
16.34
2.21
0
0.21
1.90
0
0
0.59
0


20.26
29.03
18.39
11.27
18.16
2.37
0
0
0
0
0.52
0
0


21.05
24.81
19.48
13.53
15.04
3.92
0
0
2.17
0
0
0
0


22.37
27.22
20.67
11.29
12.72
2.47
0.35
0
2.30
0.43
0.19
0
0

</tbody>
</google-sheets-html-origin>
Banat
<google-sheets-html-origin style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: medium; --darkreader-inline-color:#e8e6e3;" data-darkreader-inline-color="">
<tbody>
N_Atlantic
Baltic
West_Med
West_Asian
East_Med
Red_Sea
South_Asian
East_Asian
Siberian
Amerindian
Oceanian
NE_African
Sub-Saharan


23.53
23.76
18.21
11.00
19.10
2.17
0
0
1.32
0.37
0.12
0
0.42


18.25
27.74
20.29
11.12
17.52
1.91
0.40
0.90
0.63
1.24
0
0
0


24.06
28.12
17.87
5.65
19.29
1.76
0
1.51
0.37
1.04
0
0.33
0


23.99
25.36
15.22
15.57
13.99
1.91
1.38
0
2.57
0
0
0
0


21.71
25.42
17.45
9.79
19.16
2.28
1.14
0.44
1.47
0.82
0.33
0
0


20.09
26.81
19.78
11.97
18.06
1.00
1.80
0
0.24
0
0.24
0
0


23.27
26.87
20.21
8.86
16.34
1.91
0
0.52
0
0.92
0.59
0.51
0


20.86
28.67
19.06
9.41
17.83
1.64
0.28
1.50
0.19
0
0.13
0.43
0


20.86
28.54
16.38
13.48
15.02
2.32
0.37
0
2.60
0
0
0
0.42


21.78
24.90
16.48
11.17
18.52
3.16
0.41
0.89
2.64
0
0.06
0
0


21.95
23.73
16.39
9.97
20.92
3.84
0.54
0.22
0.76
1.21
0.47
0
0


23.81
25.88
18.64
12.16
15.14
1.30
0
1.15
1.33
0
0.59
0
0


24.53
25.10
18.74
10.33
17.26
1.30
0
0.91
1.60
0
0.16
0
0.08


24.75
24.97
16.15
10.82
15.93
3.22
1.56
1.04
1.40
0
0.16
0
0


23.84
24.14
18.67
9.75
18.49
1.05
2.52
0.07
0
0.89
0.54
0
0


23.76
23.58
17.11
11.98
19.05
0.95
0.72
0.35
2.27
0
0.23
0
0


24.71
28.90
14.90
13.53
15.24
1.22
0
0.38
0.72
0
0.39
0
0


24.65
26.92
15.98
7.88
20.35
0.82
0.86
1.50
0.21
0.71
0.13
0
0


21.09
25.53
18.49
13.94
15.73
2.99
0
0
0.27
1.17
0.77
0
0


30.41
27.05
20.44
6.95
10.68
0
0.86
1.19
0.29
1.20
0
0.93
0


22.32
23.43
17.89
14.79
15.03
1.54
1.77
0.71
0
1.45
0.69
0.39
0


28.01
26.21
14.84
10.98
15.81
0.63
0
0.08
2.14
1.01
0.29
0
0


22.96
26.89
17.60
12.74
13.30
2.49
0
0.74
2.18
1.11
0
0
0


22.94
26.83
18.61
10.62
16.89
2.63
0
0.74
0.12
0.11
0.52
0
0


26.22
24.09
16.39
9.68
18.55
1.38
1.81
0.27
0.33
1.28
0
0
0


26.25
24.71
16.40
11.05
17.84
1.52
0
0.76
0.15
0.59
0.73
0
0


25.38
23.67
15.91
9.10
19.80
2.40
0
0.20
1.87
1.50
0
0
0.17


24.97
26.75
16.68
11.38
17.08
1.29
0
0
1.47
0
0.37
0
0


22.38
27.67
20.26
8.14
15.67
2.05
0.70
0.62
1.79
0
0.71
0
0


25.99
24.79
15.06
12.52
16.44
1.30
0
2.07
0.12
0.97
0.53
0.19
0


24.35
25.37
20.38
8.51
16.49
2.78
0.48
1.18
0
0.08
0.38
0
0


27.21
23.77
16.42
11.24
16.47
1.51
0.13
0.22
2.25
0
0.78
0
0


21.48
27.63
17.28
9.55
18.97
3.20
0.77
0
0.39
0.73
0
0
0


24.97
28.69
13.22
5.78
21.54
0.63
1.51
1.99
0.50
0
0
1.16
0


23.56
26.70
14.91
11.67
18.95
1.79
0
0
2.03
0.29
0
0
0.09


24.32
25.48
16.76
12.05
17.38
1.88
0
0
1.50
0
0.65
0
0


26.49
23.99
18.36
6.81
20.26
0.37
0
1.02
2.25
0.13
0
0.33
0


22.79
21.87
17.03
12.36
21.07
2.51
0.40
0.12
1.62
0
0.22
0
0


22.97
24.54
17.61
9.48
19.52
2.11
0.08
0.84
2.28
0.31
0
0
0.26


26.16
26.13
17.94
6.95
15.97
3.67
0
0.57
1.84
0
0
0.49
0.29


24.90
28.58
17.61
9.31
15.20
1.14
1.66
0.15
1.45
0
0
0
0


20.09
25.85
17.72
13.28
18.22
2.96
0
0.72
1.14
0
0
0
0


27.80
25.10
17.71
6.45
18.68
1.41
0
0.07
2.13
0
0.65
0
0


24.84
24.42
16.45
12.03
19.59
0.31
0
0.12
0.88
0.73
0.63
0
0


27.57
23.13
16.91
11.11
14.94
3.49
0
0
2.16
0.32
0
0.37
0


19.85
28.14
19.19
8.65
18.22
2.41
0.33
0.66
1.09
0.51
0
0
0.96


23.30
27.03
15.90
12.09
15.78
2.30
0.69
0.21
1.87
0.09
0.73
0
0

</tbody>
</google-sheets-html-origin>