Classify Erjona Ala

[Panopticon]

Albanian from Norway. She came 2nd in an apparently very prestigious model contest 'Elite Model Look'.

Eye colour is blue-green seemingly.

http://gfx.dagbladet.no/labrador/140/140784/14078432/jpg/active/960x.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Dxhmlk_1eMw/TRCuyG6I87I/AAAAAAAAA6U/sSnsWnrF2e8/s1600/Introducing%2BErjona.jpg

http://nd04.jxs.cz/438/933/85c4f29b1c_71187283_o2.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_14sLSJ9mU00/TSF4JNVQLNI/AAAAAAAAGdc/z--8OQKT1-g/s1600/V69_JOOS-CASTING_erjona.jpg

http://i.models.com/i/db/2011/10/64138/64138-800w.jpg

http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lpsr3vQwQJ1qizqqeo1_500.jpg

[Pallantides]

Inferior subhuman!

...

*jk*:p;)

[Panopticon]

Inferior subhuman!

...

*jk*:p;)

You're going to have to explain yourself to Ushtari for that! :P

[Agrippa]

Atlanto-Nordid/Nordoid or Atlantid/Nordomediterranid + Dinaro-Alpinoid influences.

Very progressive traits too.

[Onychodus]

pontid

[Pallantides]

You're going to have to explain yourself to Ushtari for that! :P

I hope she sticks to Albanian men, we can't have you people polluting our prestigious genepool and stuff.;):p

[Agrippa]

I hope she sticks to Albanian men, we can't have you people polluting our prestigious genepool and stuff.;):p

Variants like that are an Eugenic-racial enrichment to all populations.

[Pallantides]

Variants like that are an Eugenic-racial enrichment to all populations.


Agrippa this is encouriging the destruction of the Norwegian people.
Next thing you know every lonely farmer will be getting himself some of that progressive Albanian bait.


:D

[Panopticon]

Agrippa this is encouriging the destruction of the Norwegian people.
Next thing you know every lonely farmer will be getting himself some of that progressive Albanian bait.


:D

Progressive MUSLIM Albanian trait if I might add. Before you know it you'll grow a beard, wear a mandress and pray five times a day! :eek: Marrying her is to ignore the Christian fundamentals of not only Norway but also Europe. Highest form of treachery there is!

[Agrippa]

Agrippa this is encouriging the destruction of the Norwegian people.
Next thing you know every lonely farmer will be getting himself some of that progressive Albanian bait.


:D

Better than South East Asian infantiles or Negroid primitives, better than lowest level Norwegians even and for sure better than dying alone and childless.

Obviously, it is, like so often, a question of alternatives and relative.

What choice(s) do you have?

Surely, for many Norwegian man, such high level women would be a good choice, both from an individual and collective point of view.

For me, being integrable or even desirable for an immigrant means: The more foreign, the higher level traits to compensate for it.

She is still European, so not that foreign, and her traits - at least physically - speak for themselves.

[Pallantides]

Better than South East Asian infantiles or Negroid primitives, better than lowest level Norwegians

I agree with the first two... but what is a low level Norwegian that you speak of?

[Agrippa]

I agree with the first two... but what is a low level Norwegian that you speak of?

There is a large number of general quality traits - some are more specific from the racial perspective (typically Europid, racially progressive, fits into the respective racial variation etc.), others are quite genuine human, part of our hardwired behaviour in normal humans - at least of our race and in a specific context.

It goes from intelligence, other personality traits, to health, fertility, attractiveness, physical functional level etc. and from their to general behaviour, education, social status, income etc.

It is closely related to sexual and partner selection, also what we have to call "partner value". That is the value an individual has as a potential mate for a person X.
For example, a high level young woman has a different partner value for a medium or lower level, or generally older men, than for a highest level young man. Because for the first two, she is a jackpot, for the latter, she is one of many he can pick from. This relates to what we know from the economy: Supply and demand.

Clearly, a dumb, unattractive, old, infertile, unfaithful and poor woman - whether Norwegian or not, can't match ANY intelligent, attractive, young, fertile, faithful and rich woman.

You or anybody else can say what he wants, but even if the latter version is Negrid or something else that foreign, if a man doesn't prefer that before the indigenous woman of version 1, he is not a preservationist, but an idiot and biological failure.

Point is, always, what choices do you have.

If you have access to highest level Norwegian females, why should you care for foreign ones, unless pure chance plays in probably?

But if you have just access to lower level ones, things look completely different. Having the choice between a high level foreign and a low level domestic one, well, I know for what I would go.
Point is, foreign or domestic is part of the calculation: The more foreign, the better the traits must be.

This means from an individual and collective perspective, an integrable Negrid must be near perfect for all human standards for example, while for a foreign European, being above average of the local population is surely enough already - actually average can be ok too in some cases, depending on the choices.

That's my point of view and I think its reasonable.

[Pallantides]

If I get to level 80 do I get to pick the best women then?

[Agrippa]

If I get to level 80 do I get to pick the best women then?

The partner level you have for the women, will be determined by their demand. Their demand is the result of individual personality traits, combined with human constants and socio-cultural influences, among other things.

So, if for example there is a media hype about pale-long haired Leptosomes in your region, your partner value will increase dramatically, as will your attractiveness for women, at least among those which are easy to influence and more herdlike in their behaviour and judgements.

But the same can go against you, if that features become the anti-thesis of a valuable male partner, for example because some people with those traits being portrayed extremely negative in the mass media and shown extremely negatively - not even positive for the "anti-authoritarian and rebellious type" of women.

That is part of the cultural influence in this calculation. Just think about haircuts then and now, which were considered attractive through the last decades, not talking about centuries.

The other is your personality and how you deal with your assets - that's part of it as well, but again part of the female evaluation, since a behaviour loved now, might have been disrespected then.

As you know, in reality and individual cases it can be quite complicated, but in general, most of the human behaviour in this respect, as in most others, is relatively easy to understand and ready for being taken into consideration.

Females are more susceptible by social and cultural influences, since they are hardwired to go for the "successful men", which can mean a lot of different things, depending on the context.

Males are easier to calculate, since they go primarily for a combination of physical quality traits plus good partner traits, at least if being raised normally in a normal cultural environment and having no genetic deviations.

[Curtis24]

Agrippa, some also call it the "sexual market value"

Also, I agree with what you say about foreign "high-level variants" being better than low-level variants in Europe. A beautiful woman is always preferable for any man, yet the beautiful foreigners are not the ones who come to Europe as brides, generally...

[Ushtari]

Inferior subhuman!

...

*jk*:p;)
Oh no you didn't https://static.flashback.org/img/smilies2/rant.gif

[Agrippa]

Agrippa, some also call it the "sexual market value"

Also, I agree with what you say about foreign "high-level variants" being better than low-level variants in Europe. A beautiful woman is always preferable for any man, yet the beautiful foreigners are not the ones who come to Europe as brides, generally...

It was not just about beauty, though, especially if talking about longer term relationships and children, other factors play in too, but even then, there are higher and lower level women everywhere and it is relative.

[safinator]

Some other photos: https://models.com/newfaces/i/2011/03/IMG_3841.jpg
https://models.com/newfaces/i/2011/03/IMG_3839.jpg
https://models.com/newfaces/i/2011/03/IMG_3860.jpg
https://models.com/newfaces/i/2011/03/IMG_3890.jpg
https://models.com/newfaces/i/2011/03/IMG_3863.jpg
https://models.com/newfaces/i/2011/03/IMG_3885.jpg
https://models.com/newfaces/i/2011/03/IMG_3874.jpg
http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj108/ax80ax/Album%203/erjona003.jpg
http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj108/ax80ax/Album%203/erjona002.jpg
http://img573.imageshack.us/img573/8466/19706882.jpg

[Absinthe]

There is a paleoatlantid hint or is it my impression? She is very pretty. Reminds me of a brunette Uma Thurman :)

[safinator]

There is a paleoatlantid hint or is it my impression? She is very pretty. Reminds me of a brunette Uma Thurman :)
Strangely enough i see also some Paleo Atlantid strain.

[Flintlocke]

What are progressive traits?

[Ushtari]

What are progressive traits?
Being Albanian

[Absinthe]

Being Albanian
:rolleyes:

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112

[Ushtari]

:rolleyes:

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112
Dinaric = Progressive

[Absinthe]

Nordid, atlantid, gracile med, generally leptomorphic types = progressive

Dinaric, CM, Borreby, Faelid, and the like robust types = less progressive

[Ushtari]

Judging by the list you provided, Dinaric is more progressive than primitive

[Absinthe]

Judging by the list you provided, Dinaric is more progressive than primitive
I didn't say dinarid is primitive, I said it is not the epitome of progressiveness

[Ushtari]

I didn't say dinarid is primitive, I said it is not the epitome of progressiveness
Judging by the list you provided, it is.

[Flintlocke]

It's all Greek to me :rolleyes:

[Panopticon]

Nordid, atlantid, gracile med, generally leptomorphic types = progressive

Dinaric, CM, Borreby, Faelid, and the like robust types = less progressive

The difference in progressiveness between some types is rather small. It's generally like this: Nordid, Atlanto-Mediterranean, Dinarid and Faelid at the top. Agrippa could probably tell you more about that.

Gracile med however isn't considered as progressive.

[Panopticon]

Agrippa's progressive trait checklist:
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=3312&stc=1&d=1259941051

And this shows where the different types lie according to their progressiveness:
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=3313&stc=1&d=1259941081

[Absinthe]

Let's put it like this:

Progressive

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fHYnVGcpW30/Tb_z3T4QvBI/AAAAAAAAA4A/7ZcNxdPlm2s/s1600/julian-assange.jpg

Much less progressive:

http://www.elora.gr/portal/images/stories/2007_12/zahopoulos.jpg

Totally unprogressive

http://pmnewsnigeria.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Tokyo-450x336.jpg

[Ushtari]

Hellena get lost

[Flintlocke]

http://www.elora.gr/portal/images/stories/2007_12/zahopoulos.jpg



HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAH..... (takes deep breath) AAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH.................:D:D:D: D:D

[Absinthe]

Hellena get lost
?

[Ushtari]

?
Why you Greeks always have to blight Albo threadz?

[Absinthe]

Why you Greeks always have to blight Albo threadz?
We bin heerin voicez ;)

[Agrippa]

Basically Dinarid is very progressive, Mediterranid generally too, unless we talk about Proto-Mediterranoid archaics.

Mediterranids are just more harmonious than Dinarids on average, that's part of their basic evolutionary tendency.

As for Cromagnoids, it depends on their exact traits.

In general, traits are progressive, infantile or primitive, partly depending on context as well. Simple put, the more traits one has going in this or that direction, the more one is in this or that field.

Most individuals and types have traits of all three categories, but usually one aspect, one basic evolutionary tendency of modern humans predominates.

These examples come from Egon Freiherr von Eickstedt, THE authority on this matters.

Progressive/Neomorphic:
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=17116&stc=1&d=1320404720
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=17117&stc=1&d=1320404725

Infantile/Paedomorphic:
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=17118&stc=1&d=1320404725

Primitive/Archemorphic:
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=17119&stc=1&d=1320404725

The difference is clear:
Infantiles show ontogentic retardation and approach, in many traits and unbalanced, a child-like condition.
Primitives show phylogenetic retardation and approach, in many traits a more animal-like, archaic condition.

[Dilberth]

Atlanto-Nordid for the most part

[Midori]

Atlantid/Norid

[aherne]

Dinaric + Pontid. Looks Romanian...

[Pallantides]

Variants like that are an Eugenic-racial enrichment to all populations.

Yeah Agrippa was condoning race mixing. :eek::D

[D_Sheetz]

Albanian from Norway. She came 2nd in an apparently very prestigious model contest 'Elite Model Look'.

Eye colour is blue-green seemingly.

http://gfx.dagbladet.no/labrador/140/140784/14078432/jpg/active/960x.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Dxhmlk_1eMw/TRCuyG6I87I/AAAAAAAAA6U/sSnsWnrF2e8/s1600/Introducing%2BErjona.jpg

http://nd04.jxs.cz/438/933/85c4f29b1c_71187283_o2.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_14sLSJ9mU00/TSF4JNVQLNI/AAAAAAAAGdc/z--8OQKT1-g/s1600/V69_JOOS-CASTING_erjona.jpg

http://i.models.com/i/db/2011/10/64138/64138-800w.jpg

http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lpsr3vQwQJ1qizqqeo1_500.jpg

Atlantid/North-Atlantid w/ minor CM influence

[Rødskjegg]

"Albanian from Norway"


Weird sentence :P

[Archduke]

Atlanto-Nordid+Dinaro-Alpinoid influneces.

[Ugo Tognazzi]

I agree with Agrippa Dinaro/Alpinoid and Nordo/Mediterranid

[george sand]

(especially in the 3rd pic) she looks french

[tEhSaint]

Atlanto-Nordid/Atlantid + Dinaro-CM (Borreby of sorts)

[King Claus]

North pontid with dinaro alpine + cm

[Toretto]

Dinaric + north Pontid and some nordid

[Kalitas]

Palaeo-Atlantid + North-Pontid IMHO

[Amun]

Pontid with Norid tendencies

[mr. logan]

North pontid noric.

[Cleitus]

Nordid, atlantid, gracile med, generally leptomorphic types = progressive

Dinaric, CM, Borreby, Faelid, and the like robust types = less progressive

:picard2:

[ChocolateFace]

North Pontid + Alpino-CM + Dinaric

[Ianus]

North Pontid+Cm

[Mark]

Dinarized North Pontid + CM.

[ALSh]

pontid alpinoid

[oh-nahhh]

Nordid, Dinard and Pontid.

[alb0zfinest]

North Pontid + Alpino-CM + Dinaric

Where is the alpine influence?

[ChocolateFace]

Where is the alpine influence?

You can see the softness of her face, and while having a low body fat % she still looks reduced. Although not totally reduced.

[quaquaraqua]

Very Good looking Atlantid with alpine and dinarid admix.

[Vanaheimr]

Atlantid

[Hithaeglir]

Dinaricized North Pontid.

[Pausanias]

Turkic.

[safinator]

Turkic.

Show your face buddy and we'll judge who looks more Turkic.

[Pausanias]

Show your face buddy and we'll judge who looks more Turkic.

i posted photos of mine a lot of times here.

why so mad? she looks turkish to me :dunno:

[Era]

Atlanto-Nordid/Nordoid or Atlantid/Nordomediterranid + Dinaro-Alpinoid influences.

Very progressive traits too.

+1

[CommonSense]

Atlanto-Med + Dinarid