post your dna genics ethnicity composition

[17571imre]

https://imgur.com/a/jy5UHVf

i am very pleased with my results :) curious to see what you guys get.

[Luke35]

https://i.imgur.com/L9g3kIB.png

[Gergő Marosvári]

I also really like my results here. :)

https://i.postimg.cc/02JJfBQ2/k-p.png

[Gergő Marosvári]

The results of my family members:

My mom:
https://i.postimg.cc/yNhGSj9L/Anya.png

My dad:
https://i.postimg.cc/Y9psNFzM/Apa.png

My grandmother (paternal):
https://i.postimg.cc/Yq4yxMYG/Mama.png

My sister:
https://i.postimg.cc/nL1dLzb5/Testv-r.png

[17571imre]

great results for you too Mr.G and Gergő Marosvári :)

[Impaler]

I've tested only my father.

https://i.ibb.co/J7ZxQH2/screencapture-my-dnagenics-ancestry-ethnicity-2022-11-18-22-58-22.png (https://ibb.co/T8yKLtR)

[Jana]

looks very good. people who got results for multiple people, do you have to pay for each or you just unlock results once and they work for everyone?

[17571imre]

...

[Coastal Elite]

https://i.imgur.com/oG2PaSn.jpg

Looks like it gives me a midpoint

[Hulu]

[imi.imgur.com/oG2PaSn.jpg[/img]

Looks like it gives me a midpoint

So it sucks then.

[RyoHazuki]

Ethnicity Estimate

Speculative Results

90.31%
Northwestern European
90.31%
Welsh 47.91%
Welsh
- England, Kent
- England, Cornwall
England 42.40%
United Kingdom
9.24%
Broadly Asian
9.24%
Unidentified Asian 9.24%
0.45%
Broadly African
0.45%
Unidentified African 0.45%

Ethnicity Estimate

Conservative Results

100.00%
Northwestern European
99.80%
England 67.41%
United Kingdom
Welsh 26.11%
Welsh
- England, Kent
- England, Cornwall
Scottish 6.28%
Scotland
- Scotland, Orkney
- Scotland, Argyll and Bute
Broadly European
0.20%
Unidentified European 0.20%

[MandM]

https://i.ibb.co/MPnztSX/Screenshot-20221119-211711-Brave.jpg (https://ibb.co/c2JWZ3m)

[hazmatnik]

Latest update is great improvement. My results from speculative to conservative:

https://i.postimg.cc/zDWBZ1PR/mydnagenics.jpg (https://postimg.cc/c6xZwPWs)

[alexmegas777]

https://i.ibb.co/nrvd4BD/Untitled.png

[Solitude]

Latest update is great improvement. My results from speculative to conservative:

https://i.postimg.cc/zDWBZ1PR/mydnagenics.jpg (https://postimg.cc/c6xZwPWs)

my result got better when i did merge my raw datas , most interest thing about Shared modern origins is that components don't interact with each other , the analyses of the segments are conducted in isolation , admixture calc have these problems but local ancestry inferece don't have it

my new one , my intermediate is almost same result but nw is norway and the percentages little bit different

https://i.postimg.cc/5NHS8GjW/dnagenics-merged-result-shared-modern-origins-1.png

https://i.postimg.cc/fWKJFFh6/dnagenics-merged-result-shared-modern-origins-2.png

https://i.postimg.cc/MHFxw15j/dnagenics-merged-result-shared-modern-origins-3.png

old result

https://i.postimg.cc/K8ZDkzX4/Screenshot-20240312-132406.jpg

[Ylla]

https://i.postimg.cc/pL7QWCL2/IMG-3684.jpg

[ScandinavianCelt]

https://i.postimg.cc/pL7QWCL2/IMG-3684.jpg

So the Ethnicity Estimate is now called Shared Modern Origins?

I'm curious how your "speculative results" compare to your conservative. My Conservative Results don't look inclusive enough.

[ScandinavianCelt]

https://i.ibb.co/nrvd4BD/Untitled.png

Post your Speculative Results?

[Solitude]

Post your Speculative Results?

She is probably shifted to west so LAI is reading wrong her west snps , reason she is getting sardinia + east iberia , probably same reason that i got denmark in NW but i dont share any dna with them only with dutch , this overlap is probably dutch north being misread, i got overlap in central amerindian aswell , that s the problem with shared modern origins they didn't update yet , they said would be in 2024.

[ScandinavianCelt]

She is probably shifted to west so LAI is reading wrong her west snps , reason she is getting sardinia + east iberia , probably same reason that i got denmark in NW but i dont share any dna with them only with dutch , this overlap is probably dutch north being misread, i got overlap in central amerindian aswell , that s the problem with shared modern origins they didn't update yet , they said would be in 2024.

Have you tried the Marques World K47 under their Exclusive Admixture reports?

[Solitude]

yes

DNAGENICS - Admixture Studio

Marques World K47

Author: Marques

South West Europe
30.19%
Sardinian 11.73%
Iberian 11.59%
Basque 6.87%
South East Europe
24.53%
Italy 12.85%
North Balkans 8.92%
South Balkans 2.76%
Africa Nigero Congolese
24.04%
Western Africa 13.86%
Luhya 9.55%
Bantu 0.63%
South And Central America
6.43%
Yucatan 4.32%
Amazonia 2.11%
North West Europe
6.29%
Scando Germanic 5.05%
British Islanders 1.24%
North America
2.82%
North Mexico 1.61%
Arctic 1.21%
East Europe And Russia
2.21%
Finland 1.85%
Balto Slavic 0.36%
Central Asia And Pakistan
1.45%
Afghanistan And North Pakistan 1.45%
Middle Eastern
1.04%
Arabia 1.04%
Africa Hunter Gatherer
0.89%
Khoisan 0.51%
Pygmy 0.38%
Africa Chamito Semitic
0.10%
Horn Of Africa 0.10%

[Grace O'Malley]

https://i.postimg.cc/MTgBp7zj/Screenshot-2025-02-21-222713.png

https://i.postimg.cc/brjQRx4f/Screenshot-2025-02-21-223107.png

https://i.postimg.cc/s2hQ0BYj/Screenshot-2025-02-21-223312.png

[Solitude]

https://i.postimg.cc/MTgBp7zj/Screenshot-2025-02-21-222713.png

https://i.postimg.cc/brjQRx4f/Screenshot-2025-02-21-223107.png

https://i.postimg.cc/s2hQ0BYj/Screenshot-2025-02-21-223312.png

A portion of your SNPs is likely very similar to regions near Dublin and Leinster, which were among the areas most frequently raided by Vikings from Hordaland and Rogaland. This could be the reason why, in admixture calculators and analysis methods like local ancestry inference, many of your SNPs are being interpreted as Scandinavian.

[Grace O'Malley]

A portion of your SNPs is likely very similar to regions near Dublin and Leinster, which were among the areas most frequently raided by Vikings from Hordaland and Rogaland. This could be the reason why, in admixture calculators and analysis methods like local ancestry inference, many of your SNPs are being interpreted as Scandinavian.

My father was from Roscommon and my mother from North Tipperary but close to Limerick which was a Viking colony. I'm not saying there might not be some Scandinavian but I think the amount is over estimated on a lot of these platforms and calcs. Thanks for the comments though. It's always interesting to get opinions on your results.

[Solitude]

My father was from Roscommon and my mother from North Tipperary but close to Limerick which was a Viking colony. I'm not saying there might not be some Scandinavian but I think the amount is over estimated on a lot of these platforms and calcs. Thanks for the comments though. It's always interesting to get opinions on your results.

You have Scandinavian ancestry with 100% certainty, most of your admixture calculator results that give almost 100 percent Irish are just due to the application of the penalty but the Scandinavian similarity is still there, your DNA without an IBD filter is almost impossible to get an accurate result.

[ScandinavianCelt]

Here is my MERGED DATA-- Conservative vs Speculative: Shared Modern Origins:

https://i.postimg.cc/hvMk6Z2T/conserv-vs-speculative-sharedmodernorigins-merged.jpg (https://postimg.cc/SY21zdFx)

[Gannicus]

Conservative:

Northwestern European 99.59%
English 85.01%
Welsh 11.70%
Scottish 2.87%
Broadly European0.41%
Unidentified European 0.41%


Intermediate:


Northwestern European 94.28%
English 60.86%
France 30.53%
Okney Islands 2.90%

Basque 1.93%
Spain
Broadly European 0.39%
Unidentified European 0.39%
Asia:3.40%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 2.98%
Arabian 2.98%
Broadly Asian 0.43%
Unidentified Asian 0.43%

137571
137572

I'm not really sure how to interpret the speculative results:

137573

[Grace O'Malley]

Conservative:

Northwestern European 99.59%
English 85.01%
Welsh 11.70%
Scottish 2.87%
Broadly European0.41%
Unidentified European 0.41%


Intermediate:


Northwestern European 94.28%
English 60.86%
France 30.53%
Okney Islands 2.90%

Basque 1.93%
Spain
Broadly European 0.39%
Unidentified European 0.39%
Asia:3.40%
Arab, Egyptian & Levantine 2.98%
Arabian 2.98%
Broadly Asian 0.43%
Unidentified Asian 0.43%

137571
137572

I'm not really sure how to interpret the speculative results:

137573

Your speculative records are really odd for your ancestry. Nearly half West Asian. That's not realistic IMO.

[Rædwald]

https://i.postimg.cc/rm4b1cHn/Screenshot-2025-02-21-223549.png

https://i.postimg.cc/WbwBYN1x/Screenshot-2025-02-21-223657.png

https://i.postimg.cc/Ssz0gcnG/Screenshot-2025-02-21-223720.png

[Gannicus]

Your speculative records are really odd for your ancestry. Nearly half West Asian. That's not realistic IMO.

The only idea I have is that it is amplifying smaller admixtures that I see occasionally with G25/ Illustrative/ certain models in qpAdm.

The description under speculative kind of supports my idea:

137590

I've been investigating this for a bit now and all I can say based on all the data I've looked at is that the near east is part of my makeup, but it is not recent. Not as ancient as the neolithic I think. More recent for instance during the Hellenistic and Roman periods.

I don't think that my merged file could be the problem. I've heard it's superior to merge DNA files together for better coverage.

[Grace O'Malley]

You have Scandinavian ancestry with 100% certainty, most of your admixture calculator results that give almost 100 percent Irish are just due to the application of the penalty but the Scandinavian similarity is still there, your DNA without an IBD filter is almost impossible to get an accurate result.

I always get a reasonably large chunk of Scandinavian on calculators. I honestly don't think it is real. I do however acknowledge there is some Scandinavian there but some of the Scandinavian on calculators is due to this Bronze Age similarity across NW Europe.

[Solitude]

I always get a reasonably large chunk of Scandinavian on calculators. I honestly don't think it is real. I do however acknowledge there is some Scandinavian there but some of the Scandinavian on calculators is due to this Bronze Age similarity across NW Europe.

It would not be something recent, your raw data has small blocks that are not common for the Insular Celts, these small blocks that are spread across different chromosomes that make the DNA of some people so different from the DNA of the same individuals from nearby regions, the common ancestor with these small blocks can reach more than 1000 years, these small blocks are only possible to be excluded using filters.

[Lard]

https://i.ibb.co/jkWf7C1s/Screenshot-2025-01-27-at-11-41-58-G25-Studio-DNAGENICS.png

[cass]

https://i.ibb.co/G4nzQLS4/Zrzut-ekranu-2-3-2025-124118-www-dnagenics-com.jpg (https://ibb.co/Ndtc2PBd)

I don't know if they use the analysis of individual sequences, but it looks similar to coordinate-based analysis.