Making hard questions

[HunterKillerDrone]

Why is everyone in all these forums so preoccupied with DNA tests when so many fundamental issues need questioning ? Is the out of Africa theory even remotely correct ? What about others that talk about multiple hominids ? Is the anthropological academia really doing research or do they have a political agenda like most other science fields nowadays and once you start making questions or make some actual findings you get crucified ? Since thats (the last question) true how reliable anything related to DNA testing is ? DNA testing started roughly 25 years ago how much of the info regarding autosomal tests is reliable ? How much anything related to haplogroups is true and how much can we rely to them ? How much do phenotypes corelate with genetics and can we just look at skulls and faces and guess someones haplo and autosomal composition (not really a hard question and i believe that yes we can but we need good pictures of individuals going back 2-3 generations to have a good idea) ? How do we know that those testing companies dont take our genetic information in order to use them in malicious ways ? After all all other big companies do take massive amounts of info in order to social engineer whole societies.I think we can have a good,polite and sober conversation :)

Of course,to go back to the first question,i have been preoccupied with tests myself but a lot of questions started popping in my head in retrospective.

[JamesBond007]

Why is everyone in all these forums so preoccupied with DNA tests when so many fundamental issues need questioning ? Is the out of Africa theory even remotely correct ? What about others that talk about multiple hominids ? Is the anthropological academia really doing research or do they have a political agenda like most other science fields nowadays and once you start making questions or make some actual findings you get crucified ? Since thats (the last question) true how reliable anything related to DNA testing is ? DNA testing started roughly 25 years ago how much of the info regarding autosomal tests is reliable ?



Yes, pretty much all science outside of physics is politically motivated statistical manipulation and anthropology removed Darwinism from it's realm thanks to the Jew Franz Boas so you basically just answered your own question to the out of Africa theory but in regards to DNA testing stuff your best bet might be trusting people outside of Academia like Davidski's G25, illustrativeDNA, and the Celtic vs Germanic PCA. Though, Davidski used some software from Harvard for G25 at least.

[HunterKillerDrone]

Yes, pretty much all science outside of physics is politically motivated statistical manipulation and anthropology removed Darwinism from it's realm thanks to the Jew Franz Boas so you basically just answered your own question to the out of Africa theory but in regards to DNA testing stuff your best bet might be trusting people outside of Academia like Davidski's G25, illustrativeDNA, and the Celtic vs Germanic PCA. Though, Davidski used some software from Harvard for G25 at least.

I would personally and with a lot of confidence say that even physics is polluted by that same academia.

Neither used G25 or illustrative DNA are they worth the cost ? How much different are their results gonna be from the Ancestry test that i received my results half a month ago ? I have used Gedmatch a lot and find its predictions very accurate.Do you have any other than gedmatch and easy to use free calculator ?

[Boudin]

Neither used G25 or illustrative DNA are they worth the cost ?

You buy G25 through IllustrativeDNA, and yes, it's 200% worth the $25.