Danish Scientist on TV: Nano-thermite Behind Collapse of WTC Buildings on 9/11

[Sol Invictus]

Danish Scientist on TV: Nano-thermite Behind Collapse of WTC Buildings on 9/11, NOT planes.

Clare Swinney (http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/04/12/danish-scientist-talks-for-10-minutes-on-tv-about-nano-thermite-found-in-the-dust-at-the-wtc/)
Uncensored Magazine
April 13, 2009

On the morning of April the 6th, Professor Niels Harrit of Copenhagen University in Denmark, who is an expert in nano-chemistry, was interviewed for an entire 10 minutes during a news program on the topic of the nano-thermite found in the dust from the World Trade Centre, (WTC).

8_tf25lx_3o

During this news report, Harrit, who is one of the nine scientists primarily responsible for the pivotal paper entitled: ‘Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe’, talks about how their research, which was conducted over 18 months, led to the conclusion that planes did not cause the collapse of the three buildings at the WTC on 9/11.

He says that they found such large quantities of nano-thermite in the dust from the WTC, that he believes that this compound, which has the ability to melt metal, must have been brought into the WTC site in tonnes, on pallets. Consequently, he suggests that we need to address this matter with those who were in charge of the security at the World Trade Centre on 9/11.

Harrit, like Dr Steven Jones who also played a major role in this ground-breaking research, refers to their findings as “the loaded gun” and suggests that military personnel might be able to enlighten us more on the little-known topic of nano-thermite, which differs from regular thermite in a number of significant ways, including that its ignition temperature is far lower than that of the conventional kind, [1].

[Ulex]

I am not able to view this particular clip, but not long ago a Danish newspaper interviewed this professor Harrit. He appears a bit nerdy, like most people do, when they study so much they are no longer able to change a light bulb. But his facts are extremely clear and well stated.

What is even more noteworthy is that several publicly known people, such as writers, entertainers, musicians etc. is backing him up. This is without any doubt the most popular conspiracy theory ever.

[Thorum]

And all this time I thought full size jet airliners traveling at high speed with fully loaded gas tanks caused the WTC destruction. Silly me, how naive.

I learned this today also:

Thermite (http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=11334.0) was found at the Pentagon crash site. Proving the damage caused by the plane hitting the Pentagon was not caused by the plane hitting the Pentagon.

Also, Thermite was found inside President Kennedy's limousine and in the book repository after assassination proving we are in the end times (http://the-end.com/2008GodsFinalWitness/?gclid=CJmD3MTuypoCFShRagodlA3D2w).

[Vulpix]

So, were the planes photoshopped on :D?

[SwordoftheVistula]

I don't see what the rationale would be to planting explosives in the building and then flying planes into it. All it would do is add to the number of people needed to be involved in the plan and increase the risk of discovery or something else going wrong.

[Sol Invictus]

The whole purpose of planting explosives in the building would be so that they would be pulverized completely, resulting in the maximum damage to property and people. The New World Order stated openly that America needs a pearl harbour style attack in order to get them behind a war of their choosing, and seize the rights guaranteed to the people under the Constitution, which in itself should be considered a holy document.

Experts in engineering, including the person who constructed the towers, knew that the twin towers were well capable of withstanding multiple impacts from aircraft. Have you seen the building plans to these facilities? They are available as diagrams on google and look for yourself. They were a solid mass of steel columns, reinforced with steel rods on every floor, with tons of concrete poured over it.

There is no way in hell that a fire from burning jet fuel will cause all of this to completely fail and pancake at free-fall speeds. You can't even temper steel with that kind of heat, let alone the Asbestos and fireproofing that the building was absolutely caked with, which was spewed into the air that everyone in the area was breathing. A hazard that has claimed the lives of more people than the actual attacks themselves.

The EPA director said: "It's okay. Take a deep breath. You don't need a respirator."

The geniuses who built this wonder had taken into consideration that the world is modern, and the skies are full of traffic, therefore, there is the possibility of a jet liner slamming into buildings in the New York skyline - especially when you're dealing with buildings that tower over everything as far as the eye can see.

They were built to withstand impacts from Boeing 707s, which actually travel faster than the planes used in the attacks, thus, carry much more fuel. They use four engines instead of two, and are significantly larger.

These buildings needed to come down, and the only thing that would do that is to use military grade high exposlive thermite. Now think about why there would be traces of explosives at a crime scene, and it is being completely disregarded. No investigation is being conducted, and they aren't even attempting to baffle our brains with bullshit about how a bunch of cavemen got a hold of thermite, just like they explained how Mohammed Atta's passport magically flew out of a ball of fire and landed so conveniently at the foot of the WTC for someone to discover it (along with his Will, a Flight Book, and a Koran).

A video by Prof. Graeme MacQueen of MacMaster University, in Hamilton Ontario Canada. Check it out.

IwQa5eokieY

cZ4dVo5QgYg

Loose Change: Final Cut, by Jason Bermas

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3719259008768610598&ei=6xsWSrWTC5H6rALfsZy1AQ&q=loose+change+final+cut

[Thorum]

Ok, you win!! I thought this thread was a joke at first, now I suppose people actually believe this crap. Carry on...............

You can embrace the Muslim hordes, I will fight them.

[Beorn]

Ok, you win!! I thought this thread was a joke at first, now I suppose people actually believe this crap. Carry on.

Hardly crap, Thorum. You just haven't seen all the evidence presented.

Have a watch of this film concerning the Pentagon attack and see what you think.

2833924626286859522

[Skandi]

I have just wasted 10 minutes of my life reading that paper. It is terrible, I would like to see a more scientific study published in a more reputable place.

[SuuT]

...Also, Bin Laden (...BOO!...) was awfully quick to lay claim to 9/11 in quite a detailed way. He never mentioned Thermite, which should beg a gargantuan amount of questions.

[Freomæg]

Ok, you win!! I thought this thread was a joke at first, now I suppose people actually believe this crap. Carry on...............

You can embrace the Muslim hordes, I will fight them.
Hello again friend ;). I know that to think Muslims are responsible for 9/11 and 7/7 gives us an extra boost in our hatred for them, but there's enough that is hideous about Islam, without these events, to warrant despising it.

9/11 was perpetrated by the New World Order (I used to be afraid of ridicule for using that term, but it is so late in the hour now that I no longer care). If you want to judge the evidence for yourself I'll be happy to link you to several documentaries that are available to watch for free.

Now, you may think that the existence of a New World Order detracts from our justification for hating Islam and wanting to preserve our races and cultures. Actually, it's the opposite. The New World Order is the cause of our struggle. The New World Order is responsible for promoting multiculturalism, the destruction of the white race, killing traditional values, corrupting spirituality, worsening our health, dumbing us down and dragging us into war.

Both the NWO and Islam are worthy of our scorn. If you need the official 9/11 story in order to hate Muslims, then I think you should perhaps look at all the other reasons that make them worth hating.

[Sol Invictus]

^ Bump ^

[SwordoftheVistula]

The whole purpose of planting explosives in the building would be so that they would be pulverized completely, resulting in the maximum damage to property and people. The New World Order stated openly that America needs a pearl harbour style attack in order to get them behind a war of their choosing, and seize the rights guaranteed to the people under the Constitution, which in itself should be considered a holy document.


Planes into the buildings would certainly have killed more than were killed in the Oklahoma City bombing (168) and people went apeshit over that. As far as the science & engineering stuff posted, for every one of those guys, you'll find a dozen or more who dispute those.




Hello again friend ;). I know that to think Muslims are responsible for 9/11 and 7/7 gives us an extra boost in our hatred for them, but there's enough that is hideous about Islam, without these events, to warrant despising it.

9/11 was perpetrated by the New World Order (I used to be afraid of ridicule for using that term, but it is so late in the hour now that I no longer care). If you want to judge the evidence for yourself I'll be happy to link you to several documentaries that are available to watch for free.

Why would the 'New World Order' (American 'neo-conservative' supporters of Israel) need to do something which they could just let the muslims do instead? Muslims had the means (suicidal maniacs), motive (America's actions in relation to the Israel/Palestine issue), and opportunity (lax security caused by political correctness). For them to do this on their own would have required a massive conspiracy, with many people involved, many chances for leaks or mistakes.

[YggsVinr]

I'm not much for conspiracy theories typically, but some of what Harrit had to say was interesting I must admit. It does raise questions for me, and seems to make more sense to me than your typical conspiracy theories concerning 9/11. However, SwordoftheVistula highlighted my main thoughts which, despite the vague plausibility of Harrit's suggestions, necessitates that I remain rather skeptical.


For them to do this on their own would have required a massive conspiracy, with many people involved, many chances for leaks or mistakes.

Those are typically my thoughts concerning 9/11 conspiracy theories. Out of curiosity, does anyone here know of any papers or videos that dispute this nano-thermite theory? I'd certainly be interested in a potential "other side of the coin", and I can imagine that the theory is not as air-tight for someone with knowledge in the field as Harrit claims.

[Freomæg]

Why would the 'New World Order' (American 'neo-conservative' supporters of Israel) need to do something which they could just let the muslims do instead?
No, you're absolutely right in that point, and were there no evidence of controlled demolition (particularly where WTC 7 was concerned), the covering up of standard-investigation, or brow-raising testimonials, I could accept that it was 100% Muslim terrorist.

The most I will concede on the subject of 9/11 is that it could have been a genuine Islamo-Fundamentalist plot, that was secretly known about by US Intelligence, who aided in the collapse of the buildings accordingly - but then it begs the question of how the buildings could have been rigged at short notice.

One thing I absolutely disbelieve is that those buildings would have fallen, in the manner that they did, without hidden means.

[SwordoftheVistula]

Popular Mechanics, a science/engineering type magazine, had a big article a few years back on this:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=1

[Rudy]

Planes into the buildings would certainly have killed more than were killed in the Oklahoma City bombing (168) and people went apeshit over that. As far as the science & engineering stuff posted, for every one of those guys, you'll find a dozen or more who dispute those.
The bomb in OKC was a hot air bomb. It would not be able to blast more than 10 feet of concrete. Force falls off at 1/x squared, that is why they have to drill a hole into a mountain in order to dynamite it. The reason why the entire front of the Murrah building exploded was because the FBI had been storing explosives in the front of the building.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/multibla.html
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/ok.html

According to Stephen Jones, who has seen the interview transcripts, it took 44 days for the FBI to convince the car rental agency owner that John Doe 1 was Timothy McVeigh. And in the end they did not dare put him on the witness stand, for fear of what might happen under cross-examination.

[Rudy]

For them to do this on their own would have required a massive conspiracy, with many people involved, many chances for leaks or mistakes.
I frequently see the false argument that large conspiracies cannot be concealed. The government has been hiding the JFK conspiracy since 1960.
E Howard Hunt's Confession. There is no greater evidence than a confession.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/13893143/the_last_confessions_of_e_howard_hunt/print

E. Howard scribbled the initials "LBJ," standing for Kennedy's ambitious vice president, Lyndon Johnson. Under "LBJ," connected by a line, he wrote the name Cord Meyer. Meyer was a CIA agent whose wife had an affair with JFK; later she was murdered, a case that's never been solved. Next his father connected to Meyer's name the name Bill Harvey, another CIA agent; also connected to Meyer's name was the name David Morales, yet another CIA man and a well-known, particularly vicious black-op specialist. And then his father connected to Morales' name, with a line, the framed words "French Gunman Grassy Knoll."

So there it was, according to E. Howard Hunt. LBJ had Kennedy killed. It had long been speculated upon. But now E. Howard was saying that's the way it was. And that Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't the only shooter in Dallas. There was also, on the grassy knoll, a French gunman, presumably the Corsican Mafia assassin Lucien Sarti, who has figured prominently in other assassination theories.

[anonymaus]

The central belief of every moron is that he is the victim of a mysterious conspiracy against his common rights and true deserts. He ascribes all his failure to get on in the world, all of his congenital incapacity and damfoolishness, to the machinations of werewolves assembled in Wall Street, or some other such den of infamy.

-Mencken

Carry on (http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/theory/conspiracy.html); nothing to see here (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/04/AR2006060400618.html).

[Rudy]

Popular Mechanics, a science/engineering type magazine, had a big article a few years back on this:
The article was written by Michael Chertoff's cousin.

The arguments presented in the article have been widely debunked by the 9/11 truth community as an example of a straw man hatchet job - whereby false arguments are erected, attributed to 9/11 skeptics, and then shot down.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/100806popularmechanics.htm

[Útrám]

You "inside job" lunatics entertain me, why do you keep denying the self-evident truth? 9/11 was obviously the doing of the Reptilians and their human allies the Freemasons, it's all part of their effort to overthrow god.

wqf0N0Z2nps

Wake Up!

No, in all seriousness this is quite an increment of credibility to the the taboo 9/11 theories. Based on what I can find about nano-thermite it is like what he said, the equivalent of finding a used pistol on a homicide scene, a proper investigator would neither ignore it or rule it out as a coincidence.

[Rudy]

The website link below has articles by architects and engineers concerning the 9-11 building collapses. The building collapse video and pictures are available there also.
http://www.ae911truth.org/

the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all the characteristics of destruction by explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics)
1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration
2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction
4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes
5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft at 60 mph
6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking
7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds
8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found
9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 – 40 stories below demolition front
10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame
11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises
12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found in steel & dust samples
13. FEMA steel analysis: sulfidation, oxidation & intergranular melting
14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”


As your own eyes witness — WTC Building #7 (a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane) exhibits all the characteristics of a classic controlled demolition with explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics)
1. Rapid onset of “collapse”
2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a full second prior to collapse
3. Symmetrical “collapse” – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall acceleration
4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed mostly in its own footprint
5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
7. Chemical signature of Thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples by physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.
8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
9. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
10. Fore-knowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”.

[Rudy]

More professionals are calling for another investigation into 9-11.

The towers should have fallen “with increasing eccentricity as the collapse progressed,” writes Howard Pasternack, P.E. These systematic collapses required that many structural connections not only fail “nearly simultaneously,” but also “in sequential order,” wrote Frank Cullinan, P.E., who designs bridges in Northern California. That’s “impossible from asymmetrical impact loading and ...
small, short-duration fires.”
http://www.ae911truth.org/downloads/29_Structural-Civil_Engineers_2009-06-17.pdf

[SuuT]

No, you're absolutely right in that point, and were there no evidence of controlled demolition (particularly where WTC 7 was concerned), the covering up of standard-investigation, or brow-raising testimonials, I could accept that it was 100% Muslim terrorist.

The most I will concede on the subject of 9/11 is that it could have been a genuine Islamo-Fundamentalist plot, that was secretly known about by US Intelligence, who aided in the collapse of the buildings accordingly - but then it begs the question of how the buildings could have been rigged at short notice.

One thing I absolutely disbelieve is that those buildings would have fallen, in the manner that they did, without hidden means.

:confused2:.....So the let me make sure I'm crystal, here: Z.O.G of the U.S. is in cahoots with Islamo-Facist secret societies that, in conjuction with one another, form a secretive N.W.O that is seeking to ensalve the population of globe and have managed to keep it out of mainstream press who's primary aim in the era of money-motivated news and sensationalistic 'journalism' is to print and report anything and everything that will, in turn, make money...?


I spent a significant amount of time re-viewing the posted videos some time back, and someone, somewhere therein, talked about the presence of Sulfur at the scence of 9/11 as the nail-in-the-coffin proof of a controlled demolition. Given that I am no engineer, I called one I know to get his thoughts. Turns out that Jet Fuel, relative to the total admixture of its composition, is very very high in Sulfur; further, the disintegration of Sulfur's molecular structure occurs at some wicked high Kelvin. In short, my friend told me that the cause for alarm would be if there were no Sulfur found at the scence: "It would be like examining a gun recently fired and finding no G.S.R", he said.

I don't question that a paradigm shift has occured in, particularly, the western world. I just think that all of this conspiratorial stuff defies, in particular, everything that we know about the nature of Power (via the Social Sciences, Philosophy, etc). Power is simply not that lest it not only vent, but make its venting ubiquitously obvious: Power has a rather insatiable ego. And while there are undoubtedly some sociopathically good liers in the world, the number who would be able to pull such large scale smoke-and-mirror acts off whilst mums the word can probably be counted on a single hand that has been run-over by a train.

[Freomæg]

:confused2:.....So the let me make sure I'm crystal, here: Z.O.G of the U.S. is in cahoots with Islamo-Facist secret societies that, in conjuction with one another, form a secretive N.W.O that is seeking to ensalve the population of globe and have managed to keep it out of mainstream press who's primary aim in the era of money-motivated news and sensationalistic 'journalism' is to print and report anything and everything that will, in turn, make money...?
I wouldn't word it like that, but essentially, yes! :thumb001:

The press is motivated by money, but it's a question of where the money's coming from and who's offering the most. All mainstream media is owned - when you trace the trail far enough - by a handful of people worldwide. Do you not think there's far more money to be made in aiding the enslavement of 6.8 billion people than there is dropping a few sensational news bombs?

PS - I don't believe in ZOG or secret Islamo-fascist societies. I believe that there is a secret cartel who transcend national, religious and ethnic (and ethical for that matter) boundaries and they go to extreme lengths to safeguard the immense power they have acquired.

[RoyBatty]

I'd like to know what happened to that supposed "plane" which hit the Pentagon. :confused:

The ZOG version of 9/11 doesn't compute as far as I'm concerned and there were too many convenient wars, "terrorist" scapegoats and policy changes which followed which makes me even more convinced the whole thing was a contrived event.

Whatever the "truth" was, the only thing that is certain is that we'll never know. :)

[Sol Invictus]

I'd like to know what happened to that supposed "plane" which hit the Pentagon. :confused:

The ZOG version of 9/11 doesn't compute as far as I'm concerned and there were too many convenient wars, "terrorist" scapegoats and policy changes which followed which makes me even more convinced the whole thing was a contrived event.

Whatever the "truth" was, the only thing that is certain is that we'll never know. :)

I don't think so. I think that it may take us 30 maybe 40 years before we know as 'common knowledge' that the towers were brought down deliberately. It will take time before all the evidence presents itself to everyone, but in the end the truth will come out, and those responsible will be held accountable. And we will be there.... smiling at everyone who thought the (as told by Glenn Beck and FOX news) 'conspiracy nuts' crazy for wanting nothing more than a PROPER investigation into the murders of over 2000 innocent lives.

[Rudy]

This reporter describes what he saw at ground zero. There are many anomalies concerning the incineration of evidence.

We are asked to believe that all four of the “indestructible” black boxes of the two jets that struck the twin towers were never found because they were completely vaporized, yet I have footage of the rubber wheels of the landing gear nearly undamaged, as well as the seats, parts of the fuselage and a jet turbine that were absolutely not vaporized. This being said, I do find it rather odd that such objects could have survived fairly intact the type of destruction that turned most of the Twin Towers into thin dust. And I definitely harbor some doubts about the authenticity of the “jet” turbine, far too small to have come from one of the Boeings!
http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=2722

[Útrám]

Another fishy aspect of 9/11 is how reluctant Usama Bin Laden was when it came to claiming responsibility. The video of "Osama" where he states he is the perpetrator is of awful quality and whoever is in it has a puffy face with a much darker skin tone as opposed to Osama who's a tall, scrawny fellow with a lighter olive skin complexion. In recent times Osama has just subtly hinted at Al-Qaeda being responsible, when he realized there weren't any prime suspects he may have falsely taken credit merely to demonstrate what Al-Qaeda is capable of.

[Guapo]

No, you're absolutely right in that point, and were there no evidence of controlled demolition (particularly where WTC 7 was concerned), the covering up of standard-investigation, or brow-raising testimonials, I could accept that it was 100% Muslim terrorist.

The most I will concede on the subject of 9/11 is that it could have been a genuine Islamo-Fundamentalist plot, that was secretly known about by US Intelligence, who aided in the collapse of the buildings accordingly - but then it begs the question of how the buildings could have been rigged at short notice.

One thing I absolutely disbelieve is that those buildings would have fallen, in the manner that they did, without hidden means.

Probably was 100% Muslim terrorist but it could have been a "planned" event by the "people with all the money". The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand was used as the excuse for the first world war, but the conflict had been decided upon long before. Supposedly, members of the Black Hand met with French and Grand Orient Freemasons months before recruiting assassins, who were suffering from TB and going to die anyway and therefore have nothing to lose, with promises of monies for there families etc. They just needed that spark to ignite it.

[Angantyr]

Ok, you win!! I thought this thread was a joke at first, now I suppose people actually believe this crap. Carry on...............

You can embrace the Muslim hordes, I will fight them.

I thought this was a joke thread, too. I thought we were all laughing at the conspiracy lunatics.

I personally would like to distance myself and European preservationism from these ideas. These are clearly not the views of European preservationists, but of a few individuals.

[Guapo]

What ideas exactly? I think many issues should be discussed concerning our national and European preservation including the agendas of governments, manipulation of media etc. Serbia fought the "Muslim hordes" and were punished for it. Take things with a grain of salt and come up with your own conclusions if you dont agree.

[Freomæg]

I thought this was a joke thread, too. I thought we were all laughing at the conspiracy lunatics.

I personally would like to distance myself and European preservationism from these ideas. These are clearly not the views of European preservationists, but of a few individuals.
I think you'll find it increasingly apparent that issues surrounding European preservation and what you deem to be conspiracy 'theories' are inextricably linked. I'm not going to lose any sleep over your dissaproval because, quite frankly, I know what I talk about to be true. If you're interested in my reasoning, I'd be happy to explain in more detail.

[Sol Invictus]

...Also, Bin Laden (...BOO!...) was awfully quick to lay claim to 9/11 in quite a detailed way. He never mentioned Thermite, which should beg a gargantuan amount of questions.

Actually, it may interest you to know that Bin Laden actually denied involvement in the attacks on three different occasions, and the Taliban offered to hand over Bin Laden to the American Government when evidence was presented that he was involved. The so-called 'smoking gun' videos have questionable authenticity, and the ones that are genuine, you'll find Bin Laden only praises the attacks, be does not take responsibility for it, but denies it. It may also interest you to know that the FBI does not list Bin Laden's apparent involvement in 9/11 as one of the charges against him, nor is he indicted for 9/11. You don't find any of this to be odd?

[Freomæg]

...and just to extend my last post a little: I sincerely believe that we will never truly succeed in reinstating cultural/ethnic pride and sovereignty to Europe until we effectively deal with the entire web of covert tyranny. So in my view, it is imperative that European preservationists wake up to the reality of all of this.

[Beorn]

The so-called 'smoking gun' videos have questionable authenticity, and the ones that are genuine, you'll find Bin Laden only praises the attacks, be does not take responsibility for it, but denies it.

The last we heard from the real bin Laden came in his post-9/11 statements to Pakistani journalists:

"I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation. ... I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. ... I had no knowledge of these attacks." (http://damien911.blogspot.com/2006/07/expert-questions-osbl-tapes-and-videos.html)

[Freomæg]

I personally would like to distance myself and European preservationism from these ideas.
I wrote an article ages ago, which I've just posted up on The Apricity, detailing the link between the destruction of Pagan values (including folkish sensibilities) and the move towards a one-world order - here (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?p=67418#post67418). Perhaps it will help you to find my beliefs a little less laughable ;).

[Sol Invictus]

Here's some information concerning the fake Bin Laden tapes.
Judge for yourself.

NkbAvx5jUu0
fkxRh2sXGdI

Concerning the background of the 9/11 hijackers, the training they received, who actually bankrolled the deaths of over 2000 American citizens, about Operation: Able Danger, Amalgam Virgo, Global Guardian, and the evidence presented by the American Government about the official version of events that unfolded that day:

WEcbS_mLjUs
qeYlB5shnag
Med5HZQ0Rmc


View the full video here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3719259008768610598&ei=n8tXStK9DaWUrALFz6nVAg&q=loose+change+final+cut

[Sol Invictus]

National Security Agency is running amok to plug leaks about 9/11.

See this (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?p=67526#post67526) thread for the video interview of Russia Today with whistle blower Wayne Madsen.

[Ulex]

I found an English interview with controversial professor Niels Harrit: http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2009/07/14/professor-harrit-wtc-buildings-were-brought-down-by-controlled-demolition/
(Enjoy his typycally borrebyoid facial structure too! (LOOOL))

[Rudy]

Lengthy paper on the thermitic material found in the Trade Center dust.

Scientists Discover Both Residues
And Unignited Fragments
Of Nano-Engineered Thermitic Pyrotechnics
In Debris From the Twin Towers
by
Jim Hoffman
Version 1.0, April 3, 2009
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html