The best Medieval Calculator I've ever seen

[Eurafricanid]

ILLUSTRATIVE DNA "recently" added their "Periodical Ancient Ancestry Breakdown", but with that, they also updated their "Customizable Ancient Ancestry" calculator with all those rich samples, I was testing with some samples there and then I got the best results in a medieval calculator:

For this calculator I used:

France (AD 130–1400)
Iberian (AD 300–1200)
Byzantine Anatolia (AD 500–1100)
Insular Celt (AD 100–1000)
Levantine (AD 300–1300)
Arabian Peninsula
SSA & Amerindian
I tried every single Medieval combination I could, and I got the best the best results with these cateories.


Here are my results:

https://i.imgur.com/1fl44vw.png

https://i.imgur.com/deo6zNJ.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/HqJPFR2.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/dweWzbc.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/RpAN9TM.png

I encourage y'all to do the same for awesome results, just keep in mind to keep them in a similar time period. :thumb001:

[Jingle Bell]

https://i.imgur.com/qlFnlYv.png

[Eurafricanid]

https://i.imgur.com/qlFnlYv.png

did u include European Jewish? I know you usually match Sephardic ;).

[Jingle Bell]

did u include European Jewish? I know you usually match Sephardic ;).

https://i.imgur.com/muSAXFV.png
Suposing that Iberian + French + IC should be my Christian Iberian ancestry and that Early Askhenazi + Arab + Levant is my Al-Andalus Elite/Soldier one looks very nice, looks like my MyHeritage results

[Eurafricanid]

https://i.imgur.com/muSAXFV.png
Suposing that Iberian + French + IC should be my Christian Iberian ancestry and that Early Askhenazi + Arab is my Al-Andalus Elite/Soldier one looks very nice

Interesting! it does look nice, but it's interesting that, for the first time (I think) you didn't match North Africans (North African (AD 580–1160))! :eek:Some categories also give you specific results, if you click on them, like my Anatolian, which is Southwetstern Anatolian and the Arab that is Medieval arab, it's very good with that! BTW, the European Jewish works very well for Sephardics, as well, since they were basically the same at that time period, :thumb001:, also, did you match Nilo-saharan and Khoi-San? I'm sorry for too many questions, you're just so similar to me, that I have to ask.

[Jingle Bell]

Interesting! it does look nice, but it's interesting that, for the first time (I think) you didn't match North Africans (North African (AD 580–1160))! :eek:Some categories also give you specific results, if you click on them, like my Anatolian, which is Southwetstern Anatolian and the Arab that is Medieval arab, it's very good with that! BTW, the European Jewish works very well for Sephardics, as well, since they were basically the same at that time period, :thumb001:, also, did you match Nilo-saharan and Khoi-San? I'm sorry for too many questions, you're just so similar to me, that I have to ask.

Np, gonna write bca i cant use imgur rn:

Iberian (AD 300–1200) : 33.2%
France (AD 130–1400) : 12.2%
Arabian (Umayyad Period) : 2.8%
Arabian (Middle Ages) : 0.4%
Byzantine Levantine : 2.2%
Pict : 0.8%
North African : 0.6%
Norwich Jew : 0.2%

Now NA appeared

[alexmegas777]

https://i.ibb.co/2kt3JnY/Untitled.png

[Eurafricanid]

https://i.ibb.co/2kt3JnY/Untitled.png

You used classical mixed with medieval, it's very all over the place.

[Beowulf]

looks pretty good

https://i.postimg.cc/bJSdprLj/Screenshot-2023-04-13-16-11-23.png (https://postimages.org/)



https://i.postimg.cc/Tws757rD/Screenshot-2023-04-13-16-23-25.png (https://postimages.org/)

[PierreUno]

Germanic (AD 700–1000) :
Scandinavian Viking (Sealand) : 20.6% (Denmark)
Scandinavian Viking (Oxford) : 20.8% (Dutch-like ?)
Insular Celt (AD 100–1000) :
Roman Britain : 39.4% (Welsh, Cornish, Breton like)
Pict : 1.0% ( a Scottish tribe)
France (AD 130–1400) : 12.4% (some French admixture can be found in Southern England)
Armenian (AD 1030–1300) : 4.6 % (these kind of exotic strains and semetic strains can be found in Cornwall England from trading tin metals in ancient times e.g. the Phoenicians)
Magyar : 1.6% ( ?? Alien to Britain but it is very minor so I ignore this)

[Vitez]

I tried different combinations, it's really interesting. I'm quite mixed.

Fit : 0.769 (Very Good)

Balkans (AD 500–1000) 20.2%

Italian (AD 650–1450) 18.2%

Slavic (AD 540–1270) 13.8%

Baltic (AD 900–1050) 12.2%

Baltic (AD 260–540)11.6%

Germanic (AD 700–1000) 9.6%

Slavic (AD 540–1100) 5.6%

Iberian (AD 300–1200) 3.6%

Levantine (AD 300–1300) 3.2%

Magyar 2.0%


Fit : 1.313 (Good)


Balto-Slavic (900–350 BC) 33.2%

Paeonian (750–100 BC) 26.4%

Scythian (750–110 BC) 13.4%

Italic and Etruscan (900–200 BC) 11.0%

Phoenician (1000–330 BC) 8.8%

Germanic (AD 100–630) 5.8%

Iberian (700–50 BC) 1.0%

Thracian (1100–200 BC) 0.4%



Fit : 1.232

Balto-Slavic (900–350 BC) 32.2%

Roman Illyria (AD 100–600) 20.6%

Roman Italy (20 BC–AD 600) 14.2%

Scythian (750–110 BC) 12.6%

Germanic (AD 100–630) 9.0%

Thracian (1100–200 BC) 6.6%

Roman Sardinia (AD 400–500) 4.0%

Paeonian (750–100 BC) 0.8%

[Boudin]

Fit: 3.331 (Moderate)
Continental Celt (800–50 BC) 86.2%
Iberian (700–50 BC) 10.4%
East Siberian (1000–900 BC) 2.8%
North Amerindian (4000 BC–AD 1600) 0.6%

It's really hard to find dates that match.

[axel.aleman]

https://images4.imagebam.com/10/a5/bd/MEK679T_o.JPG

Al Parecer tengo ancestros conversos criptojudios

[Jingle Bell]

https://images4.imagebam.com/10/a5/bd/MEK679T_o.JPG

Al Parecer tengo ancestros conversos criptojudios

Not necessarially, depending of what Iberian sample u are scoring can be just Imperial Roman or Phoenician, also if u are Panamian u prob have tons of Canarian ancestry, part of ur Guanche can begin eated by Levantine

[PierreUno]

ILLUSTRATIVE DNA "recently" added their "Periodical Ancient Ancestry Breakdown", but with that, they also updated their "Customizable Ancient Ancestry" calculator with all those rich samples, I was testing with some samples there and then I got the best results in a medieval calculator:

For this calculator I used:

...
I tried every single Medieval combination I could, and I got the best the best results with these cateories.


Here are my results:


...


Oh bugger, sorry, bloody hell ! I just realized that you wanted us to do a custom fit. I got a closer fit by throwing in a germanic sample and Celtic sample from the Iron age for Euros an Iron Age + Medeival model is probably best or the most smashing :

First model fit was :

Fit: 1.525 (Good)

New fit : 1.452 (Good) -- good enogh for me I am not going crazy autistic style to get it lower :

Germanic: (AD 700–1000) 30.0%

Insular Celt (AD 100–1000) 26.0%

Germanic (AD 100–630) 24.4%

Insular Celt (600 BC–AD 100) 10.4%

France (AD 130–1400) 5.2% (not unheard of in Southern England)

Armenian (AD 1030–1300) 4.0% (exotic strains from Cornwall or whatnot)




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9REo1QJMr8

https://i.postimg.cc/65YVPDcS/1200px-Flag-of-England-svg.webp

[Eurafricanid]

Looks really bad, actually.
You mixed medieval with Iron Age, very far away periods, along with other things.

[Kriptc06]

Is this free?

[axel.aleman]

Not necessarially, depending of what Iberian sample u are scoring can be just Imperial Roman or Phoenician, also if u are Panamian u prob have tons of Canarian ancestry, part of ur Guanche can begin eated by Levantine

I am Panamanian, my surname and Paternal Haplogroup can be traced to Canary Islands

[Vitez]

I've got a better fit if i replace Levantine by Anatolian
I found the perfect combination for me
It would be nice to see other results from the Balkans

Fit : 0.758

Slavic (AD 540–1100) 18.8%

Italian (AD 650–1450) 18.2%

Balkans (AD 500–1000) 17.6%

Baltic (AD 900–1050) 14.6%

Slavic (AD 540–1270) 13.0%

Germanic (AD 700–1000) 9.0%

Iberian (AD 300–1200) 3.4%

Byzantine Anatolia (AD 500–1100) 3.2%

Magyar 2.2%

[Jingle Bell]

Is this free?

If u have alr ur g25 i think its just 15 Bucks if im not wrong, but its just worthy if u dont have ur coordinates
U can have the same result just using the same samples in Vahaduo, or trying IllustrativeDNA calculator made by Ivorix/VikingMallorcaSpain which its simply amazing and will give u the same results for free https://www.exploreyourdna.com/calculateur/147/illustrativedna-like-ancient-calculator-ivori.htm

[Lemminkäinen]

Fit was 0.565 (Very good).

https://i.ibb.co/JHQwgTw/Screenshot-20230415-194356-736.png

[Kriptc06]

If u have alr ur g25 i think its just 15 Bucks if im not wrong, but its just worthy if u dont have ur coordinates
U can have the same result just using the same samples in Vahaduo, or trying IllustrativeDNA calculator made by Ivorix/VikingMallorcaSpain which its simply amazing and will give u the same results for free https://www.exploreyourdna.com/calculateur/147/illustrativedna-like-ancient-calculator-ivori.htm

thanks mate

Target: Kriptc_23nme
Distance: 1.4189% / 0.01418877 | ADC: 0.25x RC
49.4 Iberian*(AD*300–1200)
21.4 Balkans*(AD*500–1000)
10.4 South*Amerindian*(9000*BC–AD*1500)
10.2 Sarmatian*(AD*50–450)
5.8 Sub-Saharan*African
2.8 West*African

Target: Kriptc_23nme
Distance: 0.6539% / 0.00653860
20.6 Roman*Illyria*(AD*100–600)
13.8 Sardinian*(AD*770–1000)
11.4 South*Amerindian*(9000*BC–AD*1500)
10.4 Insular*Celt*(AD*100–1000)
9.2 Germanic*(AD*100–630)
9.2 Sub-Saharan*African
5.6 Roman*Italy*(20*BC–AD*600)
3.4 Iberian*(AD*300–1200)
3.4 Illyrian*(750–200*BC)
3.2 Volga*(AD*200–400)
2.6 Balkans*(AD*500–1000)
1.8 European*Jew*(AD*1160–1400)
1.6 Pict*(AD*300–500)
1.2 Roman*Pannonia*(AD*130–600)
0.8 Roman*Egypt
0.6 Saami*(AD*300–800)
0.4 Khoisan
0.4 Magyar
0.2 Pygmy
0.2 West*African

[CommonSense]

IllustrativeDNA and G25 in general tend to give me more Slavic ancestry than gedmatch calculators tend to do:

https://i.ibb.co/9ptfpcv/image.png

https://i.ibb.co/m5W03Md/image.png

https://i.ibb.co/Svjskq2/image.png

[sage]

IllustrativeDNA and G25 in general tend to give me more Slavic ancestry than gedmatch calculators tend to do:

https://i.ibb.co/9ptfpcv/image.png

https://i.ibb.co/m5W03Md/image.png

https://i.ibb.co/Svjskq2/image.png
How much Slavic dna does gedmatch give you ?

[CommonSense]

How much Slavic dna does gedmatch give you ?

No more than 55%, taking into account models I've used that other people made and the ones I made myself.

[sage]

No more than 55%, taking into account models I've used that other people made and the ones I made myself.
Which is one more accurate for you in your opinion gedmatch or g25/IllustrativeDNA?

[CommonSense]

Which is one more accurate in your opinion ?

There are considerably more ancient samples available on G25 which is always a plus when it comes to these things. As for accuracy, people say G25 is better for modeling with ancient samples regardless. But for measuring distance to modern populations gedmatch calculators are definitely better.

[sage]

There are considerably more ancient samples available on G25 which is always a plus when it comes to these things. As for accuracy, people say G25 is better for modeling with ancient samples regardless. But for measuring distance to modern populations gedmatch calculators are definitely better.
Cool! I get similar or just a bit more Slavic percentage then you on gedmatch (k13), about 57ish

[Solitude]

Berber and Phoenician is ok , i did like more iron age period because they have a boii sample IA, so my coords can split celt more continental from germanic tribes but another one like migration period seems to have more southern celts so my coords cant pull , iberia is a little bit low and ssa is a little bit high aswell , amerindian i think is a little bit high

Iron age

https://i.postimg.cc/wBK3NdrT/Screenshot-20240413-170744-Chrome.jpg

Middle Ages

https://i.postimg.cc/wTy6QGLt/Screenshot-20240413-170939-Chrome.jpg

[MBVC]

128907