Finally a Dzudzuana individual (G25 scaled coordinates)

[gixajo]

In case anyone was curious, they have produced the G25 coordinates of a "Dzudzuana" individual after Davdski combined the BAM files of the study for which they were produced.


GEO_Dzudzuana_UP:S2949,0.062603,0.099522,-0.009428,-0.002261,0.029852,-0.017012,0.001175,-0.001846,0.03211,0.02606,0.007632,-0.011989,0.001635,0.012799,0.000271,-0.003182,-0.01343,0.004687,-0.007416,0.003377,0.026453,0.007172,-0.01479,-0.029281,-0.00012

They warn that with such ancient individuals the coordinates can work a little strange depending on the model.

From AG forum.

[gixajo]

(…) we cannot reject the hypothesis that Dzudzuana and the much later Neolithic Anatolians form a clade with respect to ESHG (P=0.286), consistent with the latter being a population largely descended from Dzudzuana-like pre-Neolithic populations whose geographical extent spanned both Anatolia and the Caucasus. Dzudzuana itself can be modeled as a 2-way mixture of Villabruna-related ancestry and a Basal Eurasian lineage.

In qpAdm modeling, a deeply divergent hunter-gatherer lineage that contributed in relatively unmixed form to the much later hunter-gatherers of the Villabruna cluster is specified as contributing to earlier hunter-gatherer groups (Gravettian Vestonice16: 35.7±11.3% and Magdalenian ElMiron: 60.6±11.3%) and to populations of the Caucasus (Dzudzuana: 199 72.5±3.7%, virtually identical to that inferred using ADMIXTUREGRAPH). In Europe, descendants of this lineage admixed with pre-existing hunter-gatherers related to Sunghir3 from Russia for the Gravettians and GoyetQ116-1 from Belgium for the Magdalenians, while in the Near East it did so with Basal Eurasians. Later Europeans prior to the arrival of agriculture were the product of re-settlement of this lineage after ~15kya in mainland Europe, while in eastern Europe they admixed with Siberian hunter-gatherers forming the WHG-ANE cline of ancestry [See PCA above]. In the Near East, the Dzudzuana-related population admixed with North African-related ancestry in the Levant and with Siberian hunter-gatherer and eastern non-African-related ancestry in Iran and the Caucasus. Thus, the highly differentiated populations at the dawn of the Neolithic were primarily descended from Villabruna Cluster and Dzudzuana-related ancestors, with varying degrees of additional input related to both North Africa and Ancient North/East Eurasia whose proximate sources may be clarified by future sampling of geographically and temporally intermediate populations.

https://i.postimg.cc/5yf4K8XZ/dzudzuana.jpg (https://postimg.cc/7GQrfGMV)

[HelloGuys]

It seems that an upper paleolithic model doesn't work well on me:

Target: HelloGuys_scaled
Distance: 14.7442% / 0.14744249
49.0 GEO_Dzudzuana_UP
33.0 RUS_AfontovaGora3
17.4 CHN_Amur_River_19000_BP
0.6 Cameroon_Mbo_Bantu
0.0 CHN_Tianyuan
0.0 ETH_Mota
0.0 ITA_Villabruna

[gixajo]

It seems that an upper paleolithic model doesn't work well for me:

a

Of course, those are very ancient samples, the genes, although many pass the same, many also evolve, change and new ones arise that did not exist before with each generation, so Dzuduana could be really useful only to model other ancient individuals after them.

[Wend-Kruzek]

Hi very :thumb001:I'm glad there's something new here
CCa 30....BCE and . info about y-dna and mtDna Have we.
it still throws me to the Caucasus;)

Distance to: LudovitKruzek
0.12781669 GEO_Dzudzuana_UP:S2949

nice day