How should I interpret?

[WitteValk]

Should I post "Single" results too? These are just the distances. How would you interpret this? Based on these, what would you assume I am or my ancestry?

[Luke35]

I'd assume mostly British Isles ancestry based on this.

Can you post your distances to the Modern Averages Scaled?

[WitteValk]

Yes, you are correct. Father is of SW Irish and East English (Yorkshire) and my mother is Orcadian Scottish, and dutch primarily. Of course, here you are;

[WitteValk]

What would BelgianA be? Walloon or Flemish? If you happen to know or know a way to figure out. Could I isolated BelgianA and run it through Calcs to get an Idea?

[Luke35]

What would BelgianA be? Walloon or Flemish? If you happen to know or know a way to figure out. Could I isolated BelgianA and run it through Calcs to get an Idea?

Aparently thr Belgian's diverge enough to justify two different averages. I have not examined them, but yes, you could definitely remove them (Belgian A and B) from the source, move to target, and check the distance to populations. That may help give some clues as to why there are two Belgian averages.

[WitteValk]

I appreciate your reply, I will do! I will also post my findings here.

[WitteValk]

Here you are, at first glance it does appear that "BelgianA" is Flemish.

[Tchek]

Here you are, at first glance it does appear that "BelgianA" is Flemish.

What about BelgianC and B?