Post your 5 populations autosomal profile from Illustrative DNA.

[Dušan]

Steps:

1. Enter "Customizable Ancient Ancestry"
2. Select all historical samples
3. Choose 5 Pop
4. Click Calculate


Post your results :thumb001:


https://i.imgur.com/Uf9Z9vM.png

[Beowulf]

Iberian (AD 300–1200)43.6%

France (AD 130–1400)32.4%

Italic and Etruscan (900–200 BC)16.8%

North African (AD 580–1160)5.0%

Arabian Peninsula2.2%


Fit: 1.392 (Good)

[Eurafricanid]

https://i.imgur.com/PaEfdWz.png

[Flamingo]

Fit: 0.937 (Very Good)

Germanic (AD 100–630)38.4%

Insular Celt (AD 100–1000)33.0%

Volga (AD 200–400)10.6%

Italian (AD 650–1450)10.2%

Roman Sardinia (AD 400–500)7.8%

[gixajo]

Not my results, but gixajo enana´s.

https://i.postimg.cc/pXmYj8xM/gixajo-enana-5pop.png (https://postimg.cc/4mT9kYmW)

[Gallop]

https://i.imgur.com/PaEfdWz.png

I had forgotten about this company.

Iberia?

[nordiclatina]

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/8121/jT0ry0.png

[Eurafricanid]

I had forgotten about this company.

Iberia?

What do you mean by, "Iberia?"

[Gallop]

What do you mean by, "Iberia?"

Well, what am I going to say, Iberia does not appear in your 5 pop, more than half of it is France.

Your results are getting stranger and stranger, I think the best thing to do is not to take anything out of the files and wait for the companies to update, your results are getting more and more improbable.

Not to mention that the results of this company are the craziest and most exclusive since it gives results that do not coincide with other companies, it's crazy.

[Impaler]

Not accurate for my father:

https://i.ibb.co/X8yGtPY/123.png (https://ibb.co/3zfPcbR)

[Eurafricanid]

I had to try it without Sardinian, because we all know it's a proxy for EEF, and that's why so many South Euros are getting high Sardinian here.
https://i.imgur.com/Ma3K1KM.png
Looks much better IMO.

[Gallop]

I had to try it without Sardinian, because we all know it's a proxy for EEF, and that's why so many South Euros are getting high Sardinian here.
https://i.imgur.com/Ma3K1KM.png
Looks much better IMO.


In this company I do not get sardinian finally, because it wouldn't make any sense of descent.

[Eurafricanid]

Well, what am I going to say, Iberia does not appear in your 5 pop, more than half of it is France.

Your results are getting stranger and stranger, I think the best thing to do is not to take anything out of the files and wait for the companies to update, your results are getting more and more improbable.

Not to mention that the results of this company are the craziest and most exclusive since it gives results that do not coincide with other companies, it's crazy.

Since you don't seem to know how this company works I'm going to explain to you, It's supposed to be like that since all references are used, that's why they created the periodical ancestry results, there you can chose what region you are, for more accurate populations.
https://i.imgur.com/Jswtg2b.png


Here's an example with Gixajo's Enana results:

Not my results, but gixajo enana´s.

https://i.postimg.cc/pXmYj8xM/gixajo-enana-5pop.png (https://postimg.cc/4mT9kYmW)

Do you think a 75% Basque + 25% Andalusian should be like that?

[Flamingo]

I had to try it without Sardinian, because we all know it's a proxy for EEF, and that's why so many South Euros are getting high Sardinian here.
https://i.imgur.com/Ma3K1KM.png
Looks much better IMO.

I got 7% Sardinian although I don´t know about any South European Ancestry. Does this mean I have a South European ancestor probably?

[alexmegas777]

fit 1.5 https://i.ibb.co/7QXpxhL/Screenshot-20230612-192117-com-android-chrome-edit-4853973531550.jpg

[Beowulf]

I got the same using 5pops in this calc :)

https://www.exploreyourdna.com/calculateur/147/illustrativedna-like-ancient-calculator-ivori.htm

Target: vikiingMallorcaSpain_scaled
Distance: 1.3920% / 0.01392001 | R5P
43.6 Iberian*(AD*300–1200)
32.4 France*(AD*130–1400)
16.8 Italic*and*Etruscan*(900–200*BC)
5.0 Roman*North*Africa*(AD*120–220)
2.2 Arabian*Peninsula

[Eurafricanid]

I got 7% Sardinian although I don´t know about any South European Ancestry. Does this mean I have a South European ancestor probably?

If you're south German/Austrian a lot of your DNA is comming from Celts, Ancient Germanics were basically Scandinavians living in Germany, they don't plot with most Central/South Germans.

[Flamingo]

If you're south German/Austrian a lot of your DNA is comming from Celts, Ancient Germanics were basically Scandinavians living in Germany, they don't plot with most Central/South Germans.

That makes sense. My grandmother scores the same ammount of Sardinian and has a more South-Western ancestry compared to me. I also get much Celtic on Illustrative DNA

[Jana]

https://i.imgur.com/Lzc7sUz.png

[Kiel]

me
https://i.ibb.co/T42wrBH/illdname.png (https://imgbb.com/)

gf
https://i.ibb.co/WshbT9W/noruilldna.png (https://imgbb.com/)

[Flamingo]

great uncle:

Fit: 1.163 (Good)

Baltic (AD 900–1050) 40.6%

Germanic (AD 100–630) 23.0%

Balkans (AD 500–1000) 20.6%

Turkic (AD 650–1200) 9.2%

Magyar 6.6%

[Gergő Marosvári]

https://i.postimg.cc/gcvYRccr/image.png

[LaSentinelle]

Baltic (AD 260–540) 29.8%

Volga (AD 200–400) 24.2%

Germanic (AD 100–630) 23.4%

Roman Illyria (AD 100–600) 13.2%

Roman Pannonia (AD 130–600) 9.4%
I always get the most boring results

[zalireke]

121438

[Jana]

Baltic (AD 260–540) 29.8%

Volga (AD 200–400) 24.2%

Germanic (AD 100–630) 23.4%

Roman Illyria (AD 100–600) 13.2%

Roman Pannonia (AD 130–600) 9.4%
I always get the most boring results

I wouldn't call Roman Illyria boring. It's unexpected for Russian

[LaSentinelle]

I wouldn't call Roman Illyria boring. It's unexpected for Russian

that's just southern slavs, I get 12% balkan on some calculators as do a lot of Russians/Ukrainians. 12% is actually a bit too low for a southern Russian.

[Far_away]

https://i.ibb.co/SwF2qnp/aaaasd.png

[calxpal]

https://i.ibb.co/PgdQ81H/customancient.png

[Vitez]

Fit 0.850

Slavic (AD 540–1100) 33.8%

Italian (AD 650–1450) 22.2%

Roman Illyria (AD 100–600) 19.2%

Baltic (AD 900–1050) 18.2%

Sarmatian (AD 50–450) 6.6%

[MandM]

Fit: 1.566 (Good)

Thracian (1100–200 BC)
30.8%

Baltic (AD 900–1050)
27.8%

Balkans (AD 500–1000)
25.4%

Roman Anatolia (100 BC–AD 700)
10.8%

Volga (AD 200–400)
5.2%

[Flamingo]

that's just southern slavs, I get 12% balkan on some calculators as do a lot of Russians/Ukrainians. 12% is actually a bit too low for a southern Russian.

What is Volga? Is it Finno Ugric?

[Vitez]

What do you guys get with 3 pop ?
My Slavic goes up by 8% which is better

Fit 1.009
Slavic (AD 540–1270) 60.8%

Italian (AD 650–1450) 34.4%

Sarmatian (AD 50–450) 4.8%

Without Italian :

Fit 1.074
Slavic (AD 540–1270) 61.4%

Roman Italy (20 BC–AD 600) 35.2%

Saami (AD 300–800) 3.4%

[jelliedsoup]

Insular Celt (AD 100–1000) 62.4%
Roman Gaul (AD 130–500)14.2%
Southeast Asian (2000 BC–AD 1800)14.0%
Sinitic (1230 BC–AD 1670) 6.4%
Jomon (6900–800 BC) 3.0%

Fit: 1.178 (Good)

I find it quite interesting that I get this for the the "Iron Age" which implies a stronger percentage of Saxon than Briton and also fair bit of Italic. But it's hard to tell how much of a eastern pull the Asian has.

Germanic (AD 100–600)34.6%
Insular Celt (600 BC–AD 100)28.0%
Italic and Etruscan (900–200 BC)15.2%
Southeast Asian (2000 BC–AD 1800)14.8%
Sinitic (1230–130 BC)7.4%

1.942 (Good)

[Dušan]

What do you guys get with 3 pop ?


https://i.imgur.com/JOYSfdc.png

[MandM]

Who are the "Balkan AD 500-1000" there are allready Illyrian and Thracian on Illustrated dna, so who do they represent?

[MandM]

Double post

[LaSentinelle]

What is Volga? Is it Finno Ugric?

Yes, 'Volga' is most likely Volga Finns.

[Flamingo]

Yes, 'Volga' is most likely Volga Finns.

Nice, I got Volga. My great uncle is closest to Mordvins according to Illustrative Dna.

[ydatoporin]

121471121472
Fit: 1.124 (Good) vs Fit: 1.534 (Good)

But the migration period(2nd img) results seem more accurate.

[Ritz06]

https://i.imgur.com/4pxgKhb.png

With 3 pop:

https://i.imgur.com/hkBpTVm.png

[Ylla]

121517

[Rafael Passoni]

Me:
https://i.imgur.com/7WqRc9x.png

[Aila]

Volga (AD 200–400)30.2%

Germanic (AD 700–1000)24.4%

Baltic (AD 900–1050)24.0%

Germanic (AD 100–630)18.0%

Central Siberian (2400–2000 BC)3.4%

[Boudin]

36.8% Germanic (AD 100–630)
32.2% Italic and Etruscan (900–200 BC)
17.0% Insular Celt (AD 100–1000)
11.4% Byzantine Anatolia (AD 500–1100)
2.60% Southeast Asian (2000 BC–AD 1800)

[Leferena]

1.376 goodhttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230614/2ff6adc94b07209a38384f2f6757b033.jpg

Enviado desde mi 2201117TY mediante Tapatalk

[Beowulf]

Iberian (AD 300–1200)43.6%

France (AD 130–1400)32.4%

Italic and Etruscan (900–200 BC)16.8%

North African (AD 580–1160)5.0%

Arabian Peninsula2.2%


Fit: 1.392 (Good)


Without the annoying french:


Iberian (AD 300–1200)53.8%

Germanic (AD 100–630)25%

Italic and Etruscan (900–200 BC)14.4%

North African (AD 580–1160)3.6%

Arabian Peninsula3.2%

Fit: 1.427 (Good)

[Boudin]

Without the annoying french:

Mine is completely wrong too.

[Beowulf]

Mine is completely wrong too.

Me im a bit tired on getting usually high French.

[gixajo]

Me im a bit tired on getting usually high French.

I would remove also the Sardinian from the enana´s results.

[Coastal Elite]

https://i.imgur.com/Jmt4AbV.jpg

[de Burgh II]

https://i.postimg.cc/02rnrpF9/Untitleddd.jpg

[White Swan]

Illustrative isn't loading well for me. But I received a "limited offer" email from genomelink to see my "comprehensive native american analysis". When I clicked on it, the 20% american native they initially gave me was gone and instead I had 0% lol...

[Wend-Kruzek]

121842