Oasis
11-27-2023, 08:59 PM
There is a linguistic macrogroup in Gerhard Jager’s work of year 2017, which includes the Japanese language, Korean language, Eskimo languages and some Native American languages.
The article "Ancient Mitogenomes Reveal the Origins and Genetic Structure of the Neolithic Shimao Population in Northern China" points at the mutation G14560A, which is present in Native American X2a as well as in mtDNA X3 with Near Eastern and European members and in some other Near Eastern-related haplogroups. It is also present in the Finnish branch of mtDNA J1c2, as well as in Eskimo A2a. They checked in "Human population history at the crossroads of East and Southeast Asia since 11,000 years ago" that the mtDNA haplogroup with the mutation G14560A, whose bearers possibly got under the influence of bearers of the so-called hypothetical “Yin language” (a language with Japano-Koreanic affiliation) was found in the sample which also had the autosomal component of a rare Japanese bearing mtDNA A2.
The so-called hypothetical “Yin language” is such a hypothetical language that some Koreans think that when ancestors of Koreans were influencing the formation of ancient Chinese states and the formation of the Japanese state, they were the speakers of such a language as this “YIN”.
https://i.ibb.co/KFtJP4Z/59.png
On the above scheme “Old Han”, Silla and Han-Paekche were definitely Koreanic languages. As for Koguryo, Puyo and Puyo-Paekche, Christopher I. Beckwith created the reconstruction basing on available materials for these languages and concluded that Puyo-Koguryoic languages were Para-Japonic languages. However, Christopher I. Beckwith is a MacArthur Fellow, and his reconstructions are not widely supported by other researchers. Most researchers of Korean think that Koguryo, Puyo and Puyo-Paekche should be treated as definitely Koreanic languages or languages, at least related to Koreanic. Sometimes it is thought that some Japonic speakers might have been found in Kara.
More information about the “Yin language”:
“The Korean scholar Sin Yong-t’ae argues that Koguryo is related not only to Japanese and Korean but to ‘Ancient Asian’, which he calls the ‘Proto-Oracle Bone Language’. The latter he believes to be the ancestor on the one hand of the languages of Korea and on the other hand of “Yin,” the language of the Oracle Bone inscriptions, which is one of two components of Old Chinese, the other being ‘Sino-Tibetan’. This unusual and very interesting view (Sin 1988), summarized in Figure 3, has received practically no attention in the literature.”
So the Chinese geneticists, whom I mentioned, have detected the population coming to China “Out-of-Korea”, which is dispersed to a certain degree among the Japanese samples, and the sample having mtDNA with the mutation G14560A clustered on the cline of this population, which also included a rare mtDNA A2 Japanese.
Interestingly, it is rumoured on 23mofang that yDNA O1b2-47z might be the lineage of the Go Royal Family, the royal dynasty of the Koguryo state.
Thus, the mutation G14560A, hinted by "Ancient Mitogenomes Reveal the Origins and Genetic Structure of the Neolithic Shimao Population in Northern China" is found in all main members of a linguistic macrogroup in Gerhard Jager’s work of year 2017, which includes the Japanese language, Korean language, Eskimo languages and some Native American languages, as well as it is found at least in mtDNA J1c2-related Finnish speaker. As this mutation is observed in mtDNA X2a, X3, there is a strong possibility that it mainly had a Western Eurasian distribution. The alternative for Eastern Eurasians would be to consider that mtDNA L1 also had this mutation, mtDNA L1 is likely related to the population which traveled between Africa and Eurasia ca. 120000 years ago, and it is acknowledged, e.g. in Korea, that such a 120000-year-old population could contribute to modern humans. However, the mentioned Chinese peace of research pointed to the affiliation of the G14560A sample to mtDNA A2 sample. Thus, in this particular case, the Japanese-Eskimo-Korean-Native American-Uralic connection should probably have been induced by the Western Eurasian component, such as the one contained in mtDNA X2, X3-rich populations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As for the Yukaghir population, "Ancient Mitogenomes Reveal the Origins and Genetic Structure of the Neolithic Shimao Population in Northern China" pointed to the mutation A3796G of the Yukaghir population. Though the only oldest branch containing A3796G is mtDNA M21a, the mutation A3796G is much more widely distributed in young branches, such as L3e2a2a1, H1, R1a, J1c2, and it is found in the Altaic Uighur people. So such an “Ural-Altaic” population influencing the Yukaghir should have had the Western Eurasian component. It would be consistent with the fact that the Yukaghir language clustered among the Western Eurasian languages in Gerhard Jager’s work of year 2017.
The article "Ancient Mitogenomes Reveal the Origins and Genetic Structure of the Neolithic Shimao Population in Northern China" points at the mutation G14560A, which is present in Native American X2a as well as in mtDNA X3 with Near Eastern and European members and in some other Near Eastern-related haplogroups. It is also present in the Finnish branch of mtDNA J1c2, as well as in Eskimo A2a. They checked in "Human population history at the crossroads of East and Southeast Asia since 11,000 years ago" that the mtDNA haplogroup with the mutation G14560A, whose bearers possibly got under the influence of bearers of the so-called hypothetical “Yin language” (a language with Japano-Koreanic affiliation) was found in the sample which also had the autosomal component of a rare Japanese bearing mtDNA A2.
The so-called hypothetical “Yin language” is such a hypothetical language that some Koreans think that when ancestors of Koreans were influencing the formation of ancient Chinese states and the formation of the Japanese state, they were the speakers of such a language as this “YIN”.
https://i.ibb.co/KFtJP4Z/59.png
On the above scheme “Old Han”, Silla and Han-Paekche were definitely Koreanic languages. As for Koguryo, Puyo and Puyo-Paekche, Christopher I. Beckwith created the reconstruction basing on available materials for these languages and concluded that Puyo-Koguryoic languages were Para-Japonic languages. However, Christopher I. Beckwith is a MacArthur Fellow, and his reconstructions are not widely supported by other researchers. Most researchers of Korean think that Koguryo, Puyo and Puyo-Paekche should be treated as definitely Koreanic languages or languages, at least related to Koreanic. Sometimes it is thought that some Japonic speakers might have been found in Kara.
More information about the “Yin language”:
“The Korean scholar Sin Yong-t’ae argues that Koguryo is related not only to Japanese and Korean but to ‘Ancient Asian’, which he calls the ‘Proto-Oracle Bone Language’. The latter he believes to be the ancestor on the one hand of the languages of Korea and on the other hand of “Yin,” the language of the Oracle Bone inscriptions, which is one of two components of Old Chinese, the other being ‘Sino-Tibetan’. This unusual and very interesting view (Sin 1988), summarized in Figure 3, has received practically no attention in the literature.”
So the Chinese geneticists, whom I mentioned, have detected the population coming to China “Out-of-Korea”, which is dispersed to a certain degree among the Japanese samples, and the sample having mtDNA with the mutation G14560A clustered on the cline of this population, which also included a rare mtDNA A2 Japanese.
Interestingly, it is rumoured on 23mofang that yDNA O1b2-47z might be the lineage of the Go Royal Family, the royal dynasty of the Koguryo state.
Thus, the mutation G14560A, hinted by "Ancient Mitogenomes Reveal the Origins and Genetic Structure of the Neolithic Shimao Population in Northern China" is found in all main members of a linguistic macrogroup in Gerhard Jager’s work of year 2017, which includes the Japanese language, Korean language, Eskimo languages and some Native American languages, as well as it is found at least in mtDNA J1c2-related Finnish speaker. As this mutation is observed in mtDNA X2a, X3, there is a strong possibility that it mainly had a Western Eurasian distribution. The alternative for Eastern Eurasians would be to consider that mtDNA L1 also had this mutation, mtDNA L1 is likely related to the population which traveled between Africa and Eurasia ca. 120000 years ago, and it is acknowledged, e.g. in Korea, that such a 120000-year-old population could contribute to modern humans. However, the mentioned Chinese peace of research pointed to the affiliation of the G14560A sample to mtDNA A2 sample. Thus, in this particular case, the Japanese-Eskimo-Korean-Native American-Uralic connection should probably have been induced by the Western Eurasian component, such as the one contained in mtDNA X2, X3-rich populations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As for the Yukaghir population, "Ancient Mitogenomes Reveal the Origins and Genetic Structure of the Neolithic Shimao Population in Northern China" pointed to the mutation A3796G of the Yukaghir population. Though the only oldest branch containing A3796G is mtDNA M21a, the mutation A3796G is much more widely distributed in young branches, such as L3e2a2a1, H1, R1a, J1c2, and it is found in the Altaic Uighur people. So such an “Ural-Altaic” population influencing the Yukaghir should have had the Western Eurasian component. It would be consistent with the fact that the Yukaghir language clustered among the Western Eurasian languages in Gerhard Jager’s work of year 2017.