Nearly 30 percent of generation z female identify as LGBTQ

[rajputprincess]

The Gallup survey, released Wednesday, found that 28.5 percent of women and 10.6 percent of men born between 1997 and 2012 identify as LGBTQ.

I wonder why there are more LGBTQ women than men

Tbh I know many women. Who have stopped dating men and only date women now. Because of bad experience with men's.
They're happy now. Women are definitely better partner according to them.

[rajputprincess]

https://thehill.com/homenews/lgbtq/4528874-nearly-30-percent-gen-z-women-identify-as-lgbtq-gallup/

[rajputprincess]

Of all of the generations included in the survey, Gen Z respondents were most likely to identify as members of the LGBTQ community. Collectively, 22.3 percent of Gen Z survey takers were likely to identify as LGBTQ — compared to 9.8 percent of millennials (born between 1981-96), 4.5 percent of Gen X (born between 1965-80), 2.3 percent of baby boomers (born between 1946-64) and 1.1 percent of the silent generation (born between 1928-45

[rajputprincess]

Probably why incels are becoming more common. So many women only date other womens

[Saitama]

EDIT: Glitchy ass site double posting

[Saitama]

Do people actually not generally think that it's through relentless psychological media programming, especially over the last decade, to make men effeminate and mentally weak and make the women hyper-masculine and also to encourage both men and women to believe that they are actually suffering from gender dysmorphia? Having a third of your population's women not even be psychologically/biologically capable of desiring sex with men to procreate, or not desire a family, etc... It's gonna cripple population growth and that population in the coming decades will totally fall. Especially if that 30% remains stable or even increases. Take 100 people. 50 men, 50 women. If each pair only had one child, that's still only 50 new people.

If they each had 2, then they basically start back at 100 IF the 100 people somehow managed to have a perfectly even number of boys and girls. Obviously this is more random, and some pairs would have more children than others perhaps. But now let's take out 30% of the 50 women. 15 people. Doesn't sound like a lot, but... It is. There are also more women in the world than men, so the number is actually probably gonna seem larger than I make it sound here, right? Those 15 women will never have a kid, take 'em out of the equation entirely. So... What was 100 is now 75. Unless there are suddenly gonna be weird open relationship type scenarios where both men can have a child or multiple children with the same woman... Increase the numbers drastically.

By default, 15 men will also potentially go without a partner as well. So now it's actually 15% of the male population that will not procreate either.
Now those 25 men and women would have to all have 4 children just to keep the population total as it currently is. You think people are aggressively trying to have large families? Most probably can't even afford it in the countries where this is even a trend/potential population issue, and most are not willing to live like our ancestors before us, having larger families in poverty conditions and having to bust their asses like crazy potentially.... Modern people are pampered and lack any drive for stuff that was instinctive and natural to previous generations going back a few decades at least...

Total population control tactic in my mind, long-term, that maybe people think is harmless but is quite insidious... In theory, anyone with a sense of morality would think "well.... we can't force them to change their biology" which is logical and reasonable. But to me, it's been a very long-term campaign of easing into aggressively shoving this sort of stuff down the collective throats of the masses to the point that an agenda has been obvious for so damn long that only the people who are so programmed/blinded by the appeal to morality/emotion/etc.. I think that people don't even think about the logistics of it even in such a basic way..

In 2022, Gen Z's population was about 70 million. So... Figure out how many were female, and then take nearly 30% of them out of the reproductive equation. Along with nearly 30% of men who may even be "worthy" of a partner but simply cannot find one as there are not enough to go around for monogamous heterosexual pairings. That alone can lead to a huge population collapse from 70 million in future generations. Add in all of the other factors out there adding to the difficulty/improbability of two compatible straight people from having a child. But it's closer to 40% of the population if you add in the 10% of men. So 40% willingly take themselves out, and then another 40% are left with nowhere to sit when the music stops for that round of sexual pairing musical chairs.

[rajputprincess]

Do people actually not generally think that it's through relentless psychological media programming, especially over the last decade, to make men effeminate and mentally weak and make the women hyper-masculine and also to encourage both men and women to believe that they are actually suffering from gender dysmorphia? Having a third of your population's women not even be psychologically/biologically capable of desiring sex with men to procreate, or not desire a family, etc... It's gonna cripple population growth and that population in the coming decades will totally fall. Especially if that 30% remains stable or even increases. Take 100 people. 50 men, 50 women. If each pair only had one child, that's still only 50 new people.

If they each had 2, then they basically start back at 100 IF the 100 people somehow managed to have a perfectly even number of boys and girls. Obviously this is more random, and some pairs would have more children than others perhaps. But now let's take out 30% of the 50 women. 15 people. Doesn't sound like a lot, but... It is. Especially when you need women. There are also more women in the world than men, so the number is actually probably gonna seem larger than I make it sound here, right? Those 15 women will never have a kid, take 'em out of the equation entirely. So... What was 100 is now 75. Unless there are suddenly gonna be weird open relationship type scenarios where both men can have a child or multiple children with the same woman... Increase the numbers drastically.

By default, 15 men will also potentially go without a partner as well. So now it's actually 15% of the male population that will not procreate either. Perhaps the percentage of men who identify as LGBTQ is even HIGHER than the women. It'd be even more of a difference. Really, whichever percentage would be higher (be it male or female) would automatically raise the percentage in the opposite sex who would logically struggle to ever find a monogamous mate to have children with since there just ain't enough people of the opposite sex. If 30% of the women in Gen Z are not going to have an opposite sex relationship, but 45% of men are also not going to have an opposite sex relationship... Then there's 15% of straight women who will likely have nowhere to sit at the end of the next round of sexual musical chairs. Now those 25 men and women would have to all have 4 children just to keep the population total as it currently is. You think people are aggressively trying to have large families? Most probably can't even afford it, and most are not willing to live like our ancestors before us, having larger families in poverty conditions and having to bust their asses like crazy potentially.... Modern people are pampered and lack any drive for stuff that was instinctive and natural to previous generations going back a few decades at least...

Total population control tactic, that maybe people think is harmless but is quite insidious... In theory, anyone with a sense of morality would think "well.... we can't force them to change their biology" which is logical and reasonable. But to me, it's been a very long-term campaign of easing into aggressively shoving this sort of stuff down the collective throats of the masses to the point that an agenda has been obvious for so damn long that only the people who are so programmed/blinded by the appeal to morality/emotion/etc will not see it until it reaches such a critical point I suppose. I think that people don't even think about the logistics of it even in such a basic way, or think.. Well, if America's population goes from 333 million to 300 million over a relatively brief period of time? Who cares, right? I think that attitude would leave a population at a much smaller fraction of it's original numbers within a century or less. Perfect if you want to make that population that much easier to control tyrannically and absolutely through force and constant pervasive surveillance.

In 2022, Gen Z's population was about 70 million. So... Figure out how many were female, and then take 30% of them out of the reproductive equation. That alone can lead to a huge population collapse from 70 million in future generations. Add in all of the other factors out there adding to the difficulty/improbability of two compatible straight people from having a child.

You don't need to marry for kids
Many lesbian couples use sperm donor
https://youtu.be/6Q5ypMZ7miE?si=zN4f9l7EPQFsXgQb

They have 3 kids from sperm donor.

[Saitama]

You don't need to marry for kids
Many lesbian couples use sperm donor
https://youtu.be/6Q5ypMZ7miE?si=zN4f9l7EPQFsXgQb

They have 3 kids from sperm donor.

Fair enough. I still do see it as an intentional campaign for population control in the end. I don't think that's an unreasonable take, nor does it require some sort of hatred or prejudice. People fearing labels like that is why American and other societies will straight up collapse and turn into civil-war-ravaged dumpster fires over the next century with a spineless neutered society that will not bother to put up a fight. A society raised more and more by women is not going to be a balanced or efficiently functioning society IMO. Thinking we've got enough examples of blunders and dysfunction in modern societies due to that sort of growing influence.

EDIT: Actually, think about how effeminate and lame the average man has slowly become - Which in turn even YOU are suspecting turns a fair number of women to the 'other side', no?... Besides more men being raised by two women and not a traditional biological male/female pairing, what else do you figure would cause this neutering of modern males? Not media influence? We're constantly being assaulted on all fronts in that regard. If you can't resist the "spells", you're gonna succumb to them in one way or another.

[MrCuriosity]

Hey Indian girl do you still live in India or have you moved to the bad ole USA? This study must be about the US youth and has nothing to do with India or other parts of the world. Are you gonna stop make believing you are American? And what is this b.s. with people and media all over the world talking about these generations invented by American sociologists, as if it applies to non-American generations as well? Do you know that one of the so called 'universal generations' is called 'The Greatest Generation' and refers to Americans who lived during great depression and ww2? Would Germans also refer to their Nazi era generation as their 'Greatest Generation'? Geez, how is nobody even thought about that?

[Saitama]

Hey Indian girl do you still live in India or have you moved to the bad ole USA? This study must be about the US youth and has nothing to do with India or other parts of the world. Are you gonna stop make believing you are American? And what is this b.s. with people and media all over the world talking about these generations invented by American sociologists, as if it applies to non-American generations as well? Do you know that one of the so called 'universal generations' is called 'The Greatest Generation' and refers to Americans who lived during great depression and ww2? Would Germans also refer to their Nazi era generation as their 'Greatest Generation'? Geez, how is nobody even thought about that?

That is true. But is the OP actually applying this article to her own location if she's not from the US? She can technically be presenting it as an outsider looking to discuss it. I don't particularly care if she (or maybe even he, who knows who anyone actually is on a site like this, many political and racial weirdos all around larping for whatever insane reasons they have lol) is even mocking the US or thinks that there's a virtue in everyone suddenly being gay regardless of any long-term implications for that society, be it a racial one or a multi-racial one. I'm not sure that India has the same media/political forces in their country that the US and similar countries do.

So I'd imagine the average Indian man and woman is not necessarily intentionally programmed by their society even as early as 5 with books or drag queens visiting schools to teach children who are not even aware of any sexual concepts whatsoever to embrace the possibility for example of being a young gay girl rather than simply being a tom boy.. Or that they're born the wrong gender, or that they maybe like the opposite sex, etc.. At profoundly impressionable ages.

I mean, tom boys used to exist. They probably still do, but the term is pretty much never used anymore, is it? Plenty of perfectly straight women grew up thinking they liked the opposite sex/that they were actually boys or wanted to be boys... But 9/10 they would literally continue to develop and "grow out of it"...

[Hektor12]

I wonder why there are more LGBTQ women than men

I think because its easier. I mean, it doesnt hurt.

[Blondie]

That is true. But is the OP actually applying this article to her own location if she's not from the US? She can technically be presenting it as an outsider looking to discuss it. I don't particularly care if she (or maybe even he, who knows who anyone actually is on a site like this, many political and racial weirdos all around larping for whatever insane reasons they have lol) is even mocking the US or thinks that there's a virtue in everyone suddenly being gay regardless of any long-term implications for that society, be it a racial one or a multi-racial one. I'm not sure that India has the same media/political forces in their country that the US and similar countries do.

She is a mentally retarded totally insane person, who lives only in Tik Tok and other media sites. I see her as a clinical patient.

[Mortimer]

Of all of the generations included in the survey, Gen Z respondents were most likely to identify as members of the LGBTQ community. Collectively, 22.3 percent of Gen Z survey takers were likely to identify as LGBTQ — compared to 9.8 percent of millennials (born between 1981-96), 4.5 percent of Gen X (born between 1965-80), 2.3 percent of baby boomers (born between 1946-64) and 1.1 percent of the silent generation (born between 1928-45

This is evidently psychological and social programming i warned about it thirty years ago that it will arrive but people called me homophobic and laughed at me they said no one can make people gay. With trans hype its even easier to engineer children and change their gender

[Dušan]

The Gallup survey, released Wednesday, found that 28.5 percent of women and 10.6 percent of men born between 1997 and 2012 identify as LGBTQ.

I wonder why there are more LGBTQ women than men

Tbh I know many women. Who have stopped dating men and only date women now. Because of bad experience with men's.
They're happy now. Women are definitely better partner according to them.

Why are you promoting lgbt ideology around here?

You need a man and sex to calm you down.

[Maria Sharapova]

This is evidently psychological and social programming i warned about it thirty years ago that it will arrive but people called me homophobic and laughed at me they said no one can make people gay. With trans hype its even easier to engineer children and change their gender
I'm not sure what to think and haven't researched this enough but it could be a form of
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_hysteria_cases

[Valenman]

In Barcelona Spain,In 2021 ther are already more more than 50% of LGBT Woman vs 25% of men, between the age of 16 to 25 if l'm not mistike

[CosmoLady]

The Gallup survey, released Wednesday, found that 28.5 percent of women and 10.6 percent of men born between 1997 and 2012 identify as LGBTQ.

I wonder why there are more LGBTQ women than men

Tbh I know many women. Who have stopped dating men and only date women now. Because of bad experience with men's.
They're happy now. Women are definitely better partner according to them.

Of the 30% of Gen Z who identify as LGBT,

57% are bisexual (mostly women), 18% are gay, 15% are lesbian, 10% are transgender.
(and some 67% of trans are female to male)

This is still a mostly female social contagion though. Promoted by the US regime and corporations for political seasons?

[Streyndza]

Why are you promoting lgbt ideology around here?

You need a man and sex to calm you down.

She needs God but she had the misfortune of being born in a country where people defecate on the street and worship demonic entities

[Voskos]

Most women are retarded and hypersexual (both socially and physically). I've heard most of my women acquaintances/friends say, at one point or another, regardless of their generation, that they'd make out or sleep with a beautiful woman without any problems. Women , you need to remember, have also no sense of morality in the sense men have it. They have their own moral principles, that they do follow, but those principles I guess don't include too many rules about bisexuality or lesbianism.

[Mortimer]

The Gallup survey, released Wednesday, found that 28.5 percent of women and 10.6 percent of men born between 1997 and 2012 identify as LGBTQ.

I wonder why there are more LGBTQ women than men

Tbh I know many women. Who have stopped dating men and only date women now. Because of bad experience with men's.
They're happy now. Women are definitely better partner according to them.


Of all of the generations included in the survey, Gen Z respondents were most likely to identify as members of the LGBTQ community. Collectively, 22.3 percent of Gen Z survey takers were likely to identify as LGBTQ — compared to 9.8 percent of millennials (born between 1981-96), 4.5 percent of Gen X (born between 1965-80), 2.3 percent of baby boomers (born between 1946-64) and 1.1 percent of the silent generation (born between 1928-45

Eventhough its mostly women like everyone noticed, its still a huge increase in men too between the silent generation and the generation Z for men too from 1% to over 10%, its certainly harder to engineer males though, females often make out with eatch other even if they are not lesbian

[MrCuriosity]

This is evidently psychological and social programming i warned about it thirty years ago that it will arrive but people called me homophobic and laughed at me they said no one can make people gay. With trans hype its even easier to engineer children and change their gender

Huh? Weren't you 11 thirty years ago? Who were you warning about homosexuality?:confused:

[Mortimer]

Huh? Weren't you 11 thirty years ago? Who were you warning about homosexuality?:confused:

Ok I exaggerated lets say over twenty years ago since im 19 or something and high school student. I was right wing in school or "conservative" not racial but about family values.

[MrCuriosity]

This is also because American society since 1960s is highly sexualized and violent. According to their Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or CDC, almost 1 in 3 Americans has been the victim of sexual violence in their lifetime, including almost 1 in 5 women raped and 1.7% of men also raped. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/approximately-third-americans-have-been-victim-sexual-violence-180952626/ This article is by Smithsonian Magazine which is connected with the Smithsonian Institution, so not a dubious source. They have an awful society. Think about the fact that to commit these many sexual assaults and aggressions you need another large percentage of people. They have an awful society.