Post your Gedrosia K12 Oracle admix results

[tk'es]

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 CAUCASUS 36.78
2 EARLY_EUROPEAN_FARMERS 15.84
3 SINTASHTA_STEPPE_HERDERS 15.65
4 SW_ASIAN 13.88
5 BALOCHI 10.68
6 E_SIBERIAN 2.7
7 SE_ASIAN 1.8
8 S_INDIAN 1.69
9 W_SIBERIAN 0.99

[DoctorCata]

# Population Percent
1 EARLY_EUROPEAN_FARMERS 31.58
2 SINTASHTA_STEPPE_HERDERS 29.69
3 CAUCASUS 16.57
4 SW_ASIAN 12.8
5 BALOCHI 5.14
6 S_INDIAN 1.8
7 W_SIBERIAN 1.02
8 INDO_TIBETAN 0.97
9 E_AFRICAN 0.42

SUB_SAHARAN -
SE_ASIAN -
E_SIBERIAN -

Did this thing just tell me I'm Indian? :confused:
Or how should I interpret this? Because I never understood

[tk'es]

# Population Percent
1 EARLY_EUROPEAN_FARMERS 31.58
2 SINTASHTA_STEPPE_HERDERS 29.69
3 CAUCASUS 16.57
4 SW_ASIAN 12.8
5 BALOCHI 5.14
6 S_INDIAN 1.8
7 W_SIBERIAN 1.02
8 INDO_TIBETAN 0.97
9 E_AFRICAN 0.42

SUB_SAHARAN -
SE_ASIAN -
E_SIBERIAN -

Did this thing just tell me I'm Indian? :confused:
Or how should I interpret this? Because I never understood





it'll be great if gedmatch shows ancestry timeline or something like ftdna globetrekker

[DoctorCata]

it'll be great if gedmatch shows ancestry timeline or something like ftdna globetrekker

Until then, it's a waste of time.

We try to invest in learning the history of our gene, it ends up being lost in vain.
Moreover, these tests destroy our identity, distorting it.

The conclusion is that we try to invest time in something good, and we get something bad back, even though we did nothing wrong.

[chinshen]

Admix Results (sorted):

<tbody>
#

Population

Percent



1

CAUCASUS

36.58



2

SW_ASIAN

23.58



3

EARLY_EUROPEAN_FARMERS

20.94



4

BALOCHI

15.65



5

SINTASHTA_STEPPE_HERDERS

2.58



6

E_AFRICAN

0.67


</tbody>

[cass]

# Population Percent
1 SINTASHTA_STEPPE_HERDERS 42.66
2 EARLY_EUROPEAN_FARMERS 34.70
3 CAUCASUS 13.71
4 SW_ASIAN 5.01
5 BALOCHI 2.61
6 W_SIBERIAN 1.31

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Norwegian 11.9
2 Russian 21.92
3 Greek 25.28
4 Finnish 25.93
5 Estonian 27.8
6 Lithuanian 29.09
7 Sicilian 32
8 Turks_Istanbul 37.39
9 Turks_Balikesir 41
10 Turks_Aydin 41
11 Tajik_Pomiri 43.37
12 Turkmen_Afghan 44.59
13 Uzbek 45.66
14 Kurds_C 45.88
15 Kurds_N 46.13
16 Turks_Adana 46.89
17 Turks_Kayseri 47.55
18 Kurds_F 48.19
19 Iraqi_Chaldeans 48.25
20 Iraqi_Arab_Baghdad 48.37

[DoctorCata]

# Population Percent
1 SINTASHTA_STEPPE_HERDERS 42.66
2 EARLY_EUROPEAN_FARMERS 34.70
3 CAUCASUS 13.71
4 SW_ASIAN 5.01
5 BALOCHI 2.61
6 W_SIBERIAN 1.31

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Norwegian 11.9
2 Russian 21.92
3 Greek 25.28
4 Finnish 25.93
5 Estonian 27.8
6 Lithuanian 29.09
7 Sicilian 32
8 Turks_Istanbul 37.39
9 Turks_Balikesir 41
10 Turks_Aydin 41
11 Tajik_Pomiri 43.37
12 Turkmen_Afghan 44.59
13 Uzbek 45.66
14 Kurds_C 45.88
15 Kurds_N 46.13
16 Turks_Adana 46.89
17 Turks_Kayseri 47.55
18 Kurds_F 48.19
19 Iraqi_Chaldeans 48.25
20 Iraqi_Arab_Baghdad 48.37

How is it possible that a Pole is more similar to a Norwegian than to a Russian?

I do not know well the phenotypes of the Poles, nor of the Norwegians, nor of the Russians.
I don't know how similar they are phenotypically or genotypically.

All I know is that linguistically, sometimes on the bus when I hear foreigners, it's hard for me to guess if they are Russian or Polish.
Which made me think that the Poles were more similar to the Russians.

Can you teach me?

[Gallop]

# Population Percent
1 EARLY_EUROPEAN_FARMERS 44.67
2 SINTASHTA_STEPPE_HERDERS 25.13
3 CAUCASUS 17.03
4 SW_ASIAN 6.86
5 E_AFRICAN 2.20
6 BALOCHI 2.05
7 W_SIBERIAN 1.28

Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Norwegian +50% Sicilian @ 11.403626

[Gallop]

Father
# Population Percent
1 EARLY_EUROPEAN_FARMERS 43.76
2 SINTASHTA_STEPPE_HERDERS 26.83
3 CAUCASUS 15.30
4 SW_ASIAN 7.54
5 SUB_SAHARAN 3.25
6 INDO_TIBETAN 1.21

Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Norwegian +50% Sicilian @ 9.816555

[Gallop]

brother
# Population Percent
1 EARLY_EUROPEAN_FARMERS 45.16
2 SINTASHTA_STEPPE_HERDERS 24.62
3 CAUCASUS 16.52
4 SW_ASIAN 8.14
5 SUB_SAHARAN 2.23
6 BALOCHI 2.20

Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Norwegian +50% Sicilian @ 11.798997

[black hole]

Gedrosia from Caucasus to SE Asia. Interesting.

[cass]

How is it possible that a Pole is more similar to a Norwegian than to a Russian?

I do not know well the phenotypes of the Poles, nor of the Norwegians, nor of the Russians.
I don't know how similar they are phenotypically or genotypically.

All I know is that linguistically, sometimes on the bus when I hear foreigners, it's hard for me to guess if they are Russian or Polish.
Which made me think that the Poles were more similar to the Russians.

Can you teach me?

Corded diffusion in the EEF environment.

https://ibb.co/tC9L9n3

[EasternLusitanian]

# Population Percent
1 EARLY_EUROPEAN_FARMERS 39.92
2 SINTASHTA_STEPPE_HERDERS 21.37
3 SW_ASIAN 17.62
4 CAUCASUS 13.27
5 BALOCHI 3.40
6 E_AFRICAN 1.75
7 W_SIBERIAN 1.56

Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Greek +50% Sicilian @ 13.746283

Every day i stray further away from iberia, i dont know how far this will get :D

[Athalafuns]

# Population Percent
1 EARLY_EUROPEAN_FARMERS 37.70
2 SINTASHTA_STEPPE_HERDERS 27.93
3 CAUCASUS 16.21
4 SW_ASIAN 11.37
5 BALOCHI 3.55
6 E_AFRICAN 2.35


Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Norwegian +50% Sicilian @ 5.844211

Using 3 populations approximation:
1 50% Norwegian +25% Stuttgart +25% Turks_Adana @ 5.597237

[Dušan]

# Population Percent
1 EARLY_EUROPEAN_FARMERS 34.32
2 SINTASHTA_STEPPE_HERDERS 33.85
3 CAUCASUS 18.55
4 SW_ASIAN 7.06
5 BALOCHI 2.47
6 SE_ASIAN 1.84
7 W_SIBERIAN 1.06
8 S_INDIAN 0.85




Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Greek 16.09
2 Norwegian 21.4
3 Sicilian 23.06
4 Turks_Istanbul 28.34
5 Russian 30.55
6 Turks_Balikesir 32.05
7 Turks_Aydin 32.19
8 Finnish 34.96
9 Estonian 37.19
10 Kurds_N 38.01
11 Turks_Adana 38.1
12 Kurds_C 38.19
13 Lithuanian 38.47
14 Turks_Kayseri 38.57
15 Turkmen_Afghan 39.16
16 Tajik_Pomiri 39.67
17 Iraqi_Chaldeans 39.91
18 Kurds_F 40.22
19 Uzbek 40.24
20 Iraqi_Arab_Baghdad 40.4




Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 65.9% Greek + 34.1% Russian @ 3.33
2 68.9% Greek + 31.1% Finnish @ 3.4
3 70.2% Greek + 29.8% Estonian @ 3.53
4 57.3% Greek + 42.7% Norwegian @ 3.56
5 71% Greek + 29% Lithuanian @ 3.68
6 57.2% Norwegian + 42.8% Turks_Istanbul @ 4.32
7 64.7% Norwegian + 35.3% Turks_Kayseri @ 4.65
8 60.4% Norwegian + 39.6% Turks_Balikesir @ 5.08
9 52% Norwegian + 48% Sicilian @ 5.2
10 60.5% Norwegian + 39.5% Turks_Aydin @ 5.3
11 57.3% Sicilian + 42.7% Russian @ 5.33
12 64.6% Norwegian + 35.4% Turks_Adana @ 5.36
13 67.4% Norwegian + 32.6% Armenian @ 5.56
14 60.7% Sicilian + 39.3% Finnish @ 5.68
15 62.2% Sicilian + 37.8% Estonian @ 5.77
16 63% Sicilian + 37% Lithuanian @ 5.79
17 72.1% Norwegian + 27.9% Turks_Trabzon @ 6.22
18 83% Greek + 17% BA_Sintashta @ 6.45
19 83% Greek + 17% Corded_Ware_LN @ 6.45
20 68.5% Norwegian + 31.5% Assyrian @ 6.78