Genetic differentiation of Balto-Slavs

[cass]

To verify the period of division of the Balts from the Slavs, I used all available samples from the period 2400BC- 1200BC (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jb3cYq0OfKppw6LVUrVAmvO6NwNDZjny/view?usp=sharing). It can be said with high probability that the division took place in the late era of the Strzyzow culture. At the same time, there was an expansion of the more Slavic faction (possibly more close to Fatyanovo) to the west, where the Slavs created the Trzciniec culture. The clear connotations of Trzciniec with Füzesabony culture in Hungary may also explain the increased EEF among the Slavs.





https://i.ibb.co/p24FSF5/Zrzut-ekranu-10-1-2025-124545-www-youtube-com.jpg
The thesis of Russian linguists about the early division of the Slavs and the Balts can be genetically justified.

This thread is a continuation of a similar threads>
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?391627-Slavic-ethnogenesis-over-the-centuries
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?391602-In-search-of-pre-Christian-Slavs-0-600AD


Below is a chronological analysis of subsequent archaeological periods

1200BC Late Trzciniec

Differentiation of the Balto-Slavs.

https://i.ibb.co/LhDN0GR/Zrzut-ekranu-15-1-2025-131927-vahaduo-github-io.jpg (https://ibb.co/gFb4rn9)

1400BC Mid. Trzciniec
https://i.ibb.co/w0cgS8y/Spatial-range-of-the-Trzciniec-cultural-circle-and-the-Fuezesabony-culture-after.png (https://ibb.co/TvW24Jc)

The Balts remain in Strzyzow, and the Slavs build a separate culture of Trzciniec.

https://i.ibb.co/LhDN0GR/Zrzut-ekranu-15-1-2025-131927-vahaduo-github-io.jpg (https://ibb.co/gFb4rn9)

1700BC Early Trzciniec

https://i.ibb.co/XLGbbKw/Zrzut-ekranu-15-1-2025-13324-vahaduo-github-io.jpg (https://ibb.co/bmGPPCf)
The Balto-Slavs maintain unity in the Strzyzow culture, but there are clear signs of an elevated EEF among the Slavs.


1800BC Strzyzow

https://i.ibb.co/vJSJpkX/01973-Die-Fundpl-tze-der-Strzyzow-Kultur-nach-J-Gurba-und-J-Glosik-1970.jpg (https://ibb.co/xMNMW6F)

https://i.ibb.co/vq8K0q7/Zrzut-ekranu-15-1-2025-133941-vahaduo-github-io.jpg (https://ibb.co/RbWVRbx)

1889BC Early Strzyzow

https://i.ibb.co/kG612GF/Zrzut-ekranu-15-1-2025-13479-vahaduo-github-io.jpg (https://ibb.co/qDF5YDw)
Among the Balts, there is a clear signal of their correlation with Lithuania (Lithuania_LN_o.AG:Spiginas2.AG__BC_1930__Cov_76.4 7%,0.12862,0.117801,0 .099937,0.116281,0.054779,0.036535,0.00893,0.00946 1,0.012476,-0.037541, 0.011854,-0.015736,0.031516,0.022295,0.000543,0.012994,0.011 604,-0.0002 53,-0.000251,0.016258,0.012104,-0.003462,-0.010476,-0.027474,0.000359). Whether their movement northward or their subsequent mixing with the pre-Baltic population is already visible requires further investigation.



2000BC

Both groups are quite similar. However, there are clear Czech and Fatyanovo signals among the Slavs.
https://i.ibb.co/6RPxCW1/Zrzut-ekranu-15-1-2025-135414-vahaduo-github-io.jpg (https://ibb.co/N6jPBym)

2200BC
https://i.ibb.co/wYLCxKv/Zrzut-ekranu-15-1-2025-135820-vahaduo-github-io.jpg (https://ibb.co/zN5b0Sk)

2400BC CW period

Again at a distance, we see the original Polish CW profile of the Balts and clear connotations of the Slavs with the Fatyanovo population. Whether the early BB signal in the Slavs is just an avatar requires further verification.
https://i.ibb.co/FHmw66G/Zrzut-ekranu-15-1-2025-1436-vahaduo-github-io.jpg (https://ibb.co/bbQB11p)


https://i.ibb.co/MPLRLCB/Zrzut-ekranu-15-1-2025-14615-vahaduo-github-io.jpg (https://ibb.co/2cBjBkZ)



In the analysis I intentionally removed ParaSlavic outliers from Unetice and Tollense.

[Gannicus]

That map showing the zone of the Trzciniec culture is about the size and area where I think the ethnogenesis took place for the Slavs. In my mind it could be bigger. Celtic culture was fairly widespread as well from Britain and Ireland to Iberia and central Europe.

[Wend-Kruzek]

Target: Wend-Kruzek_scaled
Distance: 0.9840% / 0.00983977
44.8 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
13.6 Czechia_EBA_Unetice.AG
12.8 Czechia_EBA_CordedWare.AG
9.6 Greece_Aidonia_LBA.rel.of.AID007.AG
8.2 Greece_Perachora_EBA.SG
6.2 Germany_Lech_EBA_possible.contam.AG
2.4 Germany_EBA_Unetice.AG
1.6 Hungary_EBA_Kisapostag
0.4 USA_CA_SanNicolas_1600BP_1d.rel.SN09.SG
0.2 Greece_Crete_HgCharalambos_EMBA.AG
0.2 Poland_Mierzanowice_EBA

Target: Wend-Kruzek_scaled
Distance: 0.9999% / 0.00999944 | R5P
53.2 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
14.8 Greece_Perachora_EBA.SG
14.6 Czechia_EBA_CordedWare.AG
11.6 Germany_Lech_EBA_possible.contam.AG
5.8 Greece_Aidonia_LBA.rel.of.AID007.AG

Distance to: Wend-Kruzek_scaled
0.03646554 Czechia_EBA_Unetice_brother.I14185.AG:I11160.AG__B C_1900__Cov_61.59%
0.03780774 Czechia_EBA_Unetice.AG:I14192.AG__BC_1900__Cov_58. 41%
0.03874064 Czechia_EBA_Unetice_brother.I14585.AG:I14188.AG__B C_1900__Cov_36.87%
0.03994203 Czechia_EBA_Unetice.AG:I4130.AG__BC_2300__Cov_20.2 2%
0.04004115 Hungary_Fuzesabony_MBA:I20772__BC_1950__Cov_unknow n
0.04007062 Czechia_EBA_Unetice.AG:MIS004.AG__BC_1883__Cov_24. 70%
0.04069422 Czechia_EBA_Unetice.AG:KNE003.AG__BC_2021__Cov_68. 64%
0.04079050 Czechia_BellBeaker.AG:I4136.AG__BC_2300__Cov_21.95 %
0.04083224 Hungary_MBA_Fuzesabony.AG:I20750.AG__BC_1950__Cov_ 45.24%
0.04091799 Scotland_C_EBA.AG:I3132.AG__BC_1977__Cov_67.03%
0.04102615 Czechia_MBA_Tumulus.AG:I16100.AG__BC_1375__Cov_51. 57%
0.04103162 Czechia_EBA_Unetice:MIB083__BC_1829__Cov_42.11%
0.04228130 Czechia_BellBeaker.AG:KOP003.AG__BC_2392__Cov_46.8 0%
0.04243645 Czechia_EBA_Unetice.AG:MIS002.AG__BC_1933__Cov_75. 21%
0.04248231 Czechia_EBA_Unetice:MIB052__BC_1709__Cov_70.99%
0.04277267 Czechia_EBA_Unetice:MIB031__BC_1883__Cov_24.02%
0.04315077 Hungary_Füzesabony_MBA:I11661__BC_1950__Cov_27.92%
0.04326046 Czechia_BellBeaker.AG:I7281.AG__BC_2244__Cov_65.89 %
0.04352048 Germany_EBA_Unetice.AG:I0116.AG__BC_2028__Cov_58.8 5%
0.04354707 Czechia_EBA_Unetice:MIB007__BC_1829__Cov_42.11%
0.04393670 Czechia_BA_BellBeaker.AG:I7249.AG__BC_2061__Cov_67 .50%
0.04396498 Czechia_BellBeaker.AG:I4891.AG__BC_2181__Cov_72.58 %
0.04440083 Germany_EBA_Unetice.AG:LEU025.AG__BC_1950__Cov_41. 82%
0.04463549 Germany_BellBeaker.AG:I5531.AG__BC_2300__Cov_54.57 %
0.04467441 Czechia_EBA_Unetice.AG:KNE007.AG__BC_2027__Cov_45. 23%

[Vessna]

Target: Vessna_scaled
Distance: 2.0129% / 0.02012914
45.8 Poland_Strzyżów_EBA
26.8 Estonia_CordedWare.SG
15.8 Greece_Perachora_EBA.SG
4.2 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
3.2 Germany_EBA_Unetice.AG
3.0 Russia_Remontnoye_EBA_Yamnaya.SG
0.8 Russia_MLBA_Krasnoyarsk.AG
0.4 China_Shandong_Jiaojia_N_Late_Dawenkou_N


Distance to: Vessna_scaled
0.04445735 Czechia_BellBeaker.AG:I4136.AG__BC_2300__Cov_21.95 %
0.04466626 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz551_2__BC_1250__Cov_7.76%
0.04719420 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz655__BC_1402__Cov_21.19%
0.04742299 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz711__BC_1471__Cov_34.63%
0.04838211 Ukraine_Komarów_MBA:poz296_dr__BC_1531__Cov_29.07%
0.04843468 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz747__BC_1391__Cov_29.66%
0.04969887 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz554__BC_1394__Cov_43.58%
0.04976176 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz545_2__BC_1260__Cov_9.10%
0.04992334 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz663__BC_1526__Cov_13.67%
0.05075325 Hungary_MBA_Fuzesabony.AG:I20750.AG__BC_1950__Cov_ 45.24%
0.05097954 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz694__BC_1321__Cov_28.63%
0.05109802 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz713__BC_1312__Cov_28.37%
0.05109918 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz700__BC_1312__Cov_61.82%
0.05182588 Estonia_CordedWare.SG:EKA1.SG__BC_2245__Cov_86.69%
0.05251496 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz658__BC_1326__Cov_46.94%
0.05264558 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz690__BC_1326__Cov_25.48%
0.05329544 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz693__BC_1418__Cov_26.41%
0.05350111 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz667__BC_1529__Cov_21.14%
0.05460439 Hungary_Fuzesabony_MBA:I20772__BC_1950__Cov_unknow n
0.05470860 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz702__BC_1410__Cov_65.81%
0.05533785 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz678__BC_1564__Cov_22.95%
0.05550778 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz672__BC_1529__Cov_26.06%
0.05588214 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz684__BC_1317__Cov_27.11%
0.05631636 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz507_2__BC_1314__Cov_14.70%
0.05636975 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz675__BC_1500__Cov_26.95%

[cass]

Target: Vessna_scaled
Distance: 2.0129% / 0.02012914
45.8 Poland_Strzyżów_EBA
26.8 Estonia_CordedWare.SG
15.8 Greece_Perachora_EBA.SG
4.2 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
3.2 Germany_EBA_Unetice.AG
3.0 Russia_Remontnoye_EBA_Yamnaya.SG
0.8 Russia_MLBA_Krasnoyarsk.AG
0.4 China_Shandong_Jiaojia_N_Late_Dawenkou_N


Distance to: Vessna_scaled
0.04445735 Czechia_BellBeaker.AG:I4136.AG__BC_2300__Cov_21.95 %
0.04466626 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz551_2__BC_1250__Cov_7.76%
0.04719420 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz655__BC_1402__Cov_21.19%
0.04742299 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz711__BC_1471__Cov_34.63%
0.04838211 Ukraine_Komarów_MBA:poz296_dr__BC_1531__Cov_29.07%
0.04843468 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz747__BC_1391__Cov_29.66%
0.04969887 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz554__BC_1394__Cov_43.58%
0.04976176 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz545_2__BC_1260__Cov_9.10%
0.04992334 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz663__BC_1526__Cov_13.67%
0.05075325 Hungary_MBA_Fuzesabony.AG:I20750.AG__BC_1950__Cov_ 45.24%
0.05097954 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz694__BC_1321__Cov_28.63%
0.05109802 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz713__BC_1312__Cov_28.37%
0.05109918 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz700__BC_1312__Cov_61.82%
0.05182588 Estonia_CordedWare.SG:EKA1.SG__BC_2245__Cov_86.69%
0.05251496 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz658__BC_1326__Cov_46.94%
0.05264558 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz690__BC_1326__Cov_25.48%
0.05329544 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz693__BC_1418__Cov_26.41%
0.05350111 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz667__BC_1529__Cov_21.14%
0.05460439 Hungary_Fuzesabony_MBA:I20772__BC_1950__Cov_unknow n
0.05470860 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz702__BC_1410__Cov_65.81%
0.05533785 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz678__BC_1564__Cov_22.95%
0.05550778 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz672__BC_1529__Cov_26.06%
0.05588214 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz684__BC_1317__Cov_27.11%
0.05631636 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz507_2__BC_1314__Cov_14.70%
0.05636975 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA:poz675__BC_1500__Cov_26.95%


Strzyżów dominates over Trzciniec, so it has a Baltic profile. :thumb001:

But can you try ADC: 0.25x RC and/or 0.50x RC please?

[cass]

Target: cass
Distance: 0.7152% / 0.00715225 | ADC: 0.25x RC
34.8 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
20.0 Czechia_EBA_Unetice.AG
12.6 Sweden_Nastegarden_Steppe2.SG
10.6 Germany_EBA_Unetice.AG
7.4 Estonia_CordedWare.SG
5.6 Greece_Attica_Kolikrepi_BA.AG
4.4 Serbia_Mokrin_EBA_Maros.SG
4.2 Turkey_Central_Kalehoyuk_AssyrianColonyPeriod.SG
0.4 Germany_Lech_BellBeaker_possible.contam.AG

Target: cass
Distance: 0.4722% / 0.00472203
41.4 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
15.6 Germany_EBA_Unetice.AG
10.0 Greece_Perachora_EBA.SG
5.2 Sweden_LN_EBA.SG
5.0 Denmark_SouthScandinavia_EBA.SG
5.0 Estonia_CordedWare.SG
4.4 Turkey_Central_Kalehoyuk_AssyrianColonyPeriod.SG
4.0 Poland_Mierzanowice_EBA
3.4 Hungary_EBA_Kisapostag
2.2 Sweden_Nastegarden_Steppe2.SG
1.8 IsleofMan_EBA_lowsteppe.AG
1.0 Greece_Attica_Kolikrepi_BA.AG
0.8 Ukraine_Komarów_MBA
0.2 Germany_Lech_BellBeaker_possible.contam.AG

[cass]

Continuation of the theme of Slavic ethnogenesis. (https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?392197-G25-test-analysis-supported-by-IA&p=8158588&viewfull=1#post8158588)




With the support of AI, I decided to analyze, in a different way, the differentiation of Slavic and Baltic groups.

I used the following samples for analysis.

Baltic,0.1354096,0.1248596,0.0851556,0.083037,0.04 3785,0.031109,0.011639,0.0160688,-0.0028562,-0.0331962,-0.003415,-0.0125126,0.0221584,0.0298256,-0.0119514,0.0012044,0.0040726,-0.0004682,0.0028402,0.0033852,-0.0038388,-0.0057988,0.0083476,-0.0080288,0.0006036

Slavic,0.131316,0.119002,0.071667,0.06122,0.036402 ,0.02193,0.009715,0.012141,-0.00186,-0.02216,-0.00159,-0.00799,0.015312,0.021257,-0.01056,-0.00116,0.003795,-0.00052,0.002058,0.001577,-0.00338,-0.00377,0.004307,-0.00318,-0.00019



Slavic sample is closest to early Slavs and groups of Northern Slavs. In turn, for the Balts, I took the average of the values ​​from modern Latvia and Lithuania, cutting off the extreme samples. Unfortunately, we do not have any other reliable Baltic samples. It is highly probable that the Balts of today are more similar to the Slavs than in the Middle Ages, so the differences must have been even more significant then.

https://i.ibb.co/kVzcfQrK/output-79.png (https://ibb.co/0p1JShWq)


The analysis of ancient samples indicates a slight deviation of the Slavic population.



https://i.ibb.co/3yrVNqYG/output-83.png (https://ibb.co/WWx7ywpq)
The analysis of all similar samples indicates that both groups are similar but different. The differences in the early samples are probably the result of subsequent differences after the final differentiation. Both groups were certainly identical up to a certain period.



https://i.ibb.co/v4crznJ1/output-87.png (https://ibb.co/QvJqmw69)

The analysis of the Unetice Trzciniec and Konoviz samples indicates greater similarity of the Slavs to the Czech samples. For Trzciniec it also indicates greater proximity to the Balt population. In my opinion, the alleged greater proximity of the Slavs to Unetice is only apparent and results from the Balto-Slavic differentiation within the late Trziniec. Here I must add that I am verifying my previous theses. The connection of the Slavs to Knovitz is a more probable event. Unfortunately, as we know, we do not have intermediate samples from Lusatian Poland.





https://i.ibb.co/PbjVDqD/output-2025-01-31-T192210-181.png (https://ibb.co/MjSJBFB)
In order to date the Balto-Slavic split, I performed an analysis focusing on samples with minimal genetic differences to both groups. As we can see, the Trzciniec samples indicate equal distances to both groups, which may mean that up to this point they are indistinguishable.



After this point, there is a period of differentiation, with key events indicated by specific post-Trzciniec samples.


In order, these are the population of Central Europe (possibly proto-Celts) - Knoviz, the Scythian/Black Sea population, with the participation of Greeks, and again the Celts, and finally the Germanics, with the main interaction probably within the population of Wielbark. The high similarity of the population of Slavs, but also Balts, to such an early Scandinavian sample is very puzzling. It either proves trans-Baltic connections or is a confirmation of mixing with the Goths in the population of Wielbark.


Below are key samples deviating the Slavs from the Balts, indicating the absorption of significant non-Baltic components by the Slavs in the post-Trzciniec era. All of them and each of them individually are the source of high secondary absorption of the EEF component in Slavs.


Czechia_LBA_Knoviz.AG:I16089.AG__BC_1050__Cov_70.0 8%,0.119514,0.120848,0.066373,0.055556,0.032314,0. 023427,-0.00094,0.006692,-0.000818,-0.024602,-0.005034,-0.004646,0.010852,0.012799,-0.01045,0.00053,0.007953,0.000127,0.009553,0.00162 6,-0.000499,-0.004328,0.004683,-0.006266,-0.00491
Ukraine_Mykolaiv_Antiquity_Greeks?_2_EIA:UKR153__B C_573__Cov_42.28%,0.110408,0.12491,0.069767,0.0610 47,0.029544,0.017012,0.0094,0.009692,0.001227,-0.023873,-0.003085,-0.004196,0.01115,0.025047,-0.004343,0.014452,0.017471,0.005321,0.003771,-0.001626,0.002496,-0.00507,-0.00037,-0.006266,-0.001916
Ukraine_Kharkiv_Scythian_LeftDnipro_LocAgr_2_EIA:U KR096__BC_290__Cov_64.95%,0.129758,0.107646,0.0592 08,0.063631,0.021542,0.025937,0.008695,0.011769,-0.005113,-0.020957,-0.001786,-0.007493,0.003865,0.006744,-0.003122,-0.001989,-0.000522,0.005828,0.003142,-0.001,0.002246,0.007666,0.000246,0.000723,-0.003712
Poland_Maslomecz_Wielbark_IA.SG:PCA0103.SG__AD_194 __Cov_74.66%,0.130897,0.131003,0.076178,0.072029,0 .042469,0.021753,0.008695,0.014076,0.002863,-0.017495,-0.000974,-0.006894,0.00996,0.01734,-0.003529,-0.011535,-0.013821,-0.005448,0.005531,0.006503,0.005989,0.002226,-0.000123,-0.007471,-0.006347
Serbia_Roman_AfricanPossible.TW:I32305.TW__AD_100_ _Cov_80.26%,0.133173,0.11577,0.078064,0.07106,0.03 0775,0.031794,0.00893,0.010153,0.008385,-0.017495,0.000325,-0.002398,0.015609,0.016652,-0.011536,0.006762,0.002999,0.000887,-0.003268,0.011756,0.002371,0.004451,0.011216,-0.006145,0.00491
Germany_Hassleben_Germanic_oNorthernEurope.SG:R118 75.SG__AD_450__Cov_55.19%,0.130897,0.132019,0.0791 95,0.079781,0.041546,0.02761,0.016686,0.012461,-0.00225,-0.019681,-0.003248,-0.003747,0.00773,0.009771,0.005429,0.002519,-0.010561,0.000633,0.006788,0.004502,-0.000998,-0.005441,0.010969,0.00253,0.002754
Sweden_north_Pre_Viking.SG:rtp003.SG__AD_475__Cov_ 99.45%,0.127482,0.111708,0.07731,0.064923,0.033545 ,0.0251,0.005405,0.013846,0.001841,-0.018953,-0.009906,0.001349,0.001487,-0.007019,0.007465,-0.004243,-0.018384,0.004054,0.012821,0.008379,0.006613,0.002 102,-0.001109,0.014098,-0.000239

Please ignore these sample tags. Some of this has nothing to do with reality.



Target: Ukraine_Mykolaiv_Antiquity_Greeks?_2_EIA:UKR153__B C_573__Cov_42.28%
Distance: 2.0954% / 0.02095425 | ADC: 0.5x RC
59.4 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
40.6 Croatia_MLBA.AG



Target: Czechia_LBA_Knoviz.AG:I16089.AG__BC_1050__Cov_70.0 8%
Distance: 1.4251% / 0.01425142 | ADC: 0.5x RC
53.8 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
46.2 Croatia_MLBA.AG


Target: Ukraine_Kharkiv_Scythian_LeftDnipro_LocAgr_2_EIA:U KR096__BC_290__Cov_64.95%
Distance: 1.5077% / 0.01507739 | ADC: 0.5x RC
33.0 Ukraine_Komarów_MBA
30.6 Russia_MLBA_Krasnoyarsk.AG
16.8 Croatia_MLBA_alt.AG
11.4 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
6.4 Kazakhstan_LBA_o3.AG
1.8 Croatia_MLBA.AG

Target: Poland_Maslomecz_Wielbark_IA.SG:PCA0103.SG__AD_194 __Cov_74.66%
Distance: 1.4010% / 0.01401018 | ADC: 0.5x RC
68.2 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
30.4 Czechia_MBA_Tumulus.AG
1.4 Croatia_MLBA.AG


Target: Serbia_Roman_AfricanPossible.TW:I32305.TW__AD_100_ _Cov_80.26%
Distance: 2.2847% / 0.02284680 | ADC: 0.5x RC
60.6 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
18.4 Ukraine_Komarów_MBA
13.4 Croatia_MLBA_alt.AG
7.6 Germany_Tollense_BA_o2.SG

Target: Germany_Hassleben_Germanic_oNorthernEurope.SG:R118 75.SG__AD_450__Cov_55.19%
Distance: 1.4411% / 0.01441130 | ADC: 0.5x RC
49.0 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
14.8 Scotland_Orkney_MBA.SG
13.8 England_MBA_sister.I7580.AG
13.0 Germany_Tollense_BA_o2.SG
9.4 Ukraine_Komarów_MBA


Target: Sweden_north_Pre_Viking.SG:rtp003.SG__AD_475__Cov_ 99.45%
Distance: 1.7923% / 0.01792279 | ADC: 0.5x RC
28.6 Poland_Trzciniec_MBA
25.4 Scotland_Orkney_MBA.SG
14.2 England_MBA_sister.I7580.AG
14.2 Sweden_FirseSten_Steppe2.SG
9.8 England_MBA.AG
7.8 Russia_Karasuk_oRISE.SG




One more element is worth paying attention to, namely the appearance of Scandinavian Germans in the late Trzciniec era. Unfortunately, without further samples from Poland, it is difficult to draw any further conclusions. Certainly, the spread of cremation throughout Northern Europe during this period makes it difficult to conduct genetic evidence.
https://i.ibb.co/hF1ts7DP/output-2025-01-31-T204633-028.png (https://ibb.co/JjFMnB5f)