View Full Version : Post your Ancestry.com Origins Update 2025
ScandinavianCelt
10-10-2025, 12:35 PM
Looks like I got a LOT more DNA from my Dad's Dad (Quebec), than my Dad's Mom (British Isles)...
https://i.postimg.cc/qMhs1xgp/ancestry-originsupdate-2025.jpg (https://postimg.cc/xcQNCHKZ)
Post a screenshot/snip and let's see how yours looks too.
Rędwald
10-10-2025, 12:41 PM
https://i.postimg.cc/cJsTktpd/Screenshot-2025-10-10-101043.png
celticdragongod
10-10-2025, 11:37 PM
Celtic & Gaelic
Munster, Ireland 29%
Connacht, Ireland 27%
Donegal, Ireland 23%
Leinster, Ireland 21%
143729
143730
Gannicus
10-11-2025, 12:25 AM
Looks like I got a LOT more DNA from my Dad's Dad (Quebec), than my Dad's Mom (British Isles)...
https://i.postimg.cc/qMhs1xgp/ancestry-originsupdate-2025.jpg (https://postimg.cc/xcQNCHKZ)
Post a screenshot/snip and let's see how yours looks too.
It's strange to me how Ancestry has Quebec as it's own category when it's likely French + some British Isles.
ScandinavianCelt
10-11-2025, 02:31 AM
It's strange to me how Ancestry has Quebec as it's own category when it's likely French + some British Isles.
I have the entire genealogy on the Quebec side-- it's all French, but does incorporate a couple different native Canadian Indian lines, with one native woman finding her way to me 9 different ways/paths. But Ancestry isn't giving me any of that, so they must see it as all French.
ScandinavianCelt
10-11-2025, 11:33 AM
https://i.postimg.cc/cJsTktpd/Screenshot-2025-10-10-101043.png
Do you know via genealogy how far back your Indigenous ancestry entered? In Quebec, all of mine that the records show was in the 1600's.
~Elizabeth~
10-11-2025, 12:37 PM
I had posted my new AncestryDNA results in Grace O'Malley's earlier thread. I'll post here too. :)
By paper trail I am 25% Slovak but by DNA I'm only 2% Slovak, from my father. And I have 1% Connacht, Ireland from my father's side. And I have 1% Iceland from my father. I loved the movie The Northman which was made in Iceland.
https://i.postimg.cc/7PjGVtbg/October-9th-2025-Ancestry-DNA-paternal-maternal-update.png
https://i.postimg.cc/d11wPFN8/October-9th-2025-Ancestry-DNA-ancestral-regions-part-1.png
https://i.postimg.cc/tRcCb1j4/October-9th-2025-Ancestry-DNA-ancestral-regions-update-part-2.png
Slavic Italian
10-11-2025, 12:56 PM
This update seems really "UK" oriented.
ScandinavianCelt
10-11-2025, 01:10 PM
I had posted my new AncestryDNA results in Grace O'Malley's earlier thread. I'll post here too. :)
I wonder why some people are getting their results broken down into sub-headed categories. Mine aren't.
I didn't see any Ancestry Update post by Grace. Oh well!
Thanks for sharing.
Mopi The Dire Wolf
10-11-2025, 01:19 PM
don't like it
facking Madeira, behave :picard2:
https://i.imgur.com/PyDOuKp.jpg
Rędwald
10-11-2025, 01:30 PM
Do you know via genealogy how far back your Indigenous ancestry entered? In Quebec, all of mine that the records show was in the 1600's.
The closest full-blooded native individual I've confirmed was born in 1750; she married a Frenchman in Acadia, and they had children. However, there could be more recent contributors that I haven't discovered yet.
Nisko
10-11-2025, 02:20 PM
This update was pretty ambitious in terms of dividing results into more specific regions. A lot of people seem unhappy with the changes. Personally, I think my results got more accurate overall, but I've got small criticisms as well.
https://i.ibb.co/HvxkscP/Ancestry-DNA-2025-me.png (https://ibb.co/kn9WfLD)
ScandinavianCelt
10-11-2025, 03:30 PM
This update was pretty ambitious in terms of dividing results into more specific regions. A lot of people seem unhappy with the changes. Personally, I think my results got more accurate overall, but I've got small criticisms as well.
https://i.ibb.co/HvxkscP/Ancestry-DNA-2025-me.png (https://ibb.co/kn9WfLD)
I'm curious what your closest 10 samples are using the modern official scaled set. DM me if you want to share? Or, post them here.
~Elizabeth~
10-11-2025, 03:59 PM
I wonder why some people are getting their results broken down into sub-headed categories. Mine aren't.
I didn't see any Ancestry Update post by Grace. Oh well!
Thanks for sharing.
Here is the link to Grace O'Malley's post/thread, started at 12:01 pm on October 9th. https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?398639-Ancestry-2025-Update&p=8296861&viewfull=1#post8296861
Gannicus
10-11-2025, 06:59 PM
They just can't separate England completely from the continent. 23&Me can do it.
143746
143747
calxpal
10-12-2025, 02:17 AM
I'm not gonna post DNA results publicly here anymore sorry, but if anyone is really interested in seeing my Ancestry update you can PM me and read my explanation in my sub for my opinion on it.
Mopi The Dire Wolf
10-12-2025, 05:41 AM
Madeira...you wot :picard2:
North Af up to 4% : :picard2:
Not impressed with the update
https://i.imgur.com/PyDOuKp.jpg
calxpal
10-12-2025, 06:01 AM
Madeira...you wot :picard2:
North Af up to 4% : :picard2:
Not impressed with the update
Ah dang sorry interesting to see what you got though! :)
Yeah tbh some of the subregion assignments just felt really random, and it seems they still have a tendency to inflate a certain component a lot. I guess I'm not surprised since they tried so hard to break it down, but it was a bit overhyped to me. Especially without new community assignments for me. They got a few subregions right, but the overall %'s were fairly less accurate than before. Was the 23andme update good for you in your own opinion? I'm curious because my opinion on it is very polarized and complicated, I thought it was meh and had odd issues, didn't gain any new genetic groups or location regions either. For me it was a disappointing year for updates.
Mopi The Dire Wolf
10-12-2025, 06:05 AM
Ah dang sorry interesting to see what you got though! :)
Yeah tbh some of the subregion assignments just felt really random, and it seems they still have a tendency to inflate a certain component a lot. I guess I'm not surprised since they tried so hard to break it down, but it was a bit overhyped to me. Especially without new community assignments for me. They got a few subregions right, but the overall %'s were fairly less accurate than before. Was the 23andme update good for you in your own opinion? I'm curious because my opinion on it is very polarized and complicated, I thought it was meh and had odd issues, didn't gain any new genetic groups or location regions either. For me it was a disappointing year for updates.
The 23andMe update was better for me this time
Ancestry have gone nuts with this recent update imo. Lost the plot. Someone in their marketing set up need firing :) xD
calxpal
10-12-2025, 06:22 AM
The 23andMe update was better for me this time
Ancestry have gone nuts with this recent update imo. Lost the plot. Someone in their marketing set up need firing :) xD
That's good! The 23andme update was good for my dad and ok for my grandma and sister, but not too good for me and my mom. Massive inconsistencies between family members though and in parental inheritance, very bummed since the phasing used to work very well pre-update and our results aligned much better before now the parental inheritance and ancestry timeline are almost just a fantasy and shockingly incorrect for a 23andme feature. I've found bugs in the ancestry features as well, they need to fix them ASAP. The results do improve for me quite a bit when I change the confidence from "most likely" to 50% confidence though. I hate the "most likely" confidence trash they use now, it seems too experimental IMO. New interface is bad too imo.
Yeah I think Ancestry went way overboard with trying to distinguish regions! And I feel like they were not honest about certain aspects of the update. I wish they also worked on improving their ancestry features too honestly. Also I do not like how they grouped some of the European regions. It seems their samples are not too good either.
I'm beginning to worry about the future of DNA tests a bit.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.