Race and IQ - The IQ data is out - on Danish television

[The Lawspeaker]

A7Fdl9Kmhgs

Race and IQ - The IQ data is out - on Danish television



Nothing 'hateful' , just the facts.

[heathen_son]

Interesting. I cannot imagine something similar being aired on the BBC.

Also, do Danes actually use the word "Ragnarök" in a context outside of their mythology? Or is it just the translator?

[Lobotomist]

Interesting. I cannot imagine something similar being aired on the BBC.

Also, do Danes actually use the word "Ragnarök" in a context outside of their mythology? Or is it just the translator?

Still used in context.

[RussiaPrussia]

Interesting. I cannot imagine something similar being aired on the BBC.

Also, do Danes actually use the word "Ragnarök" in a context outside of their mythology? Or is it just the translator?

youtube video is banned in germany

[The Lawspeaker]

It still works here:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7Fdl9Kmhgs

[RussiaPrussia]

It still works here:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7Fdl9Kmhgs

also banned

[The Lawspeaker]

Hmm.. can you avoid the German censorship by using a proxy ?

[Lemon Kush]

So much for freedom in Germany..

[Ivan Kramskoï]

Not available in your country damn

[sevruk]

youtube video is banned in germany

and Germans accused Russians to a large censorship...

[The Lawspeaker]

Guys: just use proxies to get around it. It's still available here though. Damn.. you're not telling me that compared to France and Germany we actually have a (relative) freedom of the press ?

[Lobotomist]

www.hidemyass.com

[Methusalem]

Guys just use proxies to get around it. It's still available here though. Damn.. you're not telling me that compared to France and Germany we actually have a (relative) freedom of the press ?

I can't see the video. What is it about? Sounds interesting.

[Lobotomist]

I can't see the video. What is it about? Sounds interesting.

It's just about IQ differences between races - nothing political correct.

[The Lawspeaker]

I can't see the video. What is it about? Sounds interesting.

Danish TV-program about the differences in races. Very interesting. Just use the link Lobo provided.

[Lobotomist]

Danish TV-program about the differences in races. Very interesting. Just use the link Lobo provided.

She used an example of some scientists in Netherlands comparing IQ by ethnic groups. Can you find it for me? The head scientist's name is mentioned here: 3:35.

[The Lawspeaker]

She used an example of some scientists in Netherlands comparing IQ by ethnic groups. Can you find it for me? The scientist's name is mentioned here: 3:35.

I'll take a look.

[The Lawspeaker]

It sounds like something Jan(tine ?) Nijenhuis. She can't pronounce it at all. I can't find anything under that name.

[Lobotomist]

It sounds like something Jan(tine ?) Nijenhuis. She can't pronounce it at all. I can't find anything under that name.

Nevermind. I found it with my pro Dutch skills. :cool:

http://cora.ucc.ie/bitstream/handle/10468/617/JtNFlynnAV2012.pdf?sequence=4

[The Lawspeaker]

Nevermind. I found it with my pro Dutch skills. :cool:

http://cora.ucc.ie/bitstream/handle/10468/617/JtNFlynnAV2012.pdf?sequence=4

You're good. I shouldn't have searched in Dutch but just used my brains since most research papers are published in English.

[RussiaPrussia]

Guys: just use proxies to get around it. It's still available here though. Damn.. you're not telling me that compared to France and Germany we actually have a (relative) freedom of the press ?

i can watch it now, with firefox addon proxy tube. I have seen this video before but i though it was dutch last time. The reason why i am saying this or that video is banned is to aware people how much germany censors.

This indian for example i dont even know why he is banned, but i cant see any videos of him lol.

http://www.youtube.com/user/nijjhar1

[The Lawspeaker]

I can watch his channel.

[Lobotomist]

You're good. I shouldn't have searched in Dutch but just used my brains since most research papers are published in English.

I didn't really search in English.
I searched "jan tenejenhaus iq" - but Google recommended "jan te nijenhuis iq".

[Lobotomist]

I also found a copy of this video (provided by Helmuth Nyborg), if anyone still has trouble seeing it.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5ovKcyZGR8

[mr. logan]

Asian and Ashkenazis function in a similar way. They don´t have real higher intelligence, their intelligence is based on neurosis. They think repeating patterns fast. They make short movements when they think, they depend absolutely in the presence of similars around. If you isolate one of them and sorround it with Whites, it will naturally occupy the assistance spot. Very good for memorizing and making fast reasonings that need to meet another subjct who can get that and move it a little bit further. If you get one Asian or Ashkenzi solve a big logistic or similar problem by himself, he/she gets lost in abstraction. They are good in abstract disciplines, like math andtheoretical physics, philosophy. That is why everyone works for us. We can project heavy in the future and we are individualistic, apart from having the strongest body. Besides these public iq results can be dubious, and work as simple propaganda. It always depends on the faction behind.

[Methusalem]

Asian and Ashkenazis function in a similar way. They don´t have real higher intelligence, their intelligence is based on neurosis. They think repeating patterns fast. They make short movements when they think, they depend absolutely in the presence of similars around. If you isolate one of them and sorround it with Whites, it will naturally occupy the assistance spot. Very good for memorizing and making fast reasonings that need to meet another subjct who can get that and move it a little bit further. If you get one Asian or Ashkenzi solve a big logistic or similar problem by himself, he/she gets lost in abstraction. They are good in abstract disciplines, like math andtheoretical physics, philosophy. That is why everyone works for us. We can project heavy in the future and we are individualistic, apart from having the strongest body. Besides these public iq results can be dubious, and work as simple propaganda. It always depends on the faction behind.

Post proof for your drivel.

[Lobotomist]

Why would anyone think blacks and whites (for example) have the same same average level of intelligence?

Before black Africans had contact with outsiders, not ONE African society had invented the wheel, a written language, calendar, a two-story building, a mechanical device or domesticated any beast of burden.

All this suggests a low average level of intelligence.

[randomguy1235]

Why would anyone think blacks and whites (for example) have the same same average level of intelligence?

Before black Africans had contact with outsiders, not ONE African society had invented the wheel, a written language, calendar, a two-story building, a mechanical device or domesticated any beast of burden.

All this suggests a low average level of intelligence.
Now you're attributing the successes of Near Eastern civilization to that of "white" civilization? Anyways, these studies are absolutely ludicrous. As if IQ tests are an accurate measure of someone's intelligence. Even if IQ tests give an approximate range of someone's capacity/cognitive ability, that's different from general intelligence.

[Methusalem]

Now you're attributing the successes of Near Eastern civilization to that of "white" civilization? Anyways, these studies are absolutely ludicrous. As if IQ tests are an accurate measure of someone's intelligence. Even if IQ tests give an approximate range of someone's capacity/cognitive ability, that's different from general intelligence.

Don't forget that these 'IQ-studies' got already several times debunked since they were based on a very flawed data.:rolleyes:

[Methusalem]

Why would anyone think blacks and whites (for example) have the same same average level of intelligence?

Before black Africans had contact with outsiders, not ONE African society had invented the wheel, a written language, calendar, a two-story building, a mechanical device or domesticated any beast of burden.

All this suggests a low average level of intelligence.

Correlation does not imply caution.

[Lobotomist]

Now you're attributing the successes of Near Eastern civilization to that of "white" civilization? Anyways, these studies are absolutely ludicrous. As if IQ tests are an accurate measure of someone's intelligence. Even if IQ tests give an approximate range of someone's capacity/cognitive ability, that's different from general intelligence.


Don't forget that these 'IQ-studies' got already several times debunked since they were based on a very flawed data.:rolleyes:

So you believe that all races in average are equally smart?

[Methusalem]

So you believe that all races in average are equally smart?

Yes. There is NO proof for the contrary.

[Methusalem]

Now you're attributing the successes of Near Eastern civilization to that of "white" civilization?

You see how he arrange to fit the term 'white' for his own agenda? Suddenly all those !brown muslim terrorist sand niggers' are 'white' when it comes to brag about ancient achievements....

[randomguy1235]

So you believe that all races in average are equally smart?

Unless there's a reliable method of scientifically (empirically) quantifying intelligence, then we'll have to presume that this is the case

[SkyBurn]

Unless there's a reliable method of scientifically (empirically) quantifying intelligence, then we'll have to presume that this is the case

Not to mention the fact that it's impossible to separate the effect of nurture (uncountable sociological factors) on intelligence from the nature.

Also, "race" isn't as clear cut as people would like us to believe.

[Lobotomist]

Hm. Whatever you say. I wonder why it's ALWAYS those who gets portrayed bad in these studies and experiments that deny this. Defence mechanism kicking in for you?

The question should rather be, why should there not be IQ differences between races? I mean, we have acknowledged that dog breeds are not balanced regarding IQ f.x.

http://petrix.com/dogint/intelligence.html

[Methusalem]

Hm. Whatever you say. I wonder why it's ALWAYS those who gets portrayed bad in these studies and experiments that deny this. Defence mechanism kicking in for you?

Even if this was the case, this would still not proof your claim that intellectual differences between ethnic groups exist.:icon_lol:



The question should rather be, why should there not be IQ differences between races? I mean, we have acknowledged that dog breeds are not balanced regarding IQ f.x.


Humans are genetically way more closer to each other than dog breeds.


In a 2004 paper in Science, Parker et al. showed that very accurate classification is possible (410 of 414 dogs were correctly assigned to their breed). They also showed by Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA, a technique often used for estimating genetic variability using microsattelites and repeats, although it can also be used for SNPs) that 27% of genetic variance is between breeds. Using SNP data, they calculated an Fst distance between the breeds of 0.33. A recent paper on a genome-wide SNP analysis on 919 dogs from 85 breeds, showed by AMOVA that 65.1% of genetic variance was within breeds, 31.1% between breeds, and 3.8% between breed groups (they defined 10 different groups: Spaniels, Retrievers, etc.). They also that as few as 20 diagnostic SNPs can be used to accurately classify dogs into their breeds.

How does the genetic variation in dogs compare to that of humans? AMOVA analysis of humans shows that approximately 85% of variance is between individuals, 5% is between populations in the same racial group, and 10% is interracial (btw, this number is also close to the updated Fst measurement of Xing et al.). The average Fst distance between human races is approximately 0.15.

So, we can see that dog breeds are actually much more variable than human races. The myth of limited genetic diversity prevalent in racialist circles (to which I also fell victim) needs to be dispelled.


https://www.princeton.edu/genomics/kruglyak/publication/PDF/2004_Parker_Genetic.pdf

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7290/full/nature08837.html

[Lobotomist]

Hm. Whatever you say. I wonder why it's ALWAYS those who gets portrayed bad in these studies and experiments that deny this. Defence mechanism kicking in for you?

The question should rather be, why should there not be IQ differences between races? I mean, we have acknowledged that dog breeds are not balanced regarding IQ f.x.

http://petrix.com/dogint/intelligence.html

Also this.

http://imageshack.us/a/img707/3441/5bt.png

[Loki]

There is no such thing as equality in nature, I don't know how people justify this dogma.

[lamb]

It's hard to believe that anybody can have an IQ of 100 or less. No offense..I find it hard to believe majority of people are incapable of solving basic puzzles. If you know how to solve the questions, it is not hard. The only exception is if someone has never seen the type of questions before or been educated in how to solve them. If this is the case, they should make sure the test taker has a thorough understanding of what type of questions will be on the test, what the questions mean, and worked with sample questions beforehand. I don't believe they do this.

[Methusalem]

There is no such thing as equality in nature, I don't know how people justify this dogma.

True. But if you want to claim the contrary - that difference regarding intelligence between ethnic groups exist - you have to prove it.

[Petros Houhoulis]

True. But if you want to claim the contrary - that difference regarding intelligence between ethnic groups exist - you have to prove it.

Keep masturbating...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUxpMBl7RBY

[Methusalem]

Keep masturbating...


Don't have the time to watch a stupid video....

[Petros Houhoulis]

Don't have the time to watch a stupid video....

...And how do you know it is stupid if you don't watch it?

[Methusalem]

...And how do you know it is stupid if you don't watch it?

Because it is probably a pitiful attempt to disprove my previous posts? Maybe?

[Petros Houhoulis]

Because it is probably a pitiful attempt to disprove my previous posts? Maybe?

Maybe is not an answer. How do you know that the film is stupid? Do you think that I made it especially for you?

[Methusalem]

Maybe is not an answer. How do you know that the film is stupid? Do you think that I made it especially for you?

Yes. :lightbul:

[Petros Houhoulis]

Yes. :lightbul:

I am sorry, but I have to dissapoint you. I was not involved in the production of that video. I could not be, since I don't speak Norwegian...