British and Proud
05-04-2009, 03:15 PM
The Enemy Within (http://unrepentantbritishnationalist.blogspot.com/2009/05/enemy-within.html)
Like many British nationalists, I am an admirer of Enoch Powell. He was a fine orator, scholar and linguist and was undoubtedly one of the great political minds of the twentieth century - he graduated with a double starred first from Cambridge and was the youngest professor in the Commonwealth at the start of the Second World War. His political career failed because he was too outspoken and was perhaps seen as a threat by Edward Heath, but his prescience in matters such as the Common Market (the EU), devolution, economics and, of course, immigration, show him to be a politician of distinction.
What is more remarkable, and clearly evident from his speeches, is that he believed that mass-immigration into the UK and Europe was being orchestrated by an 'enemy within':
Have you ever wondered, perhaps, why opinions which the majority of people quite naturally hold are, if anyone dares express them publicly, denounced as 'controversial, 'extremist', 'explosive', 'disgraceful', and overwhelmed with a violence and venom quite unknown to debate on mere political issues? It is because the whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see.
The most perfect, and the most dangerous, example of this process is the subject miscalled, and deliberately miscalled, 'race'. The people of this country are told that they must feel neither alarm nor objection to a West Indian, African and Asian population which will rise to several millions being introduced into this country. If they do, they are 'prejudiced', 'racialist'... A current situation, and a future prospect, which only a few years ago would have appeared to everyone not merely intolerable but frankly incredible, has to be represented as if welcomed by all rational and right-thinking people. The public are literally made to say that black is white. Newspapers like the Sunday Times denounce it as 'spouting the fantasies of racial purity' to say that a child born of English parents in Peking is not Chinese but English, or that a child born of Indian parents in Birmingham is not English but Indian. It is even heresy to assert the plain fact that the English are a white nation.
Of course in 2009 it is obvious to all but the most credulous fool that our ruling elite have, for the last fifty years, undertaken a project that will ultimately alter Britain both demographically and culturally, beyond recognition. Enoch continued:
Whether those who take part know it or not, this process of brainwashing by repetition of manifest absurdities is a sinister and deadly weapon. In the end, it renders the majority, who are marked down to be the victims of violence or revolution or tyranny, incapable of self-defence by depriving them of their wits and convincing them that what they thought was right is wrong. The process has already gone perilously far, when political parties at a general election dare not discuss a subject which results from and depends on political action and which for millions of electors transcends all others in importance; or when party leaders can be mesmerised into accepting from the enemy the slogans of 'racialist' and 'unChristian' and applying them to lifelong political colleagues.
In another speech Powell again alludes to the possibility that what is happening has been contrived:
On the other hand there are at work the dark motives of those who desire the catastrophic outcome which they foresee. All round the world in various forms the same formula for rending societies apart is being prepared and applied, by ignorance or design, and there are those who are determined to see to it that Britain shall no longer be able to escape. I marvel sometimes that people should be so innocently blind to this nihilism.
And in another:
You may think what you are seeing is an exhibition of youthful exuberance and bad manners. It is not. You may think it is harmless. It is not. You may think it is aimed at me. it is not. It is aimed at all of you. They are after you. All of you are their target. Its aim is to see the day to day way of life, the decent things of life, that the majority want, demolished and destroyed. It is a movement that is in its infancy in this country. It is world wide but no mistake about it, it is spreading.
What is this movement he refers to? It is clearly global, and it is clearly supported by our mainstream politicians, media and senior civil servants. People like Andrew Marr. The following extracts are from his article entitled 'Poor? Stupid? Racist? Then don't listen to a pampered white liberal like me…', published in The Guardian on Sunday, February 28th 1999.
What then can be done? (Apart, of course, from widespread and vigorous miscegenation, which is the best answer, but perhaps tricky to arrange as public policy.)
The next answer was given by Doreen Lawrence, welcoming the report's emphasis on education: 'I truly believe in education our history, our background, is what separates us.' But, though teachers are the most effective anti-racist campaigners in the country, this means more than education in other religions it means a form of political education.
And the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be my Presbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain 'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off. The police are first in line to be burdened further, but a new Race Relations Act will impose the will of the state on millions of other lives too.
These are the solutions he proposes to ensure social cohesion. Scary stuff.
The apparatus the state are assembling now is truly frightening - ID cards, CCTV, DNA databases and records of our emails, 'phone calls and internet activity are now kept for government perusal. This is of course (ostensibly) needed to prevent terrorist attacks, which is directly attributable to mass-immigration. The fact is the more fractured and fractious our society becomes the more draconian the state will become...and as Enoch noted, 'communalism' (what he referred to multiculturalism) will inevitably lead to conflict. Was this 'their' intention all along?
Like many British nationalists, I am an admirer of Enoch Powell. He was a fine orator, scholar and linguist and was undoubtedly one of the great political minds of the twentieth century - he graduated with a double starred first from Cambridge and was the youngest professor in the Commonwealth at the start of the Second World War. His political career failed because he was too outspoken and was perhaps seen as a threat by Edward Heath, but his prescience in matters such as the Common Market (the EU), devolution, economics and, of course, immigration, show him to be a politician of distinction.
What is more remarkable, and clearly evident from his speeches, is that he believed that mass-immigration into the UK and Europe was being orchestrated by an 'enemy within':
Have you ever wondered, perhaps, why opinions which the majority of people quite naturally hold are, if anyone dares express them publicly, denounced as 'controversial, 'extremist', 'explosive', 'disgraceful', and overwhelmed with a violence and venom quite unknown to debate on mere political issues? It is because the whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see.
The most perfect, and the most dangerous, example of this process is the subject miscalled, and deliberately miscalled, 'race'. The people of this country are told that they must feel neither alarm nor objection to a West Indian, African and Asian population which will rise to several millions being introduced into this country. If they do, they are 'prejudiced', 'racialist'... A current situation, and a future prospect, which only a few years ago would have appeared to everyone not merely intolerable but frankly incredible, has to be represented as if welcomed by all rational and right-thinking people. The public are literally made to say that black is white. Newspapers like the Sunday Times denounce it as 'spouting the fantasies of racial purity' to say that a child born of English parents in Peking is not Chinese but English, or that a child born of Indian parents in Birmingham is not English but Indian. It is even heresy to assert the plain fact that the English are a white nation.
Of course in 2009 it is obvious to all but the most credulous fool that our ruling elite have, for the last fifty years, undertaken a project that will ultimately alter Britain both demographically and culturally, beyond recognition. Enoch continued:
Whether those who take part know it or not, this process of brainwashing by repetition of manifest absurdities is a sinister and deadly weapon. In the end, it renders the majority, who are marked down to be the victims of violence or revolution or tyranny, incapable of self-defence by depriving them of their wits and convincing them that what they thought was right is wrong. The process has already gone perilously far, when political parties at a general election dare not discuss a subject which results from and depends on political action and which for millions of electors transcends all others in importance; or when party leaders can be mesmerised into accepting from the enemy the slogans of 'racialist' and 'unChristian' and applying them to lifelong political colleagues.
In another speech Powell again alludes to the possibility that what is happening has been contrived:
On the other hand there are at work the dark motives of those who desire the catastrophic outcome which they foresee. All round the world in various forms the same formula for rending societies apart is being prepared and applied, by ignorance or design, and there are those who are determined to see to it that Britain shall no longer be able to escape. I marvel sometimes that people should be so innocently blind to this nihilism.
And in another:
You may think what you are seeing is an exhibition of youthful exuberance and bad manners. It is not. You may think it is harmless. It is not. You may think it is aimed at me. it is not. It is aimed at all of you. They are after you. All of you are their target. Its aim is to see the day to day way of life, the decent things of life, that the majority want, demolished and destroyed. It is a movement that is in its infancy in this country. It is world wide but no mistake about it, it is spreading.
What is this movement he refers to? It is clearly global, and it is clearly supported by our mainstream politicians, media and senior civil servants. People like Andrew Marr. The following extracts are from his article entitled 'Poor? Stupid? Racist? Then don't listen to a pampered white liberal like me…', published in The Guardian on Sunday, February 28th 1999.
What then can be done? (Apart, of course, from widespread and vigorous miscegenation, which is the best answer, but perhaps tricky to arrange as public policy.)
The next answer was given by Doreen Lawrence, welcoming the report's emphasis on education: 'I truly believe in education our history, our background, is what separates us.' But, though teachers are the most effective anti-racist campaigners in the country, this means more than education in other religions it means a form of political education.
And the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be my Presbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain 'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off. The police are first in line to be burdened further, but a new Race Relations Act will impose the will of the state on millions of other lives too.
These are the solutions he proposes to ensure social cohesion. Scary stuff.
The apparatus the state are assembling now is truly frightening - ID cards, CCTV, DNA databases and records of our emails, 'phone calls and internet activity are now kept for government perusal. This is of course (ostensibly) needed to prevent terrorist attacks, which is directly attributable to mass-immigration. The fact is the more fractured and fractious our society becomes the more draconian the state will become...and as Enoch noted, 'communalism' (what he referred to multiculturalism) will inevitably lead to conflict. Was this 'their' intention all along?