PDA

View Full Version : Muslim dentist 'refused to treat female patients unless they wore Islamic dress'



Beorn
05-10-2009, 03:02 PM
Muslim dentist 'refused to treat female patients unless they wore Islamic dress'

A Muslim dentist refused to treat patients unless they wore traditional Islamic dress, it was alleged today.
Omer Butt, 32, ordered women to put on head scarves or he would not register them or their families at his NHS-funded clinic, it was claimed.
At least two patients were left in pain after they declined to follow his self-imposed rules, the General Dental Council heard.
It is the second time that the dentist - who is the brother of a former spokesman of the radical Islamic group al-Muhajiroun - has appeared before the council's disciplinary panel on similar allegations.
Two years ago he was reprimanded for telling an Asian mother-of-two he would not register her unless she wore the Muslim hijab.
The GDC heard how Butt believed it was his duty to stop Muslim patients committing what he believed was a religious sin.
He even put a laminated sign on the wall of his waiting room telling patients they would have to adhere to his strict dress code or find another dentist.
John Snell, for the GDC, said: 'He sought to impose a dress code on patients attending his practice.

'He required that women cover their hair with a head scarf, or hijab, and that male patients remove any gold jewellery.
'If he had simply expressed a preference, without imposing any compulsion to adhere to this dress code, there may be no cause for complaint.
'However, he insisted - and those who did not comply were refused treatment.
'He made compliance with Islamic dress code a condition of treatment, which is entirely inappropriate under the auspices of the National Health Service.
'Patients should have access to NHS treatment regardless of their religious observance, or otherwise.'
One patient, referred to only as Mrs F, told how she went with her husband and three children to register as patients at the Unsworth Smile Clinic, in Bury, Lancashire, in 2006.
While they were waiting to be seen, Butt called her husband into an office and told him he would have to tell his wife to wear a head scarf or the family would not be seen.

They promptly left and made a formal complaint to the NHS.

Mrs F told the panel: 'I was extremely annoyed. It's my choice if I wear a Hijab or not. But he told my husband he wouldn't treat any of us until I did.
'He even offered to provide one for me to use, but I didn't want to wear it. I shouldn't have to wear it to get treatment.
'I had great pain in my tooth at the time, but I wasn't going to stand for that so we left.'

Another patient and her family had to leave the clinic in June 2007 because she would not wear the religious headdress after spending a year looking for a dentist in the area, the hearing was told.
The woman's husband, known as Mr C, was also called into a private room at the surgery where Butt asked him to impose a dress code on his wife.
His wife said: 'My husband came out and he looked quite angry and his face was red. He said 'let's go'.
'He shouldn't say to me that he can't treat me unless I wear the hijab. He said he could provide one for us, but I didn't want to wear one. I was in pain that day.'

Butt, of Prestwich, Manchester, denies charges of misconduct for his treatment of two patients at the clinic.

If found guilty he faces being removed the dental register.
In September 2007 Butt was formally reprimanded by the GDC for similar behaviour and found guilty of serious professional misconduct.
The hearing, being held in London, continues.

Source (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1178411/Muslim-dentist-refused-treat-female-patients-unless-wore-Islamic-dress.html)


A good sign that it has gone to a hearing and might well strike him off of the list.
I take these as votive offerings when the big back breakers go unchallenged, but you have to start somewhere.

Atlas
05-10-2009, 03:14 PM
A complete burka would be so practical for treating teeth...

Psychonaut
05-10-2009, 07:09 PM
On the one hand, who the fuck are they to tell our women how to dress? That's my immediate visceral reaction.

On the other hand, I'm reminded of the situation with doctors and religion in the US. Recently we've had a number of doctors fired and/or not promoted for refusing to provide abortions due to their religion. I'm OK with the free market impelling people to change behaviors like this, but if it were to slip into the realm of a government mandate, I would be vehemently opposed. I don't think that any government has the right to tell you what kinds of people you have to serve. If you're a Muslim and you won't serve people who don't dress like Muslims, that's fine. It's also fine for you to be fired from your job for that attitude. It's also fine for you to open up your own shop and attempt to do business that way. But it's not OK for the government to make you see patients you don't want to see.

Freomęg
05-10-2009, 07:24 PM
I don't think that any government has the right to tell you what kinds of people you have to serve.
I fully agree with you, generally speaking, but for an NHS dentist it should be a different matter. With this kind of Socialist healthcare system, as a patient you have little-to-no choice in who treats you, therefore a dentist making a career out of such a system should - likewise - have no choice in who they do and do not treat. It's unfair that the taxpayer has no choice when the health-worker does. This is why I fundamentally oppose social healthcare - there's no free market and so the power is taken away from the 'customer'. This muslim dentist should not have a say in who he does and doesn't treat. If he wants that say, he should go it on his own and work in private healthcare, then we'll see how well his religious prejudice serves him. Our taxes - the taxes of un-Burkha'd Britons - pays his living. The only thing saving his career is that the NHS system doesn't give the taxpayer a choice and protects the dentist - particularly a 'minority' one - too much.

Psychonaut
05-10-2009, 07:33 PM
but for an NHS dentist it should be a different matter

I suppose so. I was only thinking of free market health care. Although, even in the US, there's not much practical difference nowadays. It's illegal here even for private businesses to discriminate against prospective clients based on their race, religion, etc.

Brynhild
05-11-2009, 12:51 AM
He should have his licence to practise revoked. That's just another notch in the PC's feathered cap. :mad:

Gooding
05-11-2009, 03:26 AM
He should have his licence to practise revoked. That's just another notch in the PC's feathered cap. :mad:

So to be tolerant to sand niggers, we have to let them be intolerant to us?Revoke his license and give him and his family a free trip back to their country of origin.That's outrageous!!You're right, Bryn..I totally agree that at the very least his license should've been revoked.:mad::mad:

SwordoftheVistula
05-11-2009, 08:02 AM
Technically muslims shouldn't be in the country period, but I don't think they should get in the habit of revoking licenses for things unrelated to the actual practice of the profession. Generally I agree with Cythraul's post that government workers should not be allowed to implement their religious beliefs through their government job, which is a problem with government jobs but not as bad as allowing a government controlled healthcare monopoly to implement islamic law.

Rainraven
05-13-2009, 12:53 AM
If he wants every woman to wear a bloody headscarf then why doesn't he just go back where he came from and it wouldn't be a problem.

They complain if in our country we won't let them wear a headscarf in certain situations. Then this wanker thinks he can make people wear them?

:mad::mad::mad:

Christopher
05-14-2009, 04:16 AM
Technically muslims shouldn't be in the country period,....

That is true. Their religion is very opposite Western ways. To give them freedom of religion is to end our freedoms. Islam certainly does not deserve 1st Amendment status in the USA.