PDA

View Full Version : American sculptors' lamps made of human (white) skin



Vulpix
05-26-2009, 08:33 PM
Body art. Literally
An American sculptor's work made of human skin is coming to Britain (http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/body-art-literally-1690128.html).
Sunday, 24 May 2009


http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00177/IN9817678GV-Art---A_177289t.jpg

Andrew Krasnow with his 'Palette' made of skin from people who donated their bodies to medical science

Some will find it shocking, macabre, echoing the worst allegations of Nazi atrocities. An American artist has spent the past 20 years making sculptures out of human skin, and is to exhibit his work in public in the UK for the first time later this year.

Welcome to the world of Andrew Krasnow, who has tackled one of the great taboos in art. Günther von Hagens may have caused controversy with his Body Worlds exhibition of human corpses, but Krasnow goes a step further.

His works include human skin lampshades – a direct response to the belief that similar items made from the skin of Holocaust victims were found at Buchenwald concentration camp.

Using skins from white men who donated their bodies to medical science, he has created freak versions of mundane items including flags, boots and maps of America – in effect using skin like leather. His work, he says, is a commentary on human cruelty and America's ethics and morality.

The exhibition in London in July will include a new sculpture made out of the final piece of skin Krasnow obtained in a job lot 20 years ago – a defaced $10 bill, in keeping with his questioning of US values. It has been made especially for the GV Art gallery, which will host the exhibition.

Not surprisingly, the work attracts controversy. The only time it has been shown before in Britain, late last year, it was by appointment only. Now the gallery has been licensed by the UK's Human Tissue Authority to display a complete exhibition.

Krasnow's human-skin American flags were created just before the first Gulf War for the Contemporary Arts Center in Cincinnati, although they were never displayed after Republican politicians Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich denounced his work.

"The objective was to express my concerns about the war and that it would not be conducted in a way that was moral and ethical," he said. "Since that question wasn't permitted in a museum, the work became more complex, with all the inherent contradictions of what it means to be an American or, for that matter, to be human."

Gallery owner Robert Devcic said Krasnow uses only white skin because much of the suffering in the Americas has been caused by white people. "He uses skin to make the point that suffering is universal," he said. "It is tanned using the same process that you'd use for an animal skin."

Martin Kemp, emeritus professor of art history at Oxford University, said Krasnow was not trying to be sensationalist. "He has not overtly pushed the sense of spectacle or sensation, unlike, say, Damien Hirst," he said. "He is working with deep and disturbing resonances. As an artist, he is pretty much out there on his own."

Skandi
05-26-2009, 10:40 PM
Medical science? I want to have my body used for that, but not if it would end up in some freak show, like this.

Birka
05-27-2009, 12:17 AM
I hope this guy gets sued by the families of the people who left their bodies to "medical science", not lamp shades. This guy is dripping with self hatred and white guilt.

YggsVinr
05-27-2009, 03:06 AM
I hope this guy gets sued by the families of the people who left their bodies to "medical science", not lamp shades. This guy is dripping with self hatred and white guilt.

Krasnow is a Jewish name, isn't it? Not surprising if he is a Jew. What I wonder about is if these people donated their bodies to medical science who the hell gave him permission to use their skin for something other than that purpose? This "project" of his certainly isn't in the name of medical science that is for sure.

Vulpix
05-27-2009, 07:10 AM
Surprise surprise!


Of the Flesh: the Art of Andrew Krasnow (http://www.thelondonword.com/2009/01/of-the-flesh-the-art-of-andrew-krasnow/)

In the light of recent political turbulences in the US, GV Art’s director Robert Devčić has decided to curate an exhibition of a politically engaged Andrew Krasnow. This American artist of Jewish background has been voicing political criticism for over two decades and his work has been, and indeed still is, very controversial. What a shocker. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Svarog
05-27-2009, 07:51 AM
Krasnow is a Jewish name, isn't it? Not surprising if he is a Jew. What I wonder about is if these people donated their bodies to medical science who the hell gave him permission to use their skin for something other than that purpose? This "project" of his certainly isn't in the name of medical science that is for sure.

Krasnow is most likely a name of a Jewish origin from Poland, at least what was left of them, it was a common jewish surname in that region before the WWII

Eldritch
05-27-2009, 09:14 AM
Who was that British guy again who, for a laugh, got a frozen chicken from a supermarket, stuffed it with pages he'd torn out of porno magazines, nailed the whole thing to a plank of wood and then tried to pass it off as a deconstruction of the oppression of women in the heteronormative white society ruled by patriarchalist discourse, blah blah blah. And some critics actually bought it!

I don't know what is more comical, these so-called "artists" or the people who think their "art" is worth a toss. :rolleyes:

EDIT:

An oh btw, his spiel about how he only will use white people's skin may very well be genuine, but can you imagine what would happen if he used black or (gasp!) Jewish skin? He would be skinned alive himself. Live on television.

Besides, blacks don't donate their bodies to science, even the small minority of blacks who know that such a thing as "science" exists.´:rolleyes:

Groenewolf
05-27-2009, 10:00 AM
What I wonder about is if these people donated their bodies to medical science who the hell gave him permission to use their skin for something other than that purpose? This "project" of his certainly isn't in the name of medical science that is for sure.

Indeed, one wonders who gave him premission to use these skins for this?

Tabiti
05-27-2009, 02:41 PM
Sick! And no one pays attention! They believe all stories about the holocaust, but refuse to notice such ill individuals, called "artists"!

Vulpix
05-27-2009, 03:08 PM
An oh btw, his spiel about how he only will use white people's skin may very well be genuine, but can you imagine what would happen if he used black or (gasp!) Jewish skin? He would be skinned alive himself. Live on television.



Exactly :mad:.

Ladejarlen
05-27-2009, 03:09 PM
How is this "art"?

Fortis in Arduis
05-27-2009, 04:14 PM
Hey, just imagine if I pickled him in a jar and took him on to the Oprah Show. :D

lei.talk
05-29-2009, 04:24 PM
a sincere artist
reveals more of his self
in his productions
than he does of reality.
Art is a selective re-creation of reality
according to an artist’s metaphysical value-judgments.
- Ayn Rand (http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/art.html)self-confessed panderers (such as pablo picasso (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pablo_Picasso))
are the obvious exception.

is there some reason
to doubt this artist (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1T4GZAZ_enUS281US281&q=%22andrew+krasnow%22&aq=f&oq=&aqi=)'s sincerity?

Svipdag
11-17-2009, 02:02 AM
Yes, there is a great deal of reason to doubt this person's sincerity [I will not dignify him with the title "artist".] He executes these works with the obvious purpose of shocking and disgusting his viewers in order to promote a sociopolitical agenda. This is not art. It is propaganda, and a singularly vile form of propaganda.

Well, yes, he IS sincere. He is a sincere sociopolitical activist. He is NOT a sincere artist [if, indeed, he is an artist at all] . He prostitutes art to the service of his social and political views.

Making lampshades isn't sculpture. It is a craft, not an art. His work should be judged as craftsmanship, not art. He is, then, a creator of propaganda craft articles, not objets d'art.