PDA

View Full Version : Maryland taxes millionaires, millionaires leave, tax revenues fall



SwordoftheVistula
05-27-2009, 01:13 PM
A miniature 'Atlas Shrugged' scenario:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124329282377252471.html

Here's a two-minute drill in soak-the-rich economics:

Maryland couldn't balance its budget last year, so the state tried to close the shortfall by fleecing the wealthy. Politicians in Annapolis created a millionaire tax bracket, raising the top marginal income-tax rate to 6.25%. And because cities such as Baltimore and Bethesda also impose income taxes, the state-local tax rate can go as high as 9.45%. Governor Martin O'Malley, a dedicated class warrior, declared that these richest 0.3% of filers were "willing and able to pay their fair share." The Baltimore Sun predicted the rich would "grin and bear it."

One year later, nobody's grinning. One-third of the millionaires have disappeared from Maryland tax rolls. In 2008 roughly 3,000 million-dollar income tax returns were filed by the end of April. This year there were 2,000, which the state comptroller's office concedes is a "substantial decline." On those missing returns, the government collects 6.25% of nothing. Instead of the state coffers gaining the extra $106 million the politicians predicted, millionaires paid $100 million less in taxes than they did last year -- even at higher rates.

No doubt the majority of that loss in millionaire filings results from the recession. However, this is one reason that depending on the rich to finance government is so ill-advised: Progressive tax rates create mountains of cash during good times that vanish during recessions. For evidence, consult California, New York and New Jersey (see here).

The Maryland state revenue office says it's "way too early" to tell how many millionaires moved out of the state when the tax rates rose. But no one disputes that some rich filers did leave. It's easier than the redistributionists think. Christopher Summers, president of the Maryland Public Policy Institute, notes: "Marylanders with high incomes typically own second homes in tax friendlier states like Florida, Delaware, South Carolina and Virginia. So it's easy for them to change their residency."

All of this means that the burden of paying for bloated government in Annapolis will fall on the middle class. Thanks to the futility of soaking the rich, these working families will now pay Mr. O'Malley's "fair share."

chap
05-27-2009, 01:29 PM
Cutting spending should not be politically painful but then the vested interests are entrenched.

States weigh tax hikes in light of revenue shortfalls (http://www.nasdaq.com/newscontent/20090526/states-weigh-tax-hikes-in-light-of-revenue-shortfalls.aspx?storyid=19187459)


Consumers may get an extra headache in the form of tax hikes that many states are currently considering to make up for lost revenues.

According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 16 states have approved tax increases in 2009 as a result of the recession, and another 17 are currently considering them. Tax hikes in California, New York and Illinois were said to have been "significant," as is one under consideration in Illinois.

The organization also reports that at least 36 states have had to cut public services to lower their budget costs.

Revenues are falling because of higher unemployment and less consumer spending, among other factors. The group says that revenues have fallen by 40 percent in Connecticut, 35 percent in Massachusetts and 30 percent in Arizona, to give some examples.

"State budget holes are leading to cuts in services like health care, education, and assistance for the elderly and disabled," said Nicholas Johnson, director of the group's State Fiscal Project. The group claims that the higher taxes aren't all bad because it gets more money into local economies and does not appear to harm a state's fiscal performance in the longer term.