PDA

View Full Version : How white would a men or women have to be for you to date/marry/ procreate with?



Pages : [1] 2

SilverKnight
04-30-2012, 01:39 AM
POLL: How white would a men/women have to be for you to date/ marry/ have kids ?




1. Entirely (100% European).
2. Almost entirely is ok (ex. +98%).
3. Octoroons (1/12 black) or other non-white is ok.
4. + 75% ex. Castizos, Quadroon.
4. Half white or above is ok (+50%)
5. Bellow ( 50%) but with some is acceptable.
6. I don't mind.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 01:43 AM
1. Maybe 2. (I'm thinking of people like Danielle Smith who claim to be Cherokee - cause there were tons of those in Canada :confused: )

sturmwalkure
04-30-2012, 01:44 AM
1. or case-by-case 2. at 98% the non-European genes are fairly diluted by then. Of course my preference would be for 100% European. It depends however, if he has Negroid ancestry in the threshold of (2%) I would not get into a relationship with him to begin with. Just being honest here.

SilverKnight
04-30-2012, 01:45 AM
1. Maybe 2. (I'm thinking of people like Danielle Smith who claim to be Cherokee - cause there were tons of those in Canada :confused: )

There are many Euro Canadian/ Americans with miniscule amounts of non-white.. Poll is open you can vote now and select multiple choice as well :)

Han Cholo
04-30-2012, 01:48 AM
I'm not even white so I couldn't give less of a fuck. As long as it doesn't look like a turd. Castizo phenotypes are my favorite though.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 01:51 AM
There are many Euro Canadian/ Americans with miniscule amounts of non-white.. Poll is open you can vote now and select multiple choice as well :)

Well it's a bit more than miniscule. If we were to use Latin American terminology, I think a good percentage of the population here would be considered Castizo. A lot of the earlier migrants to North America (especially pre-1880) picked up Amerindian blood.

That's my opinion. I've been to Britain and the 'Anglos' I often see in North America are progressively darker feature or hold unusual features, moreso / compared to British in Europe. People like Gregor Robertson comes to mind.

http://www.replayed.org/wp-content/gallery/glen-loft/vancouver-mayor-gregor-robertson.jpg

And no I wouldn't procreate with a person (or female version) of that. My lineage is pretty clear (I have second / third cousins in Europe) and look pretty Nordish.

Rødskjegg
04-30-2012, 01:51 AM
White? No fan of that term.

But she would have to be Germanic.

SilverKnight
04-30-2012, 01:56 AM
Well it's a bit more than miniscule. If we were to use Latin American terminology, I think a good percentage of the population here would be considered Castizo. A lot of the earlier migrants to North America (especially pre-1880) picked up Amerindian blood.

That's my opinion. I've been to Britain and the 'Anglos' I often see in North America are progressively darker feature or hold unusual features, moreso / compared to British in Europe. People like Gregor Robertson comes to mind.

http://www.replayed.org/wp-content/gallery/glen-loft/vancouver-mayor-gregor-robertson.jpg

And no I wouldn't procreate with a person (or female version) of that. My lineage is pretty clear (I have second / third cousins in Europe) and look pretty Nordish.

Understandable :)

Then you're a true preservationist.



White? No fan of that term.

But she would have to be Germanic.

White = European, not, Arab, or other Caucasoid, but European.

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 01:57 AM
Well it's a bit more than miniscule. If we were to use Latin American terminology, I think a good percentage of the population here would be considered Castizo. A lot of the earlier migrants to North America (especially pre-1880) picked up Amerindian blood.

That's my opinion. I've been to Britain and the 'Anglos' I often see in North America are progressively darker feature or hold unusual features, moreso / compared to British in Europe. People like Gregor Robertson comes to mind.

http://www.replayed.org/wp-content/gallery/glen-loft/vancouver-mayor-gregor-robertson.jpg

And no I wouldn't procreate with a person (or female version) of that. My lineage is pretty clear (I have second / third cousins in Europe) and look pretty Nordish.

There are darker European types such as Northern Atlantid, Paleo Atlantid, Atlanto Med, Med and Pontid.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 01:58 AM
There are darker European types such as Northern Atlantid, Paleo Atlantid, Atlanto Med and Pontid.

This is possible but I saw these phenotypes (minus Pontid) in Britain. I don't think people like Gregor is a pure / pred. European.. and I've grown up my entire life seeing 'Anglos' like this in Canada.

Pallantides
04-30-2012, 02:03 AM
POLL: How white would a men/women have to be for you to date/ marry/ have kids ?




1. Entirely (100% European).
2. Almost entirely is ok (ex. +98%).
3. Octoroons (1/12 black) or other non-white is ok.
4. + 75% ex. Castizos, Quadroon.
4. Half white or above is ok (+50%)
5. Bellow ( 50%) but with some is acceptable.
6. I don't mind.



White = European, not, Arab, or other Caucasoid, but European.

If counting ancient admixture majority of Europeans would fall into either group 2. or group 3.
There is non-European Caucasoid influence in Southern Europe, Northeast Asian influence in Northeastern Europe and tiny bit of both in Northwestern Europe.

zack
04-30-2012, 02:03 AM
1. or case-by-case 2. at 98% the non-European genes are fairly diluted by then. Of course my preference would be for 100% European. It depends however, if he has Negroid ancestry in the threshold of (2%) I would not get into a relationship with him to begin with. Just being honest here.

Then southern Europeans are off limits then?

sturmwalkure
04-30-2012, 02:06 AM
Then southern Europeans are off limits then?

If anything there would probably be some (and a small percentage) North African admixture (Berbers are closer to Europeans than a Sub Saharan Negroid would be) in a Southern European. You must remember I have a lot of Southern European ancestry myself.

zack
04-30-2012, 02:10 AM
If anything there would probably be some (and a small percentage) North African admixture (Berbers are closer to Europeans than a Sub Saharan Negroid would be) in a Southern European. You must remember I have a lot of Southern European ancestry myself.

Berbers are part negroid as well. Southern europeans have(according to some studies) 1-3% of their DNA contributed by SSA africans.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 02:11 AM
There seems to be a delicate range in Southern Europe. It's not too much different I noticed from meeting fellow Ukrainians. Some can be Nordish or Atlantidish looking but then you'll get extreme opposites that could very well be the Khan's Grandson. :clap2:

Not too different from cherry picking Italians who could fit in well in the Middle East.

Defiance
04-30-2012, 02:15 AM
That's kind of a tough question, but if they look White, act White and are essentially White for all practical purposes, that should be fine. Preferably of West-Central European descent.

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 02:20 AM
British New Zealanders had wars against the Maori between 1845 and 1872. A low Maori population and very low in the South Island. In July 1861 there was a goldrush and many more Europeans came here. World war 1 was in 1914 to 1918 and World war two was 1939 to 1945. After World war two there were baby boomers. Their children born between 1970 to 2000. Russell Crowe is 1/16 Maori but it is not really common here. We also had immigration laws.

Australian Abo had a low population and were living by themselves. They were eating Dingo and cats and calling us "White devils" and calling our cars "monsters" in the 1960s.They started to live with other Abo people to stop inbreeding between family. Australia also had the White Australian policy keeping out people and they went to World war 1 and 2.

American Indians lived in caves and rock shelters, I don't think they had a high population. America also had immigration laws created by Calvin Coolidge and also the Jim Crow laws. USA also went to World war 1 and 2.

All three countries went to fight in the Korean war and Vietnam war too. Many of us are the children of the baby boomers and our family trees can be traced back to the Picts, Anglo Saxon, Vikings and other Germanic or Celtic tribes.

sturmwalkure
04-30-2012, 02:24 AM
Berbers are part negroid as well. Southern europeans have(according to some studies) 1-3% of their DNA contributed by SSA africans.

In any case, I'd prefer someone who is 100% European. Like I said, anything else would have to be case-by-case (and no more than 2% non-Euro admixture) if even that much.

zack
04-30-2012, 02:26 AM
In any case, I'd prefer someone who is 100% European. Like I said, anything else would have to be case-by-case (and no more than 2% non-Euro admixture) if even that much.

Does a 100% european even exist?

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 02:29 AM
British New Zealanders had wars against the Maori between 1845 and 1872. A low Maori population and very low in the South Island. In July 1861 there was a goldrush and many more Europeans came here. World war 1 was in 1914 to 1918 and World war two was 1939 to 1945. After World war two there were baby boomers. Their children born between 1970 to 2000. Russell Crowe is 1/16 Maori but it is not really common here. We also had immigration laws.

Australian Abo had a low population and were living by themselves. They were eating Dingo and cats and calling us "White devils" and calling our cars "monsters" in the 1960s.They started to live with other Abo people to stop inbreeding between family. Australia also had the White Australian policy keeping out people and they went to World war 1 and 2.

American Indians lived in caves and rock shelters, I don't think they had a high population. America also had immigration laws created by Calvin Coolidge and also the Jim Crow laws. USA also went to World war 1 and 2.

All three countries went to fight in the Korean war and Vietnam war too. Many of us are the children of the baby boomers.

United States had 3 million people in 1776. There were more Amerindians on that continent than Europeans and never mind the Founder Effect. The initial settlers were mainly European men and some took Amerindian wives and had a dozen kids. Eventually those genetics were watered down to the extent that every American family in the South claims to be part Cherokee.

Reality is that if the United States never had that constant flow of Europeans it would look much different. There may be more Blacks (less competition over living space) and the 'Whites' would probably be pred. Castizo.



Australian Abo had a low population and were living by themselves. They were eating Dingo and cats and calling us "White devils" and calling our cars "monsters" in the 1960s.They started to live with other Abo people to stop inbreeding between family. Australia also had the White Australian policy keeping out people and they went to World war 1 and 2.


I met maybe one or two Australians who claimed partial Aborigine background.

Though the 'Anglo' Australians I met were always a pretty fair people. That being said, Australia now is pretty multicultural and never mind the huge number of 'Wogs'. When I was on a Contiki tour bus, a third of the people were Aussie Wogs and they never hung out with the Anglo Aussies. ;) :D

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 02:30 AM
Does a 100% european even exist?

It's an abstraction

Pallantides
04-30-2012, 02:30 AM
Does a 100% european even exist?


Speaking in regards to genetics I'd say no.

zack
04-30-2012, 02:42 AM
Speaking in regards to genetics I'd say no.

Then why do most people keep using these terms such as "100% european"? I don't think most people on this board are stupid and ignore admixture studies. Is it denial or something? I don't get it.

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 02:47 AM
I met maybe one or two Australians who claimed partial Aborigine background.

Though the 'Anglo' Australians I met were always a pretty fair people. That being said, Australia now is pretty multicultural and never mind the huge number of 'Wogs'. When I was on a Contiki tour bus, a third of the people were Aussie Wogs and they never hung out with the Anglo Aussies

The White Australian policy was stoped by Haorld Holt in about 1965.The New Zealand immigration policy was stoped by Norman Kirk in 1971.

USSR stoped in the 1990s. People from Communist countries came to live in New Zealand and Australia.

The youngest age group most people here are allowed to date is 18. 18 year olds today are born in 1994 and 1993. These would still be children of baby boomers.

There are still lots of people with only British or Irish heritage in New Zealand and Australia.

Pallantides
04-30-2012, 02:54 AM
Judging by my latest Gedmatch Eurogenes K12b results I'm 94.33% European(Western European+North European+Finnish+Mediterranean), 3.81% non-European Caucasoid(Caucasus+West Central Asian) and 1.79% East Eurasian(Siberian+East Asian)
http://i.imgur.com/iJ2M1.png


According to Doug McDonald I'm hundred precent European though:

Most likely fit is 70.6% (+- 0.6%) Europe (all Western Europe)
and 29.4% (+- 0.6%) Europe (all Northeast Europe)
which is 100% total Europe

The following are possible population sets and their fractions,
most likely at the top
Irish= 0.712 Finland= 0.288 or
Irish= 0.700 Lithuani= 0.300

which is clearly Scandinavia of some sort.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 02:55 AM
The White Australian policy was stoped by Haorld Holt in about 1965.The New Zealand immigration policy was stoped by Norman Kirk in 1971.

USSR stoped in the 1990s. People from Communist countries came to live in New Zealand and Australia.

The youngest age group most people here are allowed to date is 18. 18 year olds today are born in 1994 and 1993. These would still be children of baby boomers.

There are still lots of people with only British or Irish heritage in New Zealand and Australia.

I wasn't just referencing Yugoslavs. Most of the Aussie wogs I met claimed Greek background (in addition to Italian)

Though it's the samething in my country with this 'babyboomer' demographic. Most of the immigrants who came in the 1990s were progressively much younger than established citizens.

SilverKnight
04-30-2012, 03:06 AM
Then why do most people keep using these terms such as "100% european"? I don't think most people on this board are stupid and ignore admixture studies. Is it denial or something? I don't get it.

Like Pallantides said, there's no real "100% European" genetically, as it's a very broad term. What I mean by " 100% " in the poll, are people who don't have recent non-European admixture. Pallantides for example is 100% European even if he has a distant non-European Caucasoid admixture in him.

zack
04-30-2012, 03:08 AM
Judging by my latest Gedmatch Eurogenes K12b results I'm 94.33% European(Western European+North European+Finnish+Mediterranean), 3.81% non-European Caucasoid(Caucasus+West Central Asian) and 1.79% East Eurasian(Siberian+East Asian)
http://i.imgur.com/iJ2M1.png


According to Doug McDonald I'm hundred precent European though:

Of course you would fit in europe :D You are a european!


Like Pallantides said, there's no real "100% European" genetically, as it's a very broad term. What I mean by " 100% " in the poll, are people who don't have recent non-European admixture. Pallantides for example is 100% European even if he has a distant non-European Caucasoid admixture in him.

Why is there always distinctions made for neolithic non-white admixture and 'recent'? If a finn on average is 10-12% non-european should he get a pass compared to someone from the new world who has the same amount of admixture?

SilverKnight
04-30-2012, 03:18 AM
Of course you would fit in europe :D You are a european!



Why is there always distinctions made for neolithic non-white admixture and 'recent'? If a finn on average is 10-12% non-european should he get a pass compared to someone from the new world who has the same amount of admixture?

It all depends, if the person wants to consider his/ her neolithic non-white then they can say they're 90-88% European. It's very hard to come to a definite conclusion weather or not neolithic/ ancient admixtures should be consider or not. One thing for sure is there's no such thing as 100% European in a historical extent, but recently yes it's possible. We could consider neolithic-non European admixture as part of the overall European component since it has already adapted to the continent/ people.

Good question anyways..

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 03:19 AM
I wasn't just referencing Yugoslavs. Most of the Aussie wogs I met claimed Greek background (in addition to Italian)

Though it's the samething in my country with this 'babyboomer' demographic. Most of the immigrants who came in the 1990s were progressively much younger than established citizens.

We both had laws to stop Eastern and South Europeans from coming here just like USA. After World war 1: many Marxist Socialist and Germans were not allowed to come here.In the 1920s, New Zealand had an immigration policy to stop non British people and mainly Italians. World War 2 soon happened and after World war 2 the Baby Boomers were born. 1970s the Baby Boomers started having children. 1990 was the fall of Communism.
I haven't meet many Eastern or Southern Europeans here. When I ask people about their heritage there were a few saying Italian or Polish but not a lot of people. Most of the people that I went to school with were British or Irish stock. Dannevirke was created by Danish people and In 1946, more people of British or Scandinavian heritage were needed to come over and work.

The first Black man in England was in 1593. Queen Elizabeth 1 wanted to deport the Moors and the Negro people. Me and my friends can trace our family trees right back to the Kings of Ancient times. I only have 1 friend that has Italian heritage and 2 friends that have Eastern European heritage. The rest have Northern or Western European heritage.The Italian guy and his Italian girlfriend say that there were Germanic and Celtic people in Northern Ialy fighting the Romans.

Geroth
04-30-2012, 03:25 AM
1 or 2. It wouldn't be to concerned if say a woman told me "my great, great grandmother was half Chinese" or something like that, but I could never date a woman who was half-caste though.

Melina
04-30-2012, 03:27 AM
Well to be fair I haven't done my 23and me test so I voted +97%.If my partner has some kind of admixter from hundreds of years back that wouldn't hurt me. Plus if the theory of evolution is true then we all came from blacks and evolved..For me the most important thing is how he looks and the way he acts.So there is my 2 cents..But this comes close to what I want my dream man to look like..

http://chaddukeswrestlingshow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/bio-sheamus2.png

:D

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 03:31 AM
1 or 2. It wouldn't be to concerned if say a woman told me "my great, great grandmother was half Chinese" or something like that, but I could never date a woman who was half-caste though.


My Great Great Grandfather lived exceptionally long and was still alive in the 1960s.

There's many half Chinese in my city and trust me something like that wouldn't go unnoticed.

I think it's better to consider living memory. Someone could have a Chinese or Black Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great Grandparent and easily not know or look mixed.

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 03:40 AM
My Great Great Grandfather lived exceptionally long and was still alive in the 1960s.

There's many half Chinese in my city and trust me something like that wouldn't go unnoticed.

I think it's better to consider living memory. Someone could have a Chinese or Black Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great Grandparent and easily not know or look mixed.

Normal people keep family trees and the Government have info about heritage and religion. The trees could than trace back to a king and you can find info about them on Wikipedia.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 03:44 AM
Normal people keep family trees and the Government have info about heritage and religion. The trees could than trace back to a king and you can find info about them on Wikipedia.

Maybe in the main branch but knowledge on other branches can be sometimes lacking (neglected to a lack of interest. People take most inspiration from their Father's strict paternal line).

Oh Geez I might have a Tatar Grandfather in the 1500s. I better 'explore muh roots' and take upon myself an Oriental Chinese Princess. :confused: :rolleyes: :D :lightbul:

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 03:53 AM
Maybe in the main branch but knowledge on other branches can be sometimes lacking (neglected to a lack of interest. People take most inspiration from their Father's strict paternal line).

Oh Geez I might have a Tatar Grandfather in the 1500s. I better 'explore muh roots' and take upon myself an Oriental Chinese Princess. :confused: :rolleyes: :D :lightbul:

Maybe Canada it is different. All of my friends and the people I have known have family trees going back to Anglo Saxon, Viking and Pict times. I have many trees and My Icelandic tree can even be traced back to Pictish Kings.
Famous people also have trees online that link up with all of our trees. My Australian friends are the same and have big trees. Having a tree is fun and it can give people pride in their ancestors.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 03:55 AM
Maybe Canada it is different. All of my friends and the people I have known have family trees going back to Anglo Saxon, Viking and Pict times. I have many trees and My Icelandic tree can even be traced back to Pictish Kings.
Famous people also have trees online that link up with all of our trees. My Australian friends are the same and have big trees. Having a tree is fun and it can give people pride in their ancestors.

Such a thing is really common in Australia? :confused:

Nothing to do with me being Ukrainian but I've never heard of Anglos or Frenchmen doing that here.

Pallantides
04-30-2012, 03:59 AM
Most people here don't know who their ancestors are prior to the 19th and early 20th century unless they come from a prominent family, have a rare surname or have done extensive family research.
But there are plenty of people claiming they descend from this and that historical person but without any actual paper trail to prove it, I most likely have some ancestors who were Vikings and ones who fought in the Great Northern War in the early 18th century but like most people I don't know the names and identities of these ancestors.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 04:00 AM
Most people here don't know who their ancestors are prior to the 19th and early 20th century unless they come from a prominent family, have a rare surname or have done extensive family research.

That's often why I am skeptical. Tracing your paternal lineage is one thing but can everyone trace every line of their Grandparents (4 families) or Great Grand Parents (8 families).

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 04:01 AM
Such a thing is really common in Australia? :confused:

Nothing to do with me being Ukrainian but I've never heard of Anglos or Frenchmen doing that here.

All the Australian people I know and the New Zealand people have trees. There are websites with info from the Government that can take us passed the 1800s and we keep searching from there. It is fun to find out you are connected to Kings that lived more than 1000 years ago. My friends are mainly Christian, Celtic Pagan and Heathen and it gives us great pride :)

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 04:02 AM
All the Australian people I know and the New Zealand people have trees.
There are websites with info from the Government that can take us passed the 1800s and we keep searching from there. It is fun to find out you are connected to Kings that lived more than 1000 years ago.

I suppose the exceptional circumstances of colonization in Oceania.

Congratulations citizen #25123, your Great Great Grandfather was a convict from Ireland. :) :eek: (joking..)

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 04:07 AM
I suppose the exceptional circumstances of colonization in Oceania.

Congratulations citizen #25123, your Great Great Grandfather was a convict from Ireland. :) :eek: (joking..)

We all can have good and bad people on our trees. That convict could still be traced back to Brian Boru.

zack
04-30-2012, 04:09 AM
Normal people keep family trees and the Government have info about heritage and religion. The trees could than trace back to a king and you can find info about them on Wikipedia.

Most people can't go back 4 generations without hiring an investigator. Plus since entering the age of single motherhood many children don't know one side of their parentage.

Me for example. I can go back 3-4 generation on my mothers side of the family,but because I've never met my father or had anything to do with his side of the family i know almost nothing except "he was part native american". That does not tell me all that much aside from the fact that apparently I'm part amerind even though i show no traits.

Stefan
04-30-2012, 04:11 AM
Just so you get an idea of how many ancestors you have 500 years ago, assuming there are 3 generations per century.

3 * 5 = 15

[2(number of parents) * .9(merger multiplier]^ 15(number of generations) ≈ 6,746

How about 1,000 years ago?
[(2 * .7(less because the higher likelihood of overlap)] ^ 30 ≈ 24,201.

Now of course these numbers can be way off, because I'm only guessing what the multiplier would be and how many generations there are on average. However, you get the idea how numerous one's ancestors can be. The further back you go, the less you actually learn from finding a single ancestor.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 04:13 AM
Just so you get an idea of how many ancestors you have 500 years ago, assuming there are 3 generations per century.

3 * 5 = 15

[2(number of parents) * .9(merger multiplier]^ 15(number of generations) ≈ 6,746

How about 1,000 years ago?
[(2 * .7(less because the higher likelihood of overlap)] ^ 30 ≈ 24,201.

Now of course these numbers can be way off, because I'm only guessing what the multiplier would be and how many generations there are on average. However, you get the idea how numerous one's ancestors can be. The further back you go, the less you actually learn from finding a single ancestor.

In theory, but in most circumstances people within an ethnicity or region are inbred and technical cousins of varying degrees.

Stefan
04-30-2012, 04:15 AM
In theory, but in most circumstances people within an ethnicity or region are inbred and technical cousins of varying degrees.

That's what the multiplier is for.

zack
04-30-2012, 04:15 AM
Just so you get an idea of how many ancestors you have 500 years ago, assuming there are 3 generations per century.

3 * 5 = 15

[2(number of parents) * .9(merger multiplier]^ 15(number of generations) ≈ 6,746

How about 1,000 years ago?
[(2 * .7(less because the higher likelihood of overlap)] ^ 30 ≈ 24,201.

Now of course these numbers can be way off, because I'm only guessing what the multiplier would be and how many generations there are on average. However, you get the idea how numerous one's ancestors can be. The further back you go, the less you actually learn from finding a single ancestor.

You also don't have any genetic material from a ancestor after a certain pint as well.

A european has no genetic heritage from a European ancestor from around 500-1,000 years ago. At least that is what I've heard on forums like these.

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 04:16 AM
Most people can't go back 4 generations without hiring an investigator. Plus since entering the age of single motherhood many children don't know one side of their parentage.

Me for example. I can go back 3-4 generation on my mothers side of the family,but because I've never met my father or had anything to do with his side of the family i know almost nothing except "he was part native american". That does not tell me all that much aside from the fact that apparently I'm part amerind even though i show no traits.

That is why I said Canada and USA must be different. The French don't like the English in Canada. In the USA, there was a war between USA and the British. For New Zealand and Australia we still have our pride for the Motherland. We are still honoured to be British. We faught in wars and we climbed mountains for all British people.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 04:17 AM
That is why I said Canada and USA must be different. The French don't like the English in Canada. In the USA, there was a war between USA and the British. For New Zealand and Australia we still have our pride for the Motherland. We are still honoured to be British. We faught in wars and we climbed mountains for all British people.

Then why did I hear that Liberals are trying to ban ANZAC day because it offends immigrants? :confused:

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 04:21 AM
Then why did I hear that Liberals are trying to ban ANZAC day because it offends immigrants? :confused:

They are stupid, not every one is like that. We just had ANZAC day and many people still have pride. Even the people from media love ANZAC day.

Stefan
04-30-2012, 04:22 AM
You also don't have any genetic material from a ancestor after a certain pint as well.

A european has no genetic heritage from a European ancestor from around 500-1,000 years ago. At least that is what I've heard on forums like these.

That makes very little sense. Admixture is harder to recognize because you have far less significant input from the odd ancestor, but certainly you still have genes from that ancestry. In fact, we still have genetic history from more distant, non-human, ancestors. The difference is that you are far less related to that 500 year old ancestor than say your 100 year old great-grandparents. It doesn't mean there isn't any genetic continuity.

Edit: Now you do have ancestors for which there is no genetic continuity. If that is what they meant. Meaning, their contribution has been "bred out."

zack
04-30-2012, 04:32 AM
That makes very little sense. Admixture is harder to recognize because you have far less significant input from the odd ancestor, but certainly you still have genes from that ancestry. In fact, we still have genetic history from more distant, non-human, ancestors. The difference is that you are far less related to that 500 year old ancestor than say your 100 year old great-grandparents. It doesn't mean there isn't any genetic continuity.

Edit: Now you do have ancestors for which there is no genetic continuity. If that is what they meant. Meaning, their contribution has been "bred out."

That is what i meant.

Marmie Dearest
04-30-2012, 04:42 AM
3-4, but only with Mongoloid admixture. I posted a photograph of a 1/4 Japanese and Scandinavian man that I was involved with and it was claimed that he was "white looking" and that one woman on this site in particular wouldn't have thought of him as mixed, though clearly his eyes are somewhat almond shaped and he has very thick straight dark hair, his bone structure is more Caucasoid.

I also posted a photo of my ex who is part Mexican and people were guessing that he was from Southern Europe or pretty far Eastern Europe.

Mestizos and Castizos are preferable over any other non-white mix because their culture is Spanish, Italian, and/or French speaking...my Argentine friends in particular have a heavy, heavy Northern Italian and Spanish influence in their family. They behave more "European" than many whites I've met in the U.S...

Mortimer
04-30-2012, 04:52 AM
I dont mind

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 05:27 AM
3-4, but only with Mongoloid admixture. I posted a photograph of a 1/4 Japanese and Scandinavian man that I was involved with and it was claimed that he was "white looking" and that one woman on this site in particular wouldn't have thought of him as mixed, though clearly his eyes are somewhat almond shaped and he has very thick straight dark hair, his bone structure is more Caucasoid.

I also posted a photo of my ex who is part Mexican and people were guessing that he was from Southern Europe or pretty far Eastern Europe.

Mestizos and Castizos are preferable over any other non-white mix because their culture is Spanish, Italian, and/or French speaking...my Argentine friends in particular have a heavy, heavy Northern Italian and Spanish influence in their family. They behave more "European" than many whites I've met in the U.S...

Doesn't mean anything. He could had been born in America and been a pseduo-rapper easily.

Marmie Dearest
04-30-2012, 05:48 AM
Doesn't mean anything. He could had been born in America and been a pseduo-rapper easily.

Huh? Excuse me, but what the hell are you talking about? I don't date pseudo-rappers and as far as I know didn't allude to rap music or African-American cultures in any way.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 06:00 AM
Huh? Excuse me, but what the hell are you talking about? I don't date pseudo-rappers and as far as I know didn't allude to rap music or African-American cultures in any way.

Your comment on Americans

Quorra
04-30-2012, 06:04 AM
Where's the "Northern European" option?:confused:

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 06:08 AM
Where's the "Northern European" option?:confused:

Someone who lists themselves as Celtic is probably not a Nordish exemplar themselves. :eek:

Quorra
04-30-2012, 06:41 AM
Someone who lists themselves as Celtic is probably not a Nordish exemplar themselves. :eek:

Where did I say "nordish"?:confused:

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 06:43 AM
Someone who lists themselves as Celtic is probably not a Nordish exemplar themselves. :eek:

Here is an Icelandic man that looks Keltic Nordid
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=47765.

Here are the Nordish types many found in Celtic areas.
Australians are Celto-Germanic like many other people and countries.

http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/rg-main.htm

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 06:45 AM
Here is an Icelandic man that looks Keltic Nordid
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=47765.

Here are Nordish types many found in Celtic areas.
Australians are Celto-Germanic like many other countries.

http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/rg-main.htm

British want to be Scandinavians (British are just like Estonians.. except at least Estonians look it) :rolleyes:

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 06:53 AM
British want to be Scandinavians (British are just like Estonians.. except at least Estonians look it) :rolleyes:

No they are not Estonians. I do not know why you think such bullshit.
Anglo Saxon from Germany and Vikings (Borreby, Brunn, Nordid and others) went to British ares. The Paleo Atlantid went to Ireland and Scotland during the Ice Age, it was from Scandinavia. Learn history and anthropology.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 06:55 AM
No they are not Estonians. I do not know why you think such bullshit.
Anglo Saxon from Germany and Vikings (Borreby, Brunn, Nordid and others) went to British ares. The Paleo Atlantid went to Irish and Scotland during the Ice Age, it was from Scandinavia. Learn history and anthropology.

http://www.musicrooms.net/files/celebs/rowan_atkinson_693891875.jpg

Master Race indeed..

Mortimer
04-30-2012, 06:56 AM
http://www.musicrooms.net/files/celebs/rowan_atkinson_693891875.jpg

Master Race indeed..

lmao

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 06:58 AM
lmao

Well I saw a lot of British like this in Britain. Dubious extension of Nordish phenotypes, average British look more like Spaniards or Frenchmen than Scandinavians.

Mortimer
04-30-2012, 06:58 AM
Well I saw a lot of British like this in Britain. Dubious extension of Nordish phenotypes, average British look more like Spaniards or Frenchmen than Scandinavians.

i laughed at his face not at your comment:)

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 06:59 AM
i laughed at his face not at your comment:)

Well then you'll have a fun time in Britain :thumb001:

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 07:00 AM
http://www.musicrooms.net/files/celebs/rowan_atkinson_693891875.jpg

Master Race indeed..

That is a Paleo Atlantid. There are also Northern Atlantid,Brunn,Borreby and Keltic Nordid people that lived in Britain and Ireland. You don't need to act jealous and mock us.

cossackpride
04-30-2012, 07:04 AM
That is a Paleo Atlantid. There are also Northern Atlantid,Brunn,Borreby and Keltic Nordid people that lived in Britain and Ireland. You don't need to act jealous and mock us.

Most people don't consider Paleo-Atlantids to be Nordish. Although I'm sure you'll bring out some hookus-pookus explanation that the phenotype is an ancient blend between Mediterranean and Nordish... blah blah.. Classifications ain't my point, the fact is that I laugh in an Englishman's face if they think their people are 'Northern European'. You are 'Western European'.

Mortimer
04-30-2012, 07:06 AM
I voted i dont mind, but i guess i prefer certain races over others

Prefer
Caucasoid Meta Race
-Indo Afghan Race which predominates in Northindia
-Europid Race of Europe
-Orientalid Races of the Middle East
Mixed Race
-Castizos and some Mullatos
Asian
-Sinid Race, especially Northsinid

Doesnt find that much attractive
-Full fletched blacks and aboriginals
-Transitional Races between Caucasoid/Australoid and Mongoloid/Australoid like some Thais,some of the Tribals of India

CelticViking
04-30-2012, 08:20 AM
the fact is that I laugh in an Englishman's face if they think their people are 'Northern European'. You are 'Western European'

Vikings and Normans were Northern Europeans.



Most people don't consider Paleo-Atlantids to be Nordish. Although I'm sure you'll bring out some hookus-pookus explanation that the phenotype is an ancient blend between Mediterranean and Nordish... blah blah.

They aren't Mediterranean.
They are Cromagnid (Dalofaelids, Brünns, Borrebys, Westbaltids, Northern Alpinoids, Palaeatlantids, Berberids, Berids and other Upper Palaeolithic survivors.)


First, a quick comment on Nordids. Nordids, a.k.a. "Nordics", are strongly depigmented, orthognathic and leptomorphic dolicho-mesocephals of northern Europe. The general Nordid type probably evolved through the blending of gracilized northern European Cro-Magnoids (robust broad-faced Upper Paleolithic types) with various types, including tall leptomorphs associated with the Battle-Axe and Boat-Axe peoples, who entered Europe from the Eurasian steppes (carrying the Corded type with them), penetrating the various Nordid-formative territories in several consecutive waves. The resulting blends were subsequently stabilized, and the resultant types further specialized, to yield the present Nordid varieties. The ancestral Corded type (named after its association with the Corded Ware culture), with its high vault and long head, was skeletally "nordiform" (approaching a Nordid), or perhaps Mediterranid (of a larger, more robust variety).

It should be duly noted that the question of Nordid origin is a much debated subject, and the foregoing account (which reflects the views of the SNPA) should not be embraced without criticism: it is merely one of several possible explanations. Carleton Coon, and others with him, suggested that the Nordid was essentially a depigmented Mediterranid, derived from the combination of Corded and "Danubian" strains, and thus not immediately affiliated with the northern European Upper Paleolithic survivals. However, there can be no doubt as to the partial affiliation of the Nordid types to the larger-framed, broader-faced Cro-Magnids of present-day northern Europe (the Dalo-Falid and Brünn types). The fact that Cro-Magnoids have been subject to gracilization in a Nordoid direction is witnessed by the existence of Paleolithic pre-Corded intermediate Cro-Magnoid-Nordoid skulls in the Scandinavian region (K.E. Schreiner, Crania Norvegica II, 1946). The Corded type seems responsible for the relative high-headedness of the Nordid types, as compared to adjacent Cro-Magnid varieties.

Nordids are in a sense a northern equivalent of the southern Mediterranid leptomorphs, existing in a general dichotomy with broader-featured Europid Cro-Magnoids. This duality may be a reflection a general distributional trend, recalling the dichotomy between the Cro-Magnoid and Capellid/Aurignacid varieties of Paleolithic Europe.


The Nordish Gallery
http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/rg-main.htm

juizdelinha
04-30-2012, 08:21 AM
She would have to be a white portuguese(97% plus european)

Tequila
04-30-2012, 08:45 AM
I voted for 1 and 2, but for the most part I wouldn't mind.
I'm a sucker for Asian girls.

Aces High
04-30-2012, 09:03 AM
100% European white....no muds no duds no juicers or chinks or dinks,no tarbrush or dirty blood.

Peyrol
04-30-2012, 10:46 AM
100-95%

I could think about a castiza only if is a euro-indios mix (not african) and look almost white.

ricko0812
04-30-2012, 11:45 AM
98.6%

Mortimer
04-30-2012, 12:05 PM
I voted i dont mind, but i guess i prefer certain races over others

Prefer
Caucasoid Meta Race
-Indo Afghan Race which predominates in Northindia
-Europid Race of Europe
-Orientalid Races of the Middle East
Mixed Race
-Castizos and some Mullatos
Asian
-Sinid Race, especially Northsinid

Doesnt find that much attractive
-Full fletched blacks and aboriginals
-Transitional Races between Caucasoid/Australoid and Mongoloid/Australoid like some Thais,some of the Tribals of India

I think i could do all races, but i would be most happy with someone of similar background and appearance like me (of course from racial type, not from weight obviously)

ricko0812
04-30-2012, 12:13 PM
but i will have to be honest, a year ago i would had said 'i dont mind'. I am a recent convert, due to being indoctrinated at a very early age that everybody is equal and that having any white pride is very very bad. But at least i had enough sense to marry a white girl though.

Han Cholo
04-30-2012, 05:08 PM
I find it funny the thread opener lumped all Amerindian mixes systematically with quadroons, mulattos and other black mixes as if they were the same thing... I wonder why. To his surprise most posters have been specifical.

Dacul
04-30-2012, 05:20 PM
More white than a pakistani.
Sure she should not be finnish,hungarian,russian or norwegian cause these are too mixed with mongs and turciks.
Something like Mary would be excelent.
(she has few russian ancestry,so she looks european enough).

She (Mary) has also well developed breasts/tits so she would be able to give a lot of milk to childrens,so childrens will grow strong and healthy.
But she keeps that burka over her face and that is covering her breasts also,such a shame.

Pallantides
04-30-2012, 05:23 PM
Sure she should not be finnish,hungarian,russian or norwegian cause these are too mixed with mongs and turciks.

So are those the nationalities of girls who have refused to date you? :D

Dacul
04-30-2012, 05:28 PM
So are those the nationalities of girls who have refused to date you? :D

No I did not tried to date with girls from those countries till now.
I dated only with girls from Romania.
Romania and balkanic (serbian and montenegrin and bulgarian) and italian women is whom I like most.But italian women are mostly catholic and I am christian orthodox,so meh.

Insuperable
04-30-2012, 05:39 PM
Since it is mentioned European and having in mind that racially there are no 100% pure Europeans, European people should strive to date people who are 100% European ethnically ( US, Canada, Australia... and on the emphasis on own ethnicity ), with no recent foreign background.
Everything else can only point to decline of European identity both racially or ethnically and following the same logic from generation to generation it could among other possible ending versions point to complete disappearance of European identity

Dacul
04-30-2012, 05:45 PM
The religion the woman has and what country is she from is more important for me than how white or no she is.
If she is whiter than a gypsie/pakistani is very fine.
This is why I do not like most women from Norway,Finland,Hungary and Russia,because how they are educated to behave.

Pallantides
04-30-2012, 05:46 PM
No I did not tried to date with girls from those countries till now.
I dated only with girls from Romania.
Romania and balkanic (serbian and montenegrin and bulgarian) and italian women is whom I like most.But italian women are mostly catholic and I am christian orthodox,so meh.


Then what is the reason for your obsession with Norwegians?:D

Dacul
04-30-2012, 05:52 PM
I had to deal with a norwegian woman a lot and I did not liked at all how she was behaving.
I did played WOW (over 1 year) with her in some guild and we were in game very good m8s.
Playing WOW with people tells you a lot about they behave in case someone is doing a mistake,you fail and so on.We were all grown people there (youngest was 20 years old) ,with jobs/or at university there and with no so much time to spend in WOW.
And some were geting histerical when we failed to achieve the goals.
Ok I understood,we had like 3 raids per week of 3 hours so no much time,but we were playing to get some fun and had a nice conversation with others,not to have that as a 2nd job.
And I noticed is quite linked with nation,with south swedes and balkaniks being very polite and calm and patient.
All norwegians I met there were arrogant.
And finns ,most of them,did not even wanted to talk to someone else or group with them, than finns and scandinavians.
Turks were also very nice persons.
(I quited WOW anyway,because I did not liked it anymore).

zack
04-30-2012, 05:55 PM
Some of the people who are saying 100% european are from nations with non-white admixture.

It is like i was told in a REP comment: a finn voting for 100% european when finns are 4-7% mongoloid :lol00002:

Or south africans saying 100% european.... now maybe I'm wrong or been told wrong by some people,but south african whites seem to have non-white admixture as well(i would be very interested in knowing the truth on this matter).

GeistFaust
04-30-2012, 05:57 PM
Nearly 100%, with a few exceptions in their gene pool, outside of the typical averages of non-European admixtures or just 100%.

They would be forced to take a DNA test, and if they don't like that then they can go find someone else.

I would also prefer someone with ancestry mainly in the Northwestern sphere, and would not want to marry anyone with a single ethnic connection, but maybe two or three, so I don't defile their pure ethnic lines.

ricko0812
04-30-2012, 05:58 PM
[QUOTE=GeistFaust;866397]Nearly 100%, with a few exceptions in their gene pool, outside of the typical averages of non-European admixtures or just 100%.

They would be forced to take a DNA test, and if they don't like that then they can go find someone else.

I would also prefer someone with ancestry mainly in the Northwestern sphere, and would not want to marry anyone with a single ethnic connection, but maybe two or three, so I don't defile their pure ethnic lines.[/QUOT

why dont you want asian girl ha ha.

zack
04-30-2012, 06:03 PM
They would be forced to take a DNA test, and if they don't like that then they can go find someone else.

:dielaughing:

Geist are you serious here?

Supreme American
04-30-2012, 06:08 PM
Unfortunately, someone sent me McDonald's email to submit 23andme results but I lost it...

ricko0812
04-30-2012, 06:09 PM
although i am done procrerating and all, if i was to get remarried and have more kids i would prefer a more southern europe white this time around. I dont know what it is about dark hair and tan skin on a girl that makes this boy go nuts.

Onur
04-30-2012, 06:11 PM
I have no limit for dating. In fact, if i had a chance, i would "love" to date with a south American woman like Brazilian or a mulatto black. I find them highly attractive.

But for marrying and especially for procreation, i wouldn't wanna have babies from a non-Caucasoid, blacks, south Asians whatever. I would like to have a child from a woman looking similar to myself.

I don't call that "European" but i call it like "she should be as white as me". I am no way in hell a racist, neither a stupid white supremacist but for procreation, i am quite strict about that. I believe cultural and geographical closeness [usually means genetical closeness too], so probably i wouldn't prefer to have a child from a Scandinavian women either.

GeistFaust
04-30-2012, 06:28 PM
[QUOTE=GeistFaust;866397]Nearly 100%, with a few exceptions in their gene pool, outside of the typical averages of non-European admixtures or just 100%.

They would be forced to take a DNA test, and if they don't like that then they can go find someone else.

I would also prefer someone with ancestry mainly in the Northwestern sphere, and would not want to marry anyone with a single ethnic connection, but maybe two or three, so I don't defile their pure ethnic lines.[/QUOT

why dont you want asian girl ha ha.


Asian women suck, and I am beginning to take Lag's approach to Asians, except for the Japanese, Koreans, and a few types of Chinese from Northeastern China. I think they are superficial, and generally have a overtly fetish and kink oriented sexuality.


I find them to be obsessive and plastic in some regards, and I think this expresses itself through all sexual symbols and imagery in Eastern Asia, but sometimes expressed in a more "sophisticated" or "modern" manner. Their external behaviors, attitudes, and personality expression tends to be scattered, shattered, and flatly broken.


I don't like women like that, because it makes them look confused and introverted into their kink/fetish oriented world of thought and imagination. They have no ability to act affirmatively and independently, but are locked in their own naive impressions of what they believe to be a rational and divine perception of the world around them as it pertains to sexual expressions and symbols.

GeistFaust
04-30-2012, 06:29 PM
:dielaughing:

Geist are you serious here?


Yes, I am dead serious, but I would be direct about it, because to be honest I am not that interested in investing myself in relationships or even having sex. :cool:

ricko0812
04-30-2012, 06:30 PM
[QUOTE=ricko0812;866402]


Asian women suck, and I am beginning to take Lag's approach to Asians, except for the Japanese, Koreans, and a few types of Chinese from Northeastern China. I think they are superficial, and generally have a overtly fetish and kink oriented sexuality.


I find them to be obsessive and plastic in some regards, and I think this expresses itself through all sexual symbols and imagery in Eastern Asia, but sometimes expressed in a more "sophisticated" or "modern" manner. Their external behaviors, attitudes, and personality expression tends to be scattered, shattered, and flatly broken.


I don't like women like that, because it makes them look confused and introverted into their kink/fetish oriented world of thought and imagination. They have no ability to act affirmatively and independently, but are locked in their own naive impressions of what they believe to be a rational and divine perception of the world around them as it pertains to sexual expressions and symbols.


yea i know, i was just messing with you. lol Your a very eloquent speaking young man.

Black Sun Dimension
04-30-2012, 06:30 PM
I find it funny the thread opener lumped all Amerindian mixes systematically with quadroons, mulattos and other black mixes as if they were the same thing... I wonder why. To his surprise most posters have been specifical.

word, mongoloid shouldnt be lumped together with negroid blood. i wont vote cuz of that

i wouldnt mind the mother of my children having some asian/amerind in her a la Thalia

http://www.scenicreflections.com/files/hot-Thalia_Wallpaper_JxHy.jpeg

zack
04-30-2012, 06:56 PM
Yes, I am dead serious, but I would be direct about it, because to be honest I am not that interested in investing myself in relationships or even having sex. :cool:

I thought about saying "Geist for you even to have this conversation you will have to at least talk to a women and be in a relationship"...but that seemed too rude :D

brunette
04-30-2012, 07:16 PM
POLL: How white would a men/women have to be for you to date/ marry/ have kids ?




1. Entirely (100% European).
2. Almost entirely is ok (ex. +98%).
3. Octoroons (1/12 black) or other non-white is ok.
4. + 75% ex. Castizos, Quadroon.
4. Half white or above is ok (+50%)
5. Bellow ( 50%) but with some is acceptable.
6. I don't mind.

No one is 100 percent White.

GeistFaust
04-30-2012, 07:19 PM
I thought about saying "Geist for you even to have this conversation you will have to at least talk to a women and be in a relationship"...but that seemed too rude :D



Very true, but I am always thinking and acting in terms of the hypothetical and theoretical possibilities of my situation, experience, and environment. ;)

GeistFaust
04-30-2012, 07:21 PM
No one is 100 percent White.


This is much true within the context of the European peoples to some extent or another, but usually its older remants and admixtures of non-European elements, which happened a long period of time.

We are speaking of non-European admixtures that might have occurred over the last 300-500 years.

A few slight admixtures over this time period does not bother me, but I think that if someone has 3% or over of some non-European admixture that might be a bit much for me, and even 1%.

ricko0812
04-30-2012, 07:25 PM
[QUOTE=GeistFaust;866549]This is much true within the context of the European peoples to some extent or another, but usually its older remants and admixtures of non-European elements, which happened a long period of time.

We are speaking of non-European admixtures that might have occurred over the last 300-500 years.

A few slight admixtures over this time period does not bother me, but I think that if someone has 3% or over of some non-European admixture that might be a bit much for me, and even 1%.[/QUOTE

so would you be open to a girl as long as she is european, reguardless of where in europe she hails from?

GeistFaust
04-30-2012, 07:29 PM
She would not hail from a specific Northwestern/West-Central European ethnic group, but rather a collection of Northwestern/West-Central ethnic groups, probably two or three.


That said I highly doubt I will get into a relationship or marriage, and it would not be for sex, which I probably would not want to have more than once every month or two.


That probably would be a turn off to the woman, and I generally have a dislike for woman and humanity and general, so relationships seem like an impossibility for me.

ricko0812
04-30-2012, 07:35 PM
She would not hail from a specific Northwestern/West-Central European ethnic group, but rather a collection of Northwestern/West-Central ethnic groups, probably two or three.


That said I highly doubt I will get into a relationship or marriage, and it would not be for sex, which I probably would not want to have more than once every month or two.


That probably would be a turn off to the woman, and I generally have a dislike for woman and humanity and general, so relationships seem like an impossibility for me.


I am going to tell you what my buddy would tell somebody "dude you need to get laid" lol:thumbs up

Mraz
04-30-2012, 07:41 PM
I don't mind for dates, relationships, except blacks because I'm not attracted by them. But for marry and children, only a Bosniak.

arcticwolf
04-30-2012, 07:46 PM
She would not hail from a specific Northwestern/West-Central European ethnic group, but rather a collection of Northwestern/West-Central ethnic groups, probably two or three.


That said I highly doubt I will get into a relationship or marriage, and it would not be for sex, which I probably would not want to have more than once every month or two.


That probably would be a turn off to the woman, and I generally have a dislike for woman and humanity and general, so relationships seem like an impossibility for me.


Being a loner is not all bad amigo! A lot of the great men were loners, most never married, most did not have kids. Don't get married just because you think it's the thing to do, you'll be miserable. Follow your instincts on this. There is a few of us who just are not meant to be social animals. ;)

Peter Nirsch
04-30-2012, 09:42 PM
I need to know the meaning of 100% European.

Because Maltese people and Cypriots are considered Europeans but they have levantine blood.

Archduke
04-30-2012, 09:47 PM
Almost entirely is alright for me.

PetiteParisienne
04-30-2012, 09:50 PM
No non-Europeans in the direct bloodline for the past 6 generations at least. No affinity for Islam.

zack
04-30-2012, 09:54 PM
Almost entirely is alright for me.

Almost entirely can mean many things to different people. Almost entirely to me means 90% european :thumb001:

Padre Organtino
04-30-2012, 10:10 PM
I don't have a problem with giving babies to a Pacific Islander girl or smth like that but if you mean serious family and stuff then a person of Caucasus ancestry (Anatolian might also work) and not Muslim. I guess South Europe and North Middle East are also options but ideally I'd like her to be Georgian.
As for the concerns of Euros - I think it's generally right to seek a person of a bloodline similar to yours and "European" is a tad bit broad term with Swedes beng not quite alike Sardinians and Bulgarians not resembling Cypriots that much. So I think Anglo-Saxons better stick to North Western Euros while Italians to Southern (not that there's anything wrong with choosing a person from another region but it's better to stick to ya own).
As for dating - don't care (except that I am not attracted to Black and East Asian girls).

brunette
04-30-2012, 10:14 PM
Georgians are the best looking out of all the Caucasus IMO. Anyway I agree with fidget and what he said above.

Stefan
04-30-2012, 11:01 PM
I have significant non-Euro ancestry(7%-12%) so I'm not in a position to answer. However, If I didn't have any recent non-Euro I'd probably go with anybody who looks white, has predominately a European cultural influence, and acts respectfully with desirable traits(intelligence, some degree of physical attractiveness, etc.) If I were a European, I would choose anybody of my ethnicity or somebody of a European ethnicity willing to assimilate into my own(shouldn't affect the allele frequencies of the population significantly.)

Ibericus
04-30-2012, 11:14 PM
Native of Europe, preferently spanish.

StonyArabia
04-30-2012, 11:17 PM
Could care less, about their genetics, race, or what have you as long they look good and are genuine in their love and intimate relationship, and all around having values of virtue and peity that all the matters to me.

Grizzly
04-30-2012, 11:29 PM
I would go as high as 50%. I wouldn't care mixing with half white/asian, half white/spanish, white/arab, etc. The offspring will look dominantly white for the most part

dralos
04-30-2012, 11:31 PM
I would go as high as 50%. I wouldn't care mixing with half white/asian, half white/spanish, white/arab, etc. The offspring will look dominantly white for the most part
you should keep albo blood alive whats this mixing:mad:

Melina
04-30-2012, 11:32 PM
I would go as high as 50%. I wouldn't care mixing with half white/asian, half white/spanish, white/arab, etc. The offspring will look dominantly white for the most part

Some Spanish are white -_-"

safinator
04-30-2012, 11:38 PM
I don't think so Grizzly.
I can see mixing with other Euros but not with Asians and Arabs

Aviane
04-30-2012, 11:51 PM
Could care less, about their genetics, race, or what have you as long they look good and are genuine in their love and intimate relationship, and all around having values of virtue and peity that all the matters to me.

That clears up anything for me.

zack
05-01-2012, 12:18 AM
I have significant non-Euro ancestry(7%-12%) so I'm not in a position to answer.

I would not call that significant personally. Some euro populations average about the same amount.

SilverKnight
05-01-2012, 03:23 AM
Well, in my case it's something I strongly believe I should do. She has to be +50% in above, no exceptions. Anyways even before I was racially aware, I dated girls who where more then half white, it was just naturally drawn to them I guess and the areas I lived, In Brooklyn, NY, and in Miami where heavily populated with mix Hispanics.

I do believe in racial preservation in my own meaning, and by having kids with a women who's less then 50% white or pure (Asian, Black, Amerind) would be just as bad as a white person dating a full black, asian, or native. Just saying .

arcticwolf
05-01-2012, 03:37 AM
This is a loaded question. I'm highly idealistic ( I know it's a bummer but some one has got to be ;) ) So if I met my soul mate, no race, no opinion, no nothing barrier would stop me from being with my other half! Luckily for all you purists, she only exists in my imagination, so you can relax now! :p

StonyArabia
05-01-2012, 03:40 AM
That clears up anything for me.

Interesting. For me who gives really, it's the personality and the actions and conduct that matters. Race I could care less, she carries admixture so what, she is not this or that could not give a damn. I do believe that true love exist and genuine and ultimately it's the most powerful conquering force. So I don't care love is the most important aspect in all of this, I think no one should have the right to infrindge upon it due to superfacial matters that are not needed or wanted by some, I think this should be respected.

Skrondsze
05-01-2012, 06:17 AM
80% White is ok. 0% black for the past 500 years is a must.

GermanicFarmer
05-01-2012, 06:17 PM
No non-Europeans in the direct bloodline for the past 6 generations at least. No affinity for Islam.

You aren't even European yourself... your background says with Ashkenazi so you aren't White yourself. :rolleyes:


Could care less, about their genetics, race, or what have you as long they look good and are genuine in their love and intimate relationship, and all around having values of virtue and peity that all the matters to me.

So you are okay with mixed race relationships and breeding the mutts? :eek:


Some Spanish are white -_-"

All ethnic Spaniards are White. :thumb001:


That clears up anything for me.

You approve of mixed race? :eek:


100% White for me, no race traitor neither.

ricko0812
05-01-2012, 06:18 PM
my girl has to be so white that i wont be able to see her when it snows:D

juizdelinha
05-01-2012, 06:22 PM
Some Spanish are white -_-"

lol some

Pallantides
05-01-2012, 06:24 PM
You aren't even European yourself... your background says with Ashkenazi so you aren't White yourself. :rolleyes:



So you are okay with mixed race relationships and breeding the mutts? :eek:



All ethnic Spaniards are White. :thumb001:



You approve of mixed race? :eek:


100% White for me, no race traitor neither.

http://i.imgur.com/x0tPb.jpg

ricko0812
05-01-2012, 06:25 PM
http://i.imgur.com/x0tPb.jpg


that almost made me spit out my hot pocket i was eating

Coriolanus
05-01-2012, 06:34 PM
A British/Irish woman with no recent non-White admixture would be my ideal (about five or six generations I'd consider recent). I would marry any other European or Caucasus person (Georgian, Armenian etc.) though, assuming we were compatible in all other areas, and assuming she was a Christian of course.

GermanicFarmer
05-01-2012, 08:50 PM
http://i.imgur.com/x0tPb.jpg

Do I take that as a compliment or as an insult? :lol00002:

PetiteParisienne
05-01-2012, 08:53 PM
You aren't even European yourself... your background says with Ashkenazi so you aren't White yourself. :rolleyes:


Ashkenazi is a ethno-religious grouping under the European umbrella. I'm European. Nothing you can do about it.

Onur
05-01-2012, 09:03 PM
You aren't even European yourself... your background says with Ashkenazi so you aren't White yourself. :rolleyes:
Do you believe what zionists says and European jews are supposedly from Palestine?

Ashkenazis are southern European and Eurasian people who converted to judaism around 900-1000 AD

GermanicFarmer
05-01-2012, 09:03 PM
Ashkenazi is a ethno-religious grouping under the European umbrella. I'm European. Nothing you can do about it.

You are not European at all... you are part Jewish.

GermanicFarmer
05-01-2012, 09:04 PM
Do you believe what zionists says and European jews are supposedly from Palestine?

Ashkenazis are southern European and Eurasian people who converted to judaism around 900-1000 AD

Don't talk so much fool, show me evidence to back that up.

Southern Europeans were Christians/Catholics and always have been and did not convert to Judaism at all and then form the Ashkenazi Jews, you silly billy.

Genetic evidence proves they descend from the middle east.

SilverKnight
05-01-2012, 09:12 PM
You are not European at all... you are part Jewish.

Petiteparisienne is pretty European looking to me and if she was a Zionist she wouldn't be on this forum to start with.

brunette
05-01-2012, 09:15 PM
Do you believe what zionists says and European jews are supposedly from Palestine?

Ashkenazis are southern European and Eurasian people who converted to judaism around 900-1000 AD

Bollocks, they have 20-30 percent South Eastern European ancestry. The rest is related to Yemeni and Spanish Jews. All Jews are related to another type of Jew that's why they're inbreds.

GermanicFarmer
05-01-2012, 09:20 PM
Petiteparisienne is pretty European looking to me and if she was a Zionist she wouldn't be on this forum to start with.

Since when is looks always something to go by? Ashkenazi Jews have mixed with Europeans for years that is why many look European and White, but lets face facts they are NOT, she is not White.

http://freeimagesarchive.com/data/media/203/12_scarlett+johansson.jpg

http://cyberboris.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/simon-cowell1.jpg

http://images.zap2it.com/images/celeb-233401/daniel-radcliffe-1.jpg

Look at these, most people would think these are White...but the fact is they are NOT, capiche?

That is not trolling, it is facts, crystal clear.

She is part Jewish, therefore not White, she is mixed race... ok?

The fact she identifies and knows this makes my point even more valid.

GermanicFarmer
05-01-2012, 09:21 PM
Bollocks, they have 20-30 percent South Eastern European ancestry. The rest is related to Yemeni and Spanish Jews. All Jews are related to another type of Jew that's why they're inbreds.

Not all have Southern European but a small percentage do yes, exactly all of them are mixed with Europeans they are inbreds and not White. :thumb001:

StonyArabia
05-01-2012, 09:22 PM
So you are okay with mixed race relationships and breeding the mutts? :eek:

Yes, as long as the relationship between the two is based on genuine love and friendship, why not. Love is a very powerful and it conquers all even the most prejudiced hearts are often altered by it. I value the idea and the concept of love or it's force more than any superfacial element like race or what the person genetic makeup is. To me that's trivial. As a mixed person I don't care either way. My father is "White" and my mother is Arabian, they seemed to have a great relationship despite the cultural differences, and to my father she was the best partner he ever had. So from my experience and how I was raised all comes down to true love, and as for breeding mutts, they have always existed even when people have disproved of it, I am netural to that regard. So people want to intermix or keep to themselves that's their choice and they should respect other people's choices this how I see it. Certainly I am proud of both of my lineages and always will be.

GermanicFarmer
05-01-2012, 09:26 PM
Yes, as long as the relationship between the two is based on genuine love and friendship, why not. Love is a very powerful and it conquers all even the most prejudiced hearts are often altered by it. I value the idea and the concept of love or it's force more than any superfacial element like race or what the person genetic makeup is. To me that's trivial. As a mixed person I don't care either way. My father is "White" and my mother is Arabian, they seemed to have a great relationship despite the cultural differences, and to my father she was the best partner he ever had. So from my experience and how I was raised all comes down to true love, and as for breeding mutts, they have always existed even when people have disproved of it, I am netural to that regard. So people want to intermix or keep to themselves that's their choice and they should respect other people's choices this how I see it. Certainly I am proud of both of my lineages and always will be.

Ah typical so you're not even White yourself you are mixed race so of course you are going to whine and moan about it.

Fact is it is wrong, you choose yourself who you want to love and your father is a low man, dirty race traitor to say the least.

That whole White lineage is destroyed and you are now an offspring as a mutt, go back to your kennel.

I have a right to go on about people who destroy my race, the White race is getting destroyed by people like your father, get a grip - it has never been accepted and never will.

You have nothing to be proud of neither.

zlakopistou
05-01-2012, 09:31 PM
^ if white people are as retarded as you are, then I don't care if they disappear.

cossackpride
05-01-2012, 09:36 PM
Dmytro Dontsov considered the Northern Caucausians like Chechyans and Dagestani to be racially Ukrainian. On the other hand, he saw Circassians as Asiatic rabble who needed to be relocate (preferably into the sea :) ).

If the Cossacks did not take the Krasnodar than there would be a another filthy Asian state in Europe (next to Turkey)

StonyArabia
05-01-2012, 09:51 PM
Ah typical so you're not even White yourself you are mixed race so of course you are going to whine and moan about it.

Yes I am mixed race, no I don't moan or whine about it. I just believe people have the choice for who their partner they want to share their lives with nothing more and nothing less.


Fact is it is wrong, you choose yourself who you want to love and your father is a low man, dirty race traitor to say the least.

Love is blind, no he made the right the choice since she took care of him well. He could of course have married a girl that's of his race, but what would be the use if they did not get along.


That whole White lineage is destroyed and you are now an offspring as a mutt, go back to your kennel.

Not really, since my sister easily pass in the Balkans and Southern Russia, as she is Pontid-Alpine and is very pale, and due to our surname no one knows she is a half breed. Well me on the other hand have taken more so from my mom.


I have a right to go on about people who destroy my race, the White race is getting destroyed by people like your father, get a grip - it has never been accepted and never will.

No it is not being destroyed, because most people often go to their own. Though some people indeed fall in love with other groups, maybe it's the personality and the actions that make them attracted to one another. Yes some people are accepting and others are not, but the first is becoming more common.


You have nothing to be proud of neither.

Yes I am proud of my lineage. I am proud to share in the culture of my father and his people and this what I was raised us, and same share some important elements that are from my maternal lineage. I have a lot to be proud of but I don't do see the need to do it at the expense of other peoples.


Dmytro Dontsov considered the Northern Caucausians like Chechyans and Dagestani to be racially Ukrainian. On the other hand, he saw Circassians as Asiatic rabble who needed to be relocate (preferably into the sea ).

The Circassians are not Asiatic at all and very closely and racially related to other North Caucasians. Circassians were at one time believed to have been the pure White race, which lead to the myth of Circassian beauty in Western Europe and eventually the naming of the European race as Caucasian.


If the Cossacks did not take the Krasnodar than there would be a another filthy Asian state in Europe (next to Turkey).

Krasandor had nothing to do with Turkey nor it was Asian. When the Cossacks conquered the region many of them adopted the traditional Circassian dress and even intermarried with the local women. You yourself might have distant Circassian ancestry like many Cossacks who do :D

GermanicFarmer
05-01-2012, 10:07 PM
^ if white people are as retarded as you are, then I don't care if they disappear.

Care to explain?


Yes I am mixed race, no I don't moan or whine about it. I just people believe have the choice for who their partner they want to share their lives with nothing more and nothing less.

Yes you are, it is only people who are mixed that try and brush off that it is okay to be mixed race when it's not, there is nothing good that comes out of it besides more mutts.


Love is blind, no he made the right the choice since she took care of him well. He could of course have married a girl that's of his race, but what would be the use if they did not get along.

Love is blind? Please, grow a backbone - you choose exactly who you want to be with, you have a choice and you make your bed you lie in it, there would have been plenty of people in his own race that he would have gotten on well with, quit making up excuses.


Not really, since my sister easily pass in the Balkans and Southern Russia, as she is Pontid-Alpine and is very pale, and due to our surname no one knows she is a half breed. Well me on the other hand have taken more so from my mom.

I don't give a monkeys about your sister at all, seriously... you both are mixed scum and your dad is a mug.


No it is not being destroyed, because most people often go to their own. Though some people indeed fall in love with other groups, maybe it's the personality and the actions that make them attracted to one another. Yes some people are accepting and others are not, but the first is becoming more common.

Yes it is being destroyed, as soon as an offspring is born that whole lineage is destroyed of both races involved not just the White one, it is not pure anymore, that race is no longer preserved but tainted forever.

I also suggest you check on how actually many mongrels are being born from a White person, the White race is getting destroyed, mixed race is legal genocide.


Yes I am proud of my lineage. I am proud to share in the culture of my father and his people and this what I was raised us, and same share some important elements that are from my maternal lineage. I have a lot to be proud of but I don't do see the need to do it at the expense of other peoples.

You have nothing to be proud of honestly... but if that is what you think then good for you but many would disagree.

2Cool
05-01-2012, 11:14 PM
Since when is looks always something to go by? Ashkenazi Jews have mixed with Europeans for years that is why many look European and White, but lets face facts they are NOT, she is not White.

http://freeimagesarchive.com/data/media/203/12_scarlett+johansson.jpg

http://cyberboris.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/simon-cowell1.jpg

http://images.zap2it.com/images/celeb-233401/daniel-radcliffe-1.jpg

Look at these, most people would think these are White...but the fact is they are NOT, capiche?

That is not trolling, it is facts, crystal clear.

She is part Jewish, therefore not White, she is mixed race... ok?

The fact she identifies and knows this makes my point even more valid.

They look white to me therefore they are white.

Supreme American
05-01-2012, 11:17 PM
Since when is looks always something to go by? Ashkenazi Jews have mixed with Europeans for years that is why many look European and White, but lets face facts they are NOT, she is not White.

http://freeimagesarchive.com/data/media/203/12_scarlett+johansson.jpg

She has had multiple plastic surgeries, including in the face to soften her pretty hard Jewish features.

GermanicFarmer
05-01-2012, 11:18 PM
They look white to me therefore they are white.

Race is not someone's skin colour... are you deluded?


She has had multiple plastic surgeries, including in the face to soften her pretty hard Jewish features.

Once a Jew, always a Jew. :thumbs up

Supreme American
05-01-2012, 11:18 PM
Yes I am mixed race, no I don't moan or whine about it. I just believe people have the choice for who their partner they want to share their lives with nothing more and nothing less.

I think you do indirectly by promoting white/Arab couples here.

Pallantides
05-01-2012, 11:22 PM
She don't look like a Semitic round eye, maybe the plastic surgeon made her eyes more narrow as well so she could blend better in a Northern crowd?



Then again she is part Danish so maybe she was born with it.:coffee:

2Cool
05-01-2012, 11:23 PM
Race is not someone's skin colour... are you deluded?



Once a Jew, always a Jew. :thumbs up

If you saw them walking in the street with no info about their ancestry how would you classify them? White that's the answer.

StonyArabia
05-01-2012, 11:28 PM
Race is not someone's skin colour... are you deluded?

Well most people don't know their geneology and if they look White, act White, and society will treat them as such despite what they might have a non-White ancestor. For example Heather Locklear looks White and she has a distant African ancestry

http://s15.postimage.org/68pxdeh63/3_heather_locklear.jpg (http://postimage.org/)
free image hosting (http://postimage.org/)


She is seen as White despite her minor African admix and same is true of this American woman also:

http://s10.postimage.org/pwl1fx2ph/Melungeon45.jpg (http://postimage.org/)

Do you think they are Black lolz?

ricko0812
05-01-2012, 11:28 PM
so white that i can see her whole vascular system:thumb001:

2Cool
05-01-2012, 11:32 PM
Well most peopel don't know their geneology and if they look White, act White, and society will treat them as such despite what that might have a non-White ancestor. For example Heather Locklear looks White and she has a distant African ancestry

http://s15.postimage.org/68pxdeh63/3_heather_locklear.jpg (http://postimage.org/)
free image hosting (http://postimage.org/)


She is seen as White despite her minor African admix and same is true of this American woman also:

http://s10.postimage.org/pwl1fx2ph/Melungeon45.jpg (http://postimage.org/)

Do you think they are Black lolz?

That's because concepts such as White, Black etc. are social constructs and have not scientific merit. Otherwise people like Halle Berry or Obama wouldn't be considered black and women like Adriana Lima wouldn't be considered white.

It also means that a good chunk of Europeans are not white either as they contain non-European blood. Too bad I guess. The Saami people can't join the club :(

Pallantides
05-01-2012, 11:35 PM
It also means that a good chunk of Europeans are not white either as they contain non-European blood. Too bad I guess. The Saami people can't join the club :(

The Saami people have about the same amount of non-european admixture as Finns(There are actually some East Finns who have even more Uralic influence than the Saami)

2Cool
05-01-2012, 11:37 PM
The Saami people have about the same amount of non-european admixture as Finns(There are actually some East Finns who have even more Uralic influence than the Saami)

The Finns are not white either then. Neither are Sicilians, Greeks etc. Basically the only white people left in Europe are the Basque people. We're all mongrels :(

Vasa
05-01-2012, 11:39 PM
Only scandinavian + german is acceptable for myself. :)

StonyArabia
05-01-2012, 11:40 PM
That's because concepts such as White, Black etc. are social constructs and have not scientific merit. Otherwise people like Halle Berry or Obama wouldn't be considered black and women like Adriana Lima wouldn't be considered white.

It also means that a good chunk of Europeans are not white either as they contain non-European blood. Too bad I guess. The Saami people can't join the club :(

The concept of absolute purity holds no water at all. These two women I have posted both admit they have African admix and they look White obviously it's distant, but they also are part of the White American culture, and hence why most people treat them as such, unless you take their DNA, there is no way you are going to to know they are admixed or to shift them into some mixed category it aint going to happen. In the real world most people could care less and often catogerize people on how they look. Europe has influences that are minor from outside Arabian and North African in Southern Europe, Turkic in Eastern Europe, and Siberan in Northern Europe this has been shown by the latest genetic studies.

Supreme American
05-02-2012, 12:00 AM
For example Heather Locklear looks White and she has a distant African ancestry

Assuming she isn't lying about it. I'd be more impressed if she had a DNA test to that effect.

Supreme American
05-02-2012, 12:02 AM
The concept of absolute purity holds no water at all. These two women I have posted both admit they have African admix and they look White obviously it's distant, but they also are part of the White American culture, and hence why most people treat them as such, unless you take their DNA, there is no way you are going to to know they are admixed or to shift them into some mixed category it aint going to happen. In the real world most people could care less and often catogerize people on how they look. Europe has influences that are minor from outside Arabian and North African in Southern Europe, Turkic in Eastern Europe, and Siberan in Northern Europe this has been shown by the latest genetic studies.

Frankly I think this argument is most popular among liberal racial deconstructionist types, and it's also selectively applied as well. This kind of thing isn't pulled out to discredit the shaky identity of the Mexicans as a Raza (race). In fact, the only time I've seen it mentioned is if the subject is white racial preservationism...

zack
05-02-2012, 12:11 AM
Frankly I think this argument is most popular among liberal racial deconstructionist types, and it's also selectively applied as well. This kind of thing isn't pulled out to discredit the shaky identity of the Mexicans as a Raza (race). In fact, the only time I've seen it mentioned is if the subject is white racial preservationism...

Racial purity does not exist outside of Africa.That does not mean that white people don't exist as a race. This all harkens back to the 1 drop rule and the idea that you have to be 100% white to belong to the white group.

The admixture in european nations and white people was there long before the 1 drop rule or 'purity' as a concept even came into effect.

I don't think someone saying that 100% purity does not exist outside of africa is advocating for race mixing or against european preservationism.

It only argues against preservation if preservation is overly hostile to minor non-white admixture in certain people.

Essentially if you are a hard-core purist who believes in the 1 drop rule:there is nothing left to preserve.There never was.

For the rest of us that realize that Italians and greeks and other great european peoples most likely still accomplished all that they did not being 100% white.

The concept of someone being 100% European can't really be believed today outside of certain european peoples like the basques. It never even passed the muster test back during the most 'racist' era of the world.

You should know this lagergeld. Back during the Jim Crow days they did not have DNA tests. If you looked white and had no known black ancestry you were taken as white. That is what 'purity' passed as back during the 'golden age'.

GermanicFarmer
05-02-2012, 12:15 AM
If you saw them walking in the street with no info about their ancestry how would you classify them? White that's the answer.

No, you can actually tell them a mile off and the way their act and go on, having light skin does not classify as being "White", I thought you would already know that.


That's because concepts such as White, Black etc. are social constructs and have not scientific merit. Otherwise people like Halle Berry or Obama wouldn't be considered black and women like Adriana Lima wouldn't be considered white.

It also means that a good chunk of Europeans are not white either as they contain non-European blood. Too bad I guess. The Saami people can't join the club :(

Obama is not black and does not look black.

You have to be of pure White lineage to consider and call yourself White, really is not rocket science.


The Saami people have about the same amount of non-european admixture as Finns(There are actually some East Finns who have even more Uralic influence than the Saami)

Ethnic Finns are White, the Finnish Tatars are not of course.


The Finns are not white either then. Neither are Sicilians, Greeks etc. Basically the only white people left in Europe are the Basque people. We're all mongrels :(

Are you seriously just a few sandwiches short of a picnic?

Finns are White.
Sicilians are White.
Greeks are White.

No, not just Basque people - all native Europeans are White.


The concept of absolute purity holds no water at all. These two women I have posted both admit they have African admix and they look White obviously it's distant, but they also are part of the White American culture, and hence why most people treat them as such, unless you take their DNA, there is no way you are going to to know they are admixed or to shift them into some mixed category it aint going to happen. In the real world most people could care less and often catogerize people on how they look. Europe has influences that are minor from outside Arabian and North African in Southern Europe, Turkic in Eastern Europe, and Siberan in Northern Europe this has been shown by the latest genetic studies.

Some people can get away with looking a certain race, I will admit right now that many Jewish people for example look White, but they are not White and should not be considered White, to consider and be seen as one race you need to be fully descended from that race.

2Cool
05-02-2012, 12:25 AM
No, you can actually tell them a mile off and the way their act and go on, having light skin does not classify as being "White", I thought you would already know that.



Obama is not black and does not look black.

You have to be of pure White lineage to consider and call yourself White, really is not rocket science.



Ethnic Finns are White, the Finnish Tatars are not of course.



Are you seriously just a few sandwiches short of a picnic?

Finns are White.
Sicilians are White.
Greeks are White.

No, not just Basque people - all native Europeans are White.



Some people can get away with looking a certain race, I will admit right now that many Jewish people for example look White, but they are not White and should not be considered White, to consider and be seen as one race you need to be fully descended from that race.

Well you just ruled out virtually everyone on the planet right there.

Pallantides
05-02-2012, 12:27 AM
Ethnic Finns are White, the Finnish Tatars are not of course.


The Northeast Asian/Siberian influence in Finns have nothing to do with Tatars though.

SilverKnight
05-02-2012, 12:57 AM
http://freeimagesarchive.com/data/media/203/12_scarlett+johansson.jpg

http://cyberboris.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/simon-cowell1.jpg

http://images.zap2it.com/images/celeb-233401/daniel-radcliffe-1.jpg



Blue eyes, pale skinned, light, fair hair, they all pretty much seem "white" European to me, and I never even taught Simon Cowell ( pure English blood in my mind) was Jew or part Jewish. :rolleyes: or maybe it's just my inexperienced eyes ?

Before we judge what's "white" or not we must firs look at the definition of "white" (people, human race).

Mayor defs . 1. A person of the Caucasian race.
2. A person with a significant amount of European features.

other definitions 3. a light-skinned race
4. Pale skinned people

The first two definitions are very contradictory with each other, as Jews or other Middle Eastern, North Africans etc. are of the Caucasoid race (or at least sub divisions of it) but not of European origins.

I believe we must look at the meaning of "white"-person before we conclude who is such. After doing a small research of my own, here's what I found. I found that the term "white" as to referring a pale skinned person, was first utilize to describe the people from Europe when the trade between slaves began. Basically, it was introduced to the English-speaking colonies in the New World by 1680....

Conclusion: White people are from Europe or of significant European stock/ ancestry (looks, genes).

StonyArabia
05-02-2012, 02:24 AM
Yes you are, it is only people who are mixed that try and brush off that it is okay to be mixed race when it's not, there is nothing good that comes out of it besides more mutts.

It has always occurred, and it's ok to many not only to mixed people.



Love is blind? Please, grow a backbone - you choose exactly who you want to be with, you have a choice and you make your bed you lie in it, there would have been plenty of people in his own race that he would have gotten on well with, quit making up excuses.

Yes love is blind and I like I have stated power it even conquers the most prejudiced heart. That might be true but the fact of the matter, he saw a girl that he liked fitted his personality more so than others and it just happened there are no excuses but the situation of a reality.


I don't give a monkeys about your sister at all, seriously... you both are mixed scum and your dad is a mug.

It seems my point flew over your head. Yes me and my sister are indeed mixed. However often in mixed race families the children often tend to get both sides of their parents and often they can pass, in such case as my sister since she can easily fit in SouthEastern Europe. In other words the race is never destroyed or what have you. If she marries a person of European origins, the Arabian blood in her children and their children would be diluted and hence it has no importance at the end and it becomes a trivial issue of ancestry or her descendants might have some romantic affiars with it. Thus nothing is lost.



Yes it is being destroyed, as soon as an offspring is born that whole lineage is destroyed of both races involved not just the White one, it is not pure anymore, that race is no longer preserved but tainted forever.

Look at my explantion for the above



I also suggest you check on how actually many mongrels are being born from a White person, the White race is getting destroyed, mixed race is legal genocide.

Not it's not and it's myth that's often concocted by WN's or people who share their ideology and it can't be called genocide, if the person chooses to intermix, since no one is forcing them to do so, it's out of their own choice and they have the right to choose who they want to live their life with.


You have nothing to be proud of honestly... but if that is what you think then good for you but many would disagree.

Like I have said I am proud of who I am, but why should I be proud of "race" or something related to it. One has to be proud of his own accomplishment and as a individual not those of others who just happen to be of the same so called "race". Pride is a very complex and beautiful thing when it's done in the correct manner without the hate and the demonization of other groups, because when that happens pride becomes a very disgusting and sinful situation and a shame to Humanity.

PetiteParisienne
05-02-2012, 04:19 AM
Do you believe what zionists says and European jews are supposedly from Palestine?

Ashkenazis are southern European and Eurasian people who converted to judaism around 900-1000 AD

Zionists believe that all Jews originated in the part of Israel currently known as the West Bank (a.k.a. Judea and Samaria). The thing is, regardless of whether or not it's true, Jews have been in the diaspora for so long now that any Middle Eastern blood is negligible. I have way more in common genetically with any and all other Europeans than I do with Jews from Ethiopia or Kai Feng.

~Nik~
05-02-2012, 03:34 PM
For me the ideal is obviously the complete European (And he exist,despite what the impures says). I believe that the only individuals who have the genius and spiritual power of a true unaltered European are those who are obviously 100%. The appearance means nothing, and the made ​​to act like a White even less.

I am aware that "99% of whiteness" are now quite numerous, but there is a solution: eugenics.

The parable of the wheat and the tares is my creed in this case.

Pallantides
05-02-2012, 03:43 PM
^ Not sure if trolling:1099:

zack
05-02-2012, 03:50 PM
^ Not sure if trolling:1099:

No he probably really thinks this.

~Nik~
05-02-2012, 04:08 PM
Yeah, I believe this, it's my right.

And I consider pure Europeans as superior, I believe in quality not quantity.

If I find myself an imperfection in my genome I would consider myself inferior.

But in this case I wouldn't looking more to convince myself of my place in the race of Lords.

dralos
05-02-2012, 04:38 PM
For me the ideal is obviously the complete European (And he exist,despite what the impures says). I believe that the only individuals who have the genius and spiritual power of a true unaltered European are those who are obviously 100%. The appearance means nothing, and the made ​​to act like a White even less.

I am aware that "99% of whiteness" are now quite numerous, but there is a solution: eugenics.

The parable of the wheat and the tares is my creed in this case.
are you gay?

Iroczor
05-02-2012, 04:39 PM
Option 1,4,5 mostly

~Nik~
05-02-2012, 04:48 PM
are you gay?

The perfect European mankind.

I was talking of a human race. Not of an sex.

Ænglisc
05-02-2012, 04:52 PM
Silly Question! 100% European..

2Cool
05-02-2012, 06:10 PM
Yeah, I believe this, it's my right.

And I consider pure Europeans as superior, I believe in quality not quantity.

If I find myself an imperfection in my genome I would consider myself inferior.

But in this case I wouldn't looking more to convince myself of my place in the race of Lords.

I hope you don't do a dna test. Purity doesn't exist. It never did and never will.

~Nik~
05-02-2012, 06:43 PM
I hope you don't do a dna test. Purity doesn't exist. It never did and never will.

You are too sure of yourself, someone has already mentioned his spouse as 100% pure in this thread, for example.

I could live with being European to 99%. But without claiming to be something pure, or seeking to justify myself in my impurity because I am a wog. That's all.

Stefan
05-02-2012, 06:49 PM
If I find myself an imperfection in my genome I would consider myself inferior.


What does "imperfection" mean in this context? Anybody adept at even introductory level biology, understands that no genome is the epitome of 'perfection.' Everybody has their genetic snares in a certain environment. Seeing as there would be a minimal phenotypical difference between a population that is 100% European(meaning their ancestors were paleolithic Eurasians who first settled Europe only) from a population that is only 99%, I think the basis and credence of your beliefs are in question, not your right to have them.

Moonbird
05-02-2012, 06:55 PM
At least he has to look 100% European, if that's the case I can accept someone who's genetically "only" 99% European.

2Cool
05-02-2012, 06:57 PM
You are too sure of yourself, someone has already mentioned his spouse as 100% pure in this thread, for example.

I could live with being European to 99%. But without claiming to be something pure, or seeking to justify myself in my impurity because I am a wog. That's all.

That user is bullshitting and doesn't know what he's saying. Your genes don't come from Europe alone. The only people in the world who would be close to being "pure" are those that come from very isolated populations and/or areas. But at that point you might have other things to worry about (such has higher occurrences of certain disorders).

~Nik~
05-02-2012, 07:03 PM
At least he has to look 100% European, if that's the case I can accept someone who's genetically "only" 99% European.


That's what I am trying to say, those who believe in the appearance, social behavior and egalitarianism are either women either men who think like women.

~Nik~
05-02-2012, 07:05 PM
That user is bullshitting and doesn't know what he's saying. Your genes don't come from Europe alone. The only people in the world who would be close to being "pure" are those that come from very isolated populations and/or areas. But at that point you might have other things to worry about (such has higher occurrences of certain disorders).


So these tests cannot really tell the race of subjects, but only the geographical origin.

~Nik~
05-02-2012, 07:10 PM
What does "imperfection" mean in this context? Anybody adept at even introductory level biology, understands that no genome is the epitome of 'perfection.' Everybody has their genetic snares in a certain environment. Seeing as there would be a minimal phenotypical difference between a population that is 100% European(meaning their ancestors were paleolithic Eurasians who first settled Europe only) from a population that is only 99%, I think the basis and credence of your beliefs are in question, not your right to have them.

My problem is equally metaphysical than biological. Maybe biology will never be (like all science) 100% accurate.

SilverKnight
05-04-2012, 11:46 PM
Zionists believe that all Jews originated in the part of Israel currently known as the West Bank (a.k.a. Judea and Samaria). The thing is, regardless of whether or not it's true, Jews have been in the diaspora for so long now that any Middle Eastern blood is negligible. I have way more in common genetically with any and all other Europeans than I do with Jews from Ethiopia or Kai Feng.

Agree.

Xenomorph
05-05-2012, 12:10 AM
Love is so much more than physical attraction. The girl that I dated in high school looked like a model Aryan (although she had a bit of Native American blood in her), but what really made me fall for her was her great character and intelligence. My cousin married a Latino woman who is an awesome person and my uncle married an Iranian (he died before I was born) whom my mother described as "elegant" and "civilized." I don't care where a woman is from, I care who she is.

2Cool
05-05-2012, 12:22 AM
To answer the question: I'd prefer a Portuguese woman. If that's not possible than something with a similar culture such a Spaniard (unlikely as they are rare where I live) or Italian. Otherwise, I don't care. You can't really fight love and love can come from people you expect the least. I wouldn't turn down a woman I love just because she isn't the same race as me. That's stupid imo.

Xenomorph
05-05-2012, 12:49 AM
To be honest, I probably will end up marrying an Irish Catholic woman, like my mother said I would when I was a kid. Oh well, I'll marry anyone who can stand White Zombie and Nightwish music being blared at 6:30 AM.

~Nik~
05-05-2012, 02:12 AM
To answer the question: I'd prefer a Portuguese woman. If that's not possible than something with a similar culture such a Spaniard (unlikely as they are rare where I live) or Italian. Otherwise, I don't care. You can't really fight love and love can come from people you expect the least. I wouldn't turn down a woman I love just because she isn't the same race as me. That's stupid imo.

It's interesting that you major atheist scientifics here are giving importance to abstract concepts such as love if it is in accordance to your way of thinking. I believe in love of course, also imbued of certain beliefs, it prevents many divorces in my opinion. :)

2Cool
05-05-2012, 02:47 AM
It's interesting that you major atheist scientifics here are giving importance to abstract concepts such as love if it is in accordance to your way of thinking. I believe in love of course, also imbued of certain beliefs, it prevents many divorces in my opinion. :)

I don't get your point sorry. I wasn't aware that Atheists didn't believe in love.

SilverKnight
05-05-2012, 02:50 AM
Love is so much more than physical attraction. The girl that I dated in high school looked like a model Aryan (although she had a bit of Native American blood in her), but what really made me fall for her was her great character and intelligence. My cousin married a Latino woman who is an awesome person and my uncle married an Iranian (he died before I was born) whom my mother described as "elegant" and "civilized." I don't care where a woman is from, I care who she is.

The same here. My fiancee likes me the way I and she's pretty aware of my racial component as well and always tells me that people are too worry about the physical these days and never looks down at the character as well, which is the most important thing in a person. Not saying that the physical isn't good to look at , but it's not everything. :)

2Cool
05-05-2012, 02:54 AM
The same here. My fiancee likes me the way I and she's pretty aware of my racial component as well and always tells me that people are too worry about the physical these days and never looks down at the character as well, which is the most important thing in a person. Not saying that the physical isn't good to look at , but it's not everything. :)

Physical attraction is good for the short term. But if you want a serious relationship to last in the long term you'll need much more than just that.

SilverKnight
05-05-2012, 02:57 AM
Physical attraction is good for the short term. But if you want a serious relationship to last in the long term you'll need much more than just that.

Agree

Is all about balance, creating a perfect harmony between the two. Also knowing each other the most and not rushing into things as well. We both do things together here at home (there's no exceptions) and see each other as more then lovers, but also best friends.

Melina
05-05-2012, 02:58 AM
Physical attraction is good for the short term. But if you want a serious relationship to last in the long term you'll need much more than just that.

That is true.I had man who loved me a lot but unfortunately I didn't love him back..I think he liked me physically and was mistaking it for love.

~Nik~
05-05-2012, 03:34 AM
I don't get your point sorry. I wasn't aware that Atheists didn't believe in love.

Oh but I'm sure you're capable of love, a love based on the infinitude of the infinite universal spirit. But a strong love, a love whose roots are deeper than the mere frivolities that conceptualize your love, this love of the Race, that you will never know. :)

PeacefulCaribbeanDutch
05-05-2012, 04:05 AM
well i fall for Iranian women in a second, so I guess they don't have to be white at all :P cus those Iranians can be breathtaking (if your into the mediterranean look, which I am)

http://www.cristopherboyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/iran3.jpg
http://www.persiancultures.com/music/nazanin_afshain_jam/nazanin_afshin_jam...jpg

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSj6747d8QWPm6_pEK3RS221vdiEeO1r ZXhbFXFcjs1_99tdxg8
http://www.chessbase.com/images2/2004/iran10.jpg


however if someone shows obvious afro genetics they are a big turn off to me.

SilverKnight
05-05-2012, 02:11 PM
That is true.I had man who loved me a lot but unfortunately I didn't love him back..I think he liked me physically and was mistaking it for love.

This is why you always get to know them first at best, until you're 100% sure that they're the right person for you and that they're not just there for your looks but feelings and character as well.




Oh but I'm sure you're capable of love, a love based on the infinitude of the infinite universal spirit.

Nothing wrong with this kind of love :p:thumb001: actually it's the true and only kind of love there is .:)

~Nik~
05-05-2012, 02:28 PM
Nothing wrong with this kind of love :p:thumb001: actually it's the true and only kind of love there is .:)

I don't believe in an universal love, it's a totally New Age concept in reality and furthermore only suitable for a cosmopolitan society. Perhaps it sounds good to you as a half-breed, but I'm afraid that the reality is slightly different.

Saruman
05-05-2012, 02:39 PM
POLL: How white would a men/women have to be for you to date/ marry/ have kids ?


1. Entirely (100% European).
2. Almost entirely is ok (ex. +98%).
3. Octoroons (1/12 black) or other non-white is ok.
4. + 75% ex. Castizos, Quadroon.
4. Half white or above is ok (+50%)
5. Bellow ( 50%) but with some is acceptable.
6. I don't mind.

Am I under impression here that you're equalizing the "non-whites", because that cannot be done. Negroid doesn't equal Middle Eastern in genetic distance from Europe, nor does Negrid equal Indianid, Mongoloid etc. To answer question in short from a European perspective, primary factor would and should be whether an individual genetically clusters in Europe or not.

Albion
05-05-2012, 02:49 PM
1. Entirely (100% European).
2. Almost entirely is ok (ex. +98%).
3. Octoroons (1/12 black) or other non-white is ok.

I'd prefer the first too though, but the third one would probably look white and if I liked someone and latter found out they were 1/12 black then I don't think it could change much. It isn't really the sort of thing you ask at first.

Any more non-European than that is just too much though.

SilverKnight
05-05-2012, 05:56 PM
:coffee:



I don't believe in an universal love,


But then ironically you where the first one that mentioned it in one of your previous post.:p


Oh but I'm sure you're capable of love, a love based on the infinitude of the infinite universal spirit. But a strong love, a love whose roots are deeper than the mere frivolities that conceptualize your love, this love of the Race, that you will never know. :)



it's a totally New Age concept in reality and furthermore only suitable for a cosmopolitan society.

It's not just a " New Age concept" but one widely used trough the ages, just that now we're beginning to awake/ become more aware to whats really [reality] and that is that the universe is one and when we die we are not , white, black, Asian anymore but our selves, the soul. Believe it or not, it's how it is and there are countless witnesses to this. But I won't get into these subject as it's something that you will probably laugh at and don't comprehend.



Perhaps it sounds good to you as a half-breed, but I'm afraid that the reality is slightly different.

:rolleyes:The same good ol' lame excuse about me being half-breed and blah blah.... It's not because I'm a half breed, I speak on behalf of my self, and if I where pure white, pure black or what ever other human race I would have said the same damn thing no exceptions.

Sometimes people need to get out of that hard shell and see the other's perspective on things. Hey I see and try to do my best seeing the European perspective of what's going on, and I agree in many of the things you guys worry and say, and I believe it will be fair if you guys try to do your part as well, as an honest men.

Sometimes what you perceive as "reality" might not be reality after all, at least not completely !



Am I under impression here that you're equalizing the "non-whites", because that cannot be done. Negroid doesn't equal Middle Eastern in genetic distance from Europe, nor does Negrid equal Indianid, Mongoloid etc. To answer question in short from a European perspective, primary factor would and should be whether an individual genetically clusters in Europe or not.

Duhh, Sauruman, I'm very damn aware that SSA Negroids aren't as equal or totally equal to Middle Eastern in genetic differences with Europeans. You don't have to lecture me on that. What I was referring to is the general/ scientific perspective, of being European, partially or not at all, very straight forward, not who clusters closer to European or now, that would be another subject/ question in an other poll that could go like this " Would you date a person who clusters closer to Europeans, and what of these races would it be ?".. See the differences?

Now that is not the case with this poll, it's just basically asking how white should a person be for you to date, not how closer to whites they should be....

2Cool
05-05-2012, 06:06 PM
Oh but I'm sure you're capable of love, a love based on the infinitude of the infinite universal spirit. But a strong love, a love whose roots are deeper than the mere frivolities that conceptualize your love, this love of the Race, that you will never know. :)

That's bullshit and you know it. Love is nothing more than a simple chemical reaction in your brain - a cocktail of hormones that make you feel a certain way towards another person. It's not some magical super-natural force that only those who believe in some deity have access to. Love predates religion and any form of human spirituality.

I don't even understand what you mean by love of the Race. It's the first time I hear about such a thing.

~Nik~
05-05-2012, 07:33 PM
It's not just a " New Age concept" but one widely used trough the ages, just that now we're beginning to awake/ become more aware to whats really [reality] and that is that the universe is one and when we die we are not , white, black, Asian anymore but our selves, the soul. Believe it or not, it's how it is and there are countless witnesses to this. But I won't get into these subject as it's something that you will probably laugh at and don't comprehend.

Sorry but my hopes are not made of blissful humanism and material goods, and my end will not be synonymous of dust and nothingness. But I don't think you can understand from your world of dreams, dreams of immediate pleasures, of multiracial social happiness,of world eternal peace and planetary citizenship etc.


:rolleyes:The same good ol' lame excuse about me being half-breed and blah blah.... It's not because I'm a half breed, I speak on behalf of my self, and if I where pure white, pure black or what ever other human race I would have said the same damn thing no exceptions.


But if you was something pure, you would have had a racial lifesaver, but in your actual situation it's much more complicated and I see it. Not many fallbacks. :ohwell:


Sometimes what you perceive as "reality" might not be reality after all, at least not completely !

Same thing for you. But that doesn't stop us from tending to what we judge to be just.



That's bullshit and you know it. Love is nothing more than a simple chemical reaction in your brain - a cocktail of hormones that make you feel a certain way towards another person. It's not some magical super-natural force that only those who believe in some deity have access to. Love predates religion and any form of human spirituality.

I don't even understand what you mean by love of the Race. It's the first time I hear about such a thing.

I knew you were going to talk about chemical reactions, that's for you:

iKYPQNU6g9w
-1VO0csounU

2Cool
05-05-2012, 07:56 PM
Sorry but my hopes are not made of blissful humanism and material goods, and my end will not be synonymous of dust and nothingness. But I don't think you can understand from your world of dreams, dreams of immediate pleasures, of multiracial social happiness,of world eternal peace and planetary citizenship etc.



But if you was something pure, you would have had a racial lifesaver, but in your actual situation it's much more complicated and I see it. Not many fallbacks. :ohwell:



Same thing for you. But that doesn't stop us from tending to what we judge to be just.




I knew you were going to talk about chemical reactions, that's for you:

[YOUTUBE]iKYPQNU6g9w[/YOUTUBE ]
[YOUTUBE]-1VO0csounU[/YOUTUBE ]

So you think that love is some type of super natural thing?
lol...

What about anger, happiness, sadness etc. Are all those emotions also of super natural origin?

~Nik~
05-05-2012, 08:26 PM
So you think that love is some type of super natural thing?

Personally I believe in the love of his fellows, but really the nearest fellows. For all others it's more a matter of charity/pity, hatred/contempt, envy or curiosity. But I don't reject the chemical reactions actually, see above. :thumb001:

SilverKnight
05-06-2012, 02:49 AM
So what went on all the time I was gone ? :rolleyes:



So you think that love is some type of super natural thing?
lol...

What about anger, happiness, sadness etc. Are all those emotions also of super natural origin?

I believe in love, and it comes in different meanings and forms. I believe love is energy, just as the energy from anything else. Energy can't be destroyed nor created but transformed. When we die the only thing we carry with is love, that essence we all have even if we deny it, but some people are cold and dark and they deny it, and when they pass away they realize they where just wrong. But I respect your opinion, and your completely free to or not to believe in love. :)

Melina
05-06-2012, 02:55 AM
So what went on all the time I was gone ? :rolleyes:




I believe in love, and it comes in different meanings and forms. I believe love is energy, just as the energy from anything else. Energy can't be destroyed nor created but transformed. When we die the only thing we carry with is love, that essence we all have even if we deny it, but some people are cold and dark and they deny it, and when they pass away they realize they where just wrong. But I respect your opinion, and your completely free to or not to believe in love. :)

NIK is banned :( ..I wonder what happened..

Transhumanist
05-06-2012, 03:03 AM
How about this Assyrian from Iraq? He is presumably as non-European genetically as the rest of us Assyrians.

http://i1096.photobucket.com/albums/g326/dok101/asy3.jpg
http://i1096.photobucket.com/albums/g326/dok101/asy2.jpg
http://i1096.photobucket.com/albums/g326/dok101/asy1.jpg

SilverKnight
05-06-2012, 03:13 AM
How about this Assyrian from Iraq? He is presumably as non-European genetically as the rest of us Assyrians.

http://i1096.photobucket.com/albums/g326/dok101/asy3.jpg
http://i1096.photobucket.com/albums/g326/dok101/asy2.jpg
http://i1096.photobucket.com/albums/g326/dok101/asy1.jpg

He seems proto-Europid, physically he might pass, but genetically probably. It's up to the person who wants to date 100% Europeans (or close), to take him as an "exception" or not to the rule I guess..?

Transhumanist
05-06-2012, 03:25 AM
He seems proto-Europid, physically he might pass, but genetically probably. It's up to the person who wants to date 100% Europeans (or close), to take him as an "exception" or not to the rule I guess..?

Thanks. I presume he would not pass for European genetically, since most Assyrians are "West Asian" genetically (read: removed from Europeans). Although I am no longer "European" looking, during my younger years (http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showpost.php?p=856158&postcount=283) I believe I could have passed as an European child. Then again, the same can be said for a good number of non-European children.

Linet
05-15-2012, 11:44 AM
What does white means? To me what counts are the history and the accomplicements of each nation. If my nation was pink with a horn in the middle of our forehead it would still be fine by me as far as we still had the same past.
So yes, i would marry someone not from my nation as long as i apreeciated his ancestry.

SilverKnight
05-17-2012, 01:41 AM
What does white means?

Technically/ Literary simply means: Person of European origins. It was used in colonial times by slaves, other non-European and European themselves to pinpoint pale skinned/ light skinned men-women of Europe as "white".



To me what counts are the history and the accomplicements of each nation. If my nation was pink with a horn in the middle of our forehead it would still be fine by me as far as we still had the same past.
So yes, i would marry someone not from my nation as long as i apreeciated his ancestry.


To me as long as she shares similar character, personality, tastes, ambitions, she's smart/wise, and has a good degree of European ancestry like me I will be fine with it.

I respect your views and if you see it that way then go for it, as long as that person respects you and truly cares about you and your views.

LightHouse89
01-10-2014, 10:48 PM
Caucasian to me is the best, so middle eastern, European or north African [like Moroccan or something similar]. maybe a mix of these would do. I just find em so attractive.

Leo Iscariot
01-10-2014, 10:58 PM
Doesn't matter to me in the least.

Krampus
01-10-2014, 11:02 PM
I would only marry a full white like me.

Melina
01-10-2014, 11:21 PM
From what I have seen people who say they don't have a preference or in this case that "they don't mind" is pretty much bullshit.

YeshAtid
01-10-2014, 11:21 PM
If anything there would probably be some (and a small percentage) North African admixture (Berbers are closer to Europeans than a Sub Saharan Negroid would be) in a Southern European. You must remember I have a lot of Southern European ancestry myself.

You're like 80% Arabian, going by phenotype

LightHouse89
01-10-2014, 11:23 PM
You're like 80% Arabian, going by phenotype

Moroccan women from pictures I have seen are attractive.

gregorius
01-10-2014, 11:24 PM
would just bang,

YeshAtid
01-10-2014, 11:24 PM
Moroccan women from pictures I have seen are attractive.

She's white, but certainly not fully European

Furnace
01-10-2014, 11:30 PM
Must be so white they become slightly transparent.

LightHouse89
01-10-2014, 11:34 PM
whiter than bird shit :cool:

Mortimer
01-10-2014, 11:45 PM
we can discuss it but silverknight (the OP) ust right now is enjoying his new white girlfriend and has a kid with another white woman. he just doesnt talk the talk but walks the walk.

Weedman
01-11-2014, 03:28 AM
the question is mis-leading , at least by American standards. White automatically means, 100% white here. If anyone has any visible non-White admixture they arent considered white, typically.

If its just a small amount then they maybe considered something like "a white person with some Indian blood" or some shit like that

it's a given that most White Americans are 97-100% white, or else they just arent usually taken as being white but just as being a mixed person.

the second poll choice is stupid too since its impossible to tell someone who is 100% white apart from someone who is 97% White, unless you check their DNA test results or something.

Weedman
01-11-2014, 03:31 AM
whiter than bird shit :cool:

most typical white people are whiter than bird shit anyway since bird shit has black mixed in with it.

LightHouse89
01-11-2014, 03:32 AM
bird shit has black mixed in with it

opps :picard1:

Leo Iscariot
01-11-2014, 09:21 PM
From what I have seen people who say they don't have a preference or in this case that "they don't mind" is pretty much bullshit.

How do you figure that?

Melina
01-11-2014, 10:11 PM
How do you figure that?

Well from personal experience. Let me give you an example. I two room mates once that told me they didn't have preference on who they dated. One was Mestiza and the other was your typical Irish American. They didn't have preference yet they would always choose to date European men.

I thinkit was more of political correctness and the fact they didn't want to offend anyone.

SardiniaAtlantis
01-11-2014, 10:11 PM
http://cdn.niketalk.com/b/b3/350x700px-LL-b31fa768_tumblr_inline_mjxoudNRnY1qz4rgp.gif

Leo Iscariot
01-11-2014, 10:20 PM
Well from personal experience. Let me give you an example. I two room mates once that told me they didn't have preference on who they dated. One was Mestiza and the other was your typical Irish American. They didn't have preference yet they would always choose to date European men.

I thinkit was more of political correctness and the fact they didn't want to offend anyone.

That to me just sounds like they had a preference for European men than anything. Anybody could have a preference, but still be open to being in a relationship with somebody regardless of race.

Another example would be like if I were to leave my gf (Who is white) and every other woman I dated from here on out ended up also being white. I know that I would never rule out a relationship with a woman based solely on her race or ethnicity, but all that meant is that I happened to fall for those white women, they reciprocated, and we ended up together.

Ivan Kramskoï
01-11-2014, 10:22 PM
Entirely, almost entirely

Carlito's Way
01-11-2014, 10:25 PM
i like my women mixed, my girlfriend is perfect, i dont mind sexy mulattas either, i really like them :thumb001:
i also wouldnt mind dating Ethiopian, Somalian or Angolan girls

Leo Iscariot
01-11-2014, 10:56 PM
i like my women mixed, my girlfriend is perfect, i dont mind sexy mulattas either, i really like them :thumb001:
i also wouldnt mind dating Ethiopian, Somalian or Angolan girls

Somalian and Angolan woman are among the most beautiful African women imho. :thumb001:

Jizo
01-12-2014, 07:14 AM
75% or above,idenitifying as only white and being either Catholic, Orthodox or non religious Jew. No Muslims and Prtoestants :)

dustdragon5717
09-11-2016, 02:07 AM
Ancestry surprised me and told me that I am only 93% European, my non-European is Caucusus (5%) and Middle Eastern (2%).

That said, I identify with my European ancestry (Non-European comes from Calabrian genes) and I would want my partner to be at least slightly more European than I, preferably 95% or more. I wouldn't want to have children who are less European than me.

Mortimer
09-11-2016, 05:02 AM
A Roma genotype 50+% European on 23andme or Wegene or ftdna, Im 60-70% European so Roma with 50+% european would be my match. If we go by genetic compatibility, but actually I dont care and oppossites attract she could be asian, black or native american.

Enflamme
09-11-2016, 05:07 AM
No big difference between 97% European and 98/99% European...

And 100% European is very rare xD

This means that here, most people will not go with people who are European to 99%
The absurd logic!

Mortimer
09-11-2016, 05:11 AM
Just checked that I have voted "I dont mind", yes thats how it should be

Bloody
09-25-2016, 11:16 PM
Well it's a bit more than miniscule. If we were to use Latin American terminology, I think a good percentage of the population here would be considered Castizo. A lot of the earlier migrants to North America (especially pre-1880) picked up Amerindian blood.

That's my opinion. I've been to Britain and the 'Anglos' I often see in North America are progressively darker feature or hold unusual features, moreso / compared to British in Europe. People like Gregor Robertson comes to mind.

http://www.replayed.org/wp-content/gallery/glen-loft/vancouver-mayor-gregor-robertson.jpg

And no I wouldn't procreate with a person (or female version) of that. My lineage is pretty clear (I have second / third cousins in Europe) and look pretty Nordish.

A lot of white americans have "bombed shaped" or smaller built noses, compared to europeans who are almost uniformely sharp featured... many white americans have minor amerind or afro ancestry and it shows up in the phenotype.

Bloody
09-25-2016, 11:17 PM
White? No fan of that term.

But she would have to be Germanic.
Then probably only scandinavian, dutch or german, others would look too un-germanic to you lol

Aëlwenn
09-25-2016, 11:22 PM
100% europeans.
I don't care so much, but i prefer western europeans males.

Neon Knight
09-25-2016, 11:34 PM
No big difference between 97% European and 98/99% European...

And 100% European is very rare xD

This means that here, most people will not go with people who are European to 99%
The absurd logic!It depends how far back in history you go to define European. 23andMe's 500 year dig is meaningful enough for moden identities and so there are many millions of 100% Europeans.

AphroditeWorshiper
09-26-2016, 12:16 AM
serious, that people care how much white/European is your partner?

just LOL

Mortimer
09-26-2016, 12:29 AM
This woman is similar to what I am. She is married though.

Family Locations: Gypsy from Vojvodina, Serbia and Albanian from Tetovo, FYROM Macedonia

She is half Albanian and half Gypsy from Vojvodina. Im also from Vojvodina.

https://www.23andmeobjects.com/photos///ba/5e/ba5ed89544864db3a96b19d50e68c2a6_M.0_107_425_532.j pg

http://s22.postimg.org/f7uydw8zl/Natalija_ACresults.jpg

Dr. Robotnik the Subbotnik
09-26-2016, 12:33 AM
I don't mind - though I am a racist on a grander scale I do not mind miscegenation on an individual basis. I will marry anyone if I feel I love them enough.

Aëlwenn
09-26-2016, 12:40 AM
serious, that people care how much white/European is your partner?

just LOL

Yes, because i want white childrens, i want a future for the white race.

AphroditeWorshiper
09-26-2016, 12:45 AM
Yes, because i want white childrens, i want a future for the white race.

but I always thought that people choose their partner by love and not by race or other things

Mortimer
09-26-2016, 12:54 AM
I don't mind - though I am a racist on a grander scale I do not mind miscegenation on an individual basis. I will marry anyone if I feel I love them enough.

You cant even practice miscgenetation because two gays cant have kids

Aëlwenn
09-26-2016, 12:54 AM
but I always thought that people choose their partner by love and not by race or other things

Yes, but I always fall in love with white man.
The others did not attract me, and whatever people say, the physical count.