Would you consider a Man who's in their 20s and a Virgin pathetic?

[Geroth]

What are you're thoughts?

[Mesrine]

If he doesn't care about sex, no.

If it's been ten years that he tries and fails to get pussy, yes.

[GeistFaust]

I am a virgin, but its not like I have been running after women my whole life, and I tend to be asexual at times, although brief spurts of heterosexual feelings do arise.

[Vasconcelos]

No lol

[Pallantides]

Depends on the circumstances.

[ricko0812]

I am a virgin, but its not like I have been running after women my whole life, and I tend to be asexual at times, although brief spurts of heterosexual feelings do arise.

you are one unique individual.

[leisitox]

Nope.

[tilltheskyfallsd0wnn]

no, I actually think its commendable.

[hipaware]

Depends on the situation. Some men are asexual on purpose until marrage.

[Svipdag]

No, not necessarily. I knew a man who died a virgin at the age of 75. He just wasn't seriously interested in sex. I don't think that anyone who knew him would call him pathetic. He wasn't unhappy or even lonely.

He was active in four Masonic lodges, so, though he had only one blood brother, he had dozens of lodge brothers. For him, being a doting uncle took the place of having children of his own.


DE GVSTIBVS NON EST DISPVTANDVM" - GAIVS VALERIVS CATVLLVS

[Insuperable]

I am a virgin, but its not like I have been running after women my whole life, and I tend to be asexual at times, although brief spurts of heterosexual feelings do arise.

Gays and asexuals. Lets preserve nations yeah

[GeistFaust]

Gays and asexuals. Lets preserve nations yeah


I probably will negate my virginity one of these days, but I don't feel like doing it now, because I have other things to take care of and be responsible.

I am not really technically an asexual, but I find I just tend to be ambitious in regards to certain subject matters, which makes me feel like sex is just a drain of energy.

When I find the time, stability, and feel like it then it will eventually occur at some point possibly, but in my past and for now I am content with things the way they are.

[Supreme American]

No. Dumb thread.

[rhiannon]

No.
My hubs was a late bloomer, for example. He never lost his until his 20s, and this is not because he was ugly and couldn't get girls.....it's because he was extremely shy around girls.

Plus, his college life was very different from most people's....he attended one of this country's esteemed Military Academies. Cadets never got much in the way of any time for a social life, lol

[StonyArabia]

I am a Virgin and certainly what is pathetic is people talking about how it's cool to be non-virgin, it's like the world turned upside down. Certainly a man who saves himself is doing himself and his partner a favor. Virgin till marriage this how it should be.

[Guapo]

yes

[Strawberry]

Yes

[Skandi]

Nope my best mates husband was a virgin at 28 when she met him, they are now married with a child, but his family are strict catholics, and he was being nice to his mother, would not be my choice but it was his.

[Ryujin]

As an asexual virgin (and who will probably die that way), I think (sexual) people need to experience it at a young age because societies in which sexuality is a taboo tend to be backward, with a soaring rate of rape cases. If I ever had a child I would like him or her to have sex in high school.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

I lost virginity as teenager, but most of the guys I know who lost it very young are subhumanoid decliners of some kind.

Most smart people seem to be 'late bloomers', even in the intellectual sense many times, let alone physically and sexually.

[rhiannon]

No.
I'd consider him either very shy or possibly very religious

[Skjaldemjøden]

A late bloomer perhaps. There could be lots of reasons though, and most I can think of aren't pathetic.

[Skulgrimen]

Always

Most slayers probably lose their virginity before age 14.

[Mary]

If the guy is not into sex, from a sexually repressed culture, or from an older generation then no. But if he's young and lives in Western Europe then yes.

[rhiannon]

If the guy is not into sex, from a sexually repressed culture, or from an older generation then no. But if he's young and lives in Western Europe then yes.
At least you admit to the possibility of asexuality.

I think there are more people like this than we realize.

[Neanderthal]

I am a Virgin and certainly what is pathetic is people talking about how it's cool to be non-virgin, it's like the world turned upside down. Certainly a man who saves himself is doing himself and his partner a favor. Virgin till marriage this how it should be.

According to your religion.

On topic: It would depend. But in most cases, yes. If you don't get laid before you hit 30, odds are you will never get

[zhaoyun]

mid 20s, yeah

[Óttar]

No. Who cares?

[Dylan]

I am a Virgin and certainly what is pathetic is people talking about how it's cool to be non-virgin, it's like the world turned upside down. Certainly a man who saves himself is doing himself and his partner a favor. Virgin till marriage this how it should be.

losing your virginity = nothing changes. you feel exactly the same afterwards, it doesnt change shit. for guys virginity = My interest in attaining sex does not overpower my shyness, modesty, laziness etc.
Anyone can lose their virginity at a relatively young age if their shameless/desperate enough to do it. Obviously if you're unattractive as hell and have 0 personality, its gonna be tougher, but still easy if you really try to so bad. If you're shy, its just now gonna happen unless you get over it.

[Ivan Kramskoï]

Always

Most slayers probably lose their virginity before age 14.
This is ridiculous.

[Petalpusher]

losing your virginity = nothing changes. you feel exactly the same afterwards, it doesnt change shit. for guys virginity = My interest in attaining sex does not overpower my shyness, modesty, laziness etc.

I don't know, the first time i remember i felt like a superhero for a couple of minutes afterward. It definetly changes something, like crossing the bridge between boys and men.

[Stimpy]

It's only pathetic if you really want to have sex but can't.
Like all these sluthate ''incels'' or w/e, that constantly whine about it like it's the only important thing there is to them.

[SupaThug]

I would never call a person pathetic based on how much sex they've had,some few men are like me,they don't give a damm about sex and relationships,I don't even masturbate because it is pretty pointless to me,I have never kissed a girl or had sex,but it does not bother me,but most who people reach my age on the same stuatus as me are incels who love girls but can't get then(I know some of them,they are the kind of men who masturbate all the day long),I pitty them,but I don't consider them to be pathetic!As an arromantic assexual I hate the term ''virgin'' because it implies you are one of those incels,that you are short,weak and socially inept and that's definitly not my case neither the case of most assexuals.

[Rædwald]

No.

[Also]

I don't know, the first time i remember i felt like a superhero for a couple of minutes afterward. It definetly changes something, like crossing the bridge between boys and men.

Nah... you are still the same person, inserting your penis inside a vagina for the first time doesn't change anything, you are exactly the same person after and unlike women we don't even get an anatomical change. It only feels like 'something' because of the weight we and others put in it, we got rid of our 'virginity' so now we are proving something to the world.

Being a virgin is no different than being someone who has never been to Mexico or who has never skydived from a substantial point of view, it just means you haven't had a particular experience. Anything else is socially constructed and inside people's mind.

[Dylan]

This is ridiculous.

Anytime someone uses the word "slayer", ridiculousness soon follows.

[Dylan]

I don't know, the first time i remember i felt like a superhero for a couple of minutes afterward. It definetly changes something, like crossing the bridge between boys and men.

maybe its because the girl i did it with was also a virgin and she wasnt any good. hmmm did you have a lot of other sexual experience before it (e.g. 3rd base)

[Special K]

I wouldn't care whether they've done "it" or not.

[dude]

If it is one of those guys from sluthate bitching abuot chad's then yes, very pathetic. If he simply chooses so because of religious or any other reasons then it is like "whatever, who cares".

[Herr Abubu]

No, one of the people I respect the most is a virgin and in his twenties. If anything, chastity is a virtue, and a virtue is something that demands respect.

[Gaston]

If he doesn't care about sex, no.

If it's been ten years that he tries and fails to get pussy, yes.

This.

[Hadouken]

no why should I ? it is his dick not mine lol ...what does it change for me if he already had sex or not ? to me this question has almost the same meaning as "would you consider a man who never rode a rollercoaster in his 20s pathetic?"

I judge a person on his character and if he is a good person who I think would be a good friend then thats it

he can still lose his virginity when we go partying and pick up girls :)

[Incel King]

If he doesn't care about sex, no.

If it's been ten years that he tries and fails to get pussy, yes.

How someone can know I care about sex, people in real-life sometimes think I'm homosexual because I show no interest even at discussing about girls with other males. However I'd like to have sex with one I love and I miss it really hard, but what I can do when I'm not attracted to 99,99% females. Who cares what fuckin society thinks, because those ones are who watch American movies and look up to politicians like they're demigods so their opinion can't be taken as serious.

[Odin]

Yup.

[mosaic potato]

If he is ugly or a late physical developer (looks like a middle-teen at age 25), then no I wouldn't consider it pathetic.

If its a good looking dude, then I would think its social issues, love-shyness or maybe he's been bullied / ostracised in some way.

If its a regular-looking guy that's short, got a crappy job etc, and his only options were obese women (and he'd rather remain a virgin than fuck a fat sow) then no I wouldn't consider him pathetic. I would consider him logical and wise, put I would wonder why he hasn't used an escort already as things won't magically improve when they turn 30.

[Harley]

I find virgin men cute tbh.

Could be the Gemini in me that prefers younger/youthful men.

[Bobby Martnen]

No, I'd consider him to be a good Christian.

[idioteque]

No, I would not.

If they are saving themselves for marriage or just not having casual sex, there is nothing wrong with virginity.

[Magnolia]

http://geniusbeauty.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/libido.jpg

It's a little bit odd...

[Radimir]

Was Isaac Newton or Nikola Tesla or Immanuel Kant or Joan of Arc or Mother Teresa pathetic for staying a virgin all their lives? No.

[sean]

Pretty much yes. If a man is a virgin over the age of 25 he has pretty much failed carrying out the basic instinctual imperative and has demonstrated antisocial behaviour.

However, marrying and having kids and losing virginity are two very separate things. Nothing wrong with preserving your virginity for religious reasons, be they for the purpose of marital fidelity or monastic celibacy. What makes a man are qualities of honour and virtue, not whether or not he's gotten his dick wet.

Monogamy was a system that was developed so women would pair up with roughly their equal in attractiveness/status. This contributed to better raised children and more men investing in society.

But male purity shouldn't be held to anywhere near the same standard as female purity. If anything, men having more partners displays their viability as a potential mate.

[Alexandro]

Nah, being a "loser" is not really necessarily determined by having or not having sex....and its okay to take your time and wait for the right person. Man, personally I lost my virginity to a fucking batshit insane Portuguese girl that I'm not even on speaking terms with anymore, so would have preferred to have waited in hindsight.

However, might add that not everyone who is a virgin at 26 is a loser, but most losers at 26 are virgins.

[Harley]

I think that if you have your own reason for being a virgin, it doesn’t matter what anyone else thinks. Sex is a choice, and you don’t have to put out just because someone says you should.

[Richmondbread]

Pretty much yes. If a man is a virgin over the age of 25 he has pretty much failed carrying out the basic instinctual imperative and has demonstrated antisocial behaviour.

However, marrying and having kids and losing virginity are two very separate things. Nothing wrong with preserving your virginity for religious reasons, be they for the purpose of marital fidelity or monastic celibacy. What makes a man are qualities of honour and virtue, not whether or not he's gotten his dick wet.

Monogamy was a system that was developed so women would pair up with roughly their equal in attractiveness/status. This contributed to better raised children and more men investing in society.

But male purity shouldn't be held to anywhere near the same standard as female purity. If anything, men having more partners displays their viability as a potential mate.No monogamy was Gods idea. Sex outside of marriage is called fornication

Sent from my G9 PRO using Tapatalk

[Anglo-Celtic]

I'll keep it real. I don't care if you're a virgin, and I don't care if you're a player. It makes no difference to me and my life. It's way down on my "give a da" list.

[Bragisson]

No it's normal

[Richmondbread]

Losers lose their virginity before marriage.

[Petalpusher]

All the xcels who save themselves for marriage


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MftLoXfUKwY


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfmkHNSSSMs

I truely sympathize but it's brutal to watch

[Dragoon]

20s is still normal.
30s gets stranger.

[Renekton]

No

[Richmondbread]

Not at all. Most men are not married yet before 30.

Sent from my SM-G960U1 using Tapatalk

[Flashball]

Penetrating a vagina is not an achievement, it's just penetrating a vagina.

[calxpal]

Nope I would not consider them pathetic. I'm not sure why society judges those so harshly who don't have a certain "body count", it doesn't make them any more accomplished or better to have had more sex.

[Atlantic Reptilian]

No. That's normal in some cultures. The exception is if you get married at a young age, but that's not very common.

You see, people have other things in life: many people go to university in their early 20s and finish mid 20s. And around 30 they start a family.

[Richmondbread]

Nope I would not consider them pathetic. I'm not sure why society judges those so harshly who don't have a certain "body count", it doesn't make them any more accomplished or better to have had more sex.I agree. Its not an accomplishment of any kind


Sent from my SM-G960U1 using Tapatalk

[Millennial_Falcon]

that'd mean half this website was pathetic... wait you might be onto something...

[Volvado Seja]

no