The dirty side of Africa

[Lulletje Rozewater]

Black men on African children: “We fuck them, we abuse them, we torture them, we kill them, we sell them, we eat them, we dismember them while alive”

The last four posts were based on newspaper articles published in the last 24 hours. Crimes against children simply go on and on. Black mothers dump their newly born or full term aborted foetuses in pit latrines, dumpsters, drains, toilets and even hurl them out of high rise ghetto apartments onto the streets below. Plumbers are regularly confronted with drain blockages caused by baby corpses. Its not an uncommon sight for squatter camp dwellers to see dogs running around with & chewing on bits of dead babies.


http://i42.tinypic.com/wlsyn4.jpg



Those who survive the first few months of life, are often sold to witch doctors who dismember them while still alive. Lips, ears, genitalia and internal organs are harvested for use as “traditional medicine”. Once they reach the ripe old age of two, they become sought after sex objects and are raped by wild black savages who believe intercourse with a small child will cure them of HIV/AIDS, although some of them have admitted they “don’t really buy the HIV cure story, they really just enjoy a nice tight fuck”.



http://i44.tinypic.com/2daycsx.jpg



The horror knows no bounds. The savage cruelty meted out against the most vulnerable, defenceless children is completely out of control - South African child murders are up a staggering 25 % between 2007 and 2008 but the ANC sees fit to close specialised Child Protection Units. What are we to make of this? A tacit approval? An overt encouragement and signal to the vile jungle bunnies to do their damnedest without fear of prosecution?

Being on the outside and looking in, all we can do is stoically shrug our “racist” White shoulders and say “TIS”. This Is Africa.

[Eldritch]

The dirty side of Africa?

Besides the small bastions of civilization (under constant assault) in the RSA and Zimbabwe, is there supposed to be a clean side?

Nothing surprised me about kaffirs anymore. Absolutely nothing.

[Brännvin]

Besides the small bastions of civilization (under constant assault) in the RSA and Zimbabwe, is there supposed to be a clean side?


What is surprising, Rhodesia and SA until the 80's were developed economies, looks the situation today, scary.

Indeed, the whole "black" Africa is tribal, even if you give them a billion of dollars daily, they'll still end up in some chieftain's pocket with millions starving and industry being on the prehistoric level.

Africa needs a new period of enlightened white leadership, (call it neo-imperialism, though China is already colonizing the Africa), for a couple of more centuries to help them establish national states, or at least surpass the tribal level and create decent economy, infrastructure and QoL for their people.

Feeding them with stories that "liberty is a reward in itself" and "take your time, you'll catch up soon" won't help. Because they won't.

[The Lawspeaker]

What is surprising, Rhodesia and SA until the 80's were developed economies, looks the situation today, scary.

Indeed, the whole "black" Africa is tribal, even if you give them a billion of dollars daily, they'll still end up in some chieftain's pocket with millions starving and industry being on the prehistoric level.

Africa needs a new period of enlightened white leadership, (call it neo-imperialism, though China is already the colonizing Africa), for a couple of more centuries to help them establish national states, or at least surpass the tribal level and create decent economy, infrastructure and QoL for their people.

Feeding them with stories that "liberty is a reward in itself" and "take your time, you'll catch up soon" won't help. Because they won't.

I guess that it would instead be better to stop sending any kind of aid but also cancel their debts, evacuate the Europeans, cut all connections and only trade with them for those resources we really need while we start looking for ways to lessen our dependence on those resources and slowly let the Africans fuck themselves over.

Suppose that we Europeans would also start relying more on ourselves and also trade less with China then China will also need less resources and they will stop colonizing Africa too.. - and thus we can slowly let it sink into the oubliette. After perhaps a century or so we can come back and bury the bodies.

[Eldritch]

Warning: post contains serious negrophobia.




Africa needs a new period of enlightened white leadership, (call it neo-imperialism, though China is already colonizing the Africa), for a couple of more centuries to help them establish national states, or at least surpass the tribal level and create decent economy, infrastructure and QoL for their people.



Post-colonial, or rather pre-being-colonised-by-China Africa is in a state or perpetual catastrophe and everyone knows it. Throwing money at them won't make a fraction of an inch of difference, on the contrary it makes it worse.

Let me tell you why I couldn't care less if they were all enclosed in reservations to slowly die of AIDS and to eat other: after WW2, there's been exactly one (1) recorded gang rape in this country.

Until, of course, the negroes came in, less than 20 years ago. Now, not a single week goes by that you don't hear of a new case, each one more horrible than the previous one, of course with the by-now usual drill of horrifying, barbaric beating, slashing with knives and broken bottles, objects inserted into bodily orifices. Since you live in Malmö, I'm sure you know how it goes.

There's nothing we can do to stop these creatures from killing, raping, torturing and eating each other forever, until they finally go extinct. And I no longer even want to try.

[Lulletje Rozewater]

The dirty side of Africa?

Besides the small bastions of civilization (under constant assault) in the RSA and Zimbabwe, is there supposed to be a clean side?

Nothing surprised me about kaffirs anymore. Absolutely nothing.

The clean side is 6 ft under.:)

[Lulletje Rozewater]

What is surprising, Rhodesia and SA until the 80's were developed economies, looks the situation today, scary.

Indeed, the whole "black" Africa is tribal, even if you give them a billion of dollars daily, they'll still end up in some chieftain's pocket with millions starving and industry being on the prehistoric level.

Africa needs a new period of enlightened white leadership, (call it neo-imperialism, though China is already colonizing the Africa), for a couple of more centuries to help them establish national states, or at least surpass the tribal level and create decent economy, infrastructure and QoL for their people.

Feeding them with stories that "liberty is a reward in itself" and "take your time, you'll catch up soon" won't help. Because they won't.

That is why the Kellogg foundation(7th day Baptist) and the Ford foundation do irreparable damage.
They save one black from starvation for a few years and 6 kids are born starving

[Brännvin]

I guess that it would instead be better to stop sending any kind of aid but also cancel their debts, evacuate the Europeans, cut all connections and only trade with them for those resources we really need while we start looking for ways to lessen our dependence on those resources and slowly let the Africans fuck themselves over.

Yes, I agree, but the situation is not as simple as you might imagine, we have to deal with our reality. Citing an example, Netherlands, where many leading multinationals have important business in Africa, Shell dominates part of the trading of oil in Nigeria, an African country with serious problems of overpopulation, Unilever is another company with business in African countries. Do you think they will stop its business with Africa at any time? No, they will not. The whole problem is our current system that sustains it.



Suppose that we Europeans would also start relying more on ourselves and also trade less with China then China will also need less resources and they will stop colonizing Africa too.. - and thus we can slowly let it sink into the oubliette. After perhaps a century or so we can come back and bury the bodies.

China is not only to colonize Africa for the needs of industrial resources, but that part of Chinese territory is not productive for agriculture, as they are having problem of overpopulation, the government encourages millions Chinese anually, to migrate for the Africa, and what they are doing is similar what the European colonialists did in the eighteenth and nineteenth century. The difference; they are more numerous than hundreds of Europeans who moved to Africa in that period, they naturally will dominate geopolitically the African territory inside of two decades, and it isn't good too.

Why I think the Europeans should promote a neo-colonialism in Africa, too, not only to control resources and compete with the China, but also control the Africans, demographic issues, HIV and other epidemics that constantly appears in some of the jungle Africa.