PDA

View Full Version : Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja



ioan assen
08-16-2012, 08:30 PM
I ve read in the Serbian forum that Macedonians stated that they were never called Bulgarians by Croats and Slovenes.
As far as I know the Macedonians claim Samuel of Bulgaria as "Macedonian". So lets see what a Croat has to say about their king. Mind you the book was written only a century after Samuels reign so the Croat is almost an eye withness:
Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja, 1: Chapters 30-36

"At this time Peter, the emperor of the Bulgars, died [AD 969]. He used to rule from the city of Great Preslav. The Greek emperor [John I Tzimiskes, 969-76] mustered a mighty host of his people and conquered the whole of Bulgaria which he subjected to his imperial rule. He then returned to his palace and relinquished command of his army.

XXXIII. [330] Tugemir succeeded to the kingdom. Having taken a wife he sired a son whom he named Chvalimir. At that time, among the race of Bulgars, a certain Samuel commanded that he be called emperor, fought many battles with the Greeks, and drove them completely from Bulgaria. During his reign the Greeks did not dare approach that land. [Samuel Kometopoulos, with his three brothers, rebelled in AD 976, was sole ruler of Bulgaria by 987, and proclaimed himself Tsar in 997-8. 'That Land' was centred on Ohrid and Prespa, in the modern Republic of Macedonia]

XXXVI. Once he had acceded to the kingdom, the young Vladislas matured into a wise and pious fellow. While Vladimir was still a youth ruling in his father's stead, the aforementioned Samuel, emperor of the Bulgars, mustered a mighty army which he led into the Dalmatian lands which lay beyond the territory of King Vladimir. The king, who was truly a holy man, did not want any of his people to die. Therefore, he withdrew humbly and, with all his people, climbed the Black Mountain (Crna Gora). Subsequently, when the emperor arrived he saw that he could not engage the king in battle. Therefore, he left part of his army at the foot of the mountain, and led the rest to attack the city of Ulcinj. Meanwhile, the venomous serpents which inhabited the Black Mountain did great damage, for they began to strike immediately, and whatever they bit died without delay, whether man or beast. So a weeping King Vladimir [332] offered up a prayer to the Lord, entreating the almighty to spare his people from such a pestilential demise. The Lord heard his servant's prayer, and from that day forward none were struck down. Indeed, until the present day if man or beast is bitten by a snake on that mountain he survives healthy and without any other injury. From the day that St. Vladimir prayed until today, it has been as if the snakes on that mountain have no venom. The emperor [Samuel] sent messengers to King Vladimir to encourage him and his followers to descend from the mountain, but the king declined. However, a zupan of that same place, like the traitor Judas sent a message to the emperor, stating: "Master, if it pleases your eminence, I will deliver the king to you"; to which the emperor replied: "if you manage to do this, know that I will make you rich and powerful". The king then gathered all the men with him, and spoke to them thus: "Dearest brethren, it seems fitting to me that I fulfil the adage of the evangelist, which states: 'the good shepherd devotes his being to his flock'. Therefore, brothers, it is better that I devote my being to all of you and deliver my body voluntarily for butchery [333] or slaughter, and thereby deliver you from famine or the sword". After he had said this, and much more he bade farewell to all and approached the emperor. Forthwith, the emperor sent him into exile to the territory of Ohrid, which is called Prespa, where that emperor had his court. Having regrouped his army, he [Samuel] persecuted a prolonged assault on Ulcinj, but failed to achieve anything of note. Consequently he flew into a rage, and proceeded to despoil, burn and plunder the whole of Dalmatia. He set fire to the cities of Lausium and Kotor, as well as villages throughout the whole of the province. It was as if the land was uninhabited. The emperor traversed the land destroying both maritime and mountainous regions as far as Zadar, before returning to his own land through Bosna and Rassa.

[334] Meanwhile, Vladimir was held in chains and offered supplication day and night, fasting and praying. An angel of the Lord appeared to him in a vision and comforted him with revelations of what would come to pass, how he would be liberated from his prison, and how, through his martyrdom, he would ascend to the heavenly kingdom and receive the everlasting crown and reward of eternal life. Galvanized by the angelic vision, St. Vladimir held forth with greater and greater prayers and fasts. It came to pass that Samuel's daughter, Cossara, was animated and inspired by a beatific soul. She approached her father and begged that she might go down with her maids and wash the head and feet of the chained captives. Her father granted her wish, so she descended and carried out her good work. Noticing Vladimir among the prisoners, she was struck by his handsome appearance, his humility, gentleness and modesty, and the fact that he was full of wisdom and knowledge of the lord. She stopped to talk to him, and to her his speech seemed sweeter than honey and [335] the honeycomb. Therefore, in no wise on account of lust, but rather profoundly affected by his youth and beauty, and since she heard that he was a king, the scion of royal blood, she desired him. Having bade him farewell, she was intent upon securing his release from bondage. She approached the emperor, threw herself at his feet and addressed him thus: "My Father, my lord, I know that you mean to present me with a husband, as is customary. Now, if it pleases your eminence, I would have you give me the king Vladimir whom you are holding in chains. You should know that I would rather die than accept another man". The emperor was overjoyed when he heard this, and granted her request because he loved his daughter deeply, and knew that Vladimir was of royal lineage. Immediately he sent for Vladimir, and ordered that he be brought before him bathed and clothed in the manner of a king. Then, gazing fondly upon him, and kissing him in front of the nobles of his kingdom, he gave his daughter to him for his wife. Having celebrated his daughter's marriage in a regal manner, the emperor made Vladislas a king, and gave him both the land of his patrimonial kingdom, and the whole territory of Dyrrachium. Then the emperor sent to Vladimir's uncle Dragimir, so that he might come down [from the Black Mountain] and receive the land [336] of Tribunia, where he might gather his people and settle there. This was done.

Therefore King Vladimir lived with his wife Cossara in all sanctity and chastity, worshipping God and serving him night and day, and he ruled the people entrusted to him in a Godfearing and just manner. Not long after the emperor Samuel died and his son Radomir acceded to the empire. This brave and courageous man waged numerous wars against the Greeks during the reign of the Greek emperor Basil, and conquered all the lands as far as Constantinople. [Samuel died 6 October 1014. After this Basil II rapidly recovered all the lands lost to Samuel and more. Clearly the account given here attributes too much to [Gabriel] Radomir as his father's successor. However, there is no reason to dismiss the whole episode as unreliable. Radomir may well have, indeed almost certainly would have fought alongside his father as he established his control over various Balkan lands. Cf. J. V. A. Fine, Early Medieval Balkans, pp. 193-8.] Therefore, fearing the loss of his empire, the emperor Basil secretly sent ambassadors to Vladislas, Radomir's cousin, who asked: "Why do you not avenge the blood of your father ? Take our gold and silver, as much as you desire to be at peace with us, and take Samuel's kingdom because he killed your father, his own brother. If you get the upper hand, kill his son Radomir, who now rules the kingdom". Vladislas consented to these words, and on an appointed day while Radomir was out hunting, he rode out with him and struck him dead. In this way Radomir died, and Vladislav, his murderer, ruled in his stead. [337] Once he had taken over the empire, he sent messengers to King Vladimir to demand his attendance. When Queen Cossara heard this she grabbed him saying: "My lord, do not go, lest - God forbid - he does to you as he did to my brother. Send me instead, so that I may see and hear what the king has in mind. If he wants to murder me, let him murder me, so long as you do not perish". Therefore, the queen willingly took her husband's place, and approached her cousin, who received her with honour, but under false pretences. Then, he once again sent messengers to the king, giving him a gold cross and [a pledge of] faith, and saying: "Why do you hesitate to come ? You can see that your wife is with me and has come to no harm. Rather, she is treated with honour by myself and my men. Accept my pledge on the cross and come, so that I might see you and you can return to your land with due honour, gifts and your wife". The king replied to him: "We believe that our Lord Jesus Christ, who died for us, was suspended not on a golden cross, but on a wooden one. Therefore, if both your faith and your words are true, send me a wooden cross in the hands of religious men, then in accordance with the belief and conviction of the Lord Jesus Christ, I will have faith in the life-giving cross and holy wood. I will come". So [the emperor] summoned [338] two bishops and a hermit and, concealing his bad faith from them, gave them the wooden cross and sent them to the king. When they reached the king they greeted him and gave him the oath and cross. Accepting the cross, the king prostrated himself on the ground in reverence, kissed it and clutched it to his chest. He then collected a few followers, and set off to the emperor.

Meanwhile the emperor had given instructions that ambushes be set along the route so that as the king passed by they would leap out from the roadside and kill him. However, almighty God, who had cared for His servant from his infancy, did not wish to remain dormant above these men, but sent His angels to guard them. Thus, as the king passed through the area of the ambushes, his enemies that he was accompanied by soldiers who appeared to have wings who were carrying trophies in their hands. When they realised that these were the Lord's angels all of them fled home. The king carried on to the emperor's court, at a place called Prespa. As soon as he arrived he offered prayers to the God on high, as was his custom. In this way the emperor realised that the king had arrived, and flew into a towering rage. He had been sure in his heart that he [the king] would be murdered en route, that is before he reached him, so that he should not [339] appear to be implicated in or consent to the death. [This was important] because he had given him [the king] his word, and entrusted the cross to the hands of the bishops and the hermit, so that he could set the ambushes for him along the route. Therefore, when he saw that his despicable deed had been exposed [Vladislav] sent swordsmen to decapitate him. While the king prayed the soldiers surrounded him. When the king noticed this he called to the bishops and hermit who were there and said: "My lords, what is this ? What have you done ? Why did you deceive me thus ? Why should I die blameless for having believed your words and oaths ?" They were so ashamed that they did not dare look him in the face. Next the king prayed and made his confession, received the body and blood of Christ, and taking in his hands the cross which he had obtained from the emperor, he said: "Pray for me my lords, and let this cross as well as you be my witness on the Day of Judgement that I died blameless". Then he kissed the cross, made peace with the bishops, and left the church as all around him wept. Immediately before the doors of the church he was struck down by the soldiers; he was beheaded on the 22nd May. The bishops carried his body into the church [340] and buried him amid hymns and paeans. Henceforth the Lord revealed the merits of the blessed martyr Vladimir, since on entering the church and praying at his tomb people with many afflictions were cured, and by night all could see a divine light as if many candles were burning there. His wife wept copious tears for St. Vladimir, more than can be told for many days. When the emperor saw what miracles the Lord performed there, he repented and so filled with terror that he allowed his cousin [Cossara] to take his body and bury it wherever she wished. So she took his body and transported it to a place known as Krajina, where his [Vladimir's] court was, and interred him in the church of St. Mary. His body lies intact and smells as if it were perfumed with many scents, holding the cross which he received from the emperor in his hand. Each year on his feast day many folk congregate in that church, and by his meritous intercession many benefices are granted to those who pray with a virtuous heart, right until the present day. Cossara, the wife of St. Vladimir, impelled by her moral purity (sanctimonialis effecta)[Could also mean became a nun. Cf. Butler, Monumenta Serbocroatica, p. 139.], lived a pious and holy life, and at her death was entombed in the same church at the feet of her husband.

[341] At the same time that the body of St. Vladimir was transported from Prespa to Krajina, the emperor Vladislav mustered an army and marched out to conquer the land of the blessed Vladimir and the city of Dyrrachium, which the emperor Basil had promised him in return for the murder he had perpetrated. One day, while he was encamped before Dyrrachium, he was tucking into a feast when a vision of St. Vladimir as an armed soldier appeared before him. He was shaken with fear, and began to cry at the top of his voice: "Guards, come at once, run and defend me from Vladimir, he wants to kill me". Saying this he leapt to his feet to flee. Immediately he was struck by the angel. He fell to the ground and both his body and soul expired. His nobles, soldiers and all of his people were struck with terror and foreboding. Setting fire to their camp they all fled that very night and made for their homes. So it came to pass that this most worthless killer, who had ordered that Vladimir be beheaded and thus made a martyr while he was sitting down to dine, was himself struck dead and joined Satan's angels at suppertime.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronicle_of_the_Priest_of_Duklja
So my question is: are you still denying that Croats called you Bulgarians or you just think Samuel wasnt ethnic Macedonian? If he was ethnic Macedonian why the Croats failed to see it? Why do they call you Bulgarian as your eastern neigbour?

Archduke
08-16-2012, 08:37 PM
Novi Pazar is going to be angry because of this. :D

ioan assen
08-16-2012, 08:39 PM
Mind you the author says "among the race of Bulgars" so obviously here Bulgars is in ethnic sense not political etc. crap that I ve seen here invented to justify why certain people were called Bulgarians.
Also I ve read from Novis serbian propaganda crap that the Greeks called the Macedonians Bulgarians because the Greeks couldnt distinguish Serboi and Bulgarians. So it turns out that a Croat - a slav couldnt also distinguish Serboi from Bulgarians and maybe thats why called the Macedonians Bulgarians (if they claim Samuel as theirs of course).

Novi Pazar
08-19-2012, 11:21 AM
Novi Pazar is going to be angry because of this. :D

I find it funny, l have nothing to lose here because TRUTH is on my side.

Novi Pazar
08-19-2012, 11:28 AM
Mind you the author says "among the race of Bulgars" so obviously here Bulgars is in ethnic sense not political etc. crap that I ve seen here invented to justify why certain people were called Bulgarians.
Also I ve read from Novis serbian propaganda crap that the Greeks called the Macedonians Bulgarians because the Greeks couldnt distinguish Serboi and Bulgarians. So it turns out that a Croat - a slav couldnt also distinguish Serboi from Bulgarians and maybe thats why called the Macedonians Bulgarians (if they claim Samuel as theirs of course).

Its because the name Bulgaria signified low, peasant, dirty and a barbarian. The Greeks viewed slavs as a second class and unfortunately they confused their words for common man and bulgar because they were similarly spelt and pronounced, hence why the called Macedonians wrongly as Bulgars.

The bad attachment it had to be called a Bulgar made Paisiy dumbfounded, he didn't understand why Bulgars were ashamed to be called a Bulgar. Songs were sung in dedication to the Bulgars that signified a bad harvest in Croatia-serbia-macedonia ;)

Nothing is propaganda from me, more will come, my topic: SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TERM BULGAR is near :)

poiuytrewq0987
08-19-2012, 11:36 AM
Its because the name Bulgaria signified low, peasant, dirty and a barbarian. The Greeks viewed slavs as a second class and unfortunately they confused their words for common man and bulgar because they were similarly spelt and pronounced, hence why the called Macedonians wrongly as Bulgars.

The bad attachment it had to be called a Bulgar made Paisiy dumbfounded, he didn't understand why Bulgars were ashamed to be called a Bulgar. Songs were sung in dedication to the Bulgars that signified a bad harvest in Croatia-serbia-macedonia ;)

Nothing is propaganda from me, more will come, my topic: SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TERM BULGAR is near :)

Your posts are of typical Novakovism calibre. You try to denigrate the Bulgarian name in hopes Bulgarians of Macedonian origin will not want to be associated with anything Bulgarian and sadly it did work because 1.3 million of them now identify as only Macedonian. Where is Stojan Novakovic's grave btw? I would like to deface it!

ioan assen
08-19-2012, 12:14 PM
Its because the name Bulgaria signified low, peasant, dirty and a barbarian.
Reread the source. Its says AMONG THE RACE (RACE, RACE) of the Bulgars. Obviously here the author (A CROAT) has ethnic Bulgarians in mind not "peasants". If he meant Serboi peasants why does he talks about their kings (Peter and Samuel). Shouldnt the Serboi peasants be subject to the SERF kings? Obviously here the Croats has an ethnicity in mind: Bulgars. And you CAN NOT SWAY its meaning no matter how hard you try!

The Greeks viewed slavs as a second class and unfortunately they confused their words for common man and bulgar because they were similarly spelt and pronounced, hence why the called Macedonians wrongly as Bulgars.
No connection with the Chronicle. Its not Greek, but CROATIAN. And surprise, surprise the Croats also thought that the Macedonians were Bulgars (mind you Croats are neighbours to Serboi and should be familiar with them, there is no excuse why they failed to see Serboi of Samuel! Plus they are SLAVS so they should know best!)


The bad attachment it had to be called a Bulgar made Paisiy dumbfounded, he didn't understand why Bulgars were ashamed to be called a Bulgar.
Again this shows your lack of INFO on Bulgarian history. The quote is provoked because alot of Bulgarians were hellenizing themselves. Its his critisms toward helenization. On the subject of Paiisii: I still wait for your answer: Your teory is that all Macedonians were Serboi before the Exarchate. The facts are the following: he is from Macedonia, lived centuries before the Exarchate and wrote the most patriotic Bulgarian book. Who influenced him, turn him into Bulgars centuries before the Exarchate??????????????

Songs were sung in dedication to the Bulgars that signified a bad harvest in Croatia-serbia-macedonia ;)
I dont know what Serboi sang but please provide proof about Macedonia: I highly doubt they sung in dedication to themselves that signified a bad harvest. There is no logic here as most of your "posts".



Nothing is propaganda from me, more will come, my topic: SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TERM BULGAR is near :)
Yes more laughs on your back. I guess its trilling to be the laughing stock of the forum, but you deserve it.

Novi Pazar
08-27-2012, 04:56 AM
This priest LMAO mentions that samuils empire rules over a people :picard1:

PS Another failure from the Bulgars, my, my

ioan assen
08-27-2012, 08:49 AM
This priest LMAO mentions that samuils empire rules over a people :picard1:

PS Another failure from the Bulgars, my, my

Or rather that among the race of Bulgars, a certain Samuel commanded that he be called emperor..... So he ruled over Macedonians (according to Macedonian historiography), yet the Croats calls those over which he ruled Bulgars. Thus Macedonians = Bulgars at that time. Plus they are called "race" which means there were ETHNICITY Bulgars.
Another failure from Novi :picard1:

Methmatician
08-27-2012, 09:43 AM
Sorry, but that Chronicle isn't considered reliable. It also refers to Duklja as Croatian land.

Novi Pazar
08-27-2012, 01:09 PM
Or rather that among the race of Bulgars, a certain Samuel commanded that he be called emperor..... So he ruled over Macedonians (according to Macedonian historiography), yet the Croats calls those over which he ruled Bulgars. Thus Macedonians = Bulgars at that time. Plus they are called "race" which means there were ETHNICITY Bulgars.
Another failure from Novi :picard1:

No, i'm no failure. The whole chronicle is flawed, c'mon, historically, the 1st Bulgar empire reaches Vardar Macedonia in the late 9th century....serbs by then were well established (250 years) in the region.

Lets see what people say about this failure:

Joannes Lucius, Dalmatian-Italian-Croatian historian/writer from the 17th century, translator of the Chronicle:

..he mixes areas, genealogy and archaeology so much that it is clear that he would rather write fairy tales than history..

Croatian-Yugoslavian historian Ferdo Šišić:

..The Priest's Chronicle is a part of worthless historical science...from the beginning of the 16th century numerous prominent notable and unknown self-styled writers have rewritten it.

Slavist historian Konstantin Jireček:

A Latin scripture with no title or ending, as it seems written by some priest from Bar in the last years of the reign of Emperor Michael (1160 - 1180) [..] Obviously this genealogy was invented somewhere in the vicinity of Bar, to magnify the glory of these small princes [..] In the entire Latin text there is not a single date. The writer has no capability to measure the lasting of past ages [..] The genealogy lacks a great majority of rulers that are known to us from writings, edicts, Papal, Venetian or Byzantine monuments; in their place a mass of names of which we have no confirmation at all in documents emerges. [..] The Doclean's chaos of seven generations in 20 years is unacceptable.

Austrian historians Johann Christian von Engel and Friedrich Crause, German historian Ernst Ludwig Dümmler and Croatian linguist Vatroslav Jagić claimed the Chronicle is entirely worthless as a whole as a historical source

So here we have it Ioan, its a failure! Now walk away in shame LMAO

ioan assen
08-27-2012, 08:47 PM
The chronicle is not a failure as far as Samuel kingdome goes: it is IN compliance with the other sources (Greek, Bulgarian) on Samuel so in that respect it is credible. No sources calls Samuels empire Serboian or his people Serboi.
Another failure of Novi

morski
08-28-2012, 12:05 PM
Novi is lying his ass off claiming Serbs have been established in MAcedonia 250 years before it was incorporated into FBE. There simply was no Serbs, neither Serbia at the time he points at.:D

Arbërori
08-28-2012, 12:22 PM
All my regards to the Bulgarian members! :coffee:
May thy Great Fyromian ''Serboman'' warriors finally establish a true ethnicity.

ioan assen
08-28-2012, 01:31 PM
Novi is lying his ass off claiming Serbs have been established in MAcedonia 250 years before it was incorporated into FBE. There simply was no Serbs, neither Serbia at the time he points at.:D
Yes, the Serboi are described in Administratio Imperio as people settling on the Balkans in 630. The people in what was Macedonia are described as different slavic tribes, Bulgars and some mixed people (Bulgaro-romans of Kuber). Thats it. Practically the same people as in Bulgaria: Slavs, Bulgars and some ex Roman citizens of Thracian origin :):cool: