Log in

View Full Version : Indian DNA in Russia.



evon
10-30-2012, 09:54 PM
So this thread is going to be dedicated to investigating the Indian connection to Russians and Russian based peoples (especially Volga Tatars) that has been slightly touched on over at 23andme.com.

I thought i would open a thread here on TA first since i need critics to spot flaws in my logic and evidence, so please, if you see any, let the heads rolls :D

The theory is based on a few points which i will investigate further as time goes by;

- Indian 4gp Ancestry finder (shared DNA segments with people of various nationalities) cousins among peoples in Russia (Especially Volga Tatars), my own family connection to both Volga Tatars and India, which i assume is related to this theory, and hence give me a great opportunity to investigate it using all means available to me, such as Relative finder matches (Usually larger segments then Ancestry finder).

- Known Instances of Indians in Russian history, i will focus on Indian merchants, and Roma primarily, will also check out potential Central Asian links in this regard.



Firstly lets present the evidence at hand today:


My family's Indian 4gp matches (My grandmother and me from left to right, in that order):
http://imageshack.us/a/img89/3327/66001939.jpg

Historical presence of Indian Merchants in Russia:


INDIAN PRESENCE IN ASTRAKHAN

Archival records reveal that the Indian presence in Russia dates back to the 17th century when Astrakhan, a trading-port in the delta of the Volga river by the Caspian Sea was incorporated into Moscow state. By then, Indian traders had reached as far as Isfahan in Persia, Kizlyar in the North Caucasus and Astrakhan in Russia.

The Archives in Astrakhan, Moscow and St. Petersburg contain significant information on the activity of Indian merchants and artisans. We learn that the first Indians from Sindh and Multan arrived in Russian Astrakhan in 1615-1616. In 1624 a special trading post for Indian merchants was erected in Astrakhan along with separate posts for Armenian and Persian merchants.

Historical records show that at one point more than one hundred Indian merchants and their servants lived in the region. They were dealers in Astrakhan textiles, jewelry and medicines. In 1645 an Indian merchant dared to go as far as Kazan and Moscow, trading his goods with great success. As a result, 25 more Indian traders came to Astrakhan via Persia. In 1650 Indian merchants sold their goods in Yaroslavl, not far from Moscow. Thereafter the Russian Tsar, Alexei Mikhaylovich, invited Indian artisans to Moscow to introduce a textile industry there.

An English traveler named Forster has described Indians who traveled from India to Astrakhan to propagate their religion – Buddhism, Hinduism and Zorastrianism. An Armenian merchant refers to Indians there as cow-worshippers, suggesting that they were mostly Hindus and not Muslims. The Russian archives too contain information on certain Indians who had their living quarters and a temple, along with a trading center, in Astrakhan. There are records of Indians marrying Soviet Tartar women.

Although Moscow allowed Indian traders to follow their religious rites, including that of cremation of dead bodies, and a Hindu temple existed in the city, the number of professing Hindus diminished and some of them were converted to Islam. Others, however, retained their Hindu faith. They even poured water from the Ganges into the Volga, and considered the Volga as their local Ganges since that ceremony. They freely prayed to their gods and conducted religious rituals despite hostility from Muslims and Christians who considered them as pagans. Moscow had given the local administrative head instruction to allow Hindus to follow their rites of passage.

By the early 18th century Indian merchants lived not only in Astrakhan, but also in Moscow. Russian chroniclers reported the presence of Hindu traders in Moscow in the18th century.

Along with the expansion of their trade to central Russia and to the capital city of St. Petersburg many Hindu traders converted to Orthodox Christianity. It was common for them to acquire Russian Christian names and surnames. In 1740s we have several records of ‘Russian Indians’ with surnames Ivanov, Feodorov etc. Later on they were assimilated into the Russian population. It may be surmised that some Russians from Astrakhan with typical Russian surnames but somewhat South Asian features may have Indian ancestors. Yet, in the 19th century few of the locals there could claim Indian heritage.

Indian diamond trade was known then in Moscow and St. Petersburg. While it is impossible to speak of a continued Indian presence, Astrakhan Indians are known to have dispersed to Kazan, Moscow, and St. Petersburg and their descendents became assimilated, although, it may be assumed that some families of ‘Russian Indians’ still keep memories of their South Asian ancestors.

The Soviet era also witnessed the emergence of an Indian Communist community in Moscow and Leningrad in 1920s-1930s. From the mid-1950s onwards significant numbers of Indian students began attending educational institutions in Moscow, Leningrad, Sverdlovsk, Kursk etc. A few managed to remain in Russia after completing their education. They did not form a diaspora, and the temporary presence of Indians in major Russian cities was not questioned because of strict immigration and residence rules.

The situation however changed with the collapse of the Soviet Union. Although economic hardships made post-Soviet Russia unattractive for foreign students who depended on stipends, the wealthy and the adventurous found Russian conditions suitable, especially since Russian immigration and residence rules were lax. As a result the new wave of Indians who came were mostly students. But only the medical students made education their primary aim; the others found an opportunity to combine their study abroad with a small business, often in retailing, which they would continue after graduation.

That was how an increase in Indians -- some of them successful and rich, others petty traders -- came about in the Russian Federation. Rich Indian businessmen were involved in tea and garments trade, construction industry, and most recently have invested in St. Petersburg and Moscow breweries. New projects involve Indian investment in Russian oil fields, particularly in Sakhalin Island in the Russian Far East and in steel production.

http://www.indolink.com/displayArticleS.php?id=111904091126

Now looking at my own collected records of North Eurasian ties from a few months ago (its not been updated since, but will update it probably within 2012):

-Norwegian samples with Ties across Eurasia; 21, samples with matches in India/Pakistan; 8.

-Volga Tatar samples with ties across Eurasia; 5, samples with matches in India/Pakistan; 3.

-Faeroese sample 1, Indian segments 1.

Relative finder matches from my own family that is potentially Indian/Volga Tatar in origin;

-Multiple cousins with mtDNA linage G2a (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_G_%28mtDNA%29) (one confirmed Volga Tatar).

-A cousin with YDNA O1a1* (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_O1_%28Y-DNA%29).

-A cousin with YDNA D1* (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_D1_%28Y-DNA%29).

-Multiple cousins with mtDNA R1a (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_R_%28mtDNA%29).

plus, various other matches with Eurasian YDNA and mtDNA linages that i will add later, need a break now:)

beaver
10-30-2012, 10:09 PM
among peoples in Russia (Especially Volga Tatars)
Russian = Volga Tatars? Whats going with your head? See genetic maps everythere and you will find that Russians = Poles from the genetical point of view. Idiotic statement = Indians are equal to Russians and particularly to Volga Tatars. The Indians are equal to Poles, Russians, Lithuanians would be more or less discussable and with great problems on the road.

evon
10-30-2012, 10:20 PM
Russian = Volga Tatars? Whats going with your head? See genetic maps everythere and you will find that Russians = Poles from the genetical point of view. Idiotic statement = Indians are equal to Russians and particularly to Volga Tatars. The Indians are equal to Poles, Russians, Lithuanians would be more or less discussable and with great problems on the road.

You missed my points it seems, i never said that Volga Tatars are Indians or closer to Indians then anyone else in North Eurasia, what i said is that there seem to be a link between many Volga Tatars and Indians in the 23andme database, found in the form of matching segments.
We are not talking about admixture % or genetics maps, we are talking about chunks of DNA that is evidence of shared ancestry between two individuals within the last centuries, likely at maximum 750 years at the oldest, here between various North Eurasian peoples and Indian peoples.

beaver
10-30-2012, 10:31 PM
Russians and particularly to Volga Tatars.
Evon stop this bullshit

You missed my points it seems,
Dont say that Russians=Volga Tatars. This is one of your points. What do want to learn in this strong theme (PraIE) with such initial idiotic points? Read forums for beginning.

Sophie
10-30-2012, 10:31 PM
Maybe it is not "Indian DNA" in Russia, but Turkic/Mongolian DNA that is common to both places because of historical empires like Mughals, Khazars, etc

I think it would make more sense.

beaver
10-30-2012, 10:36 PM
Maybe it is not "Indian DNA" in Russia, but Turkic/Mongolian DNA that is common to both places because of historical empires like Mughals, Khazars, etc
Fuck, absolutely new in the theme? Or you love to footle?

evon
10-30-2012, 10:52 PM
Evon stop this bullshit

Dont say that Russians=Volga Tatars. This is one of your points. What do want to learn in this strong theme (PraIE) with such initial idiotic points? Read forums for beginning.

Again you missed my point, i never said that Tatars are Russians, i said they are a Russian based people. From my own investigations Volga Tatars have much more frequent Indian segments then other Russian based peoples, such as ethnic Russians.

Maybe you are having problems with the translation or something as you keep misunderstanding me everytime you post :confused:


Maybe it is not "Indian DNA" in Russia, but Turkic/Mongolian DNA that is common to both places because of historical empires like Mughals, Khazars, etc

I think it would make more sense.

I dont see how that would make more sense given we have historical records to show the presence of Indians along the Volga especially, and noteworthy within a fitting time frame for these DNA segments, Most of the historical empires that are linked to say Turkic speaking peoples are likely too old for these segments, unless we are dealing with "hotspot" segments, which i dont think we are for the most part.

The problem with looking for Turko-Mongol connections is that these people to my knowledge was only present in India as a ruling elite and did not mingle with the populous much, the other problem is that one would then expect to find matching segments in China, Iran and various Central and North Asian countries, but its not really the case, there are no recorded Chinese segments among my Volga Tatar samples, which is odd given its a much closer in geography, and should then be present at a more frequent number then the Indian segments. There are a good number of Iranian segments, but i dont know if they function as a proxy for anything or if they are related to their own connections to Russia in terms of trade and migration?

When using my own family and various other Norwegians also, ive tried to find a pattern in them that i could make sense of, and using Volga Tatars as a link in that chain between Scandinavia and South Asia, so far ive found links between Norway and East Asia via Volga Tatars, but i have not done much research on this yet, i will try to see if Polako over at Eurogenes and John at Gedmatch.com might be interested in collaborating on these mysteries of these connections?as i noted Polako's interested over at 23andme.com already.

Anglojew
10-30-2012, 10:54 PM
Could be the result of Slavic/"Aryan" invasion of India too.

evon
10-30-2012, 10:55 PM
Could be the result of Slavic/"Aryan" invasion of India too.

such migration theories are too old to be relevant for such DNA segments as i am talking about...they are likely max 750 years old, probably around 500 though..

Sophie
10-30-2012, 11:01 PM
Could be the result of Slavic/"Aryan" invasion of India too.

India was never invaded by Slavs

beaver
10-30-2012, 11:07 PM
Maybe you are having problems with the translation or something as you keep misunderstanding me everytime you post
I understand all what you write and I understand that you know nothing in the theme

Again you missed my point, i never said that Tatars are Russians, i said they are a Russian based people.
What is Russian based then? Have you ever seen genetic maps with Tatars and Russian? Or maybe I should upload these for you?

evon
10-30-2012, 11:09 PM
I understand all what you write and I understand that you know nothing in the theme

What is Russian based then? Have you ever seen genetic maps with Tatars and Russian? Or maybe I should upload these for you?


Russian based means someone who lives within Russia (a minority in Russia, such as also, Udmurts, Ezyra, Chuvash, ect ect), its clearly a miscommunication issue from where i am sitting...

beaver
10-30-2012, 11:13 PM
Could be the result of Slavic/"Aryan" invasion of India too.
Sorry, guys, what to discuss with such knowledges? Slavic/Aryans? When and where?

beaver
10-30-2012, 11:23 PM
Russian based means someone who lives within Russia (a minority in Russia, such as also, Udmurts, Ezyra, Chuvash, ect ect), its clearly a miscommunication issue from where i am sitting...
No. Russians came from the Central Euro and they are the same what they were then. All people you counted - aborigines of the Eastern-Europe plain to the moment. But this is a part of more complicated and very interesting history. But if you begin from "Russians and particularly Tatars". Please go.

evon
10-30-2012, 11:26 PM
No. Russians came from the Central Euro and they are the same what they were then. All people you counted - aborigines of the Eastern-Europe plain to the moment. But this is a part of more complicated and very interesting history. But if you begin from "Russian and particularly Tatars". Please go.

See, its a miscommunication. :bored:

beaver
10-30-2012, 11:39 PM
See, its a miscommunication.
Yeah, "the Sun and particularly the Moon" is a miscommunication. I will never understand you in this way. Ok, I'm an idiot then.

StonyArabia
10-30-2012, 11:42 PM
I would bet it's assimilated Roma and some Indian merchant/trade.

Gustavsson
10-30-2012, 11:47 PM
Rather Slavs invaded India, not Indians invaded Slavs lol.

Sophie
10-30-2012, 11:49 PM
Russians have plently of Turkic ancestry. In fact, a good amount more than Anatolian Turks which is reflected in their East Eurasian pull on genetic plots.



http://www.zackvision.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/sister-bga-1.png



Dodecad Globe4

Turkish_D
European 88
Asian 9.2
African 0.7
Amerindian 2.1


Russian_D
European 87.7
Asian 2
African 0
Amerindian 10.3



Note that "Amerindian" is genetically more East Eurasian than the "Asian" component based on fst distances.

StonyArabia
10-30-2012, 11:51 PM
Rather Slavs invaded India, not Indians invaded Slavs lol.

The Aryans were rather more Baltic like than Slavic, if Balts lack this Indian admixture, this means that Russians have recent Indian ancestry and is probably via trade routes or assimilated Rroma/Roma.

beaver
10-31-2012, 12:21 AM
The Aryans were rather more Baltic like than Slavic
Yeah! At least one good statement :)

Sājāja bramaņi
Augstajā kalnā,
Sakāra zobenus
Svētajā kokā.
Svētajam kokam
Deviņi zari,
Ik zara galā
Deviņi ziedi,
Ik zieda galā
Deviņas ogas.


Построчный перевод:

Sа-jāja с предлогом -са у глагола скакать нет соответствия в русском,примерно:

Прискакали с раных сторон (отовсюду)что бы собраться браманы
На Высокую гору
Повесили мечи
На свещенном дереве (на дерево).
У Священного дерева
Девять ветвей,
На конце каждой ветви
Девять цветов,
На конце каждого цветка
Девять ягод.
CircassianWine, do you speak Russian? Do you see bramani (brahman) in this Latvian daina?

evon
10-31-2012, 09:46 AM
I would bet it's assimilated Roma and some Indian merchant/trade.

I am planning to investigate the possibility of Roma as a prime source, or as one of many links behind these segments..but that will take more time as i would have to check for Indian segments across Europe in order to look for historical Roma settelemts ect.

evon
10-31-2012, 09:48 AM
Russians have plently of Turkic ancestry. In fact, a good amount more than Anatolian Turks which is reflected in their East Eurasian pull on genetic plots.



http://www.zackvision.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/sister-bga-1.png



Dodecad Globe4

Turkish_D
European 88
Asian 9.2
African 0.7
Amerindian 2.1


Russian_D
European 87.7
Asian 2
African 0
Amerindian 10.3



Note that "Amerindian" is genetically more East Eurasian than the "Asian" component based on fst distances.

As i have already noted, we are not talking about admixture or a nationwide Indian presence in Russia here, we are talking about a few individuals with Indian ancestry from one or more ancestors whom might be linked to historical events such as Indian traders settling in various cities...Also by extension a few Scandinavian individuals with both Volga Tatar and Indian segment matches.

evon
10-31-2012, 09:55 AM
Yeah, "the Sun and particularly the Moon" is a miscommunication. I will never understand you in this way. Ok, I'm an idiot then.

You did misunderstand and you continue to do so, it seems you think i am talking about all Russians as having Indian ancestry, and that you think i called Volga Tatars and other minorities Russians ect, which is all nonsense as i never said anything like that, we are dealing with a FEW individuals who live in Russia, that have PROVEN, DNA ties to some Indians, i am merely trying to find the source for this connection between these individuals..but you would have known all this had you read my original post correctly, which you clearly did not. But its not about being an idiot, its about miscommunication and language barriers.

evon
10-31-2012, 10:12 AM
Potentially it would look something like this:

http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/1641/eurasian.png

Now later today i am planning to check one of my grandmothers matching Indians Ancestry finder score for any traces, also look for public profiles among the Indians with shared segments in Europe at large, to see if they want to share and thus help me look for patterns, but first i need to hit the gym.

beaver
10-31-2012, 10:44 AM
You did misunderstand and you continue to do so, it seems you think i am talking about all Russians as having Indian ancestry, and that you think i called Volga Tatars and other minorities Russians ect, which is all nonsense as i never said anything like that, we are dealing with a FEW individuals who live in Russia, that have PROVEN, DNA ties to some Indians, i am merely trying to find the source for this connection between these individuals..but you would have known all this had you read my original post correctly, which you clearly did not. But its not about being an idiot, its about miscommunication and language barriers.
Just dont say such things as "Russians and especially Tatars", "Tatars are Russian-based people" and there will be no language barriers. I had hard times discussing the PIE problem with Russians on Russian forums (can there be the "language barriers"?). What do you want to understand for yourself? Indian DNA in Russia (some Indian came to Russia) literally? Its of no interest for me but can be a theme. Or what? I'm interested in about 2000 b.c and when and from there Aryans went to India? But I wouldnt like to discuss my points with a man talking about "Tatars are Russian-based people" (from the anthro point of view).

beaver
10-31-2012, 10:55 AM
And, Evon, I really cannot perceive non-scientific/ non-technical texts in English too quickly, its truth.

evon
10-31-2012, 05:45 PM
Just dont say such things as "Russians and especially Tatars", "Tatars are Russian-based people" and there will be no language barriers. I had hard times discussing the PIE problem with Russians on Russian forums (can there be the "language barriers"?). What do you want to understand for yourself? Indian DNA in Russia (some Indian came to Russia) literally? Its of no interest for me but can be a theme. Or what? I'm interested in about 2000 b.c and when and from there Aryans went to India? But I wouldnt like to discuss my points with a man talking about "Tatars are Russian-based people" (from the anthro point of view).

Facts:

-"Volga Tatars are a Russian based people" (ethnic minority in Russia), see:
Мы находимся в этом городе. (google translation of the term based).

-"Russians and Especially Tatars", meaning Tatars have more Indian segments among my samples then ethnic Russians.

Yes, it seems its of no interest to you as you said above, because this thread is about individual Indian people coming to Russia since the 1600's. so if you have no interest in that, this is not the thread for you ;) why dont you make another thread if you want to talk about languages shift theories going back to 200 bc ect.. ?

So are we in an agreement then?

evon
10-31-2012, 06:24 PM
Ive looked at my grandmothers public Indian match, he has only one other European 4gp match, which is British (might be a Indian whos grandparents are born in UK?), the rest are Indian, Pakistani and a few US matches, now i just hope the new ancestry painting will help out.

beaver
10-31-2012, 06:32 PM
There are no two different words for Russians-nationality and Russians - inhabitants of Russia so a nigger living in Russia will be Russian and Russian-based person in your words. This is really of no interest to me.

Sophie
10-31-2012, 10:55 PM
As i have already noted, we are not talking about admixture or a nationwide Indian presence in Russia here, we are talking about a few individuals with Indian ancestry from one or more ancestors whom might be linked to historical events such as Indian traders settling in various cities...Also by extension a few Scandinavian individuals with both Volga Tatar and Indian segment matches.

I'm wasn'ttalking about Indian ancestry. I don't think Russians have Indian ancestry.

evon
11-04-2012, 05:22 PM
This is my lastest mind-map of the matches found in Norwegians:

http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/636/ties1w38vra2.jpg


I think the Volga Tatar matches are largely regional European matches...i will make a similar mind-map for Volga Tatars ect next week..

Here is also a mind-map of my family's matches that are either confirmed or suspected exotic matches (colour coded, Blue Eurasia, Red Caucasus, Pink South Asia):

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/9831/volgaindia1w38vhld.jpg