Aryans - Culture Bearers to China

[Folkvar]

I always wondered how the Chinese (mongoloid race) had created such an advanced ancient civilization.

This explains everything;
http://www.tomatobubble.com/chinamummies.html





T9ppqQ_r1dQ

[archangel]

lol aryan means noble in south asian language and have nothing to do with you wannabe nazis:)

[Folkvar]

lol aryan means noble in south asian language and have nothing to do with you wannabe nazis:)

:picard2:

[Siberian Cold Breeze]

Default Aryans - Culture Bearers to China
I always wondered how the Chinese (mongoloid race) had created such an advanced ancient civilization.

This explains everything;:picard2::picard1::picard2:

[SabirHunOgur]

The europid race in Asia is hungarian, later uyghur (means hungarian too)

https://www.google.hu/search?q=blonde+uyghurs&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:hu:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=hu&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=s9QSUfDiHIe0tAa-2YGwCg&biw=1024&bih=556&sei=ttQSUeGHAs2Thgfy8IG4Dg

[Xenomorph]

The Tocharians had a relatively advanced civilization that interacted with China and other neighboring cultures, but it by no means brought civilization to East Asia.

If advanced culture was the sole invention of Aryans, then Europe should have been filled with complex, urban societies in the 1000s B.C. This of course wasn't the case, and with the exception of the Roman period, most of Europe remained the backwater of Eurasia until about the late fifteenth century.

[Dombra]

East asia is the other uber mensh point. Deal with it.
Does Uyhur mean Hungarian?

[evon]

If advanced culture was the sole invention of Aryans, then Europe should have been filled with complex, urban societies in the 1000s B.C. This of course wasn't the case, and with the exception of the Roman period, most of Europe remained the backwater of Eurasia until about the late fifteenth century.

Actually this is misleading, the main reason Europe was not as advanced as say those regions further south in the levant is for one main reason; climate ,and hence the low population numbers found in europe was due to the climate, it was impossible until quite late in history for Europe to rival the near east in the level of productivity of the soil, because in Europe the soil is much heavier and so the near eastern tools would not work, so it was impossible to sustain a large population needed for urbanization and a complex culture of the nature found in the near east...

The main reason Rome could sustain its large population was its access to Egypt and in the early era to Sicily, which basically fed the empire and especially the capital..

I think the thread is another one of those rubbish racist oriented ideals, which fed on the Romantic nationalist ideas of the 1800's that belong in ruins of the Nazi reich.

China has been one of the most advanced cultural regions since the ancient era, rivalling those found in the near east and south Asia, and its connected with the climate zones these civilizations arose in, China has been a civilization since around the rise of the early dynasties (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynasties_in_Chinese_history) in about 2800-2000 BCE, and hence is one of the oldest and one of the longest continuous civilization in the world. It's advanced nature comes from two main things, climate and perfect rivers making cultivation and harvest very large and stable, thus making way for a large population, and with more minds comes more ideas ect ect...
If you look at how millions of people died during the warring states period (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warring_States_Period), you get an idea of the large numbers when the estimates run into 10 million causalities, in a world with around 200 million..

[Sky earth]

Chinese people are more superior than Tocharians deal with it:D. I think the fate of the Tocharians was to be assimilated by Turkic steppe nomads

[Anglojew]

Although I think that that IndoEuropeans probably did introduce a lot to China it could be the other way too. I'm sure the Chinese introduced a lot to the IndoEuros. Say what you want about the Chinese they can't be described as unintelligent.

I already did a thread on this;

http://theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=67590&highlight=mummies

[Colonel Frank Grimes]

I always wondered how the Chinese (mongoloid race) had created such an advanced ancient civilization.

This explains everything;
http://www.tomatobubble.com/chinamummies.html

It doesn't explain much. Where these folks lived wasn't the cradle of Chinese civilization. These super Aryan mummies lived in an area that would later be on the fringe of Chinese civilization. The roots of said civilization is further east.

[Hayalet]

It doesn't explain much. Where these folks lived wasn't the cradle of Chinese civilization. These super Aryan mummies lived in an area that would later be on the fringe of Chinese civilization. The roots of said civilization is further east.
Exactly.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/54/Territories_of_Dynasties_in_China.gif

[d3cimat3d]

China got it's first taste of horse and chariot riding from the Scythians who settled in the Ordos desert (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordos_culture). Tocharians had nothing to do with China's success.

[Saruman]

I always wondered how the Chinese (mongoloid race) had created such an advanced ancient civilization.

This explains everything;
http://www.tomatobubble.com/chinamummies.html



Explains little. Chinese have their own advanced sub-race North Sinids, they created and were bearers of Sinid civilization.
http://www.taijiren.cn/UploadFile/UserHead/20091016150922898.jpg

http://www.a.com.cn/uploads/allimg/120809/9-120PZ95625408.jpg


"Aryans" are honorable and noble and that means not stealing, lying and making preposterous claims. It's impossible that for ex. Max Von Sydow would have made such claims if he was informed in any meaningful way.