Dravidians: Caucasoid or Australoids? [Archive] - The Apricity Forum: A European Cultural Community

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 06:44 AM

Sometimes I think why some anthropologist classify them as Australoid when their facial and bone structure look Caucasoid to me, aside from their dark skin they do not look anything like the Australian aborigines or Negrito.

They have straight prominent nose
They have straight hair
They have facial hair
They have body hair
They have beards

A albino DRAVIDIAN can even look European.

I see Dravidian everyday, If you bleach them they can end up looking like a Iranian
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45642000/jpg/_45642333_007141002-1.jpg
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/4345/610xjew.jpg

http://thuppahi.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/1003432-16x9-340x191-tamil-refugees2.jpg
http://www.psheshadri.com/gallery/atithi/wgc_media/photos/Prakash%20Rai.jpg
http://www.nation.lk/edition/media/k2/items/cache/b111a6b1c4f6bc81572a17be5e6326d4_XL.jpg
http://harpymarx.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/dscn502736030001.jpg?w=652

Albino dravidian
http://www.noopooh.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/indian8.png
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Young_blond_man.jpg/250px-Young_blond_man.jpg
http://8020.photos.jpgmag.com/3013025_224562_857422dda5_m.jpg

Anglojew

02-25-2013, 06:47 AM

Is that blonde guy really an albino Dravidian?

I understood they were classified as Caucasians?

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 06:50 AM

Let me just say they are genetically unrelated with other Australoids and are very distant from Africans. Their features are type of Veddoid which can be considered Australoid phenotypes of different variations.

These are veddas the origin of Dravidians, they are 100% pure ASI while the Dravidians are like 70-90% ASI

In my opinion even they look kind of Caucasoidish.
http://www.bestoflanka.com/images/index/mainAnimation/veddas.jpg
http://www.7wow.by/control_files/Image/veddas.jpg
http://b.vimeocdn.com/ts/185/961/185961354_640.jpg

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 06:52 AM

The problem is some anthropologist consider them caucasoid, while other consider them veddoid which is according to them Australoid but totally unrelated with other Australoids.

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 06:56 AM

Is that blonde guy really an albino Dravidian?

I understood they were classified as Caucasians?

Yes, here's more

http://lh4.ggpht.com/-PLyoy5x0GKk/UB9kPp_u-AI/AAAAAAAANpc/PIXx9zYvN6E/2012-07-26-Rising-Star-Outreach-5741.jpg?imgmax=800
http://farm1.staticflickr.com/207/535559954_3965ce90fe_z.jpg?zz=1

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 07:12 AM

Here's the last of what I found.

What greater evidence than this?

http://www.whatsonshenzhen.com/news_images/42f989c377761aafeb0eba7e_worlds%20biggest%20albino %20clan3.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/03/07/article-2111298-120DB142000005DC-984_306x423.jpg
http://www.mizozo.com/images/item_images/43000/42469_gallery.jpg

StonyArabia

02-25-2013, 07:16 AM

The Veddahs/Dravidians are proto-Caucasoids.

DebtCollector

02-25-2013, 07:16 AM

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Young_blond_man.jpg/250px-Young_blond_man.jpg

Is this a joke? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Two_blond_males.jpg
Two blond males, of Baltic and Scandinavian descent, respectively.

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 07:21 AM

Is this a joke? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Two_blond_males.jpg

I wonder why his picture showed up in google images when I typed " Albino Dravidians " ?

Google is so shit sometimes.

http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01465/SNN0621GG-532_1465215a.jpg

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 07:28 AM

Strange...... I wonder why this Indian have blonde hair and green eyes yet have such a dark skin tone, it seems to me he is a mixture rather a albino

http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/7620/indian49864mg.jpg

Dravidian albino
http://picturestack.com/821/48/z30Picture1YkJ.png

Pakistani albino, they look so different.

http://topnews.in/law/files/aslam-parvez.jpg

asingh

02-25-2013, 07:29 AM

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 07:32 AM

^^
Butler, can you not still tell an Albino from an Europid/oid. The Albino's do not look normal, and have this weird spaced out look on their face, and the "whiteness"; which you are trying to correlate is different.

Yes, they do have little strange features on the nose and some part of the face but they certainly look far more EUROPEAN and CAUCASIAN than any North Indian.

If you were to compare what race these albino look like..... I can only tell you.... EUROPEAN.

asingh

02-25-2013, 07:33 AM

Google is so shit sometimes.

Well, bro, at least you can take the liberty to be logical before you cherry-pick. Right. :)

asingh

02-25-2013, 07:35 AM

If you were to compare what race these albino look like..... I can only tell you.... EUROPEAN.

Albino's hardly resemble any race per say. Apart from where they originate. Skin color is not all there is to it. You are trying to equate a disorder to normalcy. How stupid that sounds. Seriously.

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 07:39 AM

Albino's hardly resemble any race per say. Apart from where they originate. Skin color is not all their is to it. You are trying to equate a disorder to normalcy. How stupid that sounds. Seriously.

Yeah right, try asking a random British Indian what this guy looks like the most?
http://picturestack.com/821/48/z30Picture1YkJ.png

asingh

02-25-2013, 07:45 AM

Yeah right, try asking a random British Indian what this guy looks like the most?

You can carry on with trying to map a disorder with a healthy phenotype, my "random British Indian". Either you are retarded or an Albino yourself for doing all this utter stupidity and nonsense on this forum. Idiotic threads like this should be deleted immediately, cause they add nothing to the forum. If you can post a full blown Europid in midst of your OP, which has Indians, and he sticks out like a sore thumb, and then blame it on Google images (a machine is never wrong); what more can you be called. Troll.

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 07:53 AM

You can carry on with trying to map a disorder with a healthy phenotype, my "random British Indian". Either you are retarded or an Albino yourself for doing all this utter stupidity and nonsense on this forum. Idiotic threads like this should be deleted immediately, cause they add nothing to the forum. If you can post a full blown Europid in midst of your OP, which has Indians, and he sticks out like a sore thumb, and then blame it on Google images (a machine is never wrong); what more can you be called. Troll.

What the heck is retarded here? Or are you acting all pissed just like in the Aryan invasion threads? I'm asking you what will a random British Indian think when seeing these pictures? Don't tell me you think they look or resemble anything like your North Indian Ghandi or whatever.

Stick out like a sore thumb you say? SHOULD WE WE SEE?

Here are your typical North Indian
http://www.brahminsmatrimony.com/images/marry-a-sunni.jpg

Here are albino Africans
http://media.nowpublic.net/images//25/d/25dfdc46225605e2f760ef7277375814.jpg

Here are freaking Europeans who you say don't look like them? Keep dreaming.
http://www.colourbox.com/preview/1011218-60019-.jpg

asingh

02-25-2013, 08:13 AM

What the heck is retarded here? Or are you acting all pissed of just like in your Aryan invasion threads? I'm asking you what will a random British Indian think when seeing these pictures? Don't tell they look or resemble anything like your North Indian Ghandi or whatever.

Stick out like a sore thumb you say? SHOULD WE WE SEE?

Dumb-ass. If the Random British, is in charge of his faculties, he will also call those people what they are. An Indian couple, African kids with a disorder, and an European women. You fucking idiot, I was saying the same thing: Those Indian Albino's you posted, will look like Indids, and not Europoid even. How can you be so idiotic. Look at those Albino kids "white", and the Blond womens "whiteness". Is it not different...? Do not the kids looks, demented and spaced out...? (Sorry to say) Anyone can tell the difference, except you and your arm chair pseudo-science. If you think those African children resemble the blond European, hit your head on the wall or smoke some weed, to come back to normalcy.

And regarding the Aryan Invasion threads. I have never ever created one in my life. So shut up, good you were kicked out of ABF, Troll King. If you cannot tell the difference between an Albino/Indid/Europiod -you- should not even be allowed to create an ID here.

I meant this dude:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Young_blond_man.jpg/250px-Young_blond_man.jpg

You posted him in the middle (smack down); with Indids. He is fucking looking weird in there. Plus he is not even Albino, fool. Did you get temporary blindness or screen glare stigma when posting him. So shut up, with this dumb assary of yours.

And by the way, Gandhi (if you mean MohanDas K. Gandhi), was not North Indian. So fuck off again, Troll King. Or whatever you do as your past time, apart from arm-chair Albino studies.

**And when are sure of yourself then post a reply. You changed that Indian couple to a darker shade..he he. What a looser you are. I had all ready picked up your thread for a reply, and then now see; you have changed it. Moron.

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 08:27 AM

Dumb-ass. If the Random British, is in charge of his faculties, he will also call those people what they are. An Indian couple, African kids with a disorder, and an European women. You fucking idiot, I was saying the same thing: Those Indian Albino's you posted, will look like Indids, and not Europoid even. How can you be so idiotic. Look at those Albino kids "white", and the Blond womens "whiteness". Is it not different...? Do not the kids looks, demented and spaced out...? (Sorry to say) Anyone can tell the difference, except you and your arm chair pseudo-science. If you think those African children resemble the blond European, hit your head on the wall or smoke some weed, to come back to normalcy.

And regarding the Aryan Invasion threads. I have never ever created one in my life. So shut up, good you were kicked out of ABF, Troll King. If you cannot tell the difference between an Albino/Indid/Europiod -you- should not even be allowed to create an ID here.

I meant this dude:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Young_blond_man.jpg/250px-Young_blond_man.jpg

You posted him in the middle (smack down); with Indids. He is fucking looking weird in there. Plus he is not even Albino, fool. Did you get temporary blindness or screen glare stigma when posting him. So shut up, with this dumb assary of yours.

And by the way, Gandhi (if you mean MohanDas K. Gandhi), was not North Indian. So fuck off again, Troll King. Or whatever you do as your past time, apart from arm-chair Albino studies.

**And when are sure of yourself then post a reply. You changed that Indian couple to a darker shade..he he. What a looser you are. I had all ready picked up your thread for a reply, and then now see; you have changed it. Moron.

Blah Blah Blah........ You still haven't answer my question. Btw Were you the one who kicked me out when you were a mod? I returned to ABF anyway and logged into another account Samurai398 but it's funny that it was gone 2 day after I used it all because it was hacked.

Okay here's another question. Who do the dravidian albino resembles the most?

African albino
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_hzG4HkJlBmQ/TCcAWve5ysI/AAAAAAAAAA8/Bca1kJoeJGs/s1600/black+albino.jpg

Or European albino

http://www.knowlton-family.co.uk/Albinism/fabulousface_5_060.gif

Now here a Dravidian albino
http://nyc.barstoolsports.com/files/2012/03/Screen-shot-2012-03-06-at-12.37.07-PM.png

asingh

02-25-2013, 08:31 AM

^^
I'll wait 10 minutes. You can edit if you wish. Then will reply. Will keep hitting F5.

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 08:35 AM

^^
I'll wait 10 minutes. You can edit if you wish. Then will reply. Will keep hitting F5.

Whatever......

Changing the topic won't change the fact you have lost this debate.

asingh

02-25-2013, 08:36 AM

Whatever......

Changing the topic won't change the fact you have lost this debate.

I guess you really cannot read. I said: I am waiting 10 minutes. Cause you have a penchant to change your "images"; midway. And it will make me look like you; a dumbass. So am waiting 5 more minutes, and will give you a comprehensive reply.

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 08:37 AM

I guess you really cannot read. I said: I am waiting 10 minutes. Cause you have a penchant to change your "images"; midway. And it will make me look like you; a dumbass. So am waiting 5 more minutes, and will give you a comprehensive reply.

Wait for you 10 minutes.... and you replied right after I posted 30 seconds ago.

You are trolling.

asingh

02-25-2013, 08:39 AM

Wait for you 10 minutes.... and you replied right after I posted 30 seconds ago.

You are trolling.

Yes, Butler King. And you cannot really read. :( I meant your thread where you posted the Dravidian, European and African; albino specimens. Groan.....

ButlerKing

02-25-2013, 08:40 AM

Yes, Butler King. And you cannot really read. :( I meant your thread where you posted the Dravidian, European and African; albino specimens. Groan.....

This time is like less than 28 seconds.

Why are you even spending the time to reply if you're on to something or whatever?

asingh

02-25-2013, 08:46 AM

Blah Blah Blah........ You still haven't answer my question. Btw Were you the one who kicked me out when you were a mod? I returned to ABF anyway and logged into another account Samurai398 but it's funny that it was gone 2 day after I used it all because it was hacked.

As if you have answered mine. He he.

No, I did not kick you out. Moderators cannot do that on ABF. Only ADMIN can.

Okay here's another question. Who do the dravidian albino resembles the most?

The picture would most resemble the European girl -but- if it is a force fit vs. the African people. That is obvious right, what is so different here....? There is a cline within India and Indians can fit the Caucasoid bucket, which is similar to Europeans for some crano-facial features. What does this prove. You won..? Or something else..? Again that is pushing it right. Are you an Albino yourself..?

druzynnik

06-16-2013, 05:44 AM

The idea that Dravidians= 'Veddoid'= 'Australoid= kinky hair/flat nose/dark skin/basically an Australian, was an idea that never seemed right to me. It's a theory spread by clueless Westerners obsessed with Aryans.

I see plenty of South Indians who clearly have a distinct look, and it isn't due to Northern influence. It's not quite 'Indoid', but not quite 'Australoid' either. It looks almost Semitic/Middle Eastern, but yet still a bit different. I agree a lot could pass for Iranians before I'd think "Northern Indian".

As for the dark/light skin, I think the original Dravidians were medium complexioned, and became darker either through environment or through assimilation of earlier tribal groups who were autochthonous to India. These are the Australoid/Austroasiatic/Negrito peoples, which I think are what confuses everything because a lot of South Indians have blended with them. Many of the lighter-skinned castes may indeed have some Northern influence, but that's the exception, not the rule.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_zGreRPcsAtg/TBHmjf4_7fI/AAAAAAAABqs/SZOFaNN_g00/s1600/PhantomIndia-2-2.jpg

This guy does not look like any North Indian to me for example.

aherne

06-16-2013, 07:04 AM

Like all Indians (tribals excluded), they are pred. Caucasoid. This albino looks like having archaic Aryan features (deep set blue eyes, high forehead, ultra-angular features):
http://picturestack.com/821/48/z30Picture1YkJ.png
The only thing that looks truly out of place is his mulatto-like nose (aboriginal inheritance).

http://topnews.in/law/files/aslam-parvez.jpg
This reinforces the pattern. The more wider faced and wider nosed, the more aboriginal (australoid) one looks like.

Smeagol

06-16-2013, 07:32 AM

Dravidians are mainly Caucasoid.

YeshAtid

12-16-2013, 04:49 PM

Predominantly caucasoid

Cleitus

12-16-2013, 04:51 PM

Mix of Both

GrebluBro

12-16-2013, 04:55 PM

I think 25% of South-Indians/Dravidians got Caucasoid type face/skull..
In the rest of India (exclude north-east), dravidian-type phenotype/skin Indians might be 50%..

Kalimtari

12-16-2013, 10:04 PM

people from Tamil Nadu:

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3086/2640629408_6417db8b32_o.jpg
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3258/2639809505_2646c65aab_o.jpg
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3013/2639791501_0538478106_o.jpg
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8378/8574619301_c692f81fb9_o.jpg
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3069/2640524940_f098ba1a57_o.jpg
http://www.flickr.com/photos/48926249@N06/4580153680/sizes/o/in/photostream/
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5258/5482086236_81e965b0d8_o.jpg
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4012/4580154150_dee274927d_o.jpg
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8037/8057346677_e29d7d23cd_b.jpg
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8179/8056499193_08259d2976_b.jpg
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4006/4390898250_7f8bce6da7_o.jpg
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4008/4630039276_f841706b12_z.jpg
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4035/4436468578_8e63ff2c6e_o.jpg
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4007/4446436803_89441ff6ac_o.jpg
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2692/4436468432_3b9559d461_o.jpg
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4047/4446438269_26de8be361_o.jpg
http://farm2.staticflickr.com/1346/4728199217_047b48582c_b.jpg
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4033/4297177299_f1ab753859_o.jpg
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2801/4446439273_245f48344c_o.jpg
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2716/4297923378_3e08dc7588_o.jpg

Smeagol

12-16-2013, 10:11 PM

Typically Caucasoid-Weddid mixes, with some pure Caucasoids.

tamilgangster

12-18-2013, 02:24 AM

Dravidians are a mix of caucasoid and australoid, but are more Caucasoid, the average tamil is 25-35% australoid, with some minor paleomongloloid influences could also be present, but the rest is caucasoid.. The bulk of the caucasoid, is protocaucasoid, who are dark skinned, the socotrans and mehri are also protocaucasoid. There is also neocaucasoid elements too. Even tough they are dark their features are more caucasoid, but australoid influences are visible

http://www.innercitypress.com/idps1tamil.jpg http://fastuntoaction.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/cimg1417.jpghttp://www.galatta.com/assets/gallery/movie/kasu-panam-thuttu-10913/image-big/kasu-panam-thuttu-22.jpg

Kalimtari

12-18-2013, 11:24 AM

^^

to me they look very close to Veddas and to the Ainu people (facial features). I don't see much ANI in them. On the contrary, I see more ASI in the North than vice versa.

ButlerKing

12-18-2013, 07:04 PM

tamilgangster

12-21-2013, 08:36 AM

Sri Lanka Tamils are much less pure Tamils

There is actually no real Mongoloid influence in Tamil because the Mongoloid influence haplogroup DNA did come from modern mongoloid features but dated 50,000 years ago.

Real Mongoloid DNA influence in South Asia and India is O3, O2a, C3, D

Sri Lankan Tamil are more Dravidian than Indian tamils because they lack mixture from North Indians, and they are descended from middle and lower castes.

druzynnik

02-25-2014, 01:24 AM

I'm curious to know the background of the actor Sivaji Ganesan. Like I said months ago he looks like an archetypical 'old Dravidian' to me. In those photos posted above on this page I see few examples of his look and I think that's because it's of course mainly confined to upper castes. I am surprised people do not see "Mongoloid" in those pictures because I think I see some Australoid ie old tribal people (very very distant relatives of Khmer and Viet speakers, but of course today genetically different). Is that not classified Mongoloid? You could even say there is a continuum that runs from SE Asia to the Austronesian peoples (Malay, Cham etc) through Thailand, Laos etc all the way to that part of India. Very common look throughout.

Why are the Sri Lankans 'less pure'? Is the Caucasoid look I see in those pictures because of Sinhalese? I can't see that as the case. I see a bit more Dravidian in those pics

Kalimtari

02-25-2014, 06:13 PM

The King, I am

02-25-2014, 06:17 PM

Sometimes I think why some anthropologist classify them as Australoid when their facial and bone structure look Caucasoid to me, aside from their dark skin they do not look anything like the Australian aborigines or Negrito.

They have straight prominent nose
They have straight hair
They have facial hair
They have body hair
They have beards

A albino DRAVIDIAN can even look European.

I see Dravidian everyday, If you bleach them they can end up looking like a Iranian
[img]http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45642000/jpg/_45642333_007141002-1.jpg[/mg]
[img]http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/4345/610xjew.jpg[/mg]

[img]http://thuppahi.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/1003432-16x9-340x191-tamil-refugees2.jpg[/ig]
[img]http://www.psheshadri.com/gallery/atithi/wgc_media/photos/Prakash%20Rai.jpg[/mg]
[img]http://www.nation.lk/edition/media/k2/items/cache/b111a6b1c4f6bc81572a17be5e6326d4_XL.jpg[img]
[img]http://harpymarx.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/dscn502736030001.jpg?w=652[/ig]

Albino dravidian
[img]http://www.noopooh.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/indian8.png[/ig]
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Young_blond_man.jpg/250px-Young_blond_man.jpg[/ig]
[img]http://8020.photos.jpgmag.com/3013025_224562_857422dda5_m.jpg[/ig]

Why do you have to lie like that all the time :/
on that other thread you made about how other ethnic groups can also be blonde or whatever you put in Albinos
You just lie and twist the truth
And your a punjabi not an "Irish" Brit :laugh:

asingh

02-26-2014, 05:47 AM

Why do you have to lie like that all the time :/
on that other thread you made about how other ethnic groups can also be blonde or whatever you put in Albinos
You just lie and twist the truth
And your a punjabi not an "Irish" Brit :laugh:

Anyone who thinks that Albinos can pass as Europoid is full blown retard. BK has done this many times. Also on other boards. It does not matter "what" he is. We (TA as a group) have surpassed that milestone; to decipher and/or ascertain what BK is, eons ago.

Nehellenia

02-26-2014, 05:54 AM

Both... Australoid and Caucasoid.

blogen

02-26-2014, 06:13 AM

They vere Caucasoids (various Mediterranid types) originally, but they mixed with the southern Veddoid population later.

Hadouken

02-26-2014, 06:20 AM

Smeagol

02-27-2014, 03:42 AM

Anyone who thinks that Albinos can pass as Europoid

Indids are Europoid.

Nehellenia

02-27-2014, 04:06 AM

these people are not caucasoid

no matter what some say

caucasoid australoid mix at the most maybe

Indeed, at least i live in the realms of reality knowing so too :P

GrebluBro

02-27-2014, 04:21 AM

Indeed, at least i live in the realms of reality knowing so too :P

these people are not caucasoid

no matter what some say

caucasoid australoid mix at the most maybe

They aren't Caucasoid nor Australoid, they are their own type..Some Dravidians got full Caucasoid skull/features though.

There is no common genes between present South Indian population and Australoids
http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/study-throws-light-on-genetic-diversity-of-indian-population/article24239.ece

Australoids might've left or pass through Indian sub-continent 10000+ years ago, it doesn't matter..
Caucasoids and Mongolids split about 30,000 (roughly, you Google for more accurate number) ago..so both are to be considered same now?

What matters is how much common genes present in current population..
Based on that, Dravidians and Australoids got nothing in common genetically cuz of several 1000s of years of mutation..

Nehellenia

02-27-2014, 04:37 AM

South Indians and North Indians have Australoid influence. Low caste Tamils (and Sinhalese) have the highest Australoid influence in South Asia.

North Indians have Australoid influence but the Australoid admixture was lighter skinned than that of south India, but overall southern and eastern parts of India has the highest Australoid influence.

There is no such thing as a "Dravidian" race unless your term "Dravidian" means the wave of major west Eurasians who migrated to the Indian subcontinent 10 000 years ago.

Dravid means south in Sanskrit. nobody used the term "Dravidian" in any ethnic sense ONLY until the colonial era.
Dravidian is a language. South Indians speak Dravidian but that doesn't mean they were the original speakers of the language.
An early group, similar to Australian Aborigines inhabited India before Dravidians immigrated to India. Dravidians are also mixed with Austro-Asiatic people.
Later, Dravidians who lived in north India especially also mixed with Indo-Aryan immigrants.
Before 10,000 YBP, Indians looked like Aborigines.

Also, Melanesian teeth are very different from SE Asian teeth. SE Asian teeth are halfway between Melanesian teeth (Australoid) and NE Asian Sinodont teeth. This implies that SE Asians are halfway between Australoids and classic Mongoloids (NE Asians).

Australoid race: Aborigines, Papuans, Melanesians, Negritos, Ainu, Fuegians, Pericu, Tamils and other Veddoids and South Indian tribal types.

asingh

02-27-2014, 04:54 AM

Indids are Europoid.

I find the features to be different to be similar enough.

GrebluBro

02-27-2014, 04:59 AM

An early group, similar to Australian Aborigines inhabited India before Dravidians immigrated to India.
True

Before 10,000 YBP, Indians looked like Aborigines.
Speculation

Australoid race: Aborigines, Papuans, Melanesians, Negritos, Ainu, Fuegians, Pericu, Tamils and other Veddoids and South Indian tribal types.
:picard1:

As I said b4, unless there is any genetic similarities between present Tamil population and other so-called Australoid races, we can't put them under one race.

Indians genetic tests repeatedly prove North and South Indians genetic distance is too low...

They don't look much different either (except North-west)

West Bengal (East)
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-qDFjHxO4lPQ/Uv9jWlSgWeI/AAAAAAAAEOE/4nKdARQz1H0/w742-h577-no/WEST+BENGAL-MEN.JPG

Maharashtra (Central India)
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-YbVe6inKSSo/Uv9jP9ieKHI/AAAAAAAAEMc/XBaD6lvTZcs/w742-h577-no/MAHARASHTRA-MEN.JPG

Uttar Pradesh(North India)
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Mt9hS4y2YVM/Uv9jUSCGeAI/AAAAAAAAENs/w22QRwzk0fA/w742-h577-no/UTTAR+PRADESH-MEN.JPG

South India
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-AMfudpWVo3k/Uv9nAnZKxfI/AAAAAAAAEPs/kfXf_Z-dgeg/w742-h577-no/KERALA-MEN+%25281%2529.JPG

Do you think non-Indians can pick south-Indian team correctly if these four team pictures are given ? :laugh:

Nehellenia

02-27-2014, 05:12 AM

True

Speculation

:picard1:

As I said b4, unless there is any genetic similarities between present Tamil population and other so-called Australoid races, we can't put them under one race.

Indians genetic tests repeatedly prove North and South Indians genetic distance is too low...

They don't look much different either (except North-west)

Do you think non-Indians can pick south-Indian team correctly if these four team pictures are given ? :laugh:

Which part of India is the most Weddoid influenced?
Weddoid = Australoid, there is no debate around it.

South Asian Australoids

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d5/Veddah_woman_of_Sri_Lanka_Australoid_Negrito.png

http://img479.imageshack.us/img479/7301/veddid8qlsf3.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v416/photo_bucket_1/Races/Indian_Australoid.jpg

http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/Photos/tamilman.jpg

Weddoid influenced Dravidians

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bfcDGRZGYyM/UebkRqGFZMI/AAAAAAAALP8/sHfuM9g8M_c/s1600/3_veddahs.jpg

http://www.bestoflanka.com/images/index/mainAnimation/veddas.jpg

http://z3.ifrm.com/67/29/0/p478189/dravidian_australoid.jpg

http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Misc/Common/Humans/India/India15.jpg

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7037/6940856169_f7ff5cbb77_z.jpg

South Asian Australoid/Caucasoid mix (for example)

http://i47.tinypic.com/nf2i9.png

GrebluBro

02-27-2014, 05:23 AM

Which part of India is the most Weddoid influenced?
Weddoid = Australoid, there is no debate around it.

Handful of earlier anthropological researchers said something without deep analysis, you guys keep believing it..

Only in less matured informal sites, people talk about Weddoid..
Recent professional genealogists simply brush off this claim..

I wish to see some deep genetic test results..not those 100 yrs old incomplete bullshit race classifications.

Did you ever see 23andMe results of an Indian?

The King, I am

02-27-2014, 06:21 AM

Anyone who thinks that Albinos can pass as Europoid is full blown retard. BK has done this many times. Also on other boards. It does not matter "what" he is. We (TA as a group) have surpassed that milestone; to decipher and/or ascertain what BK is, eons ago.

Yer the creep even made 2 other accounts, I forget the names but as a Punjabi and an other Brit :laugh:

Prisoner Of Ice

02-27-2014, 06:33 AM

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WroSZ2hAIRE/UEsFgDFmyxI/AAAAAAAAAPc/1iILaiZqBaw/s1600/india-metspalu2011-figS12.png

They are buck negroes.

Well, maybe 5% caucasian.

Hadouken

02-27-2014, 09:20 AM

They aren't Caucasoid nor Australoid, they are their own type

good enough

they are not caucasoid and thats it

if people want to see them as caucasoid then a caucasoid race doesnt exist because these people are too different .....whats next ? australian aborigines are caucasoid too ?

even though europeans , north africans (non negroid admixed) and middle eastern people have some noticable differences (even WITHIN the same continent because of the various subraces) it is still obvious that they are the same "major race" (caucasoid) and the similarities are even more obvious between them but these people are totally alien and look like their own thing as you said but since as far as i know australoids are their own thing and that there ARE australoids in india i would say that these people are indeed australoids or caucasoid+australoid hybrids at best

GrebluBro

02-27-2014, 09:31 AM

good enough

they are not caucasoid and thats it

if people want to see them as caucasoid then a caucasoid race doesnt exist because these people are too different .....whats next ? australian aborigines are caucasoid too ?

even though europeans , north africans (non negroid admixed) and middle eastern people have some noticable differences (even WITHIN the same continent because of the various subraces) it is still obvious that they are the same "major race" (caucasoid) and the similarities are even more obvious between them but these people are totally alien and look like their own thing as you said

:thumb001:

but since as far as i know australoids are their own thing and that there ARE australoids in india i would say that these people are indeed australoids or caucasoid+australoid hybrids at best

:no:

asingh

02-27-2014, 10:04 AM

good enough

they are not caucasoid and thats it

if people want to see them as caucasoid then a caucasoid race doesnt exist because these people are too different .....whats next ? australian aborigines are caucasoid too ?

even though europeans , north africans (non negroid admixed) and middle eastern people have some noticable differences (even WITHIN the same continent because of the various subraces) it is still obvious that they are the same "major race" (caucasoid) and the similarities are even more obvious between them but these people are totally alien and look like their own thing as you said but since as far as i know australoids are their own thing and that there ARE australoids in india i would say that these people are indeed australoids or caucasoid+australoid hybrids at best

Indians can exhibit Caucasoid features. Some of the people posted as Australoids, do not even look like the feature-set, but are Weddoid which is different.

YeshAtid

02-27-2014, 11:25 PM

There's a sizeable amount that is caucasoid, but most are australoid influenced.

Smeagol

02-27-2014, 11:28 PM

Indians can exhibit Caucasoid features

The majority of the Northwest Indians are clear Caucasoids.

Smeagol

02-27-2014, 11:29 PM

I find the features to be different to be similar enough.

Gracileindids, and Nordindids I mean.

Smeagol

02-27-2014, 11:36 PM

North Indians have Australoid influence but the Australoid admixture was lighter skinned than that of south India, but overall southern and eastern parts of India has the highest Australoid influence.

Most Northwest Indians are pure Caucasoid. I don't know what you're talking about with the ''Australoid'' influence being lighter skinned, because for the few North Indians who do have Australoid influence, it's the same type (Australiform Weddid) as in the south.

There is no such thing as a "Dravidian" race unless your term "Dravidian" means the wave of major west Eurasians who migrated to the Indian subcontinent 10 000 years ago.

Yes, original Dravidians are Europids, now usually mixed with Weddids.

SE Asian teeth are halfway between Melanesian teeth (Australoid) and NE Asian Sinodont teeth. This implies that SE Asians are halfway between Australoids and classic Mongoloids (NE Asians).

No it doesn't imply that, but many Southeast Asians have non-Mongolid ''Australoid'' admixture. Vietnamese though are basically pure Mongolids. (Suedsinid-Palaemongolid mainly)

Australoid race: Aborigines, Papuans, Melanesians, Negritos, Ainu, Fuegians, Pericu, [B]Tamils and other Veddoids and South Indian tribal types.

Nope. It only really should include the Australids, Tasmanids, and Melanesids. Ainu for example are archaic Europids.

Shah-Jehan

02-28-2014, 12:30 AM

http://cs411428.vk.me/v411428246/8180/Cy0uQ6RSfnY.jpg

asingh

02-28-2014, 04:45 AM

There's a sizeable amount that is caucasoid, but most are australoid influenced.

Not really.

loggedin

02-28-2014, 01:42 PM

GrebluBro

02-28-2014, 01:49 PM

Has there ever been a study where the skulls of Indians were compared against Europeans?

If a forensic anthropologist can tell the difference with a high degree of accuracy because of readily apparent structural differences then "dravidians" shouldn't be classified as "caucasoids" with europeans.

Where in South Asia are you from?
I guess Punjabi or Sri Lankan Tamil..

Dravidians are not Caucasoids on average..But about 25% of them do have Caucasoid skull & features.

michelle

02-28-2014, 01:54 PM

Yeah right, try asking a random British Indian what this guy looks like the most?
http://picturestack.com/821/48/z30Picture1YkJ.png

To be honest, this guy looks a lot like a botany professor I had. He was of Scandinavian heritage. The nose just needs to be more thin and pointy and they could be related.

Stimpy

02-28-2014, 02:05 PM

Not really.
True, pure dravidians (which today are extremely rare) are cousins of australoids, the two groups split away from eachother x thousands of years ago. Today most 'dravidians' are however heavily mixed since ancient times with caucasoid and to a lesser extent mongoloid type people. They are their own people, really.

loggedin

02-28-2014, 02:12 PM

Where in South Asia are you from?
I guess Punjabi or Sri Lankan Tamil..

Dravidians are not Caucasoids on average..But about 25% of them do have Caucasoid skull & features.

Where do you get that statistic from on 25% of dravidians having "caucasoid skull and features??

The real question to me is if you take a bunch of Indian (or Dravidian) skeletons could they be differentiated easily from Europeans? I have no idea.

I guess you're assuming I'm either Sri Lankan Tamil or Punjabi (Indian Sikh) because I'm from Canada. My parents are from Northern Punjab, a region called Potohar in Pakistan.

GrebluBro

02-28-2014, 02:15 PM

True, pure dravidians (which today are extremely rare) are cousins of australoids, the two groups split away from eachother x thousands of years ago.

So are all other races if we go back further (why do you stop at X, go back till Y)

Today most 'dravidians' are however heavily mixed since ancient times with caucasoid and to a lesser extent mongoloid type people. They are their own people, really.

First there were some unknown people in India, then Dravidians migrated from West and later several type of people migrated (Aryan migration is myth)..It all happened 5000+ years ago..

This kind of migration happened in all continents in the world and all places caused heavy genetic mutation to local population, we should see what current Dravidian population got common with Australoids => no common genes mean they are different from Australoids

GrebluBro

02-28-2014, 02:17 PM

Where do you get that statistic from on 25% of dravidians having "caucasoid skull and features??

Well, many TA members claim strong majority of North Indians are Caucasoids..
Using that as a reference, I say 25% for Caucasoids.

The real question to me is if you take a bunch of Indian (or Dravidian) skeletons could they be differentiated easily from Europeans? I have no idea.
me neither

I guess you're assuming I'm either Sri Lankan Tamil or Punjabi (Indian Sikh) because I'm from Canada. My parents are from Northern Punjab, a region called Potohar in Pakistan.

Yep..

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 06:15 AM

http://www.racialcompact.com/racesofhumanity.html

What does it say here?
""OUT-OF-AFRICA" GROUP
I. Australoid Subspecies
A. Veddoid race (remnant Australoid population in central and southern India)" ...yes, Dravidians are mixed.

GrebluBro

03-01-2014, 06:24 AM

So English got more in Common with North Indians than with Iranians? :rolleyes:

Such a useless crap genetic study you've been believing in

http://www.racialcompact.com/geneticrelationship.jpg

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 06:28 AM

GrebluBro

03-01-2014, 06:32 AM

///

Most Indians are different race..
They aren't Caucasoid nor Australoid in reality..

You guys' are obsessed with linking Dravidians with Australoid..This is ignorant as fuck

You go back 10,000 years and do comparison, why no going back 50,000 years or more to declare all humans races are mixed?

We should talk only on the basis of genetic compostion of current population (after several mutations everywhere) => Nothing common between Indians & Australoids now

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 06:34 AM

So English got more in Common with North Indians than with Iranians?

http://www.racialcompact.com/geneticrelationship.jpg

Wheres the rest of Europe? :D
Indian would be at the bottom of that then, there's nothing Indian about English people... Proto-Indo-European people existed too long ago, thousands of years ago...

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 06:36 AM

Most Indians are different race..
They aren't Caucasoid nor Australoid in reality..

You guys' are obsessed with linking Dravidians with Australoid..This is ignorant as fuck

You go back 10,000 years and do comparison, why no going back 50,000 years or more to declare all humans races are mixed?

We should talk only on the basis of genetic compostion of current population (after several mutations everywhere) => Nothing common between Indians & Australoids now

And if we all are, so what.. I am answering the question: 'are Dravidians Caucasoid or Australoid'.. i believe i have answered your question and provided evidence, but i'm guessing soon, you'll just make another identical thread in a month, because you're not satisfied with my opinion.

That's why they have darker skin and a similar skull shape to them, but that's just 'circumstantial' according to you. Indians aren't 'not' Australoid, nor are they 100% European, they are a hybrid race, i don't think you understand that.

GrebluBro

03-01-2014, 06:36 AM

Wheres the rest of Europe? :D
Indian would be at the bottom of that then, there's nothing Indian about English people... Proto-Indo-European people existed too long ago, thousands of years ago...

We share something common here :thumb001:

GrebluBro

03-01-2014, 06:39 AM

Mortimer

03-01-2014, 06:40 AM

You just thumb me down every time, because you want people to say Dravidians are Caucasoid white, THEY AREN'T... they are mixed race, eugenicists classified them so, people have classified nearly every South Indian you've posted up here as 'Indian looking', not Europid looking, Middle Eastern mixed rarely at most.. but i don't agree with it and neither does science.. why would it bother me if Indians aren't 'pure white', most Indians know this and accept it.

Huxley's race map
http://mathildasanthropologyblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/huxleyraces.gif

McNally's race map
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/21/Stoddard_race_map_1920.jpg

why do you say "white" or "pure white" of course indians arent anything "white". caucasoid was a term to donate native races from europe, northafrica, middle east and southasia. in southasia it said that there are different races of which some were classified as australoid like weddahs or negritos etc. coon classified "dravidians" as caucasoid, some classified them as seperate "dravida" race, there are different theories from where dravidians come from and some have different races for same label, like in earnest hootons anthropology dravidian is a dark skinned short meditteranid race while in deniker dravidian is a negrito resembling australoid race etc. if by dravidian you mean the dravidian speakers then i think that ancient anthropologists would have classified some as caucasoid and some as australoid, however 19th century anthropology shouldnt be mixed up with social definitions of race or modern day genetic biology etc. inbefore we had 3-4 races but now we moved towards 9 genetic clusters or like that, and physical anthropology was not able to see the genetic make up of the individuals only judged by skull and features (phenotype) they didnt know genetic clusters etc. it is not the same, and there is now a southasian cluster which is distinct from european or oceanian etc. and socially they are "asian indians" etc. part of the asian race. no race is genetically hundred percent pure etc. for example northeuros have 20% Ancestral North Eurasian a siberian type people genes but they wouldnt get classified as anything else then white by physical anthropology because that is hidden deep ancestry from ten thousand years ago which has little relevance to the phenotype of established races etc. also all indians have ASI but it as much old like 12.000 years ago point of admixture between ANI/ASI that is deep hidden ancestry and many still would have been classified as caucasoid back then measuring their skull values. we shouldnt mix two different fields up etc.

Mortimer

03-01-2014, 06:43 AM

And if we all are, so what.. I am answering the question: 'are Dravidians Caucasoid or Australoid'.. i believe i have answered your question and provided evidence, but i'm guessing soon, you'll just make another identical thread in a month, because you're not satisfied with my opinion.

That's why they have darker skin and a similar skull shape to them, but that's just 'circumstantial' according to you. Indians aren't 'not' Australoid, nor are they 100% European, they are a hybrid race, i don't think you understand that.

i think you are talking out of your ass, how can you link dark skin in indians to aboriginals etc. is african dark skin aboriginal etc.? or dark skin in amerindians etc. also you are polynesian and polynesians are dark as indians mostly so you are also aboriginal, i think polynesians are related to aboriginals anyways, no?

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 06:43 AM

You guys are using useless incomplete genetic results to talk

So are you, claiming Indians are closer to English than Persians.. how many countries were cut out of that genetic 'sample group'.
Why don't you take a 23andme DNA test, and find out your racial admixture, you seem overly curious to what your race is, why not find out for yourself?

Arcadefire

03-01-2014, 06:43 AM

LOL what an interesting thread. I suspect that ButtlerKing is a south Indian. Just a guess.

Arcadefire

03-01-2014, 06:46 AM

All south Asians have austroloid blood. Get over it. I dont like this snood attempt of trying to connect ourselves with other people. Have some pride mofos!

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 06:48 AM

i think you are talking out of your ass, how can you link dark skin in indians to aboriginals etc. is african dark skin aboriginal etc.? or dark skin in amerindians etc. also you are polynesian and polynesians are dark as indians mostly so you are also aboriginal, i think polynesians are related to aboriginals anyways, no?

I'm not Aboriginal Austronesian and Polynesians are descended from Aboriginal Taiwanese people (i.e - Mongoloids), so what..
I'm not 'talking out of my ass' so to speak, because Aboriginals are the same race as the Australoid people of India, Papua New Guinea, Ainu people in Japan (of Jomon origin), Negritos of the Andaman Islands and Indonesia, they are all of partial Australoid extraction and they all share a skin colour in common with various degrees depending on their personal admixture, no race is completely pure, but i am answering the question posed on this thread 'are Dravidians: Caucasoid or Australoid', are you going to sit there and deny that they are both, look at their DNA haplogroups and their admixture for yourself and then tell me i'm talking out of my ass, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to accept it's high likelihood, if they are 25% or more, so what?

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 06:52 AM

All south Asians have austroloid blood. Get over it. I dont like this snood attempt of trying to connect ourselves with other people. Have some pride mofos!

This guy gets it, it's not a racial diss at all.. It is a fact :D

Arcadefire

03-01-2014, 06:55 AM

I'm not Aboriginal, Polynesians are descended from Aboriginal Taiwanese people (i.e - tanned mongoloids), so what.. i can handle the fact i'm distantly Eurasian, you can choose to identify which what you are and i go with how i look and was raised.
I'm not 'talking out of my ass' so to speak, because Aboriginals are the same race as the Australoid people of India, Papua New Guinea, Ainu people in Japan (of Jomon origin), Negritos of the Andaman Islands and Indonesia, they are all of partial Australoid extraction, no race is completely pure, but i am answering the question posed on this thread 'are Dravidians: Caucasoid or Australoid', are you going to sit there and deny that they are both, look at their DNA haplogroups and their admixture for yourself and then tell me i'm talking out of my ass, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to accept it's high likelihood, if they are 25% or more, so what?

Truth! Agree with some of the things you said with some exceptions.
Is there any factual link which connects all the aforementioned people into one group. I mean Polynesians and Jomons being part of the same race? Based on what exactly?

Also, there is no denying that all south asians are mixed to a certain degree. But there is the stigma of associating ourselves with tribals who run around naked really does it for us south asians.

Mortimer

03-01-2014, 06:55 AM

All south Asians have austroloid blood. Get over it. I dont like this snood attempt of trying to connect ourselves with other people. Have some pride mofos!

australoid is as much a valid term as europid, it both labeled after a continent and its native people but obviously there are differences between a nordid swede and a europid ethiopid ethiopian, you think southasians are anything aboriginal? people mix all the things up, southasians are product of human variation just as europeans are, and i wouldnt also call myself europid if i were southasian because that would mean that you are like european etc. which is wrong and shouldnt be linked, but that is because of 19th century european anthropology written by europeans. i however wouldnt allow some racist shits to call me "hybrid" race, their race is as much hybrid especially if they are mixed with polynesian (that isnt hybrid?)

GrebluBro

03-01-2014, 06:55 AM

So are you, claiming Indians are closer to English than Persians.. how many countries were cut out of that genetic 'sample group'.
Why don't you take a 23andme DNA test, and find out your racial admixture, you seem overly curious to what your race is, why not find out for yourself?

Wtf..I called it a joke..I didn't take it seriously..
I edited my comment now..check it..

I believe only on phenotype

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 06:57 AM

i bet you know shit about their dna haplogroups and admixture etc. you are just a retarded polynesian racist, funny idea a polynesian racist, i spoted you by now in all those racist threads hating against other races, piece of shit. dravidians arent ocenian they are southasian they dont have oceanian genetic markers, they are linked only from fifty thousand years ago like all people are related to eatch other and humans to chimpanzees, they have ASI that isnt oceanian that is southasian, and some anthroplogists classified ainus and weddahs as proto-caucasoid not as australoid, you make it to simple, you talk out of your ass polynesian shit

Did i say any of those races are 100% Australoid? Do you know how to read... 'they are all of partial Australoid extraction and they all share a skin colour in common with various degrees depending on their personal admixture, no race is completely pure' Hahahaha and you call me a racist when you say this 'you talk out of your ass polynesian shit' and 'you are just a retarded polynesian racist'.... i didn't know Polynesians would boil your blood so much, please i am dying to know, why did you add me to your friends list if you're just a racial bigot?

GrebluBro

03-01-2014, 06:57 AM

LOL what an interesting thread. I suspect that ButtlerKing is a south Indian. Just a guess.

He fights for Armenians, Turks, Afghans, Ethiopians etc in same breadth..

His unbiased trolling makes everyone not to conclude something unanimous :laugh:

Arcadefire

03-01-2014, 06:59 AM

He fights for Armenians, Turks, Afghans, Ethiopians etc in same breadth..

His unbiased trolling makes everyone not to conclude something unanimous :laugh:

haha im still new here.

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 07:01 AM

australoid is as much a valid term as europid, it both labeled after a continent and its native people but obviously there are differences between a nordid swede and a europid ethiopid ethiopian, you think southasians are anything aboriginal? people mix all the things up, southasians are product of human variation just as europeans are, and i wouldnt also call myself europid if i were southasian because that would mean that you are like european etc. which is wrong and shouldnt be linked, but that is because of 19th century european anthropology written by europeans. i however wouldnt allow some racist shits to call me "hybrid" race, their race is as much hybrid especially if they are mixed with polynesian (that isnt hybrid?)

You're the one who first used the word 'Aboriginal' not me, do you know how far the link is between Aboriginals and Australoid Weddoids, about 20,000-30,000 at best.
And secondly, Proto-Caucasoids like the 'Ainu', as you state share genetic links with Australians/Papuans with their common ancestor, Denisovan man, that isn't a bad thing.. but that means every Australoid then and Mongoloid Asian have Denisovan DNA as well.

GrebluBro

03-01-2014, 07:01 AM

haha im still new here.

He also fight for Hungarians...Who knows what next?

Mortimer

03-01-2014, 07:01 AM

Did i say any of those races are 100% Australoid? Do you know how to read... 'they are all of partial Australoid extraction and they all share a skin colour in common with various degrees depending on their personal admixture, no race is completely pure' Hahahaha and you call me a racist when you say this 'you talk out of your ass polynesian shit' and 'you are just a retarded polynesian racist'.... i didn't know being 1/8th Polynesians would boil your blood so much, please i am dying to know, why did you add me to your friends list if you're just a racial bigot?

you keep repeating yourself but they arent one race etc. and skin colour is independent of race, just because they are all dark doesnt mean they are the same race, or of admixture etc. i told you polynesians are also dark skinned and you said they arent aboriginal, amerindians are also dark, africans are also dark, etc. you view it from a eurocentric point of view, when i added you to my friends list i thought you are a nice girl, but then i saw you frequently making racist ignorant comments. you can remove me from your friends list

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 07:02 AM

Mortimer

03-01-2014, 07:03 AM

You're the one who first used the word 'Aboriginal' not me, do you know how far the link is between Aboriginals and Australoid Weddoids, about 20,000-30,000 at best.
And secondly, Proto-Caucasoids like the 'Ainu', as you state share genetic links with Australians/Papuans with their common ancestor, Denisovan man, that isn't a bad thing.. but that means every Australoid then and Mongoloid Asian have Denisovan DNA as well.

i think europeans also have denisovan etc. on gedmatch they do score some. well all humans are related in one way or the other, but you cant say dravidians are part of the same race as aboriginals (i say aboriginal because they are used as reference that is why it is called australoid) if you call it southindianoid then i agree and they arent linked to europeans i wouldnt call them europid either

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 07:04 AM

you keep repeating yourself but they arent one race etc. and skin colour is independent of race, just because they are all dark doesnt mean they are the same race, or of admixture etc. i told you polynesians are also dark skinned and you said they arent aboriginal, amerindians are also dark, africans are also dark, etc. you view it from a eurocentric point of view, when i added you to my friends list i thought you are a nice girl, but then i saw you frequently making racist ignorant comments. you can remove me from your friends list

Did you see my earlier posting when i posted Weddoid Indians next to Australoids (non-Indians), who the hell says my posts have been racially motivated, not at all.. i am simply answering the damn question with the things i have read. What is your point exactly? You're just mad because i'm right :)

Mortimer

03-01-2014, 07:05 AM

Tanned skin is probably an additional Denisovan trait, don't get butthurt over it.

first humans had probably dark skin being out of africa, so you are quiete wrong probably eventhough denisovans might have had dark skin too, light skin pigmentation is probably more recent, there was this human discovered in europe who had no light skin marker

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 07:06 AM

i think europeans also have denisovan etc. on gedmatch they do score some. well all humans are related in one way or the other, but you cant say dravidians are part of the same race as aboriginals (i say aboriginal because they are used as reference that is why it is called australoid) if you call it southindianoid then i agree and they arent linked to europeans i wouldnt call them europid either

You clearly don't read my entire posts do you? I never said they were the SAME, i said they are mixed with both races, more or less.. it depends on the person clearly. That's it!
Indians have been separated racially for 20-30,000 years with Australoids and Aboriginals in Australia have been here over 40,000 years already.

Mortimer

03-01-2014, 07:09 AM

Did you see my earlier posting when i posted Weddoid Indians next to Australoids (non-Indians), who the hell says my posts have been racially motivated, not at all.. i am simply answering the damn question with the things i have read. What is your point exactly? You're just mad because i'm right :)

you arent right, and resemblance is superficial, hispanics might pass sometimes in mideast but they arent. and some post humans next to chimpanzees and the resemblance is also there etc. i dont know who butlerking is the one who asked the question some say he is this or that but i think he is a idiot and racist european etc. he also made that thread about asian woman, i think australoid and europid isnt enough to explain the human variation etc. i dont like how ignorant people are but you cant explain it to most, im all for truthfullness and correctness but im sure the labels are wrong and aboriginals arent part of the same race as southindians or that southindians are half or quarter aboriginal and half european etc. like portrayed, they are different race, there might be links from very ancient past

Mortimer

03-01-2014, 07:10 AM

You clearly don't read my entire posts do you? I never said they were the SAME, i said they are mixed with both races, more or less.. it depends on the person clearly. That's it!
Indians have been separated racially for 20-30,000 years with Australoids and Aboriginals in Australia have been here over 40,000 years already.

yeah but thats wrong, people think indians are something like half european half aboriginal when they arent, thats wrong.

GrebluBro

03-01-2014, 07:10 AM

Did you see my earlier posting when i posted Weddoid Indians next to Australoids (non-Indians)

C'mon White lady, what the fuck is wrong with you?

I posted North, West, East, South Indian state team pictures..All these four show no fucking big difference.

You ignored it and you insist on Weddoid Indians & Australoids similarities?

I started to believe you hate Tamils for some reason..

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 07:14 AM

yeah but thats wrong, people think indians are something like half european half aboriginal when they arent, thats wrong.

There's a big difference between Australoid and Aboriginal (if you're comparing that word to Australians), clearly Indians aren't Australians, but the people who left India thousands of years ago, did end up in Indonesia and then after, in Australia.. 40,000 years ago, but they share an ancestral remnant. But since Indians became mixed with Indo-Aryans and other races, they are historically mixed. If you had seen Indians in every province of India, you would know that and if you do know that, don't be so ignorant.

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 07:17 AM

C'mon White lady, what the fuck is wrong with you?

I posted North, West, East, South Indian state team pictures..All these four show no fucking big difference.

You ignored it and you insist on Weddoid Indians & Australoids similarities?

I started to believe you hate Tamils for some reason..

Why would i hate Tamils, i am merely showing you the admixture of peoples in India varies, so you can't say that every Dravidian is Caucasoid or Australoid.. they are people who appear more Indo-Aryan, some more Australoid, which was what i was originally saying, before you misunderstood me. And if they don't share any common differences, they must be racially similar.. in your words.

Mortimer

03-01-2014, 09:41 AM

There's a big difference between Australoid and Aboriginal (if you're comparing that word to Australians), clearly Indians aren't Australians, but the people who left India thousands of years ago, did end up in Indonesia and then after, in Australia.. 40,000 years ago, but they share an ancestral remnant. But since Indians became mixed with Indo-Aryans and other races, they are historically mixed. If you had seen Indians in every province of India, you would know that and if you do know that, don't be so ignorant.

Thats like saying people left africa tens thousands of years ago and ended here and there, and all humans share remnants. Also I dont think of "Indo-Aryans" as a race of people more like a culture, indians are since ten thousand years anthropologically/genetically basically the same people you can find in the sub-continent today, that is proven. Only the languages are different.

Nehellenia

03-01-2014, 11:31 AM

Thats like saying people left africa tens thousands of years ago and ended here and there, and all humans share remnants. Also I dont think of "Indo-Aryans" as a race of people more like a culture, indians are since ten thousand years anthropologically/genetically basically the same people you can find in the sub-continent today, that is proven. Only the languages are different.

About your earlier comment about me being a 'shit' when you clearly misunderstood me, do i get an apology for that or what? Not very gentleman-like of you.

Indo-Aryans are Caucasians, i.e - The Caucasoid which did settle in India.. I agree they have been the same race for for thousands of years, but what is that race, according to you?

Mortimer

03-01-2014, 12:18 PM

About your earlier comment about me being a 'shit' when you clearly misunderstood me, do i get an apology for that or what? Not very gentleman-like of you.

Indo-Aryans are Caucasians, i.e - The Caucasoid which did settle in India.. I agree they have been the same race for for thousands of years, but what is that race, according to you?

ok i apologise. sorry that was harsh, but i did saw you making many racist comments in many threads about various ethnicities, blacks, muslims, gypsies, indians etc. but my comment was harsh sorry. i think asking what race indians are is like asking what race europeans are, they are a own race, indians are indians. or southasians. they form a own genetic cluster. i believe human variation cant be described with 3-4 races etc. (european, mongoloid, african and australian) that is too few races. i believe trying to fit in indians into the 4 races isnt accurate.

asingh

03-03-2014, 05:42 AM

Where do you get that statistic from on 25% of dravidians having "caucasoid skull and features??

The real question to me is if you take a bunch of Indian (or Dravidian) skeletons could they be differentiated easily from Europeans? I have no idea.

I guess you're assuming I'm either Sri Lankan Tamil or Punjabi (Indian Sikh) because I'm from Canada. My parents are from Northern Punjab, a region called Potohar in Pakistan.

Nice to see you here. Welcome...!

All south Asians have austroloid blood. Get over it. I dont like this snood attempt of trying to connect ourselves with other people. Have some pride mofos!
Not really. There is nothing supporting the fact, that Australoid were the true Indians. No one is trying to disconnect. And most Indians, are aware that tribals could have been our prior ancestors. There is no running away from that. I see no crano-facial resemblance between Weddoid and Australoid people.

There's a big difference between Australoid and Aboriginal (if you're comparing that word to Australians), clearly Indians aren't Australians, but the people who left India thousands of years ago, did end up in Indonesia and then after, in Australia.. 40,000 years ago, but they share an ancestral remnant. But since Indians became mixed with Indo-Aryans and other races, they are historically mixed. If you had seen Indians in every province of India, you would know that and if you do know that, don't be so ignorant.

I have seen Indians from nearly all the states. What is your point here. How can you see faces, and say historically mixed..? There is diversity vs. a cline. I am not sure what you are getting at here.

Nehellenia

03-03-2014, 03:00 PM

ok i apologise. sorry that was harsh, but i did saw you making many racist comments in many threads about various ethnicities, blacks, muslims, gypsies, indians etc. but my comment was harsh sorry. i think asking what race indians are is like asking what race europeans are, they are a own race, indians are indians. or southasians. they form a own genetic cluster. i believe human variation cant be described with 3-4 races etc. (european, mongoloid, african and australian) that is too few races. i believe trying to fit in indians into the 4 races isnt accurate.

When have i ever insulted Blacks, Indians or Muslims..? I have a right as a woman to disagree with the niqab, i don't have to agree with that religion, but i have muslim friends and i don't mind their religion as long as Muslims are properly educated about the meaning of their own religion, not to mention, i don't condone religious extremism. Why would i insult Indians? I have Indian slave ancestors from South Africa and my grandpa was born in Colombo, look it up.. it ain't in Europe, so where do you get off saying i'm racist?

You don't have a damn clue and you seem ignorant as hell.. I don't care if some of my blood may be Australoid in case, it certainly hasn't diminished my intelligence, my IQ is evidently higher and i've spent years researching biology, haplogroups and DNA.. like you claimed i knew nothing about, you're the one who thought Polynesians were Australoid and got Aboriginal mixed up with Australoid, Indians aren't Aboriginal, but they share a remnant of the same genetic race (Australoid) as Aboriginals and the other countries i mentioned, that is a known fact, Indians may be the least Australoid race out there compared to Papuans for instance, but they are still a mixed race, what's even wrong with that?

Nehellenia

03-03-2014, 03:04 PM

Nice to see you here. Welcome...!

Not really. There is nothing supporting the fact, that Australoid were the true Indians. No one is trying to disconnect. And most Indians, are aware that tribals could have been our prior ancestors. There is no running away from that. I see no crano-facial resemblance between Weddoid and Australoid people.

I have seen Indians from nearly all the states. What is your point here. How can you see faces, and say historically mixed..? There is diversity vs. a cline. I am not sure what you are getting at here.

The ancestors of Weddoids are partially Australoid, but i never said they aren't Caucasoid mixed too, that is a scientific fact and i know Australoid/Golid Indians from the South and even they told me so... so unless all the scientists i have read are wrong and they were lying, i apologise.. but i know i am not wrong. I never said Australoids were the 'true' Indians, we don't know who the true Indians were, proto-Caucasoid, but it doesn't mean they didn't mix.

http://www.sott.net/image/image/s5/112453/full/Human_migration_out_of_A.jpg

The map of human evolution :P

Arcadefire

03-04-2014, 02:35 AM

This guy is from where I come from. how would yall classify him?
http://fridayweekly.com.np/uploaded_image/celeb_gallery/245851/v4IHWdBQ8t.jpg

Arcadefire

03-04-2014, 02:40 AM

Just to clear off few thing .
-Just because someone may share tribal ancestry, it does not always show up in their phenotype
-ASI (ancestral south Asians) comprises of proto middle easterners with Weddid and paleo mongoloid elements.

So ASI is not exclusively synonymous with Australoids. I hope this helps. :lol:

asingh

03-04-2014, 05:04 AM

The ancestors of Weddoids are partially Australoid, but i never said they aren't Caucasoid mixed too, that is a scientific fact and i know Australoid/Golid Indians from the South and even they told me so... so unless all the scientists i have read are wrong and they were lying, i apologise.. but i know i am not wrong. I never said Australoids were the 'true' Indians, we don't know who the true Indians were, proto-Caucasoid, but it doesn't mean they didn't mix.

http://www.sott.net/image/image/s5/112453/full/Human_migration_out_of_A.jpg

The map of human evolution :P

So you saying, you met Indians from the Southern regions who told you about the Australoid aspect..? Coupled with the scientific proof -you- have a strong stance here...! There is no need to apologize though. It is just a debate here. To be honest, Indians hardly know about deep ancestry aspects.

Prisoner Of Ice

03-04-2014, 05:24 AM

Is that blonde guy really an albino Dravidian?

I understood they were classified as Caucasians?

No he is scando, pic comes from the wiki article on blonde hair.

ButlerKing is a liar part 400....

Mortimer

03-04-2014, 05:35 AM

When have i ever insulted Blacks, Indians or Muslims..? I have a right as a woman to disagree with the niqab, i don't have to agree with that religion, but i have muslim friends and i don't mind their religion as long as Muslims are properly educated about the meaning of their own religion, not to mention, i don't condone religious extremism. Why would i insult Indians? I have Indian slave ancestors from South Africa and my grandpa was born in Colombo, look it up.. it ain't in Europe, so where do you get off saying i'm racist?

You don't have a damn clue and you seem ignorant as hell..

Thats why it makes it even more weird that you are racist, but you are, i saw you making many racist and generalised statements etc.

I don't care if some of my blood may be Australoid in case, it certainly hasn't diminished my intelligence, my IQ is evidently higher and i've spent years researching biology, haplogroups and DNA.. like you claimed i knew nothing about, you're the one who thought Polynesians were Australoid and got Aboriginal mixed up with Australoid, Indians aren't Aboriginal, but they share a remnant of the same genetic race (Australoid) as Aboriginals and the other countries i mentioned, that is a known fact, Indians may be the least Australoid race out there compared to Papuans for instance, but they are still a mixed race, what's even wrong with that?

quiete racist again that you would say australoid makes you dumber usually. and indians dont share anything with australoids/aboriginals. there is the wrong assumpution that native southasian races are genetically the same as aboriginals, which isnt true. and indians arent a "mixed" race not more then europeans or any other race. i dont like how you use the word mixed for a ancient people as if they are half breeds, europeans are also mixed from ancient times, but you wouldnt call them mixed race etc. nothing is wrong with being mixed, but it is wrong for indians

Nehellenia

03-04-2014, 06:14 AM

So you saying, you met Indians from the Southern regions who told you about the Australoid aspect..? Coupled with the scientific proof -you- have a strong stance here...! There is no need to apologize though. It is just a debate here. To be honest, Indians hardly know about deep ancestry aspects.

My mum's ex-boyfriend was the most Australoid looking South Indian alive, i know they exist.. i'm not saying every Indian looks the same or has the same genetics though, but out of all of India, South India has diverse racial admixtures.

Nehellenia

03-04-2014, 06:16 AM

Thats why it makes it even more weird that you are racist, but you are, i saw you making many racist and generalised statements etc.

quiete racist again that you would say australoid makes you dumber usually. and indians dont share anything with australoids/aboriginals. there is the wrong assumpution that native southasian races are genetically the same as aboriginals, which isnt true. and indians arent a "mixed" race not more then europeans or any other race. i dont like how you use the word mixed for a ancient people as if they are half breeds, europeans are also mixed from ancient times, but you wouldnt call them mixed race etc. nothing is wrong with being mixed, but it is wrong for indians

I'm not going to bother arguing with a person who doesn't get it, nor has studied anthropology, believe whatever you want.. i don't care and i didn't care before. Don't call me a racist when you have no idea about me and second, i find it ironic you defend actual racists, no you have an attitude against me, because i am a female.. it is obvious. If i was a 'Polynesian guy' for instance, i don't think i would of heard a peep out of you, but you haven't let go of the fact of the last thread (which you apparently read).. that the majority of Europeans are annoyed with criminal Romanis, that's not racism.. nor a lie or a generalization, it is a fact!

Several people agreed with me, and yet you deem 'me, the racist' when i have in fact seen Romanis for myself in person, but i never did i ever say they are 'ALL the same' but many many of them are and those ones will never assimilate culturally, many Europeans know that also.
I'm not commenting on this thread again to you, that is funny considering my IQ is 120, race and IQ aren't always a given.. maybe that's why your head is in the sand.

Nehellenia

03-04-2014, 06:19 AM

So you saying, you met Indians from the Southern regions who told you about the Australoid aspect..? Coupled with the scientific proof -you- have a strong stance here...! There is no need to apologize though. It is just a debate here. To be honest, Indians hardly know about deep ancestry aspects.

Exactly it's a debate, no one is 100% correct to which race because each person is genetically different, but like every other person on this forum, have a right to their own personal opinion, regardless of what others may think.. based on the facts surrounding the question. Second, this is why i am happy things like 'genetic racial dna tests' are available to people now, so they can be more informed about themselves and the world around them.. :P

Nehellenia

03-04-2014, 06:45 AM

This guy is from where I come from. how would yall classify him?
http://fridayweekly.com.np/uploaded_image/celeb_gallery/245851/v4IHWdBQ8t.jpg

http://z3.ifrm.com/67/29/0/p479250/south_asian_phenotype.jpg

He is Melanid with Indobrachid.

Mortimer

03-04-2014, 06:55 AM

I'm not going to bother arguing with a person who doesn't get it, nor has studied anthropology, believe whatever you want.. i don't care and i didn't care before. Don't call me a racist when you have no idea about me and second, i find it ironic you defend actual racists, no you have an attitude against me, because i am a female.. it is obvious. If i was a 'Polynesian guy' for instance, i don't think i would of heard a peep out of you, but you haven't let go of the fact of the last thread (which you apparently read).. that the majority of Europeans are annoyed with criminal Romanis, that's not racism.. nor a lie or a generalization, it is a fact!

Several people agreed with me, and yet you deem 'me, the racist' when i have in fact seen Romanis for myself in person, but i never did i ever say they are 'ALL the same' but many many of them are and those ones will never assimilate culturally, many Europeans know that also.
I'm not commenting on this thread again to you, that is funny considering my IQ is 120, race and IQ aren't always a given.. maybe that's why your head is in the sand.

You were active in many threads saying racist leaning things, also in the blacks rape australian girl thread or in some muslim threads, and yes also in the thread about romas etc. why would i care if you are female or male. thats something you made up. im not done arguing with you, you are arrogant and racist.

Nehellenia

03-04-2014, 06:59 AM

You were active in many threads saying racist leaning things, also in the blacks rape australian girl thread or in some muslim threads, and yes also in the thread about romas etc. why would i care if you are female or male. thats something you made up. im not done arguing with you, you are arrogant and racist.

You are the most hilarious person i've ever met then.. WHERE DID I SAY SOMETHING RACIST ON THE BLACKS RAPING AUSTRALIAN THREAD.
...'that' my sympathy was with the girl and not with thugs (regardless of their race), should be given no sympathy for their actions, well sorry they do not! I don't care if you come from the 3rd world, if you rape anyone, you're a criminal and you should go back.
If it were an Indian or a African girl, i would of said and thought the same damn thing.

armenianbodyhair

03-04-2014, 07:08 AM

Mortimer

03-04-2014, 07:11 AM

You are the most hilarious person i've ever met then.. WHERE DID I SAY SOMETHING RACIST ON THE BLACKS RAPING AUSTRALIAN THREAD.
...'that' my sympathy was with the girl and not with thugs (regardless of their race), should be given no sympathy for their actions, well sorry they do not! I don't care if you come from the 3rd world, if you rape anyone, you're a criminal and you should go back.
Omg.. i'm so racist for having sympathy for a rape victim, how dare i.. if it were an Indian or a African girl, i would of said the same damn thing.
Lol, bigot :3

you were quick to generalise blacks. and blame the african race etc. dont be in denial, i saw you making many racist comments, when i first read your mixed race thread and how you were rejected by dates for not being fully white i thought you are cool and not racist and know better, but then i saw you claiming you are european and better then all others etc. or certain races and that europeans are better that certain others are savages (that was your point of the debate) etc. and i thought what is wrong with this girl etc.

it is quiete strange since you are a little bit southindian, a little bit polynesian, your mum dated a "australoid" southindian etc. and then you still say australoid makes you dumb etc. you are quiete weird. etc. maybe you dont even get that you write racist things, but you should if your IQ is really 120 etc.

you write quiete europeancentric things, and probably you also believe in aryan invasion theory and such white supremacist modells and theories about india, where native indians are australoid and the conquerors brought them civilisation etc. and all that racial bullshit about india etc. which is highly offensive to indians, we talk here about 100.000 years of history, im sure human history is hundred thousand of years old in india and humans were in india before in europe etc. of course there were different humanoids in india at some point and they mixed etc. but the way you portray it is wrong

Nehellenia

03-04-2014, 07:41 AM

you were quick to generalise blacks. and blame the african race etc. dont be in denial, i saw you making many racist comments, when i first read your mixed race thread and how you were rejected by dates for not being fully white i thought you are cool and not racist and know better, but then i saw you claiming you are european and better then all others etc. or certain races and that europeans are better that certain others are savages (that was your point of the debate) etc. and i thought what is wrong with this girl etc.

it is quiete strange since you are a little bit southindian, a little bit polynesian, your mum dated a "australoid" southindian etc. and then you still say australoid makes you dumb etc. you are quiete weird. etc. maybe you dont even get that you write racist things, but you should if your IQ is really 120 etc.

you write quiete europeancentric things, and probably you also believe in aryan invasion theory and such white supremacist modells and theories about india, where native indians are australoid and the conquerors brought them civilisation etc. and all that racial bullshit about india etc. which is highly offensive to indians, we talk here about 100.000 years of history, im sure human history is hundred thousand of years old in india and humans were in india before in europe etc. of course there were different humanoids in india at some point and they mixed etc. but the way you portray it is wrong

If you didn't agree with my opinion, than you are fine not to agree with it, but you started a qualm with me by being racially abusive and i shouldn't have to stand for that nor will i. Unterwench, i say sexist label only because males have commented and he hasn't responded to them the way he has to me, a pity moderator have already removed some of your lovely comments, ay mrswan?

Your opinion of me is extremely flawed and parallel to what you are talking about, so i can't even be bothered. Yes, my mother wasn't a racist, my stepdad is part Chinese (including the fact my sister is too) and she had a ex-boyfriend who was Tamil, what of it.

Nehellenia

03-04-2014, 07:45 AM

You are complaining about him accusing you of racism and you argue back by accusing him of sexism? Nice.

Half of our comments on here have been edited or remove, i'm not even going to start from the beginning, i don't even know why i am still listening to him 2 days later :picard2: ..i just think why should i back down when i haven't done anything wrong or said anything incorrect.

Mortimer

03-04-2014, 07:45 AM

If you didn't agree with my opinion, than you are fine not to agree with it, but you started a qualm with me by being racially abusive and i shouldn't have to stand for that nor will i. Unterwench, i say sexist label only because males have commented and he hasn't responded to them the way he has to me, a pity moderator have already removed some of your lovely comments, ay mrswan?

Your opinion of me is extremely flawed and parallel to what you are talking about, so i can't even be bothered. Yes, my mother wasn't a racist, my stepdad is part Chinese (including the fact my sister is too) and she had a ex-boyfriend who was Tamil, what of it?

yeah i was harsh to you, but not because you are a female, it was just that i saw you last commenting your comment was on the last page i didnt read all the other comments. i apologised, it was wrong. im sorry, again. take my apology for my harsh comment.

Nehellenia

03-04-2014, 07:52 AM

yeah i was harsh to you, but not because you are a female, it was just that i saw you last commenting your comment was on the last page i didnt read all the other comments. i apologised, it was wrong. im sorry, again. take my apology for my harsh comment.

Good, thankyou! That's all i asked for. And i've already said what i thought about this threads discussion :bored:

GrebluBro

03-04-2014, 12:42 PM

///

You're obviously racist just like many TA members here, but you won't acknowledge just like others :shrug:

GrebluBro

03-05-2014, 04:33 AM

//

Every race is mixed if we talk in terms of migration and intermixing about 10000+ years ago..
However, You keep insisting as if Whites aren't mixed but Indians are..

We should go by current genetic components, both Indians and Whites are of largely single race (according to present genetics, ignoring several millennium old past mixing)..

As I said b4, Indians aren't Australoids. If they are, then Whites are part-Black part-Mongoloid or whatever and all humans are mongrels :thumb001:

ButlerKing

09-16-2014, 07:33 PM

Okay..... now I'm not sure anymore.

Seems genetics matters much more than anthropology and Dravidians are neither related with Caucasoid or Negroid.

Dombra

09-16-2014, 07:34 PM

They are a mix of proto-caucasoid and Australoid

ButlerKing

09-16-2014, 08:48 PM

They are a mix of proto-caucasoid and Australoid

That's what I used to think but Genetics says they are intermediate between North indians ( 16% ) and Mongoloid people ( 84%)

I don't get this at all.

Antimage

02-05-2015, 07:39 PM

I swear this guy looks like brownbear

http://8020.photos.jpgmag.com/3013025_224562_857422dda5_m.jpg

swagcore

04-30-2015, 03:25 PM

i'd say some are early australoid people mixed with denisovan people, some plain early australoids and as you go more north these groups have more caucasoid admixture like a gradient

australoid: http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02065/sri-lanka_2065197b.jpg
australoid mixed (note asiatic features): http://www.goway.com/media/cache/10/ff/10ffcfa58de3c1ffa33c992a35dfbe9d.jpg

jatt

04-30-2015, 03:47 PM

European R the pure Race. European r Best. Rest of world is foolish. Albinism zindABad

Seth MacFarlane

04-30-2015, 03:52 PM

Some anthropolegists say they are a mixture of australoid mongaloid and cacasoid and others say they are distinct

jatt

04-30-2015, 04:08 PM

Some anthropolegists say they are a mixture of australoid mongaloid and cacasoid and others say they are distinct

No Europeans r God. All races Made when they mix with Inferiors

Seth MacFarlane

04-30-2015, 04:16 PM

No Europeans r God. All races Made when they mix with Inferiors

Hahahhaha you have me dead . Your being sarcastic arent you bro

swagcore

04-30-2015, 04:27 PM

No Europeans r God. All races Made when they mix with Inferiors

blaqq man is god, you's all depigmented cave pigzz

Ülev

07-11-2017, 02:19 PM

European R the pure Race. European r Best. Rest of world is foolish. Albinism zindABad

I found R1ethel's brother!!! lol

Pahli

07-11-2017, 02:27 PM

I think they are slightly more Caucasian than Australoid, but only by a little.

Fractal

07-11-2017, 02:46 PM

Dravidians are not Australoids, dumb fuck non-Indians. Here is a Dravidian who was smarter than any Greek or Iranian who has ever lived.

https://todayinsci.com/R/Ramanujan_Srinivasa/RamanujanSrinivasa-Color800px.jpg

Kaushika

07-11-2017, 02:47 PM

original drividians who created IVC in North West India were from Sumeria, a brown West Asian Race.

modern drivodoans are austroloids who have nothing woth those original drividians.

Kaushika

07-11-2017, 02:47 PM

original drividians who created IVC in North West India were from Sumeria, a brown West Asian Race.

modern drivodoans are austroloids who have nothing woth those original drividians

Ülev

07-11-2017, 05:21 PM

Visage pâle

07-11-2017, 10:10 PM

According to the famous Henry de Lesquen, they are caucasoids. :rolleyes:

jatt

07-11-2017, 10:25 PM

http://www.columbusmagazine.nl/images/user_images5/31832/634x476/31832.jpg
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54339302e4b0e2920961a194/5433a024e4b06df16113907d/54470f8be4b0fbbce20f384c/1413979600035/albinomarket-wpa.jpg?format=1000w
http://www.thebetterindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/anubhav-gupta-with-albinos.jpg
http://www.thebetterindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/media.jpg

Albino Dravidians

http://image.posta.com.mx/sites/default/files/sop_ap_spani_spanfile_cast_27_0.jpg
http://technoport.no/multimedia/1134/folkeinvest.jpg?width=1200&height=520&cropping=centered

nordics....

real question is are dravidians more caucasoid looking than nordics or not