Spectacular video of a cruise missile slamming into the Pentagon!

[Martin Timothy]

Thanks Luciferhorus at www.davidicke.com for this repeat vid!

http://i467.photobucket.com/albums/rr40/413200/11/pentagon20.gif

The bright spot on the building prior to impact reminds one of the bright spots on the WTC Towers before the planes struck, which could have been power lasers that were focused to ensure the jet fuel ignited upon impact,

Some ppl say there was a "pod" under the plane that hit the South Tower, maybe however the theory that nozzles were spraying jet fuel seemed about right. It still does not explain the bright spot on the P'gon, unless maybe the cruiser had a device that homed in on the laser spot!

Ask yourselves if it resembles the cruiser pictured below, and whether the nose cone highlighted in the small pic, which is the first frame in the only officially released footage of the Pentagon strike..

http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/1622/agm86cruisemissile.jpg http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/1542/cruiseratpgon.jpg

Resembles both ..I reckon it does.

[Loddfafner]

Thanks Luciferhorus at www.davidicke.com for this repeat vid!


Megafacepalm. Now I expect lizard people.

[Sol Invictus]

Thanks for this footage, I had never seen this before. Can you give me the exact source of the video, like the original youtube link or the site that Mr. David Icke posted?

Thanks a bunch, keep up the research!

I've heard of the theory that a pod was carried underneath the flight that impacted WTC but I don't know if I quite agree with it. All I know is, there's no way in hell that jet fuel caused those buildings to disintergrate and pulverize itself to the ground. And it's a strange co-incidence that the 80 sum-odd tapes that were shooting the exact spot where the supposed "plane" hit the pentagon have not been released by the DHS. These morons sure are having a great deal of trouble trying to support their bogus stories! That's for damn sure!

[Æmeric]

So where is American Airlines Flight 77 & the people who were aboard it? At area 51 in Nevada?

Why is it so hard to believe that a group of Muslims could have carried out this terror attack? It really was a simple plan, hijack a series of jetliners & crash them into buildings. Prior to 9/11 passengers would not have resisted hijackers who would have negotiated for money or some other political demand(s). Such a plan could not be carried off today - and hijackings seem to much rarer because of it.

[Sol Invictus]

So where is American Airlines Flight 77 & the people who were aboard it? At area 51 in Nevada?

Who knows? Where's all the evidence that could prove without a doubt that it was actually a plane that hit the pentagon? They are withholding them. They could put to bed all this non-sense once and for all but they obviously got something to hide.


Why is it so hard to believe that a group of Muslims could have carried out this terror attack? It really was a simple plan, hijack a series of jetliners & crash them into buildings.

Because there's too many holes in the official story, and too much effort to censor and cover up testimony on the 9/11 investigation hearings. Why is it such a big deal to them that they have to set up a NSA detatchment charged with the sole task of distancing Washington from the 9/11 attacks? Why was 9/11 put pen-to-paper before the fact (Research Operation Able Danger, and Amalgam Virgo for yourself) and why isn't Bin Laden being indicted for his apparent involvement in the terror attacks?

Why was Weapons-grade nano-thermite discovered in the pyroclastic dust clouds of the WTC. There was nothing of the sort mentioned in the 9/11 commission hearings.

Why was it not mentioned that almost every one of the supposed "hijackers" were trained, protected, and funded as assets of the CIA and the Pakistani ISI? Why were the Hijacker's home addresses listed under various United States military installations?

Why is there no sign of any wreckage at the pentagon large enough that couldn't have been carried there by anyone? What about everything about this whole bullshit story?

You can go on and "believe" in fairytale stories all you like. I investigate. I ask questions. And when things don't add up, I ask more questions. I don't settle on one sided stories that have too many gaps in them, and neither should any other intelligent minded person on here.

[Rudy]

Eyewitness accounts of the Pentagon crash.

Ken Ford, a State Department employee, watched from the 15th floor of the State Department Annex, just across the Potomac from the Pentagon.
We were watching the airport through binoculars, he said, referring to Reagan National Airport, a short distance away. The plane was a two-engine turbo prop that flew up the river from National. Then it turned back toward the Pentagon. We thought it had been waved off and then it hit the building.

Don Wright said
"It was about 9.35 and I was looking out .. our 12th floor windows at 1600 Wilson Boulevard, in Rosslyn, Virginia ... and I watched this ...it looked like a commuter plane, two engined ... come down from the south real low ... proceed right on into the Pentagon."
"and I watched it come very low over the trees and it just dipped down ... come over right over 395, right into the Pentagon.
http://mouv4x8.club.fr/11Sept01/A0082_b_They%20saw%20the%20aircraft.htm

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/sept01/2001-09-14-pentagon-usat.htm#more

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/noplane/enginerotor.html

There does exist remote control airplane technology that could explain the extreme banking at mach speeds of a jet by an inexperienced pilot. Many experienced jet fighters are in disbelief.
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1927

[Lahtari]

No, it's not "spectacular". It is blurry as hell, which makes it impossible to tell whether it's manipulated or not.

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/1542/cruiseratpgon.jpg
And, why does all your visual evidence come in extra-low resolution?

[SwordoftheVistula]

Because there's too many holes in the official story

The problem is, there's way more holes in all the alternate explanations I've seen so far.

[Poltergeist]

Anything coming from a website of David Icke is soooo serious, for sure.

Sometimes I think the man is entertainer.

[Sol Invictus]

The problem is, there's way more holes in all the alternate explanations I've seen so far.

Like?

[Lahtari]

There does exist remote control airplane technology that could explain the extreme banking at mach speeds of a jet by an inexperienced pilot. Many experienced jet fighters are in disbelief.

And then there's always the official story that says it was piloted by a bunch of ragheads briefly trained to fly small pesticide planes over a farm. ;)

[Rudy]

Most pilots would consider it a joke to be able to fly a jet after a few weeks of flight school. Their flight school teachers did not consider them very capable either.


According to the official story, Khalid Almihdhar was the hijacker to have piloted Flight 77. But when reports in Arab newspapers indicated that he was still alive after 9/11, the story was changed to make Hani Hanjour the pilot.
http://911review.com/attack/flights/f77.html


Six of the 19 suicide hijackers identified by the FBI shortly after the attack by name, photograph, and other personal details reported themselves alive. 12
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/identities.html

How did all these people not on the passenger lists get onto the airplanes? Did they all have fake ids, and were let on? Then someone else on the official list was not there, and the lies continue.
http://911review.org/Wiki/PassengerList.shtml

[Rudy]

Another anomaly to add to the 9-11 story. It was also one of the only times a black box recorder was destroyed in a crash.

The status of the door to the cockpit is checked every four seconds throughout a flight and relayed as a simple 0 or 1, where 0=closed and 1=open, with approximately 1,300 door status checks performed during AA77’s 90 minute flight. Every one of those door status checks shows as a 0, indicating that the door to the cockpit never opened during the entire flight. Sheila Casey
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=11981

[John in Denver]

There's a lot of people that aren't aware that a plane didn't hit the pentagon, the conspirators counted on two things, a public that has been conditioned not to think over a long period of time and the big lie theory which, when infinitely repeated becomes truth.

Hitler was warning people about the big lie theory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie