PDA

View Full Version : WTC's 4, 5 & 6 appear to have been impacted by a guided missile!



Martin Timothy
08-18-2009, 04:04 AM
Footage of a UFO seen in the same frame as the air strike on the South Tower, is said to be a Tomahawk Class cruise missile with multiple thermonuclear warheads, which impacted the WTC complex moments later,

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/5451/japanesegifobject.gif

The damage to WTC’s 4, 5 and 6 visible on high resolution photographs reveal multiple cratering, one concrete panel inside the devastated WTC 6 appears to be partially vaporized, a shallow concave surface defining the event horizon of the thermonuclear fireball.

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/545/image301o.jpg

As the second jet rammed its target, “that was an explosion,” says Stephen McArdle a tax consultant from inside the Marriot Hotel, he was taping as part of an FBI sting operation, then comes a longer and much louder explosion, the second explosion was thought to be the detonation of the missile’s warhead. Greg Smith 2002.

Do not adjust your sets... this side view is aligned with the video shots!
http://xs131.xs.to/xs131/08384/4-1_wtc-091701534.jpg


The above side on view says the alleged missile is on the wrong trajectory, were it going to impact at the foot of the towers, it would need to be on an entirely different flight path! A massive explosion devastated World Trade Center 6 the eight-story U.S. Customs building, immediately after United Airlines Flight 175 smashed into the South Tower at about 9:03 am, photo caption: The flame in the photos of the mysterious burning object passing through the South Tower is almost pure white, and leaves a dark trail, is this the burning remnant of a DU penetrator. Christopher Bollyn @ American Free Press.

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/8986/objectsflyingoutofsouth.jpg


The flaming wreckage Bollyn says might be a DU penetrator, is thought to be an engine and a brightly burning magnesium wheel rim, part of the landing gear of the plane that struck the South tower, which had a different trajectory than the alleged missile. Photo: A pyroclastic cloud in an inner city environment, caption: While onlookers were distracted by the events at skyscraper level, moments after the second plane hit the South Tower, WTC 6 was torn apart by a massive explosion. The crater in the building was eight stories deep, an immense hole blasted into the sub basements, all eight stories missing, no wreckage, blown away, vaporized by the thermonuclear warhead on the missile.

TIMING CONFIRMED: American Free Press contacted CNN to determine exactly when the footage was filmed… CNN’s Public Affairs Department, confirmed that the explosion shown in the footage, occurred immediately after the second plane had crashed into the South Tower.

http://xs131.xs.to/xs131/08383/08building6342.jpg
Jack White’s 911 Studies.

Quite clearly the above images were taken at the start of the collapse of the South Tower at 10:00 am, not at 9:04 as stated... the demolition wave is clearly visible in profile in the frames at left, while the pyroclastic cloud rising from street level between Bldg 7 and the North Tower, must be coming from WTC 6.

The smaller component visible at the left of Bldg 7, could be the plume rising from the destruction of WTC 4 & 5, both are of the same shape and texture, which is distinctly different than the collapse material.

AFP: When asked if the footage was taken at 9:04 am the CNN archivist said, "that’s correct," when asked if CNN could offer any explanation about what might have caused the blast that soared higher than the 47-story WTC 7 in the foreground, the archivist said, “we can’t figure it out.”


Some 800 workers from WTC 6, were safely evacuated within 12 minutes of the first plane hitting the North Tower at about 8:46 am, according to a Sept. 18 Washington Post article by Stephen Barr.

The Barr piece is the only known article published about WTC 6, he never mentioned an explosion that allegedly devastated the building, just minutes after the workers had escaped with their lives.Avoiding the Subject: A spokesman for FEMA told AFP that because the building was considered to be very dangerous, there was no data collection from WTC 6.

http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/3940/kkkiu.jpg

There never was any visual trace on the NY skyline until the collapse, the tremendous damage to WTC’s 5 & 6 does appear consistent with a missile strike...

http://xs131.xs.to/xs131/08384/gz_aerial_wtc6140.jpghttp://xs131.xs.to/xs131/08384/gz_aerial_wtc5660.jpg

A multiple warhead Tomahawk cruiser would do it easy, though as we have ascertained, the pyroclastic event did not occur till the start of the collapse of the South Tower.

Take a look at this detail from the side on shot, ask yourself if the pattern of dark shapes at ground level to the right of the Millennium Hotel, downrange from Bldg 5, is where an overshoot component of the guided missile struck!

http://xs432.xs.to/xs432/08413/ovrshtwtcmsle572.jpg
Update: Google Earth exposes the dark shapes as trees.

McArdle’s FBI Sting tape, that recorded the explosion just after the impact on the South Tower, must have been recording one of the explosions in the underground levels Willie talks about.


So who is going' around making false videos, and going to the trouble of putting websites together like Bollyn and Jack White have done, that are total fabrication!!NY1 an internet news service from NY had excellent long shots of the entire drama, when the South Tower began to disintegrate at 10:00 am, the station was showing close up chromatically aberrated images, and it was not till the collapse was well under way were the long shots put back onto the screen.

So investigators are unable to see whether a missile could be seen at 10 am, and are unable to exactly time the emergence of the explosive cloud, emanating from the vicinity of WTC’s 4, 5 & 6.

A female ambulance officer who was a first responder, said in an interview on 1 October 2001, that cars were blowing up in the street, and that she looked up and saw an airplane explode in mid air, after seeking shelter in Building 6, to be turned away by officers in "Smoky Bear" hats.


Patricia Ondrovic says: As I was running, parked cars were blowing up and some were on fire, running up Vesey, the first car blew up on me on the corner of Vesey and the West Side Highway.

I saw two other planes, one came in one way, and the other came in the other way, there was a plane in the middle that was way far off in the distance, the plane in the middle just disappeared into a little fire ball, it looked like the size of a golf ball from where I could see it," Killtown.com.Her story resurfaced in April ’07 on Rense.com, only to be buried under truck loads of spam.

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/6179/image8.jpg

This is a shot of the car park, adjacent to where she witnessed the cars exploding at the corner of West and Vesey, diagonally opposite WTC 6 visible in the above side on shot, the missile appears to have come in on that vector, and surely from head on could easily resemble a golf ball shaped object, when the containment housing was blasted away by the separation charge!

The independent components could have then been steered "smart bomb" fashion, into their targets.


The the Readers Digest ran a story in about September 1970, which said explosives were to be built into the major buildings at the WTC complex to facilitate their eventual controlled demolition.

http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/3223/laffoley.jpg

Paul Laffoley a new York artist who was once one of Andy Warhol's proteges, worked for Emory Roth an architectural firm on the WTC project during construction, he has since gone public that there was indeed discussion of doing just that, building demolition charges into the towers!The latest WTC update

http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/8730/topics911attacks.jpg

The missile like object at right in the pic above, appears to endorse the claim that there was a missile impact almost simultaneous with the strike on the South Tower.

However that scenario seemed impossible, since the damage which appeared to have been caused by a multiple warhead cruise missile, was to Bldg's 4, 5 & 6, the supposed missile in the flash vid and in the update pic, is on the wrong trajectory to impact at the foot of the towers.


Friends there is a mystery... the streaking object in the gif animation, and the object at right in the update pic appear to be one and the same, and both resemble a cruise missile.However what sort of missile can impact in the middle of New York City without leaving a trace...

http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/2668/23overheadlowres.jpg


We had concluded that a missile hit Bldg's 4, 5 & 6 at 10:00 am, simultaneous with the collapse of the South Tower, using the Jack White montage above as a reference point.Check this latest pic...

http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/9797/18wtc1heli.jpg

The South Tower is gone and Bldgs 5 & 6 remain intact, which means that the missile if there was one, neither impacted at the same time as the South Tower was hit by the plane, nor when it collapsed!

So now we have to formulate a hypothesis that fits all the facts.

http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/4874/jackwhite.jpg

Jack White is a falsifier we know that because he declared his montage was filmed at 9:04 am, however the demolition wave seen in profile as the South Tower disintegrated means that it was 10:00 am.

That means the animated gif file at top in the Missile Story, and the update pic above, that has a missile like object in the right place at the right time, remain the only evidence there was a missile at all, sure there are dirty great holes in WTC's 5 & 6... but that does not mean a missile.


The only available time frame for there to be a missile strike at all, is when the North Tower went down!The other option is that there was no missile at all, both the gif animation and the update pic are false, these false images and Jack Whites bogus captioning on the ST collapse montage, were combined to create a false missile story, designed to divert attention from what was perhaps the "Beam Weapon," postulated by Dr Judy Wood!

Update

http://xs142.xs.to/xs142/09321/1085ma211.jpg

Consider that the above pic is the disintegration of the North Tower, and the missile is the piece within the red circle!

Sol Invictus
08-18-2009, 04:17 AM
Ok buddy, I think you're crossing the line here. Let's not go on theories, let's go on FACTS.

Here are some FACTS about 9/11:

The towers were obviously impacted by Jet Airplanes loaded with fuel. I don't buy into any sort of missile deal in regards to the WTC because there are hundreds of thousands of eyewitnesses who could discount that theory and any sort of 'video' evidence showing the impact of a missile into the towers can be easily fabricated, lets not forget.

1) We know for sure that it was fully loaded planes that hit the towers

2) We know for sure that is, against the laws of physics for towers of that size to fall straight down into the path of most resistance, therefore, could not have 'collapsed'.

3) We know that pyroclastic dust clouds were discovered in the wreckage of the towers, the likes of which are only able to present themselves on two occasions:

a) Volcanic Eruptions
b) Controlled Demolitions

4) Weapons grade nano-thermite has been proven to of been present inside the wreckage of the towers by top scientists and experts in this field of study.

5) All of the 9/11 Hijackers are proven to be CIA assets who were trained, funded, and protected by elements of the Department of Defense, as well as the Pakistani ISI.

6) First responders (Police, Firemen, and Rescue personnel) all recall multiple explosions occur prior to the collapse of the world trade center.

7) The 9/11 Commission Report hearings barred almost 400 eyewitness reports to this fact.

I've heard alot of mumbo jumbo about missiles hitting the WTC from outside sources. NONE of which come from any credible eyewitness testimony.
All of which seems to be coming from agents working for the government to purposely de-rail any sort of proper investigation into 9/11, and the 9/11 Truth Movement.

SwordoftheVistula
08-18-2009, 05:21 AM
What happened to the planes, if it was guided missiles which hit the towers?

Sol Invictus
08-18-2009, 05:25 AM
What happened to the planes, if it was guided missiles which hit the towers?

Hollograms I guess..

Cato
08-18-2009, 05:40 AM
Are you saying the Twin Towers got nuked?

:crazy:

Sol Invictus
08-18-2009, 05:45 AM
Are you saying the Twin Towers got nuked?

:crazy:

x2

Cato
08-18-2009, 02:06 PM
x2

Where'd the radioactive residue go then? :confused: I think that fellow's speculations are, at the least, inaccurate.