PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Helps Spanish Company to Buy Texas Bank



Brännvin
08-26-2009, 12:29 AM
U.S. Helps Spanish Company to Buy Texas Bank

By ERIC DASH
Published: August 21, 2009

Guaranty Bank, a deeply troubled Texas lender, was sold on Friday to Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria of Spain in one of the largest government-assisted deals offered to a foreign firm.

The federal government agreed to absorb most of the losses on $11 billion of Guaranty Bank assets in the sale agreement.

Federal regulators seized Guaranty Bank and simultaneously brokered the sale of its branches as well as most of the deposits and assets to BBVA Compass, the Spanish bank’s American subsidiary. The government, however, agreed to absorb most of the losses on $9.7 billion, or more than 80 percent, of the Guaranty assets included in the deal.

The failure is the fourth-largest since the financial crisis began, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation projects that it will cost its deposit insurance fund about $3 billion.

Regulators also arranged for the sales of three smaller banks in Alabama and Georgia on Friday, bringing the total number of bank failures so far this year to 81. That compares with only 25 bank failures in all of 2008.

News that BBVA had submitted the winning bid leaked out earlier this week, but regulators waited until late Friday to orchestrate the takeover. That may be another sign that confidence in the financial system is being restored, since in contrast to past leaks, regulators did not immediately seize the bank over fears of rumors stoking a bank run.

Stockholders in Guaranty Bank will be wiped out, but the deal ensures that its depositors will not suffer losses. Although BBVA did not take control of the failed bank’s $344 million of brokered deposits, the F.D.I.C. said that it would reimburse brokers directly for those funds.

The government also agreed to shoulder the bulk of the losses on all of Guaranty’s loans — a deal sweetener that the government has rarely extended to overseas buyers.

BBVA agreed to buy $12 billion of the $13 billion assets left at Guaranty Bank, which it will ultimately sell to private investors. The F.D.I.C. agreed to take on the remaining $1 billion of assets, as well as cover losses on the $9.7 billion pool of risky loans that BBVA bought. The agreement calls for the government to take on about 80 percent of the first $2.3 billion of losses, and 95 percent of the losses above that threshold.

Loss-sharing agreements have become a standard part of the F.D.I.C.’s toolkit for resolving troubled banks, but rarely have they covered such a big portion of a failed bank’s assets.

And seldom are they offered to foreign buyers. Indeed, it appears the last time that an overseas bank received federal assistance in a failed bank deal was when the Bank of Ireland scooped up four New Hampshire banks in September 1991.

Analysts say the BBVA deal may signal that the F.D.I.C. will be more open to bids from foreign banks. Many of the strongest American banks are occupied with deals they did last fall, while private equity firms have struggled to meet the high bar set by regulators. Weaker banks, meanwhile, have been hamstrung by their own losses. That has left regulators scrambling to drum up buyers.

José Maria Garcia Meyer, the head of BBVA’s American operations, said in a statement that the deal provided convincing evidence of the bank’s strength and stability during the current crisis. “This transaction further demonstrates BBVA’s clear commitment in building its U.S. franchise,” he added.

Along with its Spanish rival Banco Santander, BBVA has been ramping up its business in fast-growing American markets that have strong ties to Latin America. It made a series of expensive acquisitions in Texas over the last few years.

Guaranty, which is based in Austin, will add another 103 locations in Texas and 59 branches in California, where BBVA has been trying to establish a beachhead. That will give it a total of 767 locations in seven Sun Belt states and make it the nation’s 15th-largest commercial bank with about $49 billion in deposits

NYT (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/22/business/22bank.html?_r=2&hp)

____________


Quite interesting the American "capitalism" :coffee:

Psychonaut
08-26-2009, 12:35 AM
Quite interesting the American "capitalism" :coffee:


The federal government agreed to absorb most of the losses on $11 billion of Guaranty Bank assets in the sale agreement.

Come on, you know that this kind of this is the exact opposite of capitalism and that most of the Americans around here are opposed to governmental bailouts as the absolutely reek of socialism. :nono:

Birka
08-26-2009, 01:58 AM
Quite interesting the American "capitalism" :coffee:

There has not been free market capitalism in America since 1913.

Brännvin
08-26-2009, 03:13 AM
Come on, you know that this kind of this is the exact opposite of capitalism and that most of the Americans around here are opposed to governmental bailouts as the absolutely reek of socialism. :nono:

Nothing to do with socialism :nono: (don't worry, though I dislike such system), it have more to do with corporate welfare. (http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=8230)




There has not been free market capitalism in America since 1913.

Oh wow.. double standard, this coming from you. ;) And I wonder, has really the 'free market' (market anarchism) existed in the U.S. or somewhere in the world even before of 1913?

My teacher said it perhaps existed only in some Dutch and Flemish towns during the sixteenth century for a short very period.

Psychonaut
08-26-2009, 03:34 AM
Nothing to do with socialism :nono: (don't worry, though I dislike such system), it have more to do with corporate welfare. (http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=8230)


Well, the American Heritage Dictionary says:


so·cial·ism (sō'shə-lĭz'əm) n.

1. Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

2. The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.

Corporate bailouts seem, to me at least, in line with this definition as they involve the state taking money from the people and redistributing it so as to "help" the "economy." :rolleyes:

Brännvin
08-26-2009, 04:02 AM
From the Merriam-Webster's Open Dictionary (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism);

1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods

2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state

3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

________


Since that there is still private property, so it is not socialism. Socialism is where the state controls all property.

Psychonaut
08-26-2009, 11:12 PM
Since that there is still private property, so it is not socialism. Socialism is where the state controls all property.

Well, of course we're not a fully socialist society yet. We do, however, have socialist policies in place, policies which seem to multiply with every administration. This indicates to me that we're on the road to socialism, even though our destination is still a ways off.

Brännvin
08-29-2009, 04:47 AM
Well, of course we're not a fully socialist society yet.

And not even will be.


We do, however, have socialist policies in place, policies which seem to multiply with every administration. This indicates to me that we're on the road to socialism, even though our destination is still a ways off.

If the government gives money and incentive to large private corporations doesn’t meaning necessarily socialism either, you are confused between corporate reality and real meaning of the term socialism which is the absence of private property and scheme collectivism social.

Brännvin
08-29-2009, 04:51 AM
Another Spanish bank dominating;

__________


Spanish bank to buy Miami's Mellon United (http://www.miamiherald.com/business/international/story/1150271.html)

Spain's Banco de Sabadell aims to expand its foothold in Florida with the acquisition of Miami's Mellon United National Bank.

Spain's Banco de Sabadell, in a bid to expand its Florida presence, is expected to announce that it is acquiring Miami-based Mellon United National Bank, a person familiar with the transaction said Monday.

Miami-based Mellon United, a commercial bank, has assets of about $2billion and 15 offices in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties. It is a unit of giant Bank of New York Mellon, which has been selling off commercial banking operations to focus on wealth management and private banking.

Spanish banks, in turn, have been snapping up Florida institutions in recent years to provide a base for their operations in Latin America and to service Spanish companies doing business in the United States.

Mid-size Spanish bank Banco Popular Español bought Miami-based TotalBank in November 2007 for $300million, and Miami banker Leonard Abess Jr. sold an 83percent stake in City National Bancshares to savings bank Caja Madrid for $927million last November.

Despite the global financial crisis, Spanish banks have been in a relatively strong position because they didn't buy subprime mortgage instruments.

PRICE UNCERTAIN

It isn't clear how much Mellon United will fetch in the current depressed economic environment, in which banks are generally out of favor.

Dow Jones News Newswires reported Monday that one source put the price at just below $200million. That would be about half of the $400million that Bankof New York Mellonpaid for the Miamiinstitution when it acquired it from Miami banker Gerald Katcher in 1998.

Sabadell already owns Miami-based Transatlantic Bank. Officials at Transatlantic couldn't be reached late Monday for comment.

Merrett Stierheim, a director at Mellon United, declined to comment on the negotiations.

Mellon merged with Bank of New York in July 2007. Since that combination, the giant bank has been shedding commercial banking operations as it concentrated its efforts on asset and wealth management.

CO-FOUNDER OUSTED

In January, Bank of New York Mellon dispatched a top executive to Miami to fire Katcher, the chairman and a Miami banking veteran who had helped found the Florida bank 30 years ago.

Katcher's relationship with the holding company appeared to have deteriorated after an investors group he organized to buy the Florida Mellon unit from Bank of New York shelved its plans.

Three directors of the Miami bank board promptly resigned in protest. They included Dr. Pedro Greer; David Lawrence Jr., president of the Early Childhood Initiative and former publisher of The Miami Herald; and Sherwood M. ``Woody'' Weiser, chairman and chief executive of Continental Cos.

Katcher and a business associate, Howard R. Scharlin, started the bank in 1978 by acquiring a small unit of Southeast Bank, but by 1998 it had grown to more than $800million in assets.

Katcher and Scharlin sold the bank to Mellon for $400million and Katcher stayed on to run it locally before his ouster.