Should Dravidians and Australian aborigines classified as black, and are they related to eachother?

[ButlerKing]

Well for sure if I was to compare who look like them the most than Australian aborigines look Black. The same I would compare Caucasian with Ainu/Jomon. As for Dravidians, I still think they have their own look or I still think they look closer to North Indians.

Their face are different to African Blacks and Ethiopians. Australian Aborines and Dravidians have neither the genetics and skulls that matches African people, their physical features are a environmental adaption. Anyway should they be considered Black?


http://www.gulf-times.com/NewsImages//2013/2/10/428a6155-1722-4173-9342-d2ae4d91a884.jpg
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmi6kazEZY1qa944oo1_500.jpg
http://www.pa-pa.ca/image/Australian%20Aboriginals%202.jpg
http://www.buzzle.com/img/articleImages/382102-58023-58.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_2fdwS3Y1VhU/TLvGcxdZYjI/AAAAAAAAoHo/8_avO3DJhDI/s1600/australian_aborigines_10.jpg
http://www.goeringo.com/wp-content/uploads/Aboriginal_Children.jpg
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/07/05/world/05australia.600.jpg


Tamil Indians, their the only group who I would never classify as Black even though their closer to this veddoid Australoid. It's their hair, facial hair, nose shape, bone structure that is similar to Caucasian. Another group said they are related with Australian aborigines but I don't see it at all.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_BKEsPchLV78/TPlGaXmNvyI/AAAAAAAAEuo/F1Rq_9JSDH0/s1600/Tamil_protestors.jpg
http://www.armybase.us/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/tamil-protestors-demonstrate-outside-the-houses-of-parliament-in-central-london.jpg
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2008/03/06/tamil460.jpg
http://tamilguardian.com/files/Image/pictures/diaspora/Uni%20Tamil%20Soc%20Nov%202011/340438_226341737430725_124424337622466_671368_9606 48443_o.jpg
http://www.emgonline.co.uk/sikhnet-news/news/image/sikh_tamil003.jpg
http://static2.demotix.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/a_scale_large/000-6/photos/1278941105-tamil-demonstration-in-whitehall-london-17012009_9576.jpg

[SkyBurn]

Ummm, excuse me?

There are strict rules on TA about posting photos of other members :mad:

[GrebluBro]

Tamil Indians, their the only group who I would never classify as Black even though their closer to this veddoid Australoid. It's their hair, facial hair, nose shape, bone structure that is similar to Caucasian. Another group said they are related with Australian aborigines but I don't see it at all.


You seem to be smart here :laugh:

[Grace O'Malley]

Australian Aborigines originally came from India but that was thousands of years ago. The Australian Aborigine has been isolated and has deviated from the Indian population. The have an origin but are not that similar today.

[dude]

I don't know if they are related, but I don't consider Tamils black...nor white. They are Indian, eat very hot food and are very popular in the IT department.

[GrebluBro]

Australian Aborigines originally came from India but that was thousands of years ago. The Australian Aborigine has been isolated and has deviated from the Indian population. The have an origin but are not that similar today.

I agree with you to some extent..

All Caucasoids like European, MENA, most-of-south-Asians were all derived from same group near Caucasus mountain or somewhere near that place

It doesn't make sense if we go back too far (after all, all humans were originated from same place)

We should talk about current population genes alone => INdians and Australoids got nothing in common.
If you claim those two got something in common then you also should acknowledge Africans and Whites got something common

[KidMulat]

Black is already used to describe Aboriginals in Australia; its a social construct not based in science but informed by that nations context

[GrebluBro]

Indian subcontinent people are one distinct race
There are some differences within subcontient, so what? Irish and Greeks, Swedish and Spanish are showing visible difference

[KidMulat]

Indian subcontinent people are one distinct race
There are some differences within subcontient, so what? Irish and Greeks, Swedish and Spanish are showing visible difference

If they are one distinct race? No they aren't obviously that is so.

[The Illyrian Warrior]

Black is already used to describe Aboriginals in Australia; its a social construct not based in science but informed by that nations context

So basically you'd be classified as Aborigine if you went to Australia, no wonder you defended cannibalism before. :rolleyes2:

[GrebluBro]

If they are one distinct race? No they aren't obviously that is so.

If they aren't, then there is no single race like European or Negroid.

I can see obvious difference between north-East Slavic women and Mediterranean women.

To ignorant Germans & pale-Russians, the majority of Balkans,Greeks, Spaniards are not White cuz they compare these outsiders with their locals.
Same race people can show some differences, not a big deal

[KidMulat]

So basically you'd be classified as Aborigine if you went to Australia, no wonder you defended cannibalism before. :rolleyes2:

No I would be black as well but a different kind of black.

How retarded can you be?

[KidMulat]

If they aren't, then there is no single race like European or Negroid.

I can see obvious difference between north-East Slavic women and Mediterranean women.

Pashtun and Tribals are night and day. Slavs and Meds more like noon to dusk.

[GrebluBro]

Pashtun and Tribals are night and day. Slavs and Meds more like noon to dusk.

Pashtun are Afghans (living in Pakistan doesn't matter)..Afghans not Indian-subcontinent people

[The Illyrian Warrior]

No I would be black as well but a different kind of black.

How retarded can you be?

You admitted yourself earlier, black is included on Aborigines category - there isn't such a thing being different black or not. lol

Now you being oxymoronic with yourself since you said it personally in first comment. :biggrin:

[KidMulat]

You admitted yourself earlier, black is included on Aborigines category - there isn't such a thing being different black or not. lol

Now you being oxymoronic with yourself since you said it personally in first comment. :biggrin:

Wow you are a retard.

Black like white is informed by a given culture; black as I originally stated was informed by the history of Australia and Oceania back when Australians, Papuans and Melanesians were called "oceanic negroes" and such. Its recognized that Australian Aboriginals and Africans are not the same both use the same word to describe themselves.

Negritos are blacks, Khoisan are blacks; we're all black but in different ways and are treated as such.

I see no oxy but a lot of moron from you. Maybe its because you don't fully grasp English though?

[The Illyrian Warrior]

Wow you are a retard.

Black like white is informed by a given culture; black as I originally stated was informed by the history of Australia and Oceania back when Australians, Papuans and Melanesians were called "oceanic negroes" and such. Its recognized that Australian Aboriginals and Africans are not the same both use the same word to describe themselves.

Negritos are blacks, Khoisan are blacks; we're all black but in different ways and are treated as such.

I see no oxy but a lot of moron from you. Maybe its because you don't fully grasp English though?

Simply said the essence of it remains unchanged, black is word who describe Aborigines same as it describes you....Many words for same conclusion. :coffee:

[KidMulat]

Simply said the essence of it remains unchanged, black is word who describe Aborigines same as it describes you....Many words for same conclusion. :coffee:

No it's because Europeans were too stupid to recognized all these people were not the same; its one word to describe many different conclusions idiot.

How dumb are you?

[The Illyrian Warrior]

No it's because Europeans were too stupid to recognized all these people were not the same; its one word to describe many different conclusions idiot.

How dumb are you?

Thank God we have a person, to notice how dumb were Europeans back than. :picard1:

Do you honestly see what shits you write on here....See what oxymoronic statement you give for exact same thing or better say conclusion. :coffee:

[KidMulat]

Thank God we have a person, to notice how dumb were Europeans back than. :picard1:

Do you honestly see what shits you write on here....See what oxymoronic statement you give for exact same thing or better say conclusion. :coffee:

Your trolling like your attempt to seem cool, calm and correct is so off.

Glad to know your trying to improve your English by using a new word (oxymoronic how long Idid it take for you to want to interject it everywhere?"

Its a cute try though, come back to me when you have something of value to say!

[The Illyrian Warrior]

Your trolling like your attempt to seem cool, calm and correct is so off.

Glad to know your trying to improve your English by using a new word (oxymoronic how long Idid it take for you to want to interject it everywhere?"

Its a cute try though, come back to me when you have something of value to say!

Basically I laugh at your given statements so far for exact same thing you said on first post, that's all. Still don't get what's all the fuzz about blacks being different kind from other blacks, in this case Aborigines?! :rolleyes: