PDA

View Full Version : What group of Slavic people has the most Asiatic admixture?



ChocolateFace
05-01-2013, 04:07 AM
What group of Slavic people has the most Asiatic Admixture?

Kastrioti1443
05-01-2013, 04:08 AM
You mean mongoloid or middle eastern?

Sikeliot
05-01-2013, 04:11 AM
If you mean Mongoloid then probably Russians.

ChocolateFace
05-01-2013, 04:11 AM
You mean mongoloid or middle eastern?

There are 4 primary races. Caucasian , Asiatic, Negroid , and Aboriginal. Some people debate weather there are 2 groups in Africa who are part of a different race.

Middle eastern is not one. People from the middle east can be of any race.

PeacefulCaribbeanDutch
05-01-2013, 04:16 AM
Kazakstani

ChocolateFace
05-01-2013, 04:17 AM
edited.....

Smeagol
05-01-2013, 04:44 AM
Chuvash.

arcticwolf
05-01-2013, 04:48 AM
I'm sure this thread will have a huge Slavic input! Just wait for the flood to begin! :laugh:

ChocolateFace
05-01-2013, 04:51 AM
I'm sure this thread will have a huge Slavic input! Just wait for the flood to begin! :laugh:

There is a solid chance I'm going to wake up and find out this thread is 100 pages deep :lol00001:

Crn Volk
05-01-2013, 05:06 AM
Albanians

Crn Volk
05-01-2013, 05:07 AM
I'm sure this thread will have a huge Slavic input! Just wait for the flood to begin! :laugh:

and watch all the shiptars pick Serbian

Kastrioti1443
05-01-2013, 05:08 AM
Albanians

albanians are not slavs, nigger from fyrom

Crn Volk
05-01-2013, 05:15 AM
albanians are not slavs, nigger from fyrom

no? you sure about that? i hear they have serbian blood

Kastrioti1443
05-01-2013, 05:16 AM
no? you sure about that? i hear they have serbian blood

The opposite. Serbian blood does not exist. Genetics have proven this also. Among ghegs R1a and I2a2 are absent or very low.

Amun
05-01-2013, 09:10 AM
Russians because of Monogliod Admixture

Hayalet
05-01-2013, 10:15 AM
Chuvash.
...are Turkic, not Slavic.

ChocolateFace
05-01-2013, 06:14 PM
:bump2:

EF10
05-01-2013, 06:27 PM
Bulgarians

glass
05-01-2013, 06:27 PM
Bulgars
Their ethnicity name derives from asiatic word
They were living voluntary with asiatic turks hunderds years.
Every bulgar has some turkish or asiatic relatives.
In all major wars they were fighting by anti-slavic side.
Basically they are turks pretending to be slavs so most asiatic

Szegedist
05-01-2013, 06:34 PM
Well, according to RussiaPrussia......

el22
05-01-2013, 06:39 PM
There are 4 primary races. Caucasian , Asiatic, Negroid , and Aboriginal. Some people debate weather there are 2 groups in Africa who are part of a different race.

Middle eastern is not one. People from the middle east can be of any race.

This is off topic, but I went to wikipedia article about races (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_classification)) and the word aboriginal doesn't exist. What does it mean?

ChocolateFace
05-01-2013, 06:43 PM
This is off topic, but I went to wikipedia article about races (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_classification)) and the word aboriginal doesn't exist. What does it mean?

the aborginal groups of Australia. Also knows as Australoids.

Minde
05-01-2013, 06:43 PM
i dont see option ''Lithuanian''

ChocolateFace
05-01-2013, 06:44 PM
i dont see option ''Lithuanian''

You guys are a Baltic state.

el22
05-01-2013, 06:47 PM
the aborginal groups of Australia. Also knows as Australoids.

And native americans what race would be?

Minde
05-01-2013, 06:47 PM
You guys are a Baltic state.

Slavic

ChocolateFace
05-01-2013, 06:50 PM
And native americans what race would be?

They are Asian.

Hayalet
05-01-2013, 06:52 PM
Bulgars
Their ethnicity name derives from asiatic word
They were living voluntary with asiatic turks hunderds years.
Every bulgar has some turkish or asiatic relatives.
In all major wars they were fighting by anti-slavic side.
Basically they are turks pretending to be slavs so most asiatic
Not really, it's Russians who are with the most Asiatic admixture among the Slavs.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-AiqxfdH1kqo/TnC1DOX7yUI/AAAAAAAAEHk/LanedZAS19Q/s1600/admixture-caucasus.png

Mans not hot
05-01-2013, 06:52 PM
Bulgars
Their ethnicity name derives from asiatic word
They were living voluntary with asiatic turks hunderds years.
Every bulgar has some turkish or asiatic relatives.
In all major wars they were fighting by anti-slavic side.
Basically they are turks pretending to be slavs so most asiatic
lol

Pallantides
05-01-2013, 06:54 PM
North Russians, they have about 7-8% Siberian admixture, regular Russians have less in the 3-4% range I believe.

Archduke
05-01-2013, 07:08 PM
Bulgars
Their ethnicity name derives from asiatic word
They were living voluntary with asiatic turks hunderds years.
Every bulgar has some turkish or asiatic relatives.
In all major wars they were fighting by anti-slavic side.
Basically they are turks pretending to be slavs so most asiatic

I laugh so hard right now. :lol:

Kastrioti1443
05-01-2013, 07:09 PM
Russians and serbs.

glass
05-02-2013, 07:35 AM
Well, according to RussiaPrussia......
Firstly according RP russians are north asians, so they should not be on this slavic list
Secondly RP is completely insane

btw
Are you stalking me or something? Every time i write post your post follows.
Not surpirse for me you like hot russian guys but i am not really into homo relationships. You should understand it!


slavic
You can be wannabe slav at best. It is not enough to get into list of superior people. Deal with it!

Kazimiera
05-02-2013, 07:52 AM
From a geographical point of view I would say that Russia, because of the surface area and it's Asian neighbours like Mongolia and China would have the most Asiatic mix. A Russian from West Russia will obviously have less chance of being mixed than an area of Russia directly next to Mongolia, for example.

Lisa
05-04-2013, 05:03 PM
Southern Slavs, also some Ukrainians and Belarusians ... They have a large percentage of Middle Eastern and West Asian blood..
Belarusia http://www.semargl.me/ru/dna/ydna/country/24/
Poland http://www.semargl.me/ru/dna/ydna/country/188/
Russia http://www.semargl.me/ru/dna/ydna/country/194/

sevruk
05-04-2013, 05:06 PM
Southern Slavs, also some Ukrainians and Belarusians ... They have a large percentage of Middle Eastern and West Asian blood..

Why do you hate Ukrainians and Belarusians?

Windischer
05-04-2013, 05:11 PM
substantial amount of turkic and ugric speaking peoples settler in what is now eastern slovakia and adjacent areas to south and east. not sure if they were asiatic (mongoloid)

Lisa
05-04-2013, 05:16 PM
Why do you hate Ukrainians and Belarusians?

I do not hate them :confused:

sevruk
05-04-2013, 05:22 PM
I do not hate them :confused:

You hate all not Russian, you're just fucking Russian chauvinist, I'm ashamed of you!

Lisa
05-04-2013, 05:25 PM
You hate all not Russian, you're just fucking Russian chauvinist, I'm ashamed of you!

You idiot !:rolleyes2:

sevruk
05-04-2013, 05:27 PM
You idiot !:rolleyes2:

You even hate southern Russian!

inactive_member
05-04-2013, 05:34 PM
Belarusians have most Asiatic admix among all Slavs afterall! :)

Lisa
05-04-2013, 05:35 PM
You even hate southern Russian!

Stop lying , stupid troll :rolleyes2:


Belarusians have most Asiatic admix among all Slavs afterall!
You have a little bit of Jewish admixture in the western part of your country.

inactive_member
05-04-2013, 05:56 PM
You even hate southern Russian!

Mate, she is a $#%^&$! :)

Y chromosome gene pool of Belarusians - clues from biallelic markers study, Kushniarevich et al. 2007

Sample N-574
R1a-292- 50,87%
I2a- 91- 15,85%
N1c-55- 9,58%
R1b-32- 5,57%
I1-25- 4,36%
E-18- 3,14%
J- 17- 2,96%
G- 10-1,74%
Other- 34- 5,92%



Another source: http://csl.bas-net.by/xfile/n_i_i/2011/9/05vet.pdf


http://s60.radikal.ru/i169/1204/6f/6d7d3a1eb3aa.jpg




On every decent scientific study Y-DNA marker is around 50% for Belarusian males.


Speaking of admix, in most projects analysis based on autosomes Belarusians have high NE component.



So who's the most European of us all? http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2012/04/so-whos-most-european-of-us-all.html


Lithuanians 77%
Finns 74%
Belorussians 70%
Swedes 69%
Norwegians 68%

Arbërori
05-04-2013, 05:59 PM
It seems that Russians and Serbs. As I know, many Cumans were also present in Serbia, so... Macedonian Bulgarians are suspicious aswell.

Pallantides
05-04-2013, 06:00 PM
Poles
63.3% North_European
20.9% Atlantic_Med
12.1% Caucasus
2.3% Southwest_Asian
0.9% South_Asian
0.5% Gedrosia
0.1% Siberian

Belorussians
67.8% North_European
16.1% Atlantic_Med
13.3% Caucasus
1.9% Southwest_Asian
0.5% South_Asian
0.3% Siberian

Ukrainians
62.1% North_European
16.4% Caucasus
16.3% Atlantic_Med
3% Southwest_Asian
0.9% South_Asian
0.8% Siberian
0.3% Gedrosia
0.2% East_Asian

Russians
66.4% North_European
14.1% Atlantic_Med
11.7% Caucasus
3% Siberian
1.8% Gedrosia
1.4% Southwest_Asian
1.1% East_Asian
0.4% South_Asian

Russians(North)
65.4% North_Europeans
12.1% Atlantic_Med
9.2% Caucasus
7.3% Siberian
2% Southwest_Asian
2% Gedrosia
1.1% South_Asian
0.8% East_Asian
0.1% Southeast_Asian

Bulgarians
34.8% North_European
30.1% Caucasus
23.7% Atlantic_Med
6.4% Southwest_Asian
3.3% Gedrosia
0.5% Northwest_African
0.5% South_Asian
0.4% East_Asian
0.3% Siberian

inactive_member
05-04-2013, 06:06 PM
You have a little bit of Jewish admixture in the western part of your country.

You don't know the history of the country neither did you look at different scientific studies or projects run by enthusiasts. All you know that Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth had Jewish minority making far reaching conclusions.

A short answer explaining why Poles, Belarusians and Lithuanians did not mix with Jews: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?72186-What-percent-of-Polish-people-have-Jewish-blood&p=1520425&viewfull=1#post1520425

Dacul
05-04-2013, 06:09 PM
Poles
63.3% North_European
20.9% Atlantic_Med
12.1% Caucasus
2.3% Southwest_Asian
0.9% South_Asian
0.5% Gedrosia
0.1% Siberian

Belorussians
67.8% North_European
16.1% Atlantic_Med
13.3% Caucasus
1.9% Southwest_Asian
0.5% South_Asian
0.3% Siberian

Ukrainians
62.1% North_European
16.4% Caucasus
16.3% Atlantic_Med
3% Southwest_Asian
0.9% South_Asian
0.8% Siberian
0.3% Gedrosia
0.2% East_Asian

Russians
66.4% North_European
14.1% Atlantic_Med
11.7% Caucasus
3% Siberian
1.8% Gedrosia
1.4% Southwest_Asian
1.1% East_Asian
0.4% South_Asian

Russians(North)
65.4% North_Europeans
12.1% Atlantic_Med
9.2% Caucasus
7.3% Siberian
2% Southwest_Asian
2% Gedrosia
1.1% South_Asian
0.8% East_Asian
0.1% Southeast_Asian

Bulgarians
34.8% North_European
30.1% Caucasus
23.7% Atlantic_Med
6.4% Southwest_Asian
3.3% Gedrosia
0.5% Northwest_African
0.5% South_Asian
0.4% East_Asian
0.3% Siberian

Lies,Slavs do not have Atlantic med admixture.
That is actually East Med admixture,from Bulgaria and Balkans.

Pallantides
05-04-2013, 06:10 PM
Lies,Slavs do not have Atlantic med admixture.
That is actually East Med admixture,from Bulgaria and Balkans.

I think some of that East Med went into the Caucasus component.

Lisa
05-04-2013, 06:20 PM
Poles
63.3% North_European
20.9% Atlantic_Med
12.1% Caucasus
2.3% Southwest_Asian
0.9% South_Asian
0.5% Gedrosia
0.1% Siberian

Belorussians
67.8% North_European
16.1% Atlantic_Med
13.3% Caucasus
1.9% Southwest_Asian
0.5% South_Asian
0.3% Siberian

Ukrainians
62.1% North_European
16.4% Caucasus
16.3% Atlantic_Med
3% Southwest_Asian
0.9% South_Asian
0.8% Siberian
0.3% Gedrosia
0.2% East_Asian

Russians
66.4% North_European
14.1% Atlantic_Med
11.7% Caucasus
3% Siberian
1.8% Gedrosia
1.4% Southwest_Asian
1.1% East_Asian
0.4% South_Asian

Russians(North)
65.4% North_Europeans
12.1% Atlantic_Med
9.2% Caucasus
7.3% Siberian
2% Southwest_Asian
2% Gedrosia
1.1% South_Asian
0.8% East_Asian
0.1% Southeast_Asian

Bulgarians
34.8% North_European
30.1% Caucasus
23.7% Atlantic_Med
6.4% Southwest_Asian
3.3% Gedrosia
0.5% Northwest_African
0.5% South_Asian
0.4% East_Asian
0.3% Siberian

This is a not representative sample of the Belarusians (Only 9 person from Vitebsk)..You can use the sample from Pskov or Novgorod - and you can receive 80% of northern Europe component for Russians...

inactive_member
05-04-2013, 06:51 PM
This is a not representative sample of the Belarusians (Only 9 person from Vitebsk)..You can use the sample from Pskov or Novgorod - and you can receive 80% of northern Europe component for Russians...

The largest NE component would likely be in populations of north-western Belarus and northern Minsk regions. Your analogy pointing to significant genetic differences between Russian regions is not applicable to Belarus, as Belarusian male population is six times more genetically homogeneous than Russian according to Balanovsky's study. You keep writing about something you have no idea.

Dombra
05-04-2013, 07:00 PM
Serbians because of their mixing with Albos. Wait, Albos are Africans :rolleyes:

Lisa
05-04-2013, 07:01 PM
The largest NE component would most likely be in populations of north-western Belarus and northern Minsk regions ..
On contrary in NorthEastern part (Vitebsk region) - for example these 9 Belarusians from the sample of Behar. Other Belarusians have other data (look at BelarussianV in Verenich sample)..

Dacul
05-04-2013, 07:02 PM
Lol Rugevit and Lisa are you not Christian orthodox of religion?
Maybe you can stop arguing a little at least tonight,since is Easter night.

inactive_member
05-04-2013, 07:15 PM
On contrary in NorthEastern part (Vitebsk region) - for example these 9 Belarusians from the sample of Behar. Other Belarusians have other data (look at BelarussianV in Verenich sample)..

Belarusian_V sample does not consist entirely of ethnical Belarusians, hence it's labeled as _V.
I know the history and ethnogenesis of people of different ethnographical regions of Belarus which you don't.

Lisa
05-04-2013, 07:32 PM
Belarusian_V sample does not consist entirely of ethnical Belarusians, hence it's labeled as _V.
I know the history and ethnogenesis of people of different ethnographical regions of Belarus which you don't.

Belarusian_V = ethnic Belarusians from "V"erenich project :rolleyes:

inactive_member
05-04-2013, 07:37 PM
Belarusian_V = ethnic Belarusians from "V"erenich project :rolleyes:

It's been also mentioned in this post


Samples with suffix _V are NOT academic samples of any sorts. They're made up of individual project participants which in many cases have mixed ancestry, for example, Lithuanian_V average contains half Germans and Ashkenazis - that's why it's so different from the average of the actual Lithuanian academic reference samples ("Lithuanians" in your illustration).
Source: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?76049-Are-Uralic-people-white&p=1515970&viewfull=1#post1515970

Лиза, не злите меня лучше.

Mans not hot
05-04-2013, 07:43 PM
You don't know the history of the country neither did you look at different scientific studies or projects run by enthusiasts. All you know that Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth had Jewish minority making far reaching conclusions.

A short answer explaining why Poles, Belarusians and Lithuanians did not mix with Jews: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?72186-What-percent-of-Polish-people-have-Jewish-blood&p=1520425&viewfull=1#post1520425
Why are you feeding retarded nordicist Russkie troll (sorry for harsh words, but that's my opinion of Lisa).

inactive_member
05-04-2013, 07:49 PM
Why are you feeding retarded nordicist Russkie troll (sorry for harsh words, but that's my opinion of Lisa).

Virtual personalities are often deceptive. There may be a sweetheart behind moody nordist . )) And it's Christmas Eve, so peace people.

Mans not hot
05-04-2013, 07:57 PM
Virtual personalities are often deceptive. There may be a sweetheart behind moody nordist . )) And it's Christmas Eve, so peace people.
There is no point to argue with her over same things because she's trolling you, don't you see? Some people just don't get it.

Lisa
05-04-2013, 08:04 PM
Лиза, не злите меня лучше.

Вы офигели ? Прислали мне ссылку на эту тему , а теперь что то не нравится ? Что касается Веренича , он использует людей прошедших тест в 23эндми , тех кто называет себя чистыми Беларусами он видимо принимает в свой проект , вот и всё .
Те , которые просто "Belarusians" это Беларусы из академической выборки ( 9 человек) , которую опубликовал Бехар , также например как выборка Русских из Каргополя (Веренич их не использует , но они фигурирует везде - как Вологодские Русские в других проектах ). Все эти выборки НЕРЕПРЕЗЕНТАТИВНЫ , вот и всё .

Lisa
05-04-2013, 09:09 PM
There is no point to argue with her over same things because she's trolling you, don't you see? Some people just don't get it.

There is well-known troll/mod here - it's XX .. :rolleyes:

Pallantides
05-04-2013, 11:29 PM
There is well-known troll/mod here - it's XX .. :rolleyes:

Now there is one more. :p;)

Skerdilaid
05-05-2013, 05:14 PM
....

rashka
05-05-2013, 05:20 PM
Yes we Albo's can be very deceiving. Most of us have the Ballkan or Central European look, but make no mistake waste down we are Africans.:p
Any Albanians with a balkan or central european look got it from the Slavs, either that or what they got is just a pseudo european look that can easily be uncovered by looking at them in real life and not through pictures.

Skerdilaid
05-05-2013, 05:22 PM
...

Arbërori
05-05-2013, 05:23 PM
Any Albanians with a balkan or central european look got it from the Slavs, either that or what they got is just a pseudo european look that can easily be uncovered by looking at them in real life and not through pictures.

Kosova's gone->http://i.imgur.com/UBpEqVU.gif

Kastrioti1443
05-05-2013, 05:24 PM
Any Albanians with a balkan or central european look got it from the Slavs, either that or what they got is just a pseudo european look that can easily be uncovered by looking at them in real life and not through pictures.

The problem is rushka from iran, that albanians are more central looking european that serbs, much more, especially highlanders where SLAVS have never entered, which explians why R1a and I2a2 is almost unexistent in northern albania.

Skerdilaid
05-05-2013, 05:25 PM
Regarding the Slavic input on Albanian, I urge you to visit Kosova and you will see who has the Central European look.

I will warn you though that you might get disappointed on the results.

rashka
05-05-2013, 05:27 PM
The problem is rushka from iran, that albanians are more central looking european that serbs, much more, especially highlanders where SLAVS have never entered, which explians why R1a and I2a2 is almost unexistent in northern albania.

Albanians are a Sicilian/Chechen mix and god knows what else is in your soup. Deal with it.

Kastrioti1443
05-05-2013, 05:28 PM
Albanians are a Sicilian/Chechen mix and god knows what else is in your soup. Deal with it.

I agree with you subhuman, but the problem is that you are evan a more sicilian/chechen mix than us.

Mans not hot
05-05-2013, 05:28 PM
Serbs and Albos spoiling threads as usual. :picard2:

Shkembe Chorba
05-05-2013, 09:31 PM
Bulgars
Their ethnicity name derives from asiatic word
They were living voluntary with asiatic turks hunderds years.
Every bulgar has some turkish or asiatic relatives.
In all major wars they were fighting by anti-slavic side.
Basically they are turks pretending to be slavs so most asiatic
Obvious moron is obvious. Also try to read some history, mate, its not so scary that you think.

ChocolateFace
05-05-2013, 09:35 PM
Serbs and Albos spoiling threads as usual. :picard2:

The serbs (rashka) started it again as they always do

lI
05-05-2013, 11:32 PM
This is a not representative sample of the Belarusians (Only 9 person from Vitebsk)..
Would you mind explaining where you got the idea that they're all from Vitebsk?

Those Belarusian samples are from Behar's study, their genome data is publicly available at the website of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE21478) and nowhere in that website (or in any of the numerous academic studies where they were used) is it mentioned that they'd be from Vitebsk or nearby - I should know since I've specifically scoured for any regional info about them and found none.

The Lithuanian samples from the same set come from all over the country (judging from how they compare to Lithuanian project participants with geographically specific ancestry), so I would be willing to bet that the same is also true for Belarusian sample set - after all, they do seem quite diverse: few are no different from North Ukrainians while one could even pass as fully Baltic.


You can use the sample from Pskov or Novgorod - and you can receive 80% of northern Europe component for Russians...
That is false. There are several Pskovians at Dodecad and they didn't even score as much as Lithuanian average (77.1%), let alone top it:


Parents are from Keb and Vekshinc

<tbody>

<tbody>
Population



Gedrosia
2.14%


Siberian
1.46%


Northwest_African
0.24%


Southeast_Asian
-


Atlantic_Med
18.84%


North_European
63.84%


South_Asian
1.22%


East_African
-


Southwest_Asian
1.48%


East_Asian
-


Caucasus
10.78%


Sub_Saharan
-

</tbody>



</tbody>


All grandparents are from Novaya Usitva

<tbody>
Population



Gedrosia
-


Siberian
0.44%


Northwest_African
1.15%


Southeast_Asian
0.75%


Atlantic_Med
12.26%


North_European
76.36%


South_Asian
0.24%


East_African
-


Southwest_Asian
4.42%


East_Asian
-


Caucasus
4.38%


Sub_Saharan
-

</tbody>


Posting their IDs publicly would probably be inappropriate - if you want to verify, I can PM them to you.

RussiaPrussia
05-06-2013, 11:53 AM
its obviously russians. But its not mongolian blood but mostly uralic admixture.

xajapa
05-06-2013, 11:56 AM
I voted Russia. I do wonder how many within Bulgaria have Bulgar ancestry. Anybody know?

Crn Volk
05-06-2013, 11:32 PM
I voted Russia. I do wonder how many within Bulgaria have Bulgar ancestry. Anybody know?

Good question. During communist times, the view was that Bulgar ancestry was very minimal. Adolf Hitler considered modern Bulgarians as pure Bulgars, obviously to distance them from Slavic Russia. Nowadays, the view is somewhere in between.

ABest
05-06-2013, 11:34 PM
Russians, I'd say.

Shkembe Chorba
05-07-2013, 09:42 AM
Good question. During communist times, the view was that Bulgar ancestry was very minimal.
True. Now I'm reading "History of Bulgaria", published in 1954, a pure communist edition, used as political propaganda. The First Bulgarian State is said to be a Bulgaro-Slavic federation with ruling minority to the Bulgars. The communist historians think that in 9 century the two etnicities mixed together, but the Slavs dominated, so after that Bulgaria became Slavic country.

All this was written to underline the brotherhood and the blood relationship with the Russian nation. In my opinion, it is not historical, antropological and cultural correct, but only political reasons determined it.

morski
05-07-2013, 10:40 AM
True. Now I'm reading "History of Bulgaria", published in 1954, a pure communist edition, used as political propaganda. The First Bulgarian State is said to be a Bulgaro-Slavic federation with ruling minority to the Bulgars. The communist historians think that in 9 century the two etnicities mixed together, but the Slavs dominated, so after that Bulgaria became Slavic country.

All this was written to underline the brotherhood and the blood relationship with the Russian nation. In my opinion, it is not historical, antropological and cultural correct, but only political reasons determined it.

What do you think really happened, then?

ChocolateFace
06-07-2013, 10:34 PM
http://www.ricesigns.com/real_pictures/bump_sign_W8-1_large.jpg

Laag
11-20-2019, 12:48 AM
Bulgarians by far. Siberian admixture =! Asiatic admixture.

https://i.imgur.com/4GLOZ27.png


Asiatic phenotypes (Turanid for example) do not not exist among Russians but very common among Bulgarians.
Russian girls with Siberian admixture. Pass as Aryans in countries like Bulgaria, Romania, Hungaria, Turkey or Uzbekistan where Turanid is very common.

https://pp.userapi.com/c636830/v636830920/e14/gpOgZEWjS-M.jpg
https://images.fashionmodeldirectory.com/images/models/164563/header_image_9bd9f461-3b53-4789-9d25-5f4d6a2e44d0.png
http://static.fashionbank.ru/photo/2010/12/66841/Anna-Andreeva5356344.jpg
https://krot.info/uploads/posts/2019-02/1549906124_defile_giambattista_valli_automne-hiver_2013-2014_couture_-.jpg
https://editorial01.shutterstock.com/wm-preview-450/1225852p/27da64b1/finalists-in-john-gallianos-fashion-fringe-covent-garden-london-britain-shutterstock-editorial-1225852p.jpg
https://pp.userapi.com/c639321/v639321333/de66/NVcdQxBfwk4.jpg
https://pp.userapi.com/c837721/v837721325/41244/VPkKwV3LEo4.jpg
http://castamodels.com/agency/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/02/IMG_3990_kopia.jpg
https://pp.userapi.com/c622530/v622530972/46106/9bqu-YzlY18.jpg
https://mediaslide-europe.storage.googleapis.com/modusvivendis/pictures/8/85/large-1547045312-9bc12a05a890586589e27d705483901b.jpg
https://i0.wp.com/gubdaily.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/krasa-4-9-550x550.jpg?resize=550%2C550

Laag
11-20-2019, 01:15 AM
Let's be honest people with Siberian admixture pass as Aryans in all countries below 50 parallel.

Jana
11-20-2019, 12:58 PM
West Asian-Bulgarians
Mongoloid-Russians

Ymyyakhtakh
11-20-2019, 10:03 PM
Asiatic phenotypes (Turanid for example) do not not exist among Russians but very common among Bulgarians.

I dunno. If you look at old photos of Russian peasants at Kunstkamera (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT?ethnos=3114), there's a lot of people who look pretty Uralic. According to the metadata of the photos, two of the photos are from an East Siberian expedition, but I don't know if the persons in the photos are mixed.

https://i.imgur.com/sGHU2BU.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/32339)https://i.imgur.com/8mNAJ06.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/74456)https://i.imgur.com/3GVxgrZ.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/79168)https://i.imgur.com/GLoas3B.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/97457)https://i.imgur.com/YcHgCGB.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/108357)https://i.imgur.com/OGPhJ3y.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/110153)https://i.imgur.com/BeFYSok.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/110301)

Laag
11-20-2019, 10:25 PM
I dunno. If you look at old photos of Russian peasants at Kunstkamera (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT?ethnos=3114), there's a lot of people who look pretty Uralic. According to the metadata of the photos, two of the photos are from an East Siberian expedition, but I don't know if the persons in the photos are mixed.

https://i.imgur.com/sGHU2BU.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/32339)https://i.imgur.com/8mNAJ06.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/74456)https://i.imgur.com/3GVxgrZ.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/79168)https://i.imgur.com/GLoas3B.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/97457)https://i.imgur.com/YcHgCGB.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/108357)https://i.imgur.com/OGPhJ3y.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/110153)https://i.imgur.com/BeFYSok.jpg (http://collection.kunstkamera.ru/entity/OBJECT/110301)

They look very Russian to me. Uralische looking (Siberian admixtured) Russians it's not rare.


https://i.imgur.com/pnQeoFR.jpg


Turanid looking (Asiatic admixtured) Russians do not exist.

https://i.img.ie/0EL.jpg

PAGANE
11-20-2019, 11:42 PM
Russians and Ukrainians / Western and Central Asia /, followed by Bulgarians / Western Asia /

tipirneni
11-21-2019, 01:43 PM
Russia has those ancient Ural, Kola, Siberian, NAsian populations that match big in Central Asia, South Asia, Iran, Middle East etc..

Poland/Ukraine some of the EHG match big in South Asia

PAGANE
11-21-2019, 01:52 PM
In Russia, 160 ethnic groups speak about 100 languages Of these, only the Slavs should be separated and classified

Bakha
11-21-2019, 01:55 PM
If one means “west asian” admixture than it’s def south slavs

Laag
11-21-2019, 01:58 PM
Russia has those ancient Ural, Kola, Siberian, NAsian populations that match big in Central Asia, South Asia, Iran, Middle East etc..


Not really. Anthropologists have long proved that Siberian admixture come from UP population of Siberia. Siberian admixture have nothing to do with Central Asia. Genetic studies have only confirmed this.

https://i.imgur.com/4GLOZ27.png

Laag
11-21-2019, 02:00 PM
Central Asia has no Siberian admixture. If they had it they would look more European on average.

Benyzero
11-21-2019, 02:02 PM
The most eastern ones, obviously.

Jana
11-21-2019, 02:04 PM
Central Asia has no Siberian admixture. If they had it they would look more European on average.

Central Asia is full with Siberian admixture.

Laag
11-21-2019, 02:06 PM
Central Asia is full with Siberian admixture.


Look at plot above. They don't have Siberian admixture. There is no need to whitewash them.

tipirneni
11-21-2019, 02:08 PM
Central Asia has no Siberian admixture. If they had it they would look more European on average.

Kyrgyz and Kazak populations match with South Siberian populations.

Karmin 2015 study and Abilev 2012 paper shows that

Benyzero
11-21-2019, 02:09 PM
Look at plot above. They don't have Siberian admixture. There is no need to whitewash them.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/20/09/3D70FC5000000578-4241546-image-a-8_1487584174797.jpg


:D

Jana
11-21-2019, 02:13 PM
Look at plot above. They don't have Siberian admixture. There is no need to whitewash them.

What is next, you will call negroes white ? :lol:

Kazakh

Admix Results (sorted):

1 Siberian 34.97
2 East_Asian 21.62
3 West_Asian 12.86
4 Baltic 12.16
5 North_Atlantic 8.6
6 South_Asian 4.6
7 Amerindian 2.69
8 West_Med 1.33
9 Northeast_African 0.75
10 East_Med 0.21
11 Oceanian 0.16
12 Red_Sea 0.06

Single Population Sharing:

1 Kazakh 2.75
2 Kirgiz 6.37
3 Hakas 12.94
4 Shors 13.16
5 Altaian 15.34
6 Hazara 16.5
7 Uygur 17.44
8 Uzbeki 17.61
9 Afghan_Turkmen 19.1
10 Mongolian 19.41
11 Aghan_Hazara 20.39
12 Tuvinian 24.69
13 Buryat 28.34
14 Nogay 30.53
15 Ket 33.19
16 Tatar 35.5
17 Mari 35.84
18 Selkup 36.28
19 Afghan_Tadjik 37.38
20 Chuvash 37.47

Turkmen

Admix Results (sorted):

1 Siberian 25.85
2 West_Asian 24.67
3 East_Asian 12.53
4 Baltic 11.48
5 North_Atlantic 6.96
6 South_Asian 6.35
7 East_Med 6.15
8 West_Med 2.48
9 Amerindian 1.71
10 Red_Sea 0.87
11 Sub-Saharan 0.68
12 Oceanian 0.27

Single Population Sharing:

1 Afghan_Turkmen 4.11
2 Uzbeki 7.88
3 Aghan_Hazara 10.6
4 Hazara 11.58
5 Nogay 14.47
6 Uygur 14.84
7 Kazakh 18.88
8 Kirgiz 20.83
9 Afghan_Tadjik 21.63
10 Turkmen 22.85
11 Shors 23.11
12 Tadjik 23.77
13 Hakas 25.28
14 Altaian 29.61
15 Tatar 29.66
16 Kabardin 30.77
17 Balkar 30.79
18 Kumyk 31.63
19 North_Ossetian 33.28
20 Afghan_Pashtun 33.31

Uzbek

Eurogenes K13 Oracle results:

Admix Results (sorted):

1 West_Asian 23.1
2 Siberian 20.86
3 East_Asian 16.17
4 North_Atlantic 11.08
5 South_Asian 10.35
6 Baltic 9.34
7 East_Med 6.35
8 Amerindian 1.66
9 Oceanian 0.51
10 Sub-Saharan 0.48
11 Red_Sea 0.1

Single Population Sharing:

1 Aghan_Hazara 5.16
2 Uzbeki 7.16
3 Afghan_Turkmen 9.09
4 Hazara 9.8
5 Uygur 9.87
6 Nogay 15.52
7 Afghan_Tadjik 19.16
8 Turkmen 20.98
9 Tadjik 21.07
10 Kazakh 21.24
11 Kirgiz 22.83
12 Shors 27.78
13 Hakas 29.89
14 Tatar 30.5
15 Afghan_Pashtun 30.53
16 Balkar 31.3
17 Kabardin 31.35
18 Kumyk 31.4
19 Altaian 33.36
20 Azeri 33.37

Anatolian Turk

Admix Results (sorted):

1 West_Asian 27.26
2 East_Med 25.23
3 West_Med 11.52
4 Siberian 7.36
5 Baltic 7.15
6 North_Atlantic 6.98
7 East_Asian 5.52
8 Red_Sea 5.11
9 South_Asian 2.80
10 Amerindian 1.08

Least-squares method.

1 Turkish @ 7.827005
2 Azeri @ 12.115146
3 Turkmen @ 15.416478
4 Kurdish @ 18.422138
5 Kumyk @ 18.570681
6 Georgian_Jewish @ 18.789095
7 Iranian @ 18.978643
8 Armenian @ 19.156500
9 Assyrian @ 19.462763
10 Lebanese_Muslim @ 19.852335
11 Nogay @ 20.215675
12 Syrian @ 20.334293
13 Central_Greek @ 21.214485
14 Iranian_Jewish @ 21.888222
15 East_Sicilian @ 21.967295
16 Kurdish_Jewish @ 22.030170
17 Cyprian @ 22.043495
18 Balkar @ 22.044586
19 South_Italian @ 22.422161
20 Kabardin @ 23.159328

Laag
11-21-2019, 02:18 PM
What is next, you will call negroes white ? :lol:

Kazakh

Admix Results (sorted):

1 Siberian 34.97
2 East_Asian 21.62
3 West_Asian 12.86
4 Baltic 12.16
5 North_Atlantic 8.6
6 South_Asian 4.6
7 Amerindian 2.69
8 West_Med 1.33
9 Northeast_African 0.75
10 East_Med 0.21
11 Oceanian 0.16
12 Red_Sea 0.06

Single Population Sharing:

1 Kazakh 2.75
2 Kirgiz 6.37
3 Hakas 12.94
4 Shors 13.16
5 Altaian 15.34
6 Hazara 16.5
7 Uygur 17.44
8 Uzbeki 17.61
9 Afghan_Turkmen 19.1
10 Mongolian 19.41
11 Aghan_Hazara 20.39
12 Tuvinian 24.69
13 Buryat 28.34
14 Nogay 30.53
15 Ket 33.19
16 Tatar 35.5
17 Mari 35.84
18 Selkup 36.28
19 Afghan_Tadjik 37.38
20 Chuvash 37.47

Turkmen

Admix Results (sorted):

1 Siberian 25.85
2 West_Asian 24.67
3 East_Asian 12.53
4 Baltic 11.48
5 North_Atlantic 6.96
6 South_Asian 6.35
7 East_Med 6.15
8 West_Med 2.48
9 Amerindian 1.71
10 Red_Sea 0.87
11 Sub-Saharan 0.68
12 Oceanian 0.27

Single Population Sharing:

1 Afghan_Turkmen 4.11
2 Uzbeki 7.88
3 Aghan_Hazara 10.6
4 Hazara 11.58
5 Nogay 14.47
6 Uygur 14.84
7 Kazakh 18.88
8 Kirgiz 20.83
9 Afghan_Tadjik 21.63
10 Turkmen 22.85
11 Shors 23.11
12 Tadjik 23.77
13 Hakas 25.28
14 Altaian 29.61
15 Tatar 29.66
16 Kabardin 30.77
17 Balkar 30.79
18 Kumyk 31.63
19 North_Ossetian 33.28
20 Afghan_Pashtun 33.31

Uzbek

Eurogenes K13 Oracle results:

Admix Results (sorted):

1 West_Asian 23.1
2 Siberian 20.86
3 East_Asian 16.17
4 North_Atlantic 11.08
5 South_Asian 10.35
6 Baltic 9.34
7 East_Med 6.35
8 Amerindian 1.66
9 Oceanian 0.51
10 Sub-Saharan 0.48
11 Red_Sea 0.1

Single Population Sharing:

1 Aghan_Hazara 5.16
2 Uzbeki 7.16
3 Afghan_Turkmen 9.09
4 Hazara 9.8
5 Uygur 9.87
6 Nogay 15.52
7 Afghan_Tadjik 19.16
8 Turkmen 20.98
9 Tadjik 21.07
10 Kazakh 21.24
11 Kirgiz 22.83
12 Shors 27.78
13 Hakas 29.89
14 Tatar 30.5
15 Afghan_Pashtun 30.53
16 Balkar 31.3
17 Kabardin 31.35
18 Kumyk 31.4
19 Altaian 33.36
20 Azeri 33.37

Anatolian Turk

Admix Results (sorted):

1 West_Asian 27.26
2 East_Med 25.23
3 West_Med 11.52
4 Siberian 7.36
5 Baltic 7.15
6 North_Atlantic 6.98
7 East_Asian 5.52
8 Red_Sea 5.11
9 South_Asian 2.80
10 Amerindian 1.08

Least-squares method.

1 Turkish @ 7.827005
2 Azeri @ 12.115146
3 Turkmen @ 15.416478
4 Kurdish @ 18.422138
5 Kumyk @ 18.570681
6 Georgian_Jewish @ 18.789095
7 Iranian @ 18.978643
8 Armenian @ 19.156500
9 Assyrian @ 19.462763
10 Lebanese_Muslim @ 19.852335
11 Nogay @ 20.215675
12 Syrian @ 20.334293
13 Central_Greek @ 21.214485
14 Iranian_Jewish @ 21.888222
15 East_Sicilian @ 21.967295
16 Kurdish_Jewish @ 22.030170
17 Cyprian @ 22.043495
18 Balkar @ 22.044586
19 South_Italian @ 22.422161
20 Kabardin @ 23.159328

That's not saying anything. Only purple color is really Siberian admixture. Kyrgyz and Kazak have Yakuts admixture and so? Yakuts is just migarnts from Central Asia living in Siberia.

Laag
11-21-2019, 02:22 PM
Kyrgyz and Kazak populations match with South Siberian populations.

Karmin 2015 study and Abilev 2012 paper shows that

They have Yakuts admixture but Yakuts are migrants from Central Asia living in Siberia so it's logical. Neither Kazakh nor Kirghiz have a real Siberian admixture (purple color).

Laag
11-21-2019, 02:39 PM
Samoyedic people are indigenous in Siberia while Yakuts are migrants from Central Asia that's Yakut admixture is not really Siberian.

Sche
11-21-2019, 02:59 PM
Considering that there are only 3 Slavic nation, these are Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians (the rest Slavs are Slavic speakers), Russians have the largest East Asian admixture. Middle Eastern Asian admixture is more among Ukrainians. Moreover, the most Slavic people are Russians. In Russians, the largest percentage of the original Slavic blood.

tipirneni
11-21-2019, 03:05 PM
They have Yakuts admixture but Yakuts are migrants from Central Asia living in Siberia so it's logical. Neither Kazakh nor Kirghiz have a real Siberian admixture (purple color).

Many Kyrgyz n Kazak have real chink looking Siberian looks. go see all the pictures yourself

Laag
11-21-2019, 03:14 PM
Many Kyrgyz n Kazak have real chink looking Siberian looks. go see all the pictures yourself

I know perfectly well what Kazakhs or Kyrgyz look like.

Nenets people


https://i.imgur.com/HUPnBUp.jpg


Central Asians

https://s.fishki.net/upload/users/2019/04/16/868001/3f8138f05b8373d8a2da5600e858bbf9.jpg

Omanvassal
11-21-2019, 03:17 PM
Considering that there are only 3 Slavic nation, these are Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians (the rest Slavs are Slavic speakers), Russians have the largest East Asian admixture. Middle Eastern Asian admixture is more among Ukrainians. Moreover, the most Slavic people are Russians. In Russians, the largest percentage of the original Slavic blood.

Lmao I needed a laugh

Ymyyakhtakh
11-21-2019, 03:22 PM
Samoyedic people are indigenous in Siberia while Yakuts are migrants from Central Asia that's Yakut admixture is not really Siberian.

The Proto-Samoyedic urheimat is in the Sayan region, which is not that far from the Proto-Turkic urheimat (in the Altai-Sayan region or Northern Mongolia).

If you look at the Asian mtDNA haplogroups of early Hungarians, they mostly originate in Inner Asia. The Siberian haplogroups mostly come from Southern Siberia, like the Altai and Lake Baikal region.

https://i.imgur.com/vseauGi.jpg
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205920

Southern Siberia supports high population densities by Siberian standards. According to the population figures listed in the 2010 Russian census (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Census_(2010)), out of the indigenous peoples of Siberia, Buryats and Tuvans alone made up more than half (915,289 out of 1,784,755):

#population in 2010 census;people;language family
44640;Nenets;Uralic
3649;Selkup;Uralic
862;Nganasan;Uralic
227;Enets;Uralic
30943;Khanty;Uralic
12269;Mansi;Uralic
478085;Yakut;Northeastern Turkic
263934;Tuvan;Northeastern Turkic
74238;Altai;Northeastern Turkic
72959;Khakas;Northeastern Turkic
12888;Shor;Northeastern Turkic
7885;Dolgan;Northeastern Turkic
2892;Kumandin;Northeastern Turkic
2643;Teleut;Northeastern Turkic
762;Tofalar;Northeastern Turkic
355;Chulym;Northeastern Turkic
651355;Buryat;Mongolic
3608;Soyot;Mongolic
2986;Khalkha Mongol;Mongolic
37843;Evenk;Tungusic
22383;Even;Tungusic
12003;Nanai;Tungusic
2765;Ulch;Tungusic
1496;Udege;Tungusic
596;Oroch;Tungusic
513;Negidal;Tungusic
295;Orok;Tungusic
15908;Chukchi;Paleo-Siberian
7953;Koryak;Paleo-Siberian
3193;Itelmen;Paleo-Siberian
1927;Kamchadal;Paleo-Siberian
1002;Chuvan;Paleo-Siberian
4;Kerek;Paleo-Siberian
4652;Nivkh;Paleo-Siberian
1603;Yukaghir;Paleo-Siberian
1219;Ket;Paleo-Siberian
1738;Eskimo;Eskimo-Aleut
482;Aleut;Eskimo-Aleut

In the map of Inner Asia below, both Buryatia and Tuva Republic are considered to be part of Inner Asia. Both have historically been part of the East Asian (Mongolian and Chinese) sphere of influence. You can see how tiny the combined area of Tuva Republic and Buryatia is, even though it's home to about half of the indigenous population of Siberia.

http://digitalmongolia.org/item/3bfd6968-94f4-4553-bcc6-a9c84e16a71e/Inner-Asia-SRI.df-med-img.3bfd6968-94f4-4553-bcc6-a9c84e16a71e.png

The location where Jaakko Häkkinen places Pre-Proto-Uralic in the map below is meant to be very approximate, but it's around the same region as the Turkic urheimat:

http://www.elisanet.fi/alkupera/Keski-AasiaU.jpg

Alenka
11-21-2019, 03:36 PM
If you mean Mongoloid admix specifically, then it's Russians. But if West Asian counts, then rather some South Slavic group.
In that case probably Bulgarians.

Laag
11-21-2019, 03:36 PM
The Proto-Samoyedic urheimat is in the Sayan region, which is not that far from the Proto-Turkic urheimat (in the Altai-Sayan region or Northern Mongolia).



According to Strahlenberg Nenets came to the Sayan highlands from the North.

Jana
11-21-2019, 03:41 PM
That's not saying anything. Only purple color is really Siberian admixture. Kyrgyz and Kazak have Yakuts admixture and so? Yakuts is just migarnts from Central Asia living in Siberia.

It is saying they have tons of Siberian. Uralics looks whiter because of EHG/NE European they score, not because of Siberian. Lol

Sche
11-21-2019, 03:50 PM
Lmao I needed a laugh
Indo-European Europe all occurred from the territory of northeastern Russia. The next stage is the Russian steppe. Then part of the Indo-Europeans broke away and went west, there formed a Yastorf culture and Germans. The Balto-Slavs formed within Kiev culture - the west of Russia, the south of Belarus and the north-east of Ukraine. This is the ancestral home of the Slavs, whether you like it or not is a fact. The Slavs of Belarus and Ukraine mixed with the migrants of the south and north, the Slavs of the west of Russia remained as they were 2000 thousand years ago. You must come to terms with the fact that Russians are the ancestors of Croats, Slovaks, Slovenes, Poles, Czechs, Bulgarians, Yugoslavs. This is all a mongrel.

Laag
11-21-2019, 03:51 PM
It is saying they have tons of Siberian. Uralics looks whiter because of EHG/NE European they score, not because of Siberian. Lol

Siberian admixture are white admixture. She came from UP population of Siberia. Many anthropologists have written about this and genetics proves it.

Jana
11-21-2019, 03:52 PM
Siberian admixture are white admixture. Many anthropologists have written about this and genetics proves it.

Only in your dreams. It is okay to be part yellow, really.

Laag
11-21-2019, 03:57 PM
Bunak claimed that the Uralische race is not a mixture between the white and Mongoloid race but a reflection of the ancient state of the "undifferentiated " anthropological complex (type) that existed before the division of mankind into Caucasoid and Mongoloid racial trunks.

Coon stated the same.


During the Late Pleistocene age, the post-glacial Mesolithic cultural period, descendants of Upper Palaeolithic hunters lived in North Africa, in most of Europe, and in western Siberia, where some of them merged into the ancestors of the mongoloid group of humanity. Even during the Upper Palaeolithic cultural period in western Europe, some of the hunting peoples showed incipiently mongoloid racial tendencies. Among the living descendants of these hunters, these tendencies are more common in the eastern groups than among those living in the west.

Genetics only confirms this.

Laag
11-21-2019, 03:59 PM
Only in your dreams. It is okay to be part yellow, really.

People with Siberian admixture pass as Aryans in all countries below 50 paralels. You can't deny it.

Ymyyakhtakh
11-21-2019, 04:01 PM
According to Strahlenberg Nenets came to the Sayan highlands from the North.

That's someone from the 1700s?

Jaakko Häkkinen, who is one of the leading researchers in Uralistics, and who runs the Finnish equivalent of Anthrogenica, wrote "2 000 years ago Proto-Samoyed was spoken near the Sayan area." https://www.sgr.fi/sust/sust264/sust264_hakkinenj.pdf

Jana
11-21-2019, 04:02 PM
People with Siberian admixture pass as Aryans in all countries below 50 paralels. You can't deny it.

Aryans are brown. People you advertise look mostly European and have minor Siberian admixture. They are genetically mostly NE Euro.

Laag
11-21-2019, 04:08 PM
Aryans are brown. People you advertise look mostly European and have minor Siberian admixture. They are genetically mostly NE Euro.

People with Siberian admixture are white. People with Central Asian, West Asian or even in some cases Central European/Soutn European admixture most likely are not white and they don't look white as rules.

Sche
11-21-2019, 04:10 PM
Aryans are brown. People you advertise look mostly European and have minor Siberian admixture. They are genetically mostly NE Euro.
EHG had up to 20% Siberian admixture. As is known, EHG is the main component of the first Indo-Europeans. Hindus have a Dravidian mixture, so they are brown.

Laag
11-21-2019, 04:15 PM
Aryans are brown. People you advertise look mostly European and have minor Siberian admixture. They are genetically mostly NE Euro.


Those people are Mari, Komi or Uralische looking Russians girls.

Omanvassal
11-21-2019, 04:18 PM
Indo-European Europe all occurred from the territory of northeastern Russia. The next stage is the Russian steppe. Then part of the Indo-Europeans broke away and went west, there formed a Yastorf culture and Germans. The Balto-Slavs formed within Kiev culture - the west of Russia, the south of Belarus and the north-east of Ukraine. This is the ancestral home of the Slavs, whether you like it or not is a fact. The Slavs of Belarus and Ukraine mixed with the migrants of the south and north, the Slavs of the west of Russia remained as they were 2000 thousand years ago. You must come to terms with the fact that Russians are the ancestors of Croats, Slovaks, Slovenes, Poles, Czechs, Bulgarians, Yugoslavs. This is all a mongrel.

Ok my Mother score Southwest Russian 1, my Father score Ukrainian 1

Very nice (Borat Voice)

Jana
11-21-2019, 04:19 PM
Those people are Mari, Komi or Uralische looking Russians girls.

Yes. They are north Europeans with some admixure.

Jana
11-21-2019, 04:20 PM
EHG had up to 20% Siberian admixture. As is known, EHG is the main component of the first Indo-Europeans. Hindus have a Dravidian mixture, so they are brown.

Not Siberian admixture in modern sense. They had lot of ANE, which is absent in East Asians for example.

Sche
11-21-2019, 04:21 PM
People with Siberian admixture are white. People with Central Asian, West Asian or even in some cases Central European/Soutn European admixture most likely are not white and they don't look white as rules.
Anthropological signs appeared later than the first Europeans and Asians. Ancient Western Europeans had Mongoloid and Negroid characters, and the first Siberians also had Mongoloid and Caucasoid characters. The late Siberian component is Mongoloid. Early - undifferentiated.

Omanvassal
11-21-2019, 04:22 PM
I remember this Croatian user score Germany Saxon Lipsian 1, and claiming he was Slav. LOL

Sora
11-21-2019, 04:23 PM
According to these charts, Russians

http://www.haplogruplar.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/dna-and-genetics-of-slavic-people.jpg

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure/image?size=large&id=10.1371/journal.pone.0135820.g003

Jana
11-21-2019, 04:23 PM
People with Siberian admixture are white. People with Central Asian, West Asian or even in some cases Central European/Soutn European admixture most likely are not white and they don't look white as rules.

Central Asian or Central European admixture doesn't mean anything. It is just mix of all Asian and European regions, that's why it's called central.

Sche
11-21-2019, 04:27 PM
Not Siberian admixture in modern sense. They had lot of ANE, which is absent in East Asians for example.
No.Not ANE
K3, purple is Siberia.
<img src="https://i.ibb.co/JFrtmdz/new-377.jpg" alt="new-377" border="0">
Russian = modern amount of Siberia in northern Russians.
EHG = ancient amount of Siberia in the EHG -

Sche
11-21-2019, 04:34 PM
Yamnaya Samara also has a Siberian admixture of up to 10%. But modern Indo-Europeans of the West do not have Siberian admixtures. Who is more correct "white", the one who has or the one who does not have?
Among Western Europeans, the Siberian admixture is supplanted by the Middle East admixture of Anatolian farmers.

Jana
11-21-2019, 04:36 PM
Yamnaya Samara also has a Siberian admixture of up to 10%. But modern Indo-Europeans of the West do not have Siberian admixtures. Who is more correct "white", the one who has or the one who does not have?
Among Western Europeans, the Siberian admixture is supplanted by the Middle East admixture of Anatolian farmers.

NW Europeans are benchmark of white. Not your folks. Does it hurts you so much?

Jana
11-21-2019, 04:41 PM
ANE map. Ngansan apparently really don't have so much, but Laag's favorite groups have a lot :)
http://s014.radikal.ru/i329/1512/f3/630c469b270e.png

Sche
11-21-2019, 04:43 PM
NW Europeans are benchmark of white. Not your folks. Does it hurts you so much?
Northwest Europeans coined the term "white man", I do not pretend to this title. Being servants of white people is your Croatian mission. Russians are not the standard of the Indo-Europeans, but we are closest to the proto-Indo-Europeans. Northwest Europeans are slightly smaller, as they have a higher admixture of Anatolian farmer. Russians have an admixture of EHG above. But I cannot call EHG an admixture, since this component is the heart of Aryans.
Yes, we have more Siberia, but this fact is not important for me. I know that my ancestors of the Indo-Europeans also had it. Your ancestors were farmers; they didn’t have it.

Jana
11-21-2019, 08:10 PM
Northwest Europeans coined the term "white man", I do not pretend to this title. Being servants of white people is your Croatian mission. Russians are not the standard of the Indo-Europeans, but we are closest to the proto-Indo-Europeans. Northwest Europeans are slightly smaller, as they have a higher admixture of Anatolian farmer. Russians have an admixture of EHG above. But I cannot call EHG an admixture, since this component is the heart of Aryans.
Yes, we have more Siberia, but this fact is not important for me. I know that my ancestors of the Indo-Europeans also had it. Your ancestors were farmers; they didn’t have it.

Chink.

TheOldNorth
11-21-2019, 08:28 PM
Depends on what you count as Asiatic if you mean Anatolian Asiatic then Bulgarians. if you mean Siberian Asiatic though they technically are closer to Europeans genetically, than Russians

21993
11-21-2019, 08:28 PM
Russians

oszkar07
11-22-2019, 09:45 AM
Russia of course

sean
11-23-2019, 04:42 AM
Russkie.

FinalFlash
11-24-2019, 11:22 PM
Ruskis

The Blade
04-07-2020, 10:29 PM
Russians.

Roy
07-23-2020, 12:32 AM
Northern Russians, after them Bulgarians

Corporate_Demolisher
10-16-2021, 02:58 AM
Russians by a wide margin, lots of Mongoloid influence in their phenotypes. Bulgarians at a distant second.