PDA

View Full Version : Multiple universes scientifically confirmed.



mr. logan
05-26-2013, 05:04 PM
The first 'hard evidence' that other universes exist has been found by scientists.
Cosmologists studying a map of the universe from data gathered by the Planck spacecraft have concluded that it shows anomalies that can only have been caused by the gravitational pull of other universes.
The map shows radiation from the Big Bang 13.8billion years ago that is still detectable in the universe - known as cosmic microwave radiation.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/05/19/article-2326869-19DE24B5000005DC-734_634x370.jpg

Scientists had predicted that it should be evenly distributed, but the map shows a stronger concentration in the south half of the sky and a 'cold spot' that cannot be explained by current understanding of physics.
Laura Mersini-Houghton, theoretical physicist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Richard Holman, professor at Carnegie Mellon University, predicted that anomalies in radiation existed and were caused by the pull from other universes in 2005.
Now that she has studied the Planck data, Dr Mersini-Houghton believes her hypothesis has been proven.
Her findings imply there could be an infinite number of universes outside of our own.
She said: 'These anomalies were caused by other universes pulling on our universe as it formed during the Big Bang.
'They are the first hard evidence for the existence of other universes that we have seen.'
Although some scientists remain sceptical about the theory of other universes, these findings may be a step towards changing views on physics.
The European Space Agency, which runs the £515million Planck telescope, said: 'Because precision of Planck’s map is so high, it made it possible to reveal some peculiar unexplained features that may well require new physics to be understood.'
Cambridge professor of theoretical physics Malcolm Perry told the Sunday Times that the findings could be real evidence of the existence of other universes.
While George Efstathiou, professor of astrophysics at the university, told the newspaper: 'Such ideas may sound wacky now, just like the Big Bang theory did three generations ago. But then we got evidence and now it has changed the whole way we think about the universe.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2326869/Is-universe-merely-billions-Evidence-existence-multiverse-revealed-time-cosmic-map.html

Beware of the invasion and its agents.

RussiaPrussia
05-26-2013, 05:21 PM
you cant confirm another universe, its not possible

Szegedist
05-26-2013, 05:24 PM
you cant confirm another universe, its not possible

You can't truly confirm much of astrophysics.

Smaug
05-26-2013, 05:34 PM
Very interesting, I already suspected it when I first read about the Great Attractor some years ago, finding new evidences about the existence of multiple universes is certainly a huge step for modern astrophysics.

http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/great2at.jpg

Insuperable
05-26-2013, 05:47 PM
Mersini-Houghton used cold spots to support Multiverse theory. Penrose used cold spots to support his own theory called Conformal Cyclic cosmology (which would be in conflict sort of not sure) and so on. Newsreporters either purposly lie or unknowingly write (saying that it can not be explained by current understand of physics) is that there are several theories who can explain the cold spots just fine without postulating exotic hypothesis and such are Wolf-Sachse effect, early temperature flctuations and so on.

This one is even better: :D

http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=5907


One of those promoting the idea that “dark flow” was evidence for a multiverse was Mersini-Houghton, who in a 2008 paper with Holman wrote: Our contention, then, is that these observations of bulk flow can be construed as evidence for the birth of the universe from the landscape multiverse imprinted on the superhorizon sized nonlocal quantum entanglement between our horizon patch and others that began from the landscape. When we calculate the size of the induced dipole in our theory and convert it into a bulk velocity dispersion, we will see that for the constrained values of our parameters we arrive at a velocity dispersion of order 670 km/sec, remarkably close to the observed value of 700 km/sec.

One might think that the refutation of their prediction by the Planck data would be a problem. Instead though, the Sunday Times reported a few days ago that Scientists believe they have found the first evidence that other universes exist. The story got picked up by other news outlets, and appeared in the Daily Mail as “The first ‘hard evidence’ that other universes exist has been found by scientists”. The source for the story was Mersini-Houghton: