PDA

View Full Version : R1b S28 and R1b S116 Beast Bronze and Iron age warrior DNA marker



Fire Haired
07-15-2013, 06:28 AM
Maciamo(head of Eupedia) just made a thread which shows a map of Italo Celtic Y DNA R1b S116 .
[/URL]http://www.eupedia.com/images/content/Celtic_Europe.gif (http://www.eupedia.com/europe/maps_Y-DNA_haplogroups.shtml#Celtic)


As you can see it dominates western Europe most Italo Celtic R1b S116 spread in the Iron age. proto Germanic Italo Celtic speakers with Y DNA R1b L11/P310 migrated to central Germany from the Steppes(central Russia) first about 5,000 years ago.

The Italo Celts split from Germanics about 4,500ybp in Germany. Germans split into R1b S28/U106 and migrated towards Denmark and southern Scandinavia . The Italo Celts split into R1b S116 and migrated towards Austria and France.


The Italo Celtic languages and R1b S116 3,200ybp only existed in modern Austria, Switzerland, most of modern day France, and possibly Britain and Ireland. Italo Celts in the Urnfield culture around modern day Austria 3,200ybp with R1b S28/U152 where some of the earliest Iron workers in Europe and the world.

Iron triggered Italic R1b S28/U152 invasion and conquering of Italy from Austria and Slovania 3,200-3,000ybp and Hallstat/La Dene Celtic R1b S28/U106 invasion and conquering of Iberia, France, parts of eastern Europe, and central Turkey. The Hallstat Celts conquered France in more of a Culturally way because most Italo Celtic R1b S116 in France is not R1b s28/U152 but the Hallstat Celts from Austria still where the dominate group.

R1b S28/U152 is the marker of these very early Iron age beast Italo Celtic warriors from central Europe

3,200ybp. Here is a map of R1b S28/U152.
http://www.eupedia.com/images/content/Haplogroup-R1b-S28.gif


In my opinion the Iron age Italo Celts warriors are one of the greatest warriors in history. They completely dominated western Europe. The ancient Celts Romans and Greeks knew still had the traditional Italo Celtic culture and lived in the areas Italo Celts began.


It is not a surprise the Celts where known as wicked warriors. The Romans and Greeks write about Celts actulley conquering people groups like the Etruscan's the same way earlier Italo Celts did. The Celts Still had that warrior culture and fighting spirit earlier Italo Celts did.

Here is a map of the furthest expansion of the Celts almost all of these areas they conquered in the Iron age.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1f/Celts_in_Europe.png




Here are some modern depictions of Celtic warriorshttp://4.bp.blogspot.com/_oz-quqRgtfc/Skg4oZ9APLI/AAAAAAAABAk/_y0ibiOTuw8/s400/italericelts.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=celtic+warriors&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=hVIiq3KtOaPt9M&tbnid=Qs1TU-z85wcbZM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.redrampant.com%2F2009%2F06%2F celtic-warriors.html&ei=w2niUd6zM--CyAHiyIDABQ&bvm=bv.48705608,d.aWc&psig=AFQjCNFaVPdiQXJeA_WUgO51fAeAqz1Puw&ust=1373879104095566)http://getasword.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/celtic-warriors.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=celtic+warrior&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=0wRue40-exxKXM&tbnid=Op7WEm7_YifhVM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgetasword.com%2Fblog%2F1127-celtic-swords%2F&ei=VlzjUc3WPISSyAGX-oDgCA&bvm=bv.48705608,d.aWc&psig=AFQjCNFVg6XsxDLib3V6IuZYECs18-x2aA&ust=1373941168313900)

Ancient art depicting Celtic warriors


Almost all of these statues where made by Greeks and Romans of Hallstate/La Dene Celts. Who all originated around Austria and had been migrating and raiding many areas in Europe. All of them most likely had R1b S28/U152. The Greeks and Romans where very big enemies of these Celts. So most of these statues where made to celebrate victories they had over Celts.

As u can see almost all of the warriors are naked. This was a tradition for Celts naked warrior depictions have been found in Austria dating back 2,800 years. So it might be a Italo Celtic tradition that started in the Iron age, R1b S28/U152 Urnfield culture.


http://patricklavin.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/BronzeCelticWarrior.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=celtic%20warrior%20statue&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=eh9l-7dnhegsaM&tbnid=bSGGBCF-tuh9sM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatricklavin.com%2Fid20.html&ei=IGbjUaS3MKmMygH3rYGIBQ&psig=AFQjCNHgsJT0PIghVL0Eo4429TEWbIuBaQ&ust=1373943704231321)http://www.louvre.fr/sites/default/files/imagecache/235x196/medias/medias_images/images/louvre-gaulois-blesse.jpg?1336792617 (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=greek%2Bstatue%2Bof%2Bgaulic%2Bsucide&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=dckd6yvpbWsvoM&tbnid=Q-Fu0dJHLQzTeM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.louvre.fr%2Fen%2Foeuvre-notices%2Fstatue-wounded-galatian&ei=913jUf7ENO_wyAGWpYHwAQ&psig=AFQjCNFVb2C7zQo7BhHWiri9nfaCOe6wEw&ust=1373941557370083)


http://jachilli.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/dying_gaul_ind168896_hi.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=dying%2Bgaul&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=7mp1xOCH-meATM&tbnid=rCFKUPGRmZCPcM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjustinachilli.com%2F2011%2F03%2F&ei=bV3jUdrYI4vBywGejYDQDw&psig=AFQjCNGDCdjMuDCj6HiXJ02AS6mXAEiLbw&ust=1373941439789803)

It was Celtic tradition to kill your self and your wife instead of becoming a prisoner of a ememy. Celtic tribes would commit mass sucide when lossing a major battle.
http://cciv214fa2012.site.wesleyan.edu/files/2012/10/ludovisi-gaul-suicide.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=greek%2Bstatue%2Bof%2Bgaulic%2Bsucide&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=h9NWpviRNiMexM&tbnid=cMJaiZ4UaUTcGM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcciv214fa2012.site.wesleyan.edu%2 Fhellenistic-period%2Fludovisi-gaul-suicide%2F&ei=zV3jUfKwI-mfyQG80IDgBA&psig=AFQjCNFVb2C7zQo7BhHWiri9nfaCOe6wEw&ust=1373941557370083)

This is the type of Gaulic warrior Ceasar most likely fought. This statue was made in 100bc many Gauls had been influenced by Rome and the Mediterranean world. So they left the tradition of fighting naked. Instead they had very advanced Armour. They also began to Cut their hair short and shave their facial hair. He probably had R1b S116 but not R1b S28/U152
http://www.eccentricbliss.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Gaul_warrior_Vacheres_1.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=gallic%2Bwarrior%2Bstatue&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=PPLCb-59HBcN9M&tbnid=te_r6haYJQtslM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eccentricbliss.com%2Ftag%2Ffr ance%2F&ei=hV7jUfqSCcXYyQHOx4GACQ&psig=AFQjCNFrhDDfCEp8bjnqPvwqFo3aStIXVw&ust=1373941758591867)
Roman coins depicting Gaulic prisoners. They where apart of Hallstate/La Dene culture but most likley had a different R1b S116 subclade than R1b S28/U152. Or they had another haplogroup like G2a or I2a1a.

It was traditional for Celtic warriors to spike up their hair for battle it also made their hair a yellowish white color. Warriors all over the Celtic world it probably went back over 3,000 years.
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTHbkwK4iIM3jMqJ1PUzNUM4-r-WnX3dmnxWMyYrCXrQ34lz-pY (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=celtic%2Bprisoner%2Bon%2Broman%2Bcoin&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=DTRDPnIXsiyPMM&tbnid=-8wohJyVre_jMM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fahala_r ome%2Fsets%2F72157616061234078%2Fdetail%2F&ei=Y2bjUfCLEsqiyAHf34GoBg&psig=AFQjCNEAsZyXmJHRRDNS9NLbB_L281De8g&ust=1373943751963338)

a video which reconstructs Celts in battle(exaggerated) from the show deadliest warrior so it also has many parts with Persian Immortals.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=dVnKojz_z-U (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVnKojz_z-U&feature=player_detailpage)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=qbm0vH0nyXU

Video trubute to Celtic warriors

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=DMN2zZ1Id4c (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMN2zZ1Id4c&feature=player_detailpage)


It was these type of warriors that dominated bronze age and early iron age western and central Europe. The Celts even as recent as 2,200ybp where still conquering people and spreading their language if Romans(who where also Italo Celts but left the Italo Celtic culture) did not conquer the Celtic world. The Celts probably would have conquered most of eastern Europe and much of Italy(which was already Italic). It was warriors like Celts Romans and Greeks knew that spread R1b S116 and the Italo Celtic language.

In my opinion early iron age Italo Celtic warriors are the second greatest warriors in history. The greatest i think where the Roman centurion they dominated much more and had a long lasting empire for about 500 years. The Romans where Italic but from what i know they had lost the original Italo Celtic culture and where Greekified.

Romans though had a very strong warrior culture that went back to early Italic tribes and the founding of their city 2,753 years. Also Romans had mainly R1b S28/U106


The roman military was not like traditional Italo Celtic military. It was organized they had ranks, the solders where paid, not all the men in the tribe where forced to be warriors, they fought in battle as one unit not 5,000 men going on their own path. It took Rome hundreds of years to conquer Italy they conquered other Italic tribes, Celtic tribes in Italy, and non Indo European mid eastern Estrucans. They had all of Italy by 218bc.

After that Rome conquered almost all of western Europe(which was just about all Celtic), much of eastern Europe mainly the Balkans, and the Mediterranean coast of north Africa and the middle east by 117ad.

here is a map of Rome's greatest extent in 117ad
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/00/Roman_Empire_Trajan_117AD.png/800px-Roman_Empire_Trajan_117AD.png

The Roman military dominated like none other in history. No one could beat them the Romans defeated the greatest warriors of Europe, middle east, and north Africa. The Roman military was tougher, bigger, and smarter than any in the world.

They where in my opinion 10 times better than any warriors in India, China, or any where else in the world at that time. The western and eastern Roman empire existed from 27bc-476ad even after being constantly attacked by powerful enemies at their borders.

Here are modern people in Rome dressing in ancient Roman warrior equipment.
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02545/Rome_2545702b.jpghttps://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQoPBoTQWK9mC1nEXh389Lmy1gbcoDuG pPxFbAVdqoZTBI0GF3R


Ancient Depictions of Roman warriors

Roman warriors fighting Thracen tribes in modern day Bulgairia.
http://www.weapons-universe.com/Swords/Roman_and_Germanic_Armies_Battle.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=ancient%2Bdepictions%2Bof%2Broman%2Bwarriors&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=4GFeVvkBGypdHM&tbnid=aEyMnxT7vMtN4M:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.weapons-universe.com%2FSwords%2FAncient_Roman_Weapons.shtm l&ei=EWvjUcDeOoKxywHZ1YDwDQ&bvm=bv.48705608,d.aWc&psig=AFQjCNGQX6Am3VfacO5w63xKzH7DSZeIyA&ust=1373944965756712)

http://www.jcnot4me.com/images/Roman_Soldiers-web.gif (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=ancient%2Bdepictions%2Bof%2Broman%2Bwarriors&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=UrRbLZXVdfbouM&tbnid=Dis12vWmLV7iCM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jcnot4me.com%2FItems%2Fjc%3Dz ombie%2Froman_soldiers.htm&ei=kmvjUZjfIfPryAHhpYCoCw&bvm=bv.48705608,d.aWc&psig=AFQjCNGQX6Am3VfacO5w63xKzH7DSZeIyA&ust=1373944965756712)


Julis Ceasar possibly the greatest genral of all time.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/eb/Statue-Augustus.jpg/220px-Statue-Augustus.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=statues%2Bof%2Broman%2Bcenturions&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=ViTuzP3xYDMkKM&tbnid=cGTH0hwZpZMPPM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FAugust us&ei=N2zjUZ9A5JPJAbfAgPAF&psig=AFQjCNGGct5kd8-YW7rIftPhfX-F5ixhQA&ust=1373945154720958)

http://owlsmag.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/war_ef21.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=roman%2Bcenturion%2Bstatue&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=gbgDukFmFFzWOM&tbnid=vXEAEIIk-9bFkM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fowlsmag.wordpress.com%2Ftag%2Fgau l%2F&ei=Ym3jUayzBeKQyAH854C4Ag&psig=AFQjCNH60L0mYSexcJGGsPjps3d2y1pmFQ&ust=1373945548697290)
http://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/_graphics/pics/soldiers.jpg (http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=roman%2Bcenturion%2Bstatue&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=gbgDukFmFFzWOM&tbnid=vXEAEIIk-9bFkM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pbs.org%2Fempires%2Fromans%2F empire%2Fsoldiers.html&ei=cm3jUZK_EKrSygGUgIGIDg&psig=AFQjCNH60L0mYSexcJGGsPjps3d2y1pmFQ&ust=1373945548697290)


Roman pot celebrating victory over Germanic tribes.
http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/Images/109images/Roman/augustus/boscoreale_cup_1am.jpg (http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/Images/109images/Roman/augustus/boscoreale_cup_1a.jpg)
Video tributes to Roman warriors.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=36NqK0kfcvg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Tj33b0a030&feature=player_detailpage)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=4lT8yRa5JA0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Tj33b0a030&feature=player_detailpage)


In my opinion the Bronze age R1b S116 and mainly early Iron age R1b S28/U152 Italo Celts where the greatest warriors of their time. And the ancient Romans in the late Iron age who spoke a Italic language and had mainly R1b S28/U152 where the greatest warriors in history.

So from 1,200BC-476AD the greatest warriors carried mainly Italo Celtic R1b S28/U152 and other R1b S116 subclades 1,200BC-476AD is pretty much the whole European and middle eastern Iron age. R1b S28/U152 is what i call the beast Iron age warrior marker. Other R1b S116 subclades count as beast Iron age and Bronze age warriors.




30-50% of modern western European men direct paternal line goes back to these warriors. This does not mean 30-50% of their ancestry just a direct line. Modern Day Irish, Welsh, Cornish, Scottish(mainly highlander Scottish) and Britanny people have almost 100% ancestry from early Italo Celts.

French,Swiss, alps people, and north Italians probably have the most ancestry Iron Age R1b S28/U152 Italo Celts. Mainly people in central France and Switzerland because that is where R1b S28/U152 began. north Italians got a significant amount of mid eastern blood during the Greco Roman age, French and Swiss got a alot of mid eastern blood while being apart of the Roman empire.

All modern western Europeans at least partial descend from Italo Celtic warriors.
[/INDENT]
[/LIST]

Langbart
02-08-2014, 09:18 PM
Good thread! I'm R1b1b2a1a according to 23andme, that would mean R1b-L11, but people on this forum said that if that's the result of 23andme very probably I'm actually S116. Can you confirm?

Damião de Góis
02-08-2014, 09:36 PM
Also Romans had mainly R1b S28/U106


Is that your way of saying that the romans were nordic?

Langbart
02-08-2014, 09:39 PM
Is that your way of saying that the romans were nordic?

I don't think so, he just said the truth, even thought only the patricians were R1b-S28. The plebeians were non-indoeuropean speakers, so I doubt they were R.

Damião de Góis
02-08-2014, 09:42 PM
I don't think so, he just said the truth, even thought only the patricians were R1b-S28. The plebeians were non-indoeuropean speakers, so I doubt they were R.

I think the descendents of the Romans are modern central italian people. R1b u106 exists mainly in Northern Germany, Netherlands, etc:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Ish7688voT0/THYYn0iOp2I/AAAAAAAACiw/GTn5liL2F68/s1600/u106.jpg

So if Romans were mainly R1b u106, then their modern descendents are not italians.

Fire Haired
02-08-2014, 10:20 PM
Good thread! I'm R1b1b2a1a according to 23andme, that would mean R1b-L11, but people on this forum said that if that's the result of 23andme very probably I'm actually S116. Can you confirm?

I made this thread a long long time ago and I am ashamed of it. I made big assumptions with little evidence, exaggerated, and had ten times worse grammar than I do now.

You probably have to take another test(of course more expensive or specifically for S116) to find if you have S116. I think you probably do since your Italian and practically all R1b L11 in Italy is under S116 and almost all of that is under S28.

We are probably S116 brothers!! So we trace back our paternal lineage to the same father who lived maybe around 5,000-6,000 years ago. My subclade is probably Df27 which is around 20% in Britain which is where my paternal lineage is from.

Fire Haired
02-08-2014, 10:25 PM
Is that your way of saying that the romans were nordic?

No, 7 months ago I meant to put R1b S28/U152 now I know they are separate SNP's which are phyloequivalent to each other. Romans were probably no different from modern people in that area of Italy.

Fire Haired
02-08-2014, 10:28 PM
I think the descendents of the Romans are modern central italian people. R1b u106 exists mainly in Northern Germany, Netherlands, etc:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Ish7688voT0/THYYn0iOp2I/AAAAAAAACiw/GTn5liL2F68/s1600/u106.jpg

So if Romans were mainly R1b u106, then their modern descendents are not italians.

True but is anyone really mainly descended from the Romans? They were one of many different Italic people in Italy during the Iron age and there were also many non Italic people like Etruscans and Celts. Modern Italians are a mixture of all the different pre-Roman Iron age people of Italy who the Romans conquered. Saying certain Italians mainly descend from the original Romans, may be as crazy as saying French or Spainish people mainly descend from the original Romans. French and Spainish come from Latin just like Italian and Spainish and French I think forgot about who they were before Rome conquered them, Italians are the same.

Fire Haired
02-08-2014, 10:37 PM
I don't think so, he just said the truth, even thought only the patricians were R1b-S28. The plebeians were non-indoeuropean speakers, so I doubt they were R.

They were all probably full of R1b S28. Are modern Italians mainly descended of Patricians of Rome or common Plebeians? The Plebeians and Patricians I bet were no different from each other genetically and little different from modern central Italians.

Artek
02-09-2014, 08:35 AM
My subclade is probably Df27 which is around 20% in Britain which is where my paternal lineage is from.
DF27 reaches 20% nowhere in Britain, it's maybe like 5%.

Fire Haired
02-09-2014, 05:42 PM
DF27 reaches 20% nowhere in Britain, it's maybe like 5%.

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/3555/i6np.png

Z195 represents the same lineage as Df27.

Artek
02-09-2014, 07:25 PM
http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/3555/i6np.png

Z195 represents the same lineage as Df27.
What was the sampling?

Fire Haired
02-09-2014, 08:05 PM
What was the sampling?

I don't know I got it from this Eurogenes thread The story of R1b: it's complicated (http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-story-of-r1b-its-complicated.html). This is exactly what many people excepted because Df27 was found not that long ago and there is a lot of R1b P312(L21-, U152-) in France and the British isles not just Iberia.

Hanibalas Lekteris
02-12-2014, 01:35 AM
S28 is probably one of the most convincing Italo-Celtic lineages out there, its L2 and Z36 subclades seem to correspond very clearly with Hallstatt and La Tène cultural horizons while Z56 has a more Italic flavour to it (Proto-Villanovan culture is one of the best candidates here).

My guess is that most P312 clades spread with the Bell Beaker package, each Beaker type can be associated with a downstream SNP (Rhenish beaker with L21, DF27 with Maritime & Reflux, S28 with Central-Eastern and reflux).

What I find pretty compelling is S28's association with the Urnfield culture, extremely striking and I'd be ready to bet that S28 was an important lineage back then (and if you know me, I rarely like to bet on such topics given the surprises we are getting each time we explore the depths of archeogenetic testing).

Either way, P312 and U106 are very good candidates for the Indo-europeanization of Western Europe.

Whether the R1b-L11 folk adopted Indo-European speech when they came into contact with Corded Ware elements remains a possibility...
But it isn't exactly the most convincing theory.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/22/Beaker_culture_diffusion.svg/2000px-Beaker_culture_diffusion.svg.png

Fire Haired
02-13-2014, 12:00 AM
S28 is probably one of the most convincing Italo-Celtic lineages out there, its L2 and Z36 subclades seem to correspond very clearly with Hallstatt and La Tène cultural horizons while Z56 has a more Italic flavour to it (Proto-Villanovan culture is one of the best candidates here).

My guess is that most P312 clades spread with the Bell Beaker package, each Beaker type can be associated with a downstream SNP (Rhenish beaker with L21, DF27 with Maritime & Reflux, S28 with Central-Eastern and reflux).

What I find pretty compelling is S28's association with the Urnfield culture, extremely striking and I'd be ready to bet that S28 was an important lineage back then (and if you know me, I rarely like to bet on such topics given the surprises we are getting each time we explore the depths of archeogenetic testing).

Either way, P312 and U106 are very good candidates for the Indo-europeanization of Western Europe.

Whether the R1b-L11 folk adopted Indo-European speech when they came into contact with Corded Ware elements remains a possibility...
But it isn't exactly the most convincing theory.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/22/Beaker_culture_diffusion.svg/2000px-Beaker_culture_diffusion.svg.png

You obviously know more than I do. I basically agree just haven't learned that much about distribution of S28 subclades I also know almost nothing about Bell Beaker culture. I have heard they were probably native to central-west Europe so probably very Otzi like not modern west European(Sardinian-) like. Extra hunter gatherer and ANE ancestry came to west Europe from somewhere after the Neolithic. I think it may have come with R1b(which is near eastern though) L11. R1b L11 did not spread peacefully or at least not with the consent of the natives. Being an Indo European lineage makes the most sense because who migrated throughout west Europe in the metal ages? Indo Europeans. Indo European paternal lineage R1a Z283 became very popular in eastern Europe and Scandinavia, same with R1a Z93 in Asia so why couldn't R1b L11 in west Europe also be from Indo Europeans? There are huge differnces between distributions of mtDNA and Y DNA I think because of the differences between men and women in human society. You almost never see a young maternal lineage dominate and people but oftenly do with Y DNA. Indo European languages spread because there was something special about them which allowed them to almost always win, their paternal lineages became dominate because they were very patriarchal.

Do you have R1b L11? I know I do(probably Df27) and it means my paternal lineage is from "evil"(probably not that simple) conquerors and rulers who had as many wives, concubines, slave women, etc. as they wanted. Evil conquest I assume is how paternal lineages replace each other. My mtDNA U5b2a2 though is as native to central Europe as possible. It has already been found in Mesolithic Germany dating over 10,000 years old and probably mixed into invading LBK people and then Indo Europeans.

Langbart
02-14-2014, 05:10 PM
I think the descendents of the Romans are modern central italian people. R1b u106 exists mainly in Northern Germany, Netherlands, etc:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Ish7688voT0/THYYn0iOp2I/AAAAAAAACiw/GTn5liL2F68/s1600/u106.jpg

So if Romans were mainly R1b u106, then their modern descendents are not italians.

Wait, you're in error here: S28 is not U106, but U152. This haplogroup is considered to be italo-celtic(to me is ligurian-celtic, but it doesn't matter) and indeed it reaches its peaks in the Po valley, in Switzerland, France and Swabia if I'm not wrong. In southern Italy is not very much spread(and indeed southern Italian are not so much "Italic" to be honest) and in the Rome area is spread but not a lot(that's because the patrician lineage was almost entirely killed in a battle against the germanic tribes in southern France, I don't remember the name of the battle though).

Artek
02-14-2014, 08:35 PM
Wait, you're in error here: S28 is not U106, but U152. This haplogroup is considered to be italo-celtic(to me is ligurian-celtic, but it doesn't matter) and indeed it reaches its peaks in the Po valley, in Switzerland, France and Swabia if I'm not wrong. In southern Italy is not very much spread(and indeed southern Italian are not so much "Italic" to be honest) and in the Rome area is spread but not a lot(that's because the patrician lineage was almost entirely killed in a battle against the germanic tribes in southern France, I don't remember the name of the battle though).
Many patricians were killed off during the several civil wars(like by Sulla and others), not in a single battle in Southern France( I think you mean battle of Arausio).

That's mostly socio-economic term though, killed-off ones were replaced by another who took up their position.

We also don't know what was the Y-haplogroup distribution of ancient italic groups (although significant, not necessarilly predominant presence of R1b-U152 seems to be likely)

Hanibalas Lekteris
02-14-2014, 11:33 PM
We also don't know what was the Y-haplogroup distribution of ancient italic groups (although significant, not necessarilly predominant presence of R1b-U152 seems to be likely)

The current S28 peaks in Tuscany and Northern-Central Italy do not necessarily mean that Proto-Italic speakers predominantly belonged to this lineage, it just makes it very likely that this lineage was carried by Proto-Italic speakers.

Artek
02-15-2014, 09:20 AM
The current S28 peaks in Tuscany and Northern-Central Italy do not necessarily mean that Proto-Italic speakers predominantly belonged to this lineage, it just makes it very likely that this lineage was carried by Proto-Italic speakers.
And so I stated, why to double my words?

Sizzo
02-15-2014, 09:48 AM
The Italian peaks of R1b-U152 are in Lunigiana (Ligurians) and Brescia (Cenomani). It seems more Celto-Ligurian than Italic, onestly. But Venetics too were R1b-U152?

Peyrol
02-15-2014, 10:02 AM
Interesting see that the geographical diffusion of modern gallo-romance languages match perfectly the extension of this haplogrup

http://imageshack.us/a/img203/3770/2u6kxom.jpg

Probabily the romance languages developed in pre-anglosaxon Britain were galloromance too.

Peyrol
02-15-2014, 10:03 AM
I think the descendents of the Romans are modern central italian people. R1b u106 exists mainly in Northern Germany, Netherlands, etc:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Ish7688voT0/THYYn0iOp2I/AAAAAAAACiw/GTn5liL2F68/s1600/u106.jpg

So if Romans were mainly R1b u106, then their modern descendents are not italians.


Indeed

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_umhSvWEgx2c/TClAOLxqQfI/AAAAAAAAFbY/dj145Fo8p5E/s1600/colonie.jpg

Hanibalas Lekteris
02-15-2014, 02:15 PM
And so I stated, why to double my words?

Because it needs to be repeated.

Hanibalas Lekteris
02-15-2014, 02:21 PM
Probabily the romance languages developed in pre-anglosaxon Britain were galloromance too.

Not impossible but not exactly likely either.

Langbart
02-15-2014, 06:51 PM
The Italian peaks of R1b-U152 are in Lunigiana (Ligurians) and Brescia (Cenomani). It seems more Celto-Ligurian than Italic, onestly. But Venetics too were R1b-U152?

That's what I thought too. What if the R1b-U152 was actually Celto-Ligurian more than Celto-Italic? That would explain a lot.

Peyrol
02-15-2014, 07:56 PM
Not impossible but not exactly likely either.

Yep. From the data we know, britonic-romance languages (there were at least two separated romance languages) belonged to an independent branch of the romance languages.

Hanibalas Lekteris
02-15-2014, 08:39 PM
That's what I thought too. What if the R1b-U152 was actually Celto-Ligurian more than Celto-Italic? That would explain a lot.

Ligurians mostly have non-U152 and basal P312 if my memory isn't playing tricks with me.

Also, Ligurians wouldn't furnish a valuable explanation for clade Z56.... So I still think Italo-Celtic is the best label for now.

Langbart
02-15-2014, 09:30 PM
Ligurians mostly have non-U152 and basal P312 if my memory isn't playing tricks with me.

Also, Ligurians wouldn't furnish a valuable explanation for clade Z56.... So I still think Italo-Celtic is the best label for now.

P312? Where did you get that? Do you have a link to share?

Fire Haired
02-15-2014, 10:24 PM
Ligurians mostly have non-U152 and basal P312 if my memory isn't playing tricks with me.

Also, Ligurians wouldn't furnish a valuable explanation for clade Z56.... So I still think Italo-Celtic is the best label for now.

I think I know what your talking about.

I have seen multiple maps where it shows R1b(P312-, U106-) in west Europe is most popular in north-western Italy and south-eastern France.

Here is an example.

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=44597&d=1392506622

The high amount in southern Italy is probably from recent Greek and near eastern admixture.

Sizzo
02-16-2014, 02:10 PM
I test negative, on 23&Me, for L2 and L20 (and thanks to Hannibalas for the instructions). I will test with FTDNA if I'm Italo-Roman or Alpo-Celtic. In every case it would be nice being Italic or Celtic, but still Indeuropean.

Langbart
02-16-2014, 04:59 PM
I think I know what your talking about.

I have seen multiple maps where it shows R1b(P312-, U106-) in west Europe is most popular in north-western Italy and south-eastern France.

Here is an example.

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=44597&d=1392506622

The high amount in southern Italy is probably from recent Greek and near eastern admixture.

Being P312- and U106- wouldn't mean being L11 instead of P312?

Fire Haired
02-16-2014, 05:04 PM
Being P312- and U106- wouldn't mean being L11 instead of P312?

IF your P312- your not P312. I don't get what the confusion is.

Langbart
02-16-2014, 05:19 PM
IF your P312- your not P312. I don't get what the confusion is.

You were answering to that user saying that the Ligurians were P312, and you said that they were not actually P312.

Fire Haired
02-16-2014, 05:31 PM
You were answering to that user saying that the Ligurians were P312, and you said that they were not actually P312.

I never said they were not P312 I was just showing there is a high amount of R1b(P312-, U106-) around where the Ligurians lived, there is still more P312 in that region.

Langbart
02-16-2014, 09:01 PM
I never said they were not P312 I was just showing there is a high amount of R1b(P312-, U106-) around where the Ligurians lived, there is still more P312 in that region.

You misunderstood, I meant that the other user said that the Ligurians were mainly P312, and you seemed to agree with him but at the same time you said there were many R1b(P312-, U106-)(so like L52 and L11, right?)