Sweden: Rape Capital of the World - 77% of Rapists Have An Immigrant Background (Mainly Muslims)

[Anglojew]

The Living Hell For Swedish women: 5% Muslim Pop commit nearly 77.6% of all rape crimes

http://www.swedenconfidential.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/120812_affes_valdtakt_2011_stor_nyb.png

Thanks to Affes Statistik Blog for all the hard work for putting together the analysis of Sweden’s staggering and shocking rape statistics. The report is translated from Google, so there may be some minor grammatical errors.
After publishing this article we have had Muslims and the extreme socialist left argue that the numbers are distorted and fabricated. All figures in this report originates from BRÅ, The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brottsförebyggande rådet – Brå). BRÅ is an agency under the Ministry of Justice and is a centre for research and development within the judicial system. There are no distortions or fabrications in this data. There are links to the original graphs and data from BRÅ for any reference checks.
The Swedish government is no longer collecting sensitive statistics from nationality and crime in the governments deliberate intent of social engineering. Therefore, only figures from 1985-1989 and 1995-2001 are covered for comparison. The current rape statistics are likely much higher today, like in similar proven cases in Norway. These crimes mainly refer to Muslim migrants who are extremely over-represented in nearly all of the 77.6% rapes. In addition, the Swedish rapists are only represented by nationality, and may contain persons of foreign background within those numbers.
Who are the guilty people for bringing in these crimes into the country? Responsible criminal ministers, both then and now, have been informed and are social engineering specialists: Thomas Bodström (s), Beatrice Ask (m), Mona Sahlin (s), Erik Ullenhag (fp), Barbro Holmberg (s), Tobias Billström (m) and others.
There need to be criminal charges brought against these Swedish ministers who have become guilty of social engineering and growing rape crimes against it’s citizens. The ministers have to be considered charged under guilt to Assaulted Rape through Guilt by Association, Joint Liability, Conspiracy and Treason.

http://shariaunveiled.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/sweden-rape.png

http://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2012/08/20/the-living-hell-for-swedish-women-5-muslims-commit-nearly-77-6-of-all-rape-crimes/

Source:

http://affes.wordpress.com/invandrarna-och-brotten-5-utrakning/

[Smeagol]

Muslims have no right to live in Sweden.

[Loki]

Muslims have no right to live in Sweden.

Tell that to Hurrem sultana.

[Anglojew]

Muslims have no right to live in Sweden.

If 77% of rapes in Sweden were by followers of any other ideology, that only made up 5% of the population and had only been introduced recently, that ideology would be banned.

[Swearengen]

Does the swedish government have any plans to address this issue? Or do they just sweep it under the rug?

[Krampus]

We need to get these Saudi Afagians, Lesbanese shits out of Europe!

[Anglojew]

Does the swedish government have any plans to address this issue? Or do they just sweep it under the rug?

Maybe a Swede can enlighten us about this?

From the blogs I read they are sweeping it under the carpet though.

[Swearengen]

Maybe a Swede can enlighten us about this?

From the blogs I read they are sweeping it under the carpet though.

i'm also curious how the feminist lobby groups are approaching the issue.

[Anglojew]

i'm also curious how the feminist lobby groups are approaching the issue.

The feminist lobby is usually taken over by the looney left and will do anything to bury their heads in the sand over the issue. It's ironic that women's rights for feminists are less important than Muslim's rights.

Feminist groups say virtually nothing about women's rights in Muslim countries let alone over this issue.

Interesting article on the subject; http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/03/a_violent_kind_of_silence.html

[Swearengen]

The feminist lobby is usually taken over by the looney left and will do anything to bury their heads in the sand over the issue. It's ironic that women's rights for feminists are less important than Muslim's rights.

Feminist groups say virtually nothing about women's rights in Muslim countries let alone over this issue.

Interesting article on the subject; http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/03/a_violent_kind_of_silence.html

Sad. I found this while searching for info about this. I see Canada heading down the same path soon honestly.

http://blonde-on-a-mission.tumblr.com/post/31460603540/multicultural-sweden


The biggest irony of it all is that Elin Krantz fell for the Anti-White propaganda and was a supporter of multiculturalism in Sweden. She was supposedly a member of the Facebook group “We Like Diversity”, called herself “multicultural” and supported immigration of people from the third-world countries into Sweden. How’s this for backfire, Elin? How do you think dozens of other Swedish girls, your sisters, your kin felt when they had their lives taken or destroyed by an immigrant who got to Sweden thanks to your support for multiculturalism?

Rape wasn't committed by a muslim, but by a black guy.

[alfieb]

Does not surprise me at all. Why Sweden instead of another country with a large immigrant population?

Because the overly-macho immigrants know they're going to get away with doing whatever they want because the neutered politically-correct lefty Nordic welfare state has pussified the native people.

Nodick is no longer an insult, but a valid descriptor.

[Sblast]

It just won't help, bad immigration policies don't immigrate people, they immigrate the countries they come from including their cultural problems. I don't thing it has to do with Islam per she which is only one vraiable which may not even play a casual role. Many of them come from poor countries, traditional societis where swedish women seem to be inviting rape, places where rape culture is accepted.

[Trun]

places where rape culture is accepted.

Those are animalistic acts. If there are such human communities, they should be given a lesson.

[Sblast]

Those are animalistic acts. If there are such human communities, they should be given a lesson.

Like Western society not a long time ago and some parts of it today? I suggest you check the history of marital rape, it's quite interesting and shocking.

[alfieb]

Like Western society not a long time ago and some parts of it today? I suggest you check the history of marital rape, it's quite interesting and shocking.
In Sicily, until recently bride kidnapping was a normal occurrence.

This occurred when parents refused to allow their daughter to marry a man, so he pretended to kidnap and rape her (they really just went away for a while and had sex). When the two came back, because they were worried that she may have been pregnant, the parents consented to the marriage.

In some instances, there genuinely was rape involved, but usually it was just a societal loophole.

[Ultra]

Does the swedish government have any plans to address this issue? Or do they just sweep it under the rug?
Sweep it under the rug. And import more of these uncivilised apes. :picard2:


The feminist lobby is usually taken over by the looney left and will do anything to bury their heads in the sand over the issue. It's ironic that women's rights for feminists are less important than Muslim's rights.

Feminist groups say virtually nothing about women's rights in Muslim countries let alone over this issue.

Interesting article on the subject; http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/03/a_violent_kind_of_silence.html
Yep. This is 100% true. There was even an incident recently, where a Swedish girl was raped by 3 swarthy Muslim boys, and one of these infamous feminist spokesperson said that the victim girl must have been giving them her consent.. Another one recent incident is when a Muslim probationer on a workplace refused to shake hands with his female superior, then in return not getting the job since he was required to meet and shake hands with a lot of people. He sued the local municipality and got 30,000 SEK, which rounds up to about 3500€ and the female superior got a warning at her workplace.. Of course, on the feminist front everything was quiet. It's only reasonable to assume hell'd been lose if the perpetrators in these cases were white men... :rolleyes:


Such are the double-standards of today's feminists in the West. :picard2:

[Styggnacke]

Does not surprise me at all. Why Sweden instead of another country with a large immigrant population?
Ehh, non-whites are heavily overrepresented and in many cases make up the majority of the rapists in the rest of Western Europe. It's not just Sweden. It doesn't change the fact though that we at some point have to kick these niggers and Arabs out of here, together with the Jews who wanted them to come here.

[WOOHP]

They included foreigners born abroad, or born in Sweden to at least one outlandish parent in addition to the illegal ones. These numbers are somewhat old too, the situation is probably even worse by now.

But you also have to keep in mind that Swedish women today are far more likely to report a rape than many other women in eastern, southern or even other parts of western Europe.

[Útrám]

Meanwhile feminists are complaining about the lack of female characters in video games, and how negatively women are portrayed in media.

I guess sexism is okay as long as it's perpetrated by non-whites.

[Swearengen]

Sweep it under the rug. And import more of these uncivilised apes. :picard2:


Yep. This is 100% true. There was even an incident recently, where a Swedish girl was raped by 3 swarthy Muslim boys, and one of these infamous feminist spokesperson said that the victim girl must have been giving them her consent.. Another one recent incident is when a Muslim probationer on a workplace refused to shake hands with his female superior, then in return not getting the job since he was required to meet and shake hands with a lot of people. He sued the local municipality and got 30,000 SEK, which rounds up to about 3500€ and the female superior got a warning at her workplace.. Of course, on the feminist front everything was quiet. It's only reasonable to assume hell'd been lose if the perpetrators in these cases were white men... :rolleyes:


Such are the double-standards of today's feminists in the West. :picard2:

God damn. Your people suck man, I'm sorry. I'll never visit Sweden.

Over here multiculturalism is preached in schools, but that's about as far as it goes.

[Ultra]

God damn. Your people suck man, I'm sorry. I'll never visit Sweden.

Over here multiculturalism is preached in schools, but that's about as far as it goes.
Hmm yep, we are in deep shit at the moment. I'm not sure how we will get out or how it will look like in 10, 20, 30, 50 years from now. :(


This mass-rape thing and our occasional riots and burning cars is just the appetizer of it I'm afraid.

[sturmwalkure]

These invaders in Sweden will only be their own worst enemies; there will come a time when the Swedes are pissed off enough they will kick them out to where they belong-- outside of Europe. I dream of visiting Sweden but not while it is still infested with this fiendish scum who shouldn't even be in Europe in the first place! I speak about all the Arabs and Negroes in Sweden.

[Útrám]

Here's another interesting fact: in 1997-2001 (http://www.thelocal.se/article.php?ID=2683&date=20051214) 25% of crime was committed by newly arrived immigrants; in addition another 20% was committed by 1-2 generation immigrants. A total of 45%. It's certainly much worse today.

14% of Sweden's population is foreign, roughly 7% of those are men, and roughly 3.5% of those are young men. So it's a safe bet that roughly 50% of crime in Sweden is committed by a demographic that's only 3.5% of the population.

[The Illyrian Warrior]

Dont blame the perpetrators, sweden its just like a GIANT playboy garden :D

Just jokin', the rapist should be put in life time jail.:)

[Anglojew]

Ehh, non-whites are heavily overrepresented and in many cases make up the majority of the rapists in the rest of Western Europe. It's not just Sweden. It doesn't change the fact though that we at some point have to kick these niggers and Arabs out of here, together with the Jews who wanted them to come here.

I don't want them in Sweden. Some Jews supported multiculturalism initially believing it would shield them from racism (as they would not be the most prominant minority) and also for reasons of equality but now most Jews realise the mistake these beliefs were because, although Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists etc do tend to be fine citizens, Muslims are ALWAYS a problem.

[Styggnacke]

I don't want them in Sweden. Some Jews supported multiculturalism initially believing it would shield them from racism (as they would not be the most prominant minority) and also for reasons of equality but now most Jews realise the mistake these beliefs were because, although Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists etc do tend to be fine citizens, Muslims are ALWAYS a problem.
They indeed were the first promoters of multiculturalism and shaped the immigration policies we have today:
http://obekvamasanningar.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/mindeb.jpg?w=545&h=417
^ Almost 40 % of the pro-immigration side in the debates in the 60's were Jews, more than 30 % were of other ethnicities (primarily Estonians, thanks Karl :laugh:) and just 15 % were Swedes. The problematic part is that Jews today are equally supportive of multiculturalism today, as they were in the 60's. They haven't changed one bit. And a ethnic group that has so consistently worked against Swedish interests, can only be considered to be a fifth column. In many aspects you guys are worse Africans, Arabs and other MENA's (yeah, I won't call them Muslims, the problem isn't their religion).

And why are you bringing up Sikhs, Hindus and Buddhists? There are barely any of them here.

[Anglojew]

They indeed were the first promoters of multiculturalism and shaped the immigration policies we have today:
http://obekvamasanningar.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/mindeb.jpg?w=545&h=417
^ Almost 40 % of the pro-immigration side in the debates in the 60's were Jews, more than 30 % were of other ethnicities (primarily Estonians, thanks Karl :laugh:) and just 15 % were Swedes. The problematic part is that Jews today are equally supportive of multiculturalism today, as they were in the 60's. They haven't changed one bit. And a ethnic group that has so consistently worked against Swedish interests, can only be considered to be a fifth column. In many aspects you guys are worse Africans, Arabs and other MENA's (yeah, I won't call them Muslims, the problem isn't their religion).

And why are you bringing up Sikhs, Hindus and Buddhists? There are barely any of them here.

I'm not talking specifically in Sweden.

I do know enough about Swedish politics to know you're wrong when you generalize about Jews supporting multiculturalism. In fact some of the main opponents of this in Sweden are Jews such as http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Ekeroth as I've already pointed out to Dexter when he made similar generalizations about Jews.

Most Jews are against mass immigration of Muslims even of a minority are prominent and vocal.

[Styggnacke]

I'm not talking specifically in Sweden.

I do know enough about Swedish politics to know you're wrong when you generalize about Jews supporting multiculturalism. In fact some of the main opponents of this in Sweden are Jews such as http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_Ekeroth as I've already pointed out to Dexter when he made similar generalizations about Jews.
Kent Ekeroth is primarily a counter-jihadist. His main concern is Israel. Here's a funny thing, though: I think 2 years ago, Ilmar Reepalu (mayor in Malmö) claimed that Kent (and (sd)) had infiltrated the Jewish congregation in Malmö. Kent commented it later, and said that no Jews in the congregation were interested in the party, and that they were all multiculturalists.

And if Kent has actually any feelings for Sweden, it's because of his Swedish father.

Most Jews are against mass immigration of Muslims even of a minority are prominent and vocal.
No, that isn't true.

[Anglojew]

Kent Ekeroth is primarily a counter-jihadist. He main concern is Israel.

No, that isn't true.

Please show me the survey data to state otherwise.

Ekeroth is a nationalist.

[RussiaPrussia]

and the remaining 30% are african christians

[Styggnacke]

Please show me the survey data to state otherwise.
What data?

Ekeroth is a nationalist.
Read my post after I edited it.

[Anglojew]

What data?

Read my post after I edited it.

The mayor of Malmo said that accusing Jews of racism. He (Ekeroth)was "defending" Jews against that charge. The fact is, and I know this from Swedish Jews personally, most Jews support the rightist parties (even if they won't say so publicly for historical reasons).

If you're interested in the subject contact this guy;
http://tundratabloids.com/. He's in Finland but very knowledgeable about Jewish conservatives in the region.

(I'm a Jewish anti-multikulti "Euro" -specifically English- nationalist if you need proof we exist)

[YeshAtid]

The mayor of Malmo said that accusing Jews of racism. He (Ekeroth)was "defending" Jews against that charge. The fact is, and I know this from Swedish Jews personally, most Jews support the rightist parties (even if they won't say so publicly for historical reasons).

If you're interested in the subject contact this guy;
http://tundratabloids.com/. He's in Finland but very knowledgeable about Jewish conservatives in the region.

(I'm a Jewish anti-multikulti "Euro" -specifically English- nationalist if you need proof we exist)

There are still Jews in occupied Sweden ?

[Styggnacke]

The mayor of Malmo said that accusing Jews of racism. He (Ekeroth)was "defending" Jews against that charge. The fact is, and I know this from Swedish Jews personally, most Jews support the rightist parties (even if they won't say so publicly for historical reasons).
So? The "rightist" parties here tend to be the most obnoxious supporters of multiculturalism and immigration. Folkpartiet, the most pro-Israel party, and probably the party with most Jewish members in Sweden, are also the most vocal supporters of, like mentioned earlier, multiculturalism and immigration.

(I'm a Jewish anti-multikulti "Euro" -specifically English- nationalist if you need proof we exist)
No, you aren't. I once commented in a thred about the EDL, where I questioned the idea of negroes and Pakis defending England, and you made some comment about ethnic nationalism being some sort of racism. So, no you aren't a nationalist.

[Pure ja]

So the odds are that if a swedish woman meets a muslim man in Sweden, she is going to be raped about 85 times as likely as when she meets a swedish man.



They indeed were the first promoters of multiculturalism and shaped the immigration policies we have today:
http://obekvamasanningar.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/mindeb.jpg?w=545&h=417
^ Almost 40 % of the pro-immigration side in the debates in the 60's were Jews, more than 30 % were of other ethnicities (primarily Estonians, thanks Karl :laugh:) and just 15 % were Swedes.


Estonians? How is that even possible? There could not have been much more than perhaps 30 000 of them. If they got the upper hand in these debates, then the local mass media (and the plutocrats who owned it) had to provide the amplification.

PS. You can't really blame estonians in Estonia, since they did not leave the country in 1944. So what you need is more Karls.

PPS. You in Sweden and in other Nordic countries need to start calling such leftist feminists what they are - genocidal internazi communists.

[alb0zfinest]

Tell that to Hurrem sultana.

Yea but Hurrem sultana does not rape......................................or does she :D:naughty2:

[Anglojew]

The "rightist" parties here tend to be the most obnoxious supporters of multiculturalism and immigration. Folkpartiet, the most pro-Israel party, and probably the party with most Jewish members in Sweden, are also the most vocal supporters of, like mentioned earlier, multiculturalism and immigration.

Most Jews hate mass immigration for obvious reasons (most immigrants are Muslims).


No, you aren't. I once commented in a thred about the EDL, where I questioned the idea of negroes and Pakis defending England, and you made some comment about ethnic nationalism being some sort of racism. So, no you aren't a nationalist

Your confusing a nationalist for a fascist. My views are quite complex but I wouldn't deny a person the right to be a patriot based upon their skin colour. Most English people are not 100% English (for instance) 6 million alone have part-French ancestry. Does this mean an English-born person of, say, 100% Polish heritage, can be a nationalist but a person with 3 Anglo-Saxon grandparents and 1 Jamacan can't? It makes no sense. This is why I encourage patriotism but don't define it ONLY alone racial lines. Why exclude when we can include without having multiculturalism. This doesn't mean I'm pro-Immigration. I'd have virtually 0 immigration if it was up to me.

[Gorštak]

lol at people who still use terms as "Muslim" and "Swede" like it is same, one is religious belonging, second is national.


Illiterate rednecks.

[Ultra]

lol at people who still use terms as "Muslim" and "Swede" like it is same, one is religious belonging, second is national.


Illiterate rednecks.
Swedes are an ethnic group. Swedish is the nationality, just like you say Bosniak when you refer to the Muslim ethnic group of Bosnia, and Bosnians for everyone that is from Bosnia(usually only on passport). There are barely any ethnic Swedes who have converted to Islam. Muslims are thus almost 100% exclusively non-Swedish immigrants or immigrants of non-Swedish background(by majority non-Euro).


It seems to me that you avoid what's actually on-topic and complain about the terms we use, which you were wrong about anyhow. And now we are supposed to be the 'illiterate rednecks'? :coffee:

[Styggnacke]

Estonians? How is that even possible? There could not have been much more than perhaps 30 000 of them. If they got the upper hand in these debates, then the local mass media (and the plutocrats who owned it) had to provide the amplification.

PS. You can't really blame estonians in Estonia, since they did not leave the country in 1944. So what you need is more Karls.
Look at the bars in the chart. The biggest is the one representing Jews. They were also those who most aggressively agitated for multiculturalism and mass immigration in the 60's (when this debate started) and it's still them who do so. But the second bar says "other ethnicity (than Swedish)", and many of those of other ethnicity were Estonians. Estonian organizations were very active to promote multiculturalism.

The reason I mentioned Karl is because he tend to take pride in that the average Estonian immigrant in Sweden apparently was richer than the average Swede at some point. This is of course extremely retarded reasoning, because the Estonian immigrants had primarily been represented the richest and most educated segment of Estonian society before leaving, while the average Swede ranged from a homeless person to someone from the Wallenberg family. This is of course too hard for Karl to understand though, since he is a semi-moron. Either way, I mentioned Karl because I wondered if he would take any pride that his people have actively participated in the destruction of the Swedish nation.

Most Jews hate mass immigration for obvious reasons (most immigrants are Muslims).
No, that simply isn't true.

Your confusing a nationalist for a fascist. My views are quite complex but I wouldn't deny a person the right to be a patriot based upon their skin colour. Most English people are not 100% English (for instance) 6 million alone have part-French ancestry. Does this mean an English-born person of, say, 100% Polish heritage, can be a nationalist but a person with 3 Anglo-Saxon grandparents and 1 Jamacan can't? It makes no sense. This is why I encourage patriotism but don't define it ONLY alone racial lines. Why exclude when we can include without having multiculturalism. This doesn't mean I'm pro-Immigration. I'd have virtually 0 immigration if it was up to me.
Yes, there are no real English, everyone is mixed. Switch "English" with "Swedish", and you sound like your average Jewish, relativistic multicultural promoter in Sweden. And you actually tried to deny what I said earlier? Q.E.D.

[Smeagol]

Your confusing a nationalist for a fascist. My views are quite complex but I wouldn't deny a person the right to be a patriot based upon their skin colour. Most English people are not 100% English (for instance) 6 million alone have part-French ancestry. Does this mean an English-born person of, say, 100% Polish heritage, can be a nationalist but a person with 3 Anglo-Saxon grandparents and 1 Jamacan can't? It makes no sense. This is why I encourage patriotism but don't define it ONLY alone racial lines. Why exclude when we can include without having multiculturalism. This doesn't mean I'm pro-Immigration. I'd have virtually 0 immigration if it was up to me.

No, they can't.

[Gorštak]

Swedes are an ethnic group. Swedish is the nationality, just like you say Bosniak when you refer to the Muslim ethnic group of Bosnia, and Bosnians for everyone that is from Bosnia(usually only on passport). There are barely any ethnic Swedes who have converted to Islam. Muslims are thus almost 100% exclusively non-Swedish immigrants or immigrants of non-Swedish background(by majority non-Euro).


It seems to me that you avoid what's actually on-topic and complain about the terms we use, which you were wrong about anyhow. And now we are supposed to be the 'illiterate rednecks'? :coffee:


There are more than 1,5 billion people in world who are Muslims by religion.
And it would be much simpler to use their national name, ethnic name or social status(like immigrant) for those who are problem to you.
But when you just use term "Muslim", that means you have problem with more than 1,5 billion people.
As for me, I'm ok if you want it on that way, I just say that I think it's stupid.

And if you think that I'm defending immigrants or something, as for me, kick them all out of state, I don't give a damn.
But it's funny how people who most care here about immigrants in Europe are those middle easts Jews, who their personal problem with Muslims in middle east want to transform in problem of them and Europeans against Muslims in the world.

[Pure ja]

Look at the bars in the chart. The biggest is the one representing Jews. They were also those who most aggressively agitated for multiculturalism and mass immigration in the 60's (when this debate started) and it's still them who do so. But the second bar says "other ethnicity (than Swedish)", and many of those of other ethnicity were Estonians. Estonian organizations were very active to promote multiculturalism.


Are you covertly alluding that the jewish pretty much owned the Swedish mass media at that time and that they orchestrated and amplified the estonian activists to support multiculturalism in Sweden? I will take silence as a yes :D

In my opinion Estonian immigrants in Sweden are a special case, less so than the Finnish immigrants, but nevertheless.
A sizable portion of those Estonian immigrants were Estonian "coastal swedes".

Also, most of the Estonian refugees actually sought to move elsewhere from Sweden (to USA, Canada, Australia, etc.), since Sweden after WWII had a habit of sending Estonian refugees back to the USSR when Stalin ordered it.

Third, most of the WWII Estonian refugees have by now become (almost) swedish, even more their children. One Svante Pääbo comes to mind.

So it would be a mistake to apply (or campaign towards) similar immigration rules to finns, estonians, bosniaks and somalis.



The reason I mentioned Karl is because he tend to take pride in that the average Estonian immigrant in Sweden apparently was richer than the average Swede at some point. This is of course extremely retarded reasoning, because the Estonian immigrants had primarily been represented the richest and most educated segment of Estonian society before leaving, while the average Swede ranged from a homeless person to someone from the Wallenberg family.


The richest is relevant only to the extent that it helped to get better education. I am sure that Estonian WWII refugees were on average poorer than an average Swede at the time of the escape. But it is true that in Canada, for example, estonians at one time were the third richest ethnic group on average. So it is likely that there was a sample bias, but that might actually support Karl's case in some occasions (although I am not familiar with the cases).




This is of course too hard for Karl to understand though, since he is a semi-moron. Either way, I mentioned Karl because I wondered if he would take any pride that his people have actively participated in the destruction of the Swedish nation.


That is unfortunate, of course.
But as I noted before, it seems incredible that a 30 000 strong refugee group (who are not even jews) could overpower a 6 million strong local population in an open debate.

[blogen]

Rape and immigration stats (full correlation):

http://img.ie/images/2015/04/24/c9a8bdf862e6b3e5c7418282dc7d0e51.jpg
https://affes.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/valdtakt_forsok_fullbordade_1975-2014.png?w=720
http://img.ie/images/2015/04/24/93ce674c9e404ecb08eff88ccee76346.png

[randomguy1235]

If 77% of rapes in Sweden were by followers of any other ideology, that only made up 5% of the population and had only been introduced recently, that ideology would be banned.

The rape isn't a result of their ideology. It's a result of allowing backward 3rd world immigrant groups with no professional skills into a developed country.

[Taiga Lake]

This is what happens when government takes anyone in and when country doesn't have strict rules, instead that for example the Muslims are "allowed" to form ghettos and make them so dangerous that even firemen can't go there anymore, they should have been kicked back to Durka Durkaland the second they broke the law (which should be more strict and anti-Islam anyway).

[Anglojew]

The rape isn't a result of their ideology. It's a result of allowing backward 3rd world immigrant groups with no professional skills into a developed country.

Rape of non-Muslim women is often justified using Islamic jurisprudence such as is happening in Syria and Iraq and not just in the West.

[LightHouse89]

the future of Sweden belongs to the islamic hordes invading it. LOL

[LightHouse89]

This is what happens when government takes anyone in and when country doesn't have strict rules, instead that for example the Muslims are "allowed" to form ghettos and make them so dangerous that even firemen can't go there anymore, they should have been kicked back to Durka Durkaland the second they broke the law (which should be more strict and anti-Islam anyway).

I think its cool. The Muslims should be allowed to practice sharia if they want to. Its apart of the religion. Europe is secular so they could figure out a way of letting them do what they want in those neighborhoods.

[LightHouse89]

I am pro immigration, pro drugs, pro aborition etc... come on Sweden! we need more. I bet they wont beat America at who disappears first? Maybe they will?

[Anglojew]

No, they can't.

Stephen Graham, (Al Capone in Boardwalk Empire) has 1 Jamaican grand-parent, would you consider him not to be British?

http://www.moviepilot.de/files/images/0875/3750/stephen-graham.jpg

I'm by no means pro-race mixing but the question isn't 100% black and white (pardon the pun).

[Anglojew]

There are more than 1,5 billion people in world who are Muslims by religion.
And it would be much simpler to use their national name, ethnic name or social status(like immigrant) for those who are problem to you.
But when you just use term "Muslim", that means you have problem with more than 1,5 billion people.
As for me, I'm ok if you want it on that way, I just say that I think it's stupid.

And if you think that I'm defending immigrants or something, as for me, kick them all out of state, I don't give a damn.
But it's funny how people who most care here about immigrants in Europe are those middle easts Jews, who their personal problem with Muslims in middle east want to transform in problem of them and Europeans against Muslims in the world.



Everyone cares about Muslims. Reclaim Australia

[Anglojew]

Are you covertly alluding that the jewish pretty much owned the Swedish mass media at that time and that they orchestrated and amplified the estonian activists to support multiculturalism in Sweden? I will take silence as a yes :D

In my opinion Estonian immigrants in Sweden are a special case, less so than the Finnish immigrants, but nevertheless.
A sizable portion of those Estonian immigrants were Estonian "coastal swedes".

Also, most of the Estonian refugees actually sought to move elsewhere from Sweden (to USA, Canada, Australia, etc.), since Sweden after WWII had a habit of sending Estonian refugees back to the USSR when Stalin ordered it.

Third, most of the WWII Estonian refugees have by now become (almost) swedish, even more their children. One Svante Pääbo comes to mind.

So it would be a mistake to apply (or campaign towards) similar immigration rules to finns, estonians, bosniaks and somalis.



The richest is relevant only to the extent that it helped to get better education. I am sure that Estonian WWII refugees were on average poorer than an average Swede at the time of the escape. But it is true that in Canada, for example, estonians at one time were the third richest ethnic group on average. So it is likely that there was a sample bias, but that might actually support Karl's case in some occasions (although I am not familiar with the cases).




That is unfortunate, of course.
But as I noted before, it seems incredible that a 30 000 strong refugee group (who are not even jews) could overpower a 6 million strong local population in an open debate.

It's my fault.

[Anglojew]

Rape and immigration stats (full correlation):

http://img.ie/images/2015/04/24/93ce674c9e404ecb08eff88ccee76346.png

Wow. Exact correlation.

[Anima Libera]

We need to get these Saudi Afagians, Lesbanese shits out of Europe!

YAAA

[Smeagol]

Stephen Graham, (Al Capone in Boardwalk Empire) has 1 Jamaican grand-parent, would you consider him not to be British?

http://www.moviepilot.de/files/images/0875/3750/stephen-graham.jpg

I'm by no means pro-race mixing but the question isn't 100% black and white (pardon the pun).

I guess but him mixing with someone who is purely English would spread black genes around so I don't support it.

[Toscano]

He is a great actor i think. But in a longer perspective i don't really like the idea of calling non pure Europeans for Europeans. With that say i don't hate on people like him. But we need to stop the mixing. It's very important.

[The Last Emperor]

Well since swedish man are mostly homosexual, someone has to please Swedish women

[Toscano]

Well since Swedish man are mostly homosexual, someone has to please Swedish women

Do you live in Sweden? Or how can you be so sure? If you disrespect swedes and still live in our country. Go home and start your war against your brother countries - That's what you Balkaneses like to do. Kill each other for your stupid nationalism.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

u b racis

http://www.hangthebankers.com/uk-government-free-speech-illegal/

Just a matter of time before the nanny state gets you. Scary stuff.